Most Right-Wing Americans Deny the Role of Genes

Any academic or journalist who puts their head above the parapet to suggest that genes play a role in social inequality – in why some people are rich and others are poor – will soon find themselves denounced as “far-Right” or a “Nazi”. Such denunciations, aside from being little more than childish insults, give the misleading impression that people on the Right are far more likely to believe that genes matter.

In recent years, this impression has been reinforced by Donald Trump, who has attested on numerous of occasions to the supposed role of genes in his family’s success. “Do we believe in the gene thing? I mean I do,” he once proclaimed at a rally.

Yet statements of this kind are far from common among Right-wing politicians. And as a new YouGov poll makes clear, Republicans are barely more likely than Democrats to believe that genes play a role in social inequality.

YouGov’s poll was motivated by the contentious American Eagle ad that used the slogan “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”. It asked a sample of about 1,200 Americans a number of questions about genes and human differences.  

When asked whether “some people have better genes than others,” respondents who identified as “very conservative” were more likely than those who identified as “very liberal” to say “strongly agree” – though the difference between conservatives and moderates was small. And very conservative Americans were more likely to consider it appropriate to say someone has “good genes”.

However, when asked about specific traits, neither Democrats nor Republicans saw much role for genes. The results are shown below.

Distribution of responses for Democrats and Republicans. Source.

For each trait, YouGov asked respondents whether “genes”, “upbringing and environment” or “choices” matter most. (The bars represent the percentage of Democrats and Republicans in each category.) Note that this is a slightly odd formulation, since people’s choices are to a large extent a product of their genes and their environment.

In any case, there was substantial agreement between Democrats and Republicans over the role of genes – with a few exceptions. Democrats were less likely to say that genes matter most for sex and gender (the fruits of gender ideology). And Republicans were slightly more likely to say that genes matter most for intelligence. But on the whole, the two groups’ responses were very similar.

The main differences between them concerned the role they saw for “upbringing and environment” versus “choices”, with Democrats seeing a greater role for the former and Republicans seeing a greater role for the latter. For example, 77% of Republicans said people’s choices matter most for success in life, compared to only 54% of Democrats.

But remarkably, only 2% of each group said genes matter most for success in life and only 1% said genes matter most for income. Note that twin studies suggest genes play a major role in income differences, explaining more of the total variation than family background. Indeed, I would personally say that genes matter most for both income and success in life.

Overall then, YouGov’s poll clearly refutes the stereotype of the Right-wing genetic determinist. Only a tiny fraction of Republicans believe that genes matter most for where people end up. And of those who do believe genes matter most, about half are Democrats.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
8 months ago

Suspect people say what they think is acceptable, maybe they even lie to themselves

rms
rms
8 months ago

Rather than call them “right wing”, perhaps a better explanation is “non-left wing”.

RW
RW
8 months ago

What matters most for both income and success in life is a prudent choice of parents. But because of family fortunes and not genes. Rich and successful people are overwhelmingly children of people who were already rich and successful.

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

It’s having a non traumatic childhood, where curiosity is encouraged and being fed with life skills, like the Three Rs, talking WITH them about anything, like how things work and what motivates people, a daily routine (most of the time) and gradually extended boundaries, so problems are real, but manageable. And all this before the age of two years old. 🙂

Living in a civil, law abiding, neighbourhood also helps, as does having close family nearby, that are also civil.

Being rich isn’t the magic wand that the uneducated, and poor, think it is. It helps, but so much more is needed.

mickie
mickie
8 months ago

Relying on what people think is all a bit pointless, like this article. You don’t discover the truth and knowledge by conducting opinion polls.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  mickie

Insofar truth is concerned, that’s a salient point. But it matters for politics. A belief in genetic predetermination is the contemporary equivalent of a belief in God as it means that some force outside of the control of mankind determinates most life and that human attempts to change it are thus mostly futile. In contrast with this, if life outcomes are mostly determined by environment and upbringing, they’re open to social engineering to achieve different outcomes and the present outcomes can be regarded as a product social engineering, cf “critical race theory” etc which basically all claim that life is largely miserable because evil people who are control make choices to help themselves at the expense of all others.

transmissionofflame
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

Very well put

Arum
Arum
8 months ago

Something was obviously wrong with the design of the survey, for 3% of democrats to say that eye colour is a personal choice. And the sex/gender results seem odd too

Burngate
Burngate
8 months ago
Reply to  Arum

Maybe those 3% didn’t understand the question

PeterM
PeterM
8 months ago

What about the intelligent child whose childhood is wrecked by catastrophic parenting? There are many nuancing factors which determine life outcomes.

Old Brit
Old Brit
8 months ago

Remember the arguments that ensued from publication of The Bell Curve ?

Old Brit
Old Brit
8 months ago

IQ is the best metric for sicial and economic success and there are racial differences, hotly denied by social warriors

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
8 months ago
Reply to  Old Brit

I don’t think an exceptionally high IQ is required for great success. Certainly a low IQ doesn’t help, but it’s the ability to notice mistakes, and correct them, and correctly judge what is needed, what is possible, and whether it’s within their ability. And that is dependent on the experience they have had.

Just think how many graduates realise they studied the wrong subject at university. 🙂