Ditching Ed Miliband’s Net Zero Madness Could Save Every Family £1,000 a Year

In the Mail, Reform UK’s Richard Tice argues that scrapping Labour’s “Net Stupid Zero” agenda could save families £1,000 a year. Here’s an excerpt:

This week, Ed Miliband opens his latest renewable energy auction, which allows green developers to bid for lucrative taxpayer-funded contracts.

The eco lobby says the auction, officially titled Allocation Round 7 (AR7), will be the centrepiece of Labour’s plan to decarbonise the grid by 2030, and that this seventh round must be the biggest yet to “keep the dream alive”. 

But it’s a dream Britain cannot afford. Inflation is rising. Food prices are once again on the up. And families across the country are cutting back – not just on holidays or takeaways, but on essentials. …

And one of the biggest contributory factors to this crisis is an issue that almost no one in Westminster wants to talk about: Net Zero and the spiralling cost of Britain’s green energy agenda.

Expensive energy is the grenade exploding Britain’s economic model. It is not just about switching on the lights and heating homes. 

It powers industry, transports goods and underpins every job and price tag. When energy becomes expensive and unreliable, everything else does too. …

For nearly two decades, clueless politicians from Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have clung to a fantasy: that we could eliminate all hydrocarbon use, build a national grid dominated by wind and solar power and suffer no consequences.

The result? At a time of rising demand we are reliant on an unreliable energy supply and lumbered with higher bills. Three-quarters of the rise in electricity bills over the past decade can be attributed to green energy policies and the multi-billion-pound subsidies paid to renewable investors, according to Net Zero Watch. …

Now suppliers are warning that prices will rise again in 2026. Professor Gordon Hughes, a former energy adviser at the World Bank, has warned they could approach 40p per kilowatt hour by 2030 – up from 25p today, which is a catastrophic increase. 

That’s why I took action. Last month, I wrote to major wind farm developers, warning them and their investors to stay away from the AR7 auction. I made it clear that if they press ahead, a Reform government will make them regret it.

As Nigel Farage said a few weeks ago about the renegotiation of green subsidy contracts, investors will see “some haircuts”. Naturally, activists, consultants and subsidy-hunters – the ‘Green Blob’ – erupted in outrage. 

But, if these wind farms go ahead, it will be an act of grave economic self-harm. By putting a spanner in the works of Miliband’s mad plan, we can stop the 20-year rise in bills. By 2030, my letter alone might be saving households £1,000 a year.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robin Guenier
Robin Guenier
8 months ago

Although there’s no prospect of it having the sense to do it, a huge saving for our beleaguered Government would be the repeal the 2009 Climate Change Act and the termination of the unachievable, disastrous and completely pointless Net Zero policy – the biggest and most expensive project undertaken by a British government in peacetime. Unlike every other problem we’re facing, it would be a simple step with no downside, except of course for the many vested interests and the multitude of well-funded people employed in the green lobby. Yet it would eliminate hundreds of billions of pounds of current and future Government expenditure and, if not the complete solution to our current economic woes, it would make a huge contribution to industrial recovery and to getting our country back on track.

Purpleone
8 months ago
Reply to  Robin Guenier

And due to all those very sensible reasons to scrap it, the government won’t. They have their orders, and are executing them…

Gezza England
Gezza England
8 months ago
Reply to  Robin Guenier

An easier first step would be to issue a Statutory Instrument to change the target from a 100% reduction to say 5% which I suspect we have long since achieved with industry closing down.

Tonka Fairy
8 months ago

Good stuff, Richie Boy.

Please get people like David Turver and Kathryn Porter into Reform to write some practical energy policies.

jg144
jg144
8 months ago

I think the direct savings would be a drop in the bucket compared to the lost opportunities and stultified growth from the effects on industry – both direct energy costs and smothering regulatory drag.
More hopefull is the recent news that the US environment agency, the EPA, will drop the finding that CO2 is a pollutant that needs regulation. If that does get through the system (and there are trillions of dollars of opposition) the the whole rational for Net Zero collapses. And what will poor Eddie do then? May I live to see it!

inamo
inamo
8 months ago

It’s already too late to save our future generations from the miserable enslaved life of repaying the UK’s primarily Net Zero-based National Debt.

Purpleone
8 months ago

It’s a good start, but they need to demonstrate through some well explained examples the sheer madness of this – many people will simply assume they are just ‘anti net zero’ for the fun of it