Confronting a Shoplifter – Who’s the Criminal?
The Telegraph has a sorry tale about a member of the public who challenged a shoplifter in a Tesco branch, only to be vilified by the staff and ignored by the police. The Government has admitted that shoplifting has got out of hand while the policing minister Dame Diana Johnson has said shopkeepers need to do more to deter the thieves and keep expensive items away from the shop entrances.
The Telegraph’s correspondent has wisely maintained anonymity and not mentioned the location, but it’s no less dispiriting for that:
I was shopping in the Tesco Express on my local high street in South East London at 1pm last Sunday afternoon when I saw a bald, white man in his 40s use his arm to sweep an entire shelf of medicines into a gym bag. He was completely brazen about it: he wasn’t wearing a mask or hoodie to hide his face, he was in a bright-red tracksuit.
What made it even more enraging was that the Tesco staff could see him and they didn’t do a thing about it. They just stood there and watched, looking totally unbothered.
I was passing the shoplifter as he started sweeping a second shelf of medicines into his bag and I couldn’t stop myself: I loudly exclaimed: “Really?” It was almost a reflex – I was so shocked and angry.
In fact, the thief left in a casual and indifferent way. Stunned by the brazen incident and sobered by the thought that a knife might have been pulled (it wasn’t), the anonymous shopper turned to the staff and was met with not just a flat wall of indifference, but annoyance:
I started questioning them, asking: “Are you seeing this? Why did you just stand there? Why didn’t you say anything?” One woman who works there was just as unbothered as the shoplifter. She shrugged and said: “Oh, we’re not paid to confront thieves.” She pointed out that they’ve got CCTV, and she did say they would call the police later.
That’s true of course. The shop staff aren’t paid to confront shoplifters and nor are they provided with Robocop outfits and pump-action shotguns to see them off. The Thames Valley police and crime commissioner Matthew Barber has already told the public they should be doing more to try and cut thefts from shops, with the useful advice: “If you’re in a store and you witness shoplifting happening I think at the very least you should report that to the police, report it to the staff, perhaps take some mobile phone footage, shout at someone ‘put that back’.”
As it happens, the shouting in the Tesco Express came from the staff, but they weren’t addressing the thief:
But when I asked “Is this the new normal – are you just going to smile and nod?”, the staff started shouting at me…
Even more shocking, another customer (a man in his 50s with a long ponytail) then started screaming at me: “Leave it, just leave it!” He went purple in the face. He was furious that I’d said anything to the staff – he was angrier about that than about the shoplifter. I was completely stunned.
I felt like I was going mad. That’s why I’d said: “Are you seeing this?” – I was half wondering if I needed to visit my GP and get my eyes tested! The staff made me feel as if I was the person in the wrong.
The point of course is that the Telegraph’s anonymous shopper was describing an episode that epitomises a society slowly disintegrating. Law and order rely on willing compliance. It has never been possible for a state police force, however oppressive, to prevent crime completely.
The police, of course – proud possessors of Klingon cloaking devices unless accosting ordinary individuals for daring to express unauthorised opinions – were completely uninterested when the Telegraph shopper reported another incident directly to them:
I called the police afterwards and they sounded totally unfazed, even bored. I offered to stay until they came and give a description of the man, or send them the photos I’d taken of the mess, but they didn’t take me seriously. The policeman said: “Nah mate, you get on home.”

Such responses, of course, make it difficult not to see the police as complicit in the whole state of deterioration. Perhaps they’re not paid to tackle thieves either, though most of us have been labouring under the belief that they are – mainly because lots of us are obliged to stump up for their salaries.
Little by little, it’s all unravelling, whether in a Tesco Express or elsewhere. It turns out that even Tesco isn’t bothered:
After the second incident, when I’d confronted the shoplifter, I called Tesco headquarters. I explained that this might be happening on Sundays because for some reason they don’t have a security person on the door on a Sunday – on the other days of the week, the person in that role wears a yellow vest and a body cam.
The woman at Tesco HQ said they would think about having a security person on Sundays, but she quickly added that they wouldn’t physically stop a thief either, they would just record it.
Why would Tesco be bothered? Presumably they have long since factored in shoplifting to the prices, meaning that honest shoppers just cover the loss for the company.
It seems not many other people are either. The Telegraph shopper took to social media:
I posted about my experience in my local Facebook group, and I was baffled by the responses. Lots of people were vehemently against confronting shoplifters. One woman told me to mind my own business. If you even mention the idea, you get labelled socially conservative and it becomes political. Just for saying you’re against crime, really?
It seems then that the shoplifting crisis isn’t just about shoplifters, but a tired, brow-beaten country and population where initiative and community spirit are slowly being crushed out of existence. We all know too well that to raise a finger, to do anything to try and reverse the decline, even just to protest verbally, is far more likely to result in vilification by others and a knock at the front door – to say nothing of the possibility of being slashed with a machete.
