Starmer’s Palestinian Pledge Exposes the West’s Moral Collapse

I have not said much on the Israeli–Gaza war for a few weeks as it is always difficult to know what’s going on. I have been against a siege that involves cutting off food and medical supplies to Gaza from the beginning and remain so, although it should be noted the obligation to feed your enemy in a time of war is a new concept.

The announcement yesterday by British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer KC, threatening to recognise a Palestinian state following France, really sums it up though. My views on this are those that Melanie Phillips expresses: it’s monstrous. But it shouldn’t be surprising.

The fact that either Britain or France would recognise a Palestinian state while Hamas still holds hostages sums up the moral rot at the heart of Europe. I also think it is a form of trolling that Starmer announced this on the anniversary of the Southport massacre. In the days after that monstrous attack on a room full of little girls by a child of the immigration nightmare, the British state launched its own attack on the far-Right thugs — those who said enough, but in a violent manner. They had said enough in every previous election since I moved to London 20 years ago. They were ignored. As a result of the state cracking down on the disordered dissenters from “Diversity is our Strength”, Peter Lynch was “executed” and Lucy Connolly remains in jail to this day for a tweet. Yes, it is all linked.

It makes sense then that Starmer rolled out the lectern one year after Southport to talk about a Palestinian state. As the British state falls apart, it always makes sense to fight for the interests of someone far away. We already know where Starmer stands when it comes to the interests of the British people – he’s against them.

Do not be fooled into thinking this has anything to do with humanitarian concerns for the suffering of innocent children in Gaza. This Palestinian statehood fiction is being pushed at the very same time as the State of Europe is – quite frankly – falling to bits. I am not onboard with any state of Palestine project, the origins of which are questionable to say the least. It is morally wrong to push such a project whose main aim is to wipe out Israel.

blue and white flag on pole
Photo by Taylor Brandon on Unsplash

This project has gained ground at exactly the same time as the Islamification of Europe. That is not a coincidence. With it has come the spread of a very dangerous antisemitic sentiment. The union of the hard Left – which has long hated Western nations and their “historical crimes of colonialism” – with antisemitic extremism within Islam has been very effective. There can be no surrender to either of these hatreds and bigotries.

But it is particularly galling to see the very same governments who have given their own countries away now talk about a “Palestinian state”. It is also galling that these governments, who have let some areas of their own country be taken over by Islamic extremism, now cloak themselves in the shield of human rights when talking about Israel–Gaza. It is no accident at all that it is Starmer – human rights lawyer par excellence – who has delivered the final blow and threatens to recognise Palestine as a state.

Human rights lawyers have used human rights treaties to hammer Europeans into taking every Tom and Dick and Harry (although they are never called that) from every war-torn country, complete with its own vicious genocide, for at least the last 10 years. We were told we were fascist if we didn’t take what were mostly Muslim refugees from countries to the detriment of our own interests.

And then there was Gaza, a terrible war that Israel had to launch after the well-planned and executed slaughter of at least 1,200 of their own Jews. And have any Muslim countries offered safe passage to the Gazans trapped between Hamas, who use them as human shields, and Israel, carrying out a legitimate war? Of course not. They say that if they did offer refuge or safe passage, then this would be to “collude in a genocide”. Absolute total bullshit piled on utter nonsense, heaped upon self-hatred in the West, which puts no pressure on any Arab country to take in Muslim/Arab refugees. Only the West does that. It is absolutely bizarre.

I cannot figure out why the West and the Arab nations seem content to leave the Gazans in this piece of land while the bombs fall. If Europeans did that to fleeing Ukrainian refugees, condemning them to death and not offering safe passage, it would be non-stop shouts of fascism. While Europeans proclaim “refugees are welcