Families Face Losing Their Land in Solar Power Push
It seems that solar panel companies are being given the right to impose compulsory purchase on private landowners in the interests of pursuing Net Zero as quickly as possible. The Telegraph has the story:
When Sarah Pye and her partner Doug Knight bought a small property on Anglesey in Wales, it seemed to be the rural idyll they’d always wanted.
Quiet and picturesque, the smallholding was meant to be a place to raise their children and run a local tourism business. Or at least that was until a solar developer warned it could seize control of their land – casting doubt over their future plans and life savings.
“Out of the blue, we had a series of letters from LightsourceBP, a solar energy company, saying they may need our land for a solar farm,” says Sarah.
The letters, describing plans for the 3,200-acre Maen Hir solar fields, arrived just after she and Doug had finished four years of work – including planting 4,000 trees to create a woodland camper-van site.
“They want to run cables right through our new woodland and campsite and surround our property with solar panels,” says Sarah.
“And it seemed like we had no choice because if we refused, they would use compulsory acquisition powers.”
Across to the east, other landowners are being confronted by similar demands:
Over in Norfolk, two dozen villages are facing the same threats, but from a different developer.
Island Green Power’s East Pye Solar Project, a proposed 500 megawatt solar and battery energy storage system, would cover 2,500 acres of farmland – amounting to an area similar in size to the city of Chichester.
But, as in Anglesey, the developer initially owned little or none of the land. Instead, it plans to buy or lease what it can and acquire the rest using compulsory purchase.
“It seems like they can do what they want,” says Rebecca Mayhew, who co-runs Old Hall Farm with her husband Stuart, near Woodton, deep in the Norfolk countryside.
It seems that many overseas companies are involved, among them the Australian investment giant Macquarie:
But Macquarie is just one of the many, mostly foreign, solar developers being given rights to take land rights from UK citizens.
All want to build solar energy plants whose profits will come largely from subsidies paid for by levies on Britain’s energy bills.
The Planning Inspectorate for England – which only deals with the largest schemes – lists 40 vast solar plants approved or in planning, with its Welsh equivalent listing three more, including the Maen Hir development on Anglesey.
The legislation at the heart of this controversy is the Planning Act 2008, drawn up by the last Labour government when Gordon Brown was prime minister and Ed Miliband was completing his first stint as energy secretary.
Miliband helped steer the bill, which had a key aim of accelerating large-scale energy projects.
The first step was to classify these as nationally significant infrastructure projects, limiting the ability of local authorities to object to schemes and handing ultimate approval to the Secretary of State.
However, the killer clause for property owners was one that handed developers “compulsory acquisition” rights to take over other people’s private land and buildings.
The situation seems to be unprecedented in the last hundred years:
What is now happening is that, whenever a solar company seeks a development consent order, it almost always asks for those powers as part of the deal.
“This has set the stage for the most significant land transfers to private companies for more than a century,” says David Rogers, Professor of Ecology at Oxford University and founder of SolarQ, which monitors the expansion of solar farms.
“Solar and other renewable developers have been given outrageous powers by Miliband and they can use these powers to force people to give up their land, often top-quality farmland, to industrialise it with solar panels.
“So far, about 2,000sq km of English farmland are set to be covered in solar panels and many hundreds, possibly thousands, of people are facing legal threats of losing their lands and livelihoods.
“Most solar development companies are foreign-owned, so we risk seeing British people thrown off their land by foreign speculators all in the name of Net Zero.”
As Sarah Pye says:
We set up our home and business here to support our family and the local area. We have put years of work into our business, but who is going to come here just to see a countryside ruined by solar panels?
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Hopefully readers remember in the film Dr Zhivago, Yuri returns to his family in Moscow to find that their home has been requisitioned by the Communist regime to house many poorer families and they are only allowed to live in one room. Is what Miliband is doing any different?
Very different, in fact much worse. At least in the scenario you describe at least there’s a logical excuse – house poorer families (correct me if I’m wrong as I have not read the book). Solar farms serve no logical purpose… They cover over land that would otherwise be sequestering carbon (if we’re going to indulge carbon footprint ideology, which I don’t), they create more heat around them much like the urban heat island effect, disturb the balance of ecology which is bad for both the planet and the climate, and they increase your energy bills.
Not to mention the electricity pylons effects – people living near them have terrible health problems including cancer.
And they cannot even be said to be for the “greater good”… They are purely for the good of the private companies that own and profit from them.
They are also pretty good for the Chinese manufacturers who make most of the solar equipment
That’s where Mad Ed comes in! He went to china for some tour and came back with this massive solar business plan…Someone should check his Swiss bank account.
If you haven’t realized ‘net zero’, ‘ public safety’ & ‘never ending warfare’ are all part of the same playbook to seize private property & imprison populations, you most likely haven’t been watching the agenda.
Indeed. Wasn’t there a famous body in history called the Committee for Public Safety?
Planning Act 2008 passed by a Labour government, not repealed by the Fake Conservatives.
O U T R A G E O U S
Fascist. All to save the planet….and other mindless drivel and low IQ insensible, post-reality nonsense.
The narrative for wind farms and solar parks (so-called to dupe the public into thinking they are some sort of rural enterprise) is about to fail, dismally.
In politics nothing happens by mistake! It’s true. Wind farms and solar parks are not meant to be the answer, indeed they are intended to be a ludicrous concept, set to fail, blatantly, transparently, obviously a very stupid idea.
So what is the ‘sensible’ idea? A switch about puppy dog sale that we are being fooled into (not me clearly) so to proclaim wildly that nuclear power stations are the solution to our ‘terrible’ dilemma. Yes! Nuclear power stations, not so very long ago the despicable enemy of the environmental lobby are now the saviour of the Planet Earth 🌎🌍 in the minds of all the gullible pools who think that climate change is anything more than an invention of the Club of Rome.
North Wales is not the place to go to for year round sunshine. Clearly a scam to put these useless panels anywhere to make a profit on subsidies. And why so far way from where electricity most needed? Hyde Park and Regents Park in London would be far better.
The Welsh, Scottish and Labour governments pursuing their fantasy of Net Zero are doing evil to people, the wildlife and the landscape. One day there will be a reckoning (in 2029) and I just wish these zealots could then be punished.
Solar panels on domestic or industrial buildings, fine! Solar panels on farmland or the countryside should be an absolute no no! Twenty or thirty years down the road when they have had their lifespan and technology has moved on and net zero has long since been abandoned, as is its obvious destiny, we will.be left with an industrial wasteland to clear up. The talk will be all about how to restore the ugly landscape back to bring countryside and farmland again.
A 500 MW battery storage can supply 230,000 homes for 2 hours. One is being built in Leicestershire. 270 million pounds, and a huge fire risk over a massive area, and toxic fumes.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-67967564
The cost of storage can be 20 times more than the energy it is storing in the first place. It seems government can find every excuse possible not to use reliable affordable energy, and instead use unreliable unaffordable energy, with the excuse they are “saving the planet”. Bu ofcourse the real reason was not saving the planet. It was controlling the next version of it.
Disgusting behaviour by the Marxist Milliband.. what has happened to our once lovely country ?
Eco Imperialism. ——Use of the environment to justify control over land and resources. What used to conquered by armies is now defeated by regulations, mandates and International Treaties. We now have the ludicrous situation where even local government is spending more time implementing and complying with UN Climate Bureaucracy than dealing with the issues concerning the people who voted for them. ——-Marching soldiers with flags and rifles have been replaced with Sustainable Development goals.