In that sense, are we all to blame? Are we all complicit in some way? If we are, we are getting the Britain we deserve. Or is it the fault of the police, the courts that barely raise an eyebrow on the rare occasions a shoplifter appears before them, and the state? One thing is certain: the more people that get away with shoplifting, the more that discover there is nothing to stop them, the more of them there will be.
Look at what happened to the Wrexham shopkeeper who put up a sign calling shoplifters “scumbags”. Naturally, a member of the constabulary came to the shop and told him to remove the “provocative and offensive” sign after a complaint from a member of the public – even though, as Rod Liddle has pointed out in the Spectator – “of course shoplifters are scumbags”. Luckily, the shopkeeper has stuck to his guns, but he seems to be a lone voice.
The Telegraph piece is worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It is not compulsory to shop at Tesco and subsidise crime.
I would assume all supermarkets have the same policy.
I used to work retail, 8 years ago now and I’d challenge someone then.
Given the changes to the population and the explosion in knife crime I wouldn’t dream of challenging someone now…
Yep, a relative worked at Sainsbos. Staff were told to never tackle any shoplifters.
I think they should be allowed to keep pepper spray on them and zap the buggers in the eyes at close range, get them on the deck, perform a citizen’s arrest, preferably binding their ankles and wrists, while another staff member phones the police to tell them that they’ve detained a pervy man who wolf-whistled at a female staff member. That should get them off their arses policing tweets, pronto. I’m unsure where the smashing of a wine bottle over the head fits in but I do like the idea of adding that detail to my visual. Just a cheap bottle, tough, in case their wages get docked.
I admire your robust approach, very much in tune with mine.
One of those Tazer things looks like rather good fun.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/14/d-c-residents-protest-authorities-cracking-down-on-crime-as-fascists/
So the lowlife crims have got the upper hand, then? Because this looks like a green light for all and sundry scumbags to go out shopping using their 100% discount. The fact that staff and even fellow customers are siding with said arsewipes just says it all about how far standards in society have fallen if this is what’s to be tolerated. I mean: ”Shoplifters of the world, unite and take over…” or what? 😮 ”Crime pays”, ain’t that the truth? Especially when we know exactly where the police are distributing and prioritizing their resources; ”The result of police indifference is plummeting levels of trust. In London, just 40% of crimes are recorded. And of those, 40% of victims withdraw from the process altogether, largely because they just don’t believe anything will come of it. Why should they? Zak Asgard writes in the Telegraph: “Right now, there are 77,000 cases waiting to be heard. One hundred cases won’t go to trial until 2029. That’s four years until a victim—a person courageous enough to step forward—can experience any semblance of justice.” This is far more serious than just fare-dodging, phone-snatching, and shoplifting. One writer in The Times this Monday described how a relative of a… Read more »
Why would Tesco be bothered? Presumably they have long since factored in shoplifting to the prices, meaning that honest shoppers just cover the loss for the company.
Yes, this honest shoppers pay, the supermarkets, all of them will price theft into their mark-up. They’ve always done this, but shoplifting is at a much greater scale now than historically.
I used to be a butcher in a supermarket, many years ago, and if the tannoy call went out that there were shoplifters in the store, usually gypsies, a gang of butchers and warehouse staff would chase them out of the store.
In honesty, I don’t think I’d challenge a shoplifter now. In the old days you might get into a fist fight with them, and the fuzz would always defend the shop staff, now you’re likely to get stabbed and arrested for your troubles.
I think it’s more detrimental to small independents than your mega chain stores, though. The latter can realistically put prices up to cover such losses, whilst simultaneously running their special offers each week to keep loyal customers coming back and still make a profit. An independent shop’s owner won’t be able to keep hiking up prices, even employing a security guard by the door is probably not cost effective either. These are the people likely to be negatively impacted by thieves repeatedly targeting their premises. And who can be doing with sticking alarms on jars of coffee and boxes of Tampax? They can’t keep everything in the back and only have empty containers on display. What a faff that must be to keep going back and forth if it’s busy. It’s these retailers that will suffer most as a direct result of the police’s indifference to what has always been classed as a crime historically. It’s a dereliction of duty, that’s what it is, and consequently stealing from shops has effectively been decriminalised.
Back in 2005 I worked briefly at Budgens in East Finchley. Fruit and Veg. There was a little black guy who would watch the usual suspects like a hawk, and the instant they crossed the threshold to leave the store with their basket of meat he would yell “CODE TEN” through the tannoy and any employee who didn’t have his hands full would race to batter the thief on the pavement outside. Good times.