The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

NGOs are a lot of things. One of the things that they are, is blindingly, mind-numbingly, profoundly idiotic. Our native European NGOs are bad enough, but we also spend untold millions funding absurd carbon-copies of these NGOs in other countries, and they are even stupider. It beggars belief.

Today, NiUS reports the amazing boondoggle that is Defy Hate Now, or rather, #defyhatenow, because most of the stupidest NGOs and their subsidiary projects have to stylise their names in absurd ways. #defyhatenow is an anti-hate-speech project in South Sudan “that works on providing community-based and data-driven solutions to the problem of hate speech, disinformation and countering online incitement to violence.” All of this in a country where only 12% of the population even has an internet connection.

The South Sudanese Hate Defiers have received 1.2 million Euros from the European Union since 2020, and a cool million since 2023. The money flows through the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument, or the NDICI, which is the main fund the EU maintains for funnelling millions of Euros to Africa for reasons nobody can understand. Before the EU awarded grants to #defyhatenow, the German Foreign Office was their main source of funding, which means that German taxpayers have been paying to combat internet hate speech and social media disinformation in a region where almost nobody is even online for a whole decade now.

It’s not totally clear what Defy Hate Now has used all of this money for. They claim to provide “(social) media literacy trainings,” “community level facilitation of hate speech and conflict mitigation activities” and “community-based and data-driven solutions to the problem of hate speech, disinformation and misinformation.” Among the sparse materials available on their website, we find this photograph of our Hate Defiers posing with an incorrectly realised cardboard cutout of a hashtag, I guess at one of their (social) media literacy trainings.

Man holding a hashtag cutout with the word "#DEFYHATENOW"
Note the weirdly bad background posters, bearing the titles “#HASTAGS” (sic) and “SOCIAL MEDIA HANDLES”

I suspect that these trainings, facilitations and solutions are mainly a publicity distraction, and that the Hate Defiers have in fact pissed away most of their one-million-Euro grant on a strange website called 211 Check, which provides “fact-checking and information verification in South Sudan.” 211 Check employs a whopping six people, including a “Team Lead,” an “Editor” and with that kind of managerial overhead four surely over-supervised “fact-checkers,” some of whom double as “media monitors.” Judging from the extremely sparse output of 211 Check (their last piece was published a month ago) there are precious few facts to check in South Sudan. There are also precious few readers, if social media is any clue. 211 Check have racked up an astounding 226 subscribers on YouTube245 on Instagram and 1,405 on Twitter, where their posts routinely go entirely ignored. Their only meaningful presence is on Facebook, where their 7,100 followers occasionally drop a thumbs-up or two on a post. Only very rarely, however, do the number of Facebook interactions exceed the number of staff employed by 211 Check.

One of 211 Check’s more popular Facebook posts – a graphic illustrating the abject poverty of the South Sudanese, earning a rare comment

Defy Hate Now was allegedly founded by a South Sudanese feminist and fully mobbed-up NGO factotum named Marina Modi. Back in the days of Foreign Office funding, German state media ran a short piece on her group, which is the most publicity this shadowy money sink has ever received. There you can see Modi rambling into the camera about “hate” while sitting in front of a presentation board bearing a frenetically sketched “PYRAMID of HATE,” which illustrates how “BIAS” leads to “INDIVIDUAL ACTS OF PREJUDICE” which in turn cause “DISCRIMINATION” which causes “(bias motivated) VIOLENCE,” all of which finally erupts in a darkly purple “GENOCIDE” squeezed awkwardly into the pyramidion.

Imagine hailing from a country that has known protracted civil war and all manner of ethnic violence, and then being fed this naive Western drivel about bias and discrimination. It is no wonder that nobody in South Sudan gives the slightest shit about #defyhatenow.

While Modi claims to have founded #defyhatenow, it’s actually just a project of an equally if not more bizarre Berlin-based NGO that calls itself the “r0g_agency for open culture and critical transformation.” The r0g_agency was founded by two lunatics named Susanne Bellinghausen (an “architect and interaction designer” of uncertain nationality) and Stephen Kovats (a Canadian “cultural and media researcher with a background in architecture and urbanism”) in 2013.

Typical obnoxious NGO grifters. Note Bellinghausen’s insane neck chain

They aim “to combine on the ground work with open source methodologies in order to foster innovation and address structural problems in Juba, the new capital of the newly formed South Sudan,” and they are funded mostly by the German Foreign Office and our Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Alongside #defyhatenow, they run a few other hashtag projects, inlcuding #YoMIL, which promotes “the inclusion of young women in the media sector in The Gambia,” and – far more egregiously – #migrant media network. The latter is dedicated to informing Africans about how to migrate to Western countries like Germany, and the only good thing to say about them is that their “Smart Migration Guides” are so vague and platitudinous as to be totally worthless.

This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
huxleypiggles
8 months ago

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

Correction:

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Allegedly Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access
Otherwise known as money laundering.

