Green Jobs Make Us Poorer
I recently published an article that included an update on the cost of green jobs. However, since then more recent data has been published by the ONS. Ed Miliband is still boasting about creating good jobs in clean renewables, so it is worth checking in from time to time to see how much these jobs actually cost the rest of us. The detailed results from the more recent data warrant a standalone article.
How Many Green Jobs are There?
From time to time, the ONS publishes data on the number of green jobs in the economy. The most recent data was published on July 18th 2025 and gives data for 2023.
The total number of green jobs in 2023 is alleged to be 690,900 up from 513,300 in 2015. Of these, 45,200 people were employed in environmental charities, 17,700 in environmental consulting and a staggering 19,400 were employed in “managerial activities of government bodies”. The lanyard class in action.
In the renewable energy sector, the number of full-time equivalent jobs in the UK for offshore wind, onshore wind and solar was 16,400, 5,900 and 20,300, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the number of jobs in these sectors rose substantially in 2023.
The increase was caused by the number of jobs in solar power more than doubling alongside a substantial increase in offshore wind jobs. Of course such a substantial increase in renewables jobs means the energy sector is becoming less productive and of course the energy generated will likely be more expensive.
How Much do Wind and Solar Power Receive in Subsidy?
There are three subsidy regimes for renewable energy in the UK. These are Feed-in-Tariffs (FiTs), Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) and Contracts for Difference (CfDs).
Each year Ofgem publish the FiT report and dataset that details the total amount of electricity generated, total payments and the capacity installed by technology. In scheme year 14, running from April 2023 to March 2024, the total payments under the FiT scheme were £1,840 million. If we split these payments by installed capacity, we find that solar power received £1,460 million in FiT payments and wind (assumed to be onshore) received £218 million.
Details of ROCs issued can be found on the Ofgem portal. The value of ROCs related to the output period for 2023/24 was £2,618 million for offshore wind, £1,555 million for onshore wind and £561 million for solar power.
The Low Carbon Contracts Company publishes a database of CfD payments that can also be split by technology. The period 2023/24 showed subsidies increasing because gas prices subsided after the energy crisis. Offshore wind received £1,721 million in 2023/24. Because strike prices for onshore wind and solar power tend to be lower than for offshore wind, these two technologies received £55 million and £0.5 million, respectively.
The total subsidies in 2023/24 for these three sectors are around £8.1 billion. We can expect current year subsidies to be higher because all the subsidy schemes are index-linked, pushing up the value of ROCs and FiT payments. CfD strike prices have been indexed upwards too and, because the price of gas has fallen, the reference prices have fallen as well, leading to another increase in subsidies.
What is the Cost of Green Jobs?
Pulling all this together, we can add up the total subsidy received for these technologies and compare it to the number of jobs in each sector.
We can see that each offshore wind job cost £264,000 in subsidy, each onshore wind job cost over £309,000 and solar nearly £100,000. The average across all three sectors is over £192,000 per job.
Now remember, this is not a one-off payment to get a new industry up and running, it is an ongoing annual payment. The ONS does not publish its estimate of the salaries in the sector, however, the annual subsidies are far higher than any reasonable estimate of the average salaries paid in the sector.
Conclusions
It is crystal clear that all talk of a “green revolution” is simply a pipe dream. These green jobs are only a façade, Potemkin jobs to give politicians and policymakers a good sound bite and make them feel good about themselves. The idea that we can move to “green prosperity” by subsidising each job to the tune of £192,000 every year is plainly absurd. These jobs are a drag on the rest of the economy, acting as a tax on energy. We need to end this economic fantasy.
David Turver writes the Eigen Values Substack page, where this article first appeared.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Jobs are a cost. Unless the value of their output exceeds their cost then obviously they make a loss.
So-called green jobs replace existing jobs in order to supply the same output – in practice less – at a higher cost. Additionally, green jobs require the support of the jobs they are supposed to replace, so now doing the same thing costs twice as much.
In order to replace fossil fuel spinning generators requires: a huge over-capacity of wind turbines and solar panels, storage batteries, flywheels, “green” hydrogen, carbon capture, expensive imported electricity via expensive inter-connectors, and…. fossil fuel generation for at least the next 50 years. The resulting output has an end user price many times higher than what it replaces.
Those green jobs need massive subsidies (taxes) money taken out of the economy which reduces economic activity.
Green jobs are economically regressive, making everyone poorer.
Yep CORRECT
Multiple layers of cross subsidies can’t hide the futility of uneconomic processes.
If the Laws of Physics have to be broken to make a profit, there’s no hope for a sustainable industry.
It did not need a “report” to tell us this., It has been blindingly obviopus since the warmists took control.
Good to actually spell this out clearly and show that all the political show boating about green jobs being a positive, is actually total bollocks (as many of us suspected / knew). We just need Reform, for example, to clearly point this out in a very public way, and challenge the Uniparty to defend or justify it
An excellent* article by Lani Edghill in GreenBusiness Barbados website. I thoroughly recommend it to all.
How Much Biomass Is Used By Drax?
* If you can make any sense of it please let me know.
In economic terms jobs are a cost. Subsidised jobs are a greater cost.
I guess if you add unemployment benefits for those losing jobs in the fossil fuel industries, and industries fueled by fossil fuels, the costs are even greater.
The purpose of energy production is to produce ENERGY, not JOBS. The driver of economic success and prosperity is affordable reliable energy, not unaffordable unreliable energy. But Government are coercing us into the unaffordable stuff, destroying the economy and In Industrial base all so they can be aligned with the UN/WEF Global Government Agenda and get a little gold star on their lapel, and tick all the ESG boxes.
The promises of cheaper bills and jobs are crumbling but no apology ever comes for our excruciatingly high energy bills. Instead what we get is more mandates, more regulations, and more misery. We are sick of hearing about the Energy Transition, the rising food prices, while the people responsible keep insisting we are reaching targets and keep expanding the same failed policies. We are constantly told to make do with less for a “brighter future”, and we are SICK of it. We are exhausted pretending to save the planet.
Turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.
We need to elect a Government which doesn’t consist of Turkeys.
If you want Reform, you first have to vote for it.