JXB
JXB
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Indeed. And pocket-lining of losers who cannot get productive jobs.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
8 months ago
Reply to  JXB

I remember sitting on a train on the way to London from Gatwick. A young man was on his phone boasting about how he had just arrived back from an exotic destination where he had been helping out and educating the locals into leading their lives. He looked pretty well after his free trip and I suppose he will dine out on his virtuous ways for years to come. But having been to countries in Africa and the Caribbean, the locals need very little instruction on how to survive on a day to day basis. They are generally pretty good at adapting things to make their lives easier which would put the average person in the western world to shame. That’s not to say that ANY country where a disaster has taken place should not receive help. But the reality is these under developed countries need help in setting up businesses to improve their economies and sending a few 19 year olds to tell them how to conduct their lives will not help at all. Personally the whole thing is another scam to keep them poor, then encourage them to come to the west in the pretence that we are… Read more »

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

The starting point for poverty in most countries is lack of electricity but the useless elites won’t address that because a hungry person works a lot harder than one with a full belly.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

They can also get them to do dangerous jobs such as mine lithium at slave Labour prices

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Money laundering refers to the process of turning cash (usually) profits made from illegal business transactions, eg, drug dealing, into seemingly legally acquired money by channeling it through businesses created for or complicit in this purpose. As the EU has no illegal funding sources, it can’t engage in money laundering, much as someone might want to misues the term to express its disdain for procedure and actors.

The EU is spending the money of citizens of EU member states for this. It would be much nicer if it had earned it in some way instead, be it by engaging in illegal business transactions.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

Sadly, your knowledge of money laundering is inadequate.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

That’s the definition of money laundering and the very reason why it’s called laundering: Turn dirty money into clean money. That some other American (almost 100% certain) has chosen to misapply this phrase because he thought this would be of use to his politcal agenda is of no consequence.

Personally, I think such obviously misplaced pseudo-criticism, while possibly drawing cheers from the choir one happens to be preaching to, will harm any case as the other side can just discard such statements as “obviously deranged”. It’s better to criticize the EU for something it actually does than to accuse it of crime it – by definition – cannot have committed.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/starmers-two-steps-to-dictatorship/

This is much more worrying:

The Online Safety Bill and

The Police and Crime Bill.

This is the real Gulag coming in. Horrific.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

If you want something even better: In Germany, the executive has recently started to strip people of their right to stand in elections on the grounds that it’s “suspected” that they’re not loyal enough to the constitution. In practice, this usually means they have a history of making critical statements about radical political islam or mass immigration, neither of both are metioned in the German constitiution.

It seems we’re about to experience the really ugly fallout of the Corona years: The knowledge unscrupulous political actors gained that they can usually “get away with it” because the population doesn’t really have any rights it could defend against authorities determined to take them away, only privileges granted temporarily.

Real-world cases of this are members of legal parties the German (left-wing) establishment parties consider “faaah right” being stopped from standing as candidates in local elections despite laws explicitly stating that only courts can bar people from standing, eg, the elections for the mayor of Ludwigshafen where the AfD candidate was banned.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Here’s a good vid, A Barrister explaining what a mess the legal system is. It’s interesting in who is named in the vid, how it happened and the fact that even Barristers are seeing what an absolute shambles the legal system is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSD9VoXSTf0

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

At the very least it will have a chilling effect on free speech even if not misused by authorities (which I suspect it will be). They know the UK is becoming a tinderbox and thus rather than deal with underlying reasons they will silence those who point it out.”

This is the response I received from an associate / friend of mine. He’s a Barrister.

FerdIII
8 months ago

Clown World. South Sudan is nominally Christian + animist. It was formed to protect animists and Christians from the Northern Sudanese Muslims. You might remember ‘Darfur’. That was the Arab-Muslim rape and destruction of animists and Christians. I am sure your fake news told you that.

So the EU is preventing South Sudanese from criticising the arse-in-the-air-Meccan-moon cult and its Jihad. No surprise from these arselings.

JXB
JXB
8 months ago

NGOs are part of the global governance network of international committees, institutions, national bureaucracies, other vested interests.

They need to be shut down.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Unequivocally.

Westfieldmike
Westfieldmike
8 months ago

The hate, is coming from the State.

stewart
8 months ago

Orwell explained it very well in 1984. The repression machine in that novel wasn’t concerned with the mass of the population. The surveillance and mind control was directed primarily to the techno class that is responsible for running the system and the masses.

That is why the UK would be concerned with the 12% that have Internet. They’re likely to include pretty much everyone that has power and influence in the country and controls and manages the other 88%.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  stewart

That’s a theory how this could make any sense. But I prefer the simpler explanation that this is just people in control of public finances channeling money to their buddies. And their buddies are – in this case – the two German guys (I’ve some trouble believing that this Susanne is actually a women and not just the gay lover of the other guy) who set this up after they had the “business idea” for it.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

Which is money laundering – “channeling money to their buddies.” Presumably you believe there is no subsequent “reimbursement.”

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

No, this is not money laundering because all transactions involved are perfectly legal and all funds where legally acquired. It’s nepotism¹ or – to use the newer term – cronyism/ favoritism.

¹ From Latin nepos – nephew, referring to the habit of certain popes to assign important church roles to their nephews.

kev
kev
8 months ago

Who exactly are the purveyors of hate in South Sudan?

I may be wrong but I don’t believe there is a large white population in South Sudan, maybe a handful of ex-pats, contractors and mercenaries.

So the hate must be coming from somewhere else!

Who is biased, who is performing “Individual acts of prejudice”, “discrimination”, “violence” and “genocide” in South Sudan?

I it was evil white extremists, I’m certain we would hear about it constantly on mainstream media!

Pure fantasy, and corruption.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  kev

Exactly. Money laundering.

Dinger64
8 months ago

Don’t the Sudanese prefer machetes to show their hatered?

Simon MacPhisto
Simon MacPhisto
8 months ago

I do enjoy this guy’s articles. His prose is second to none, and he’s German !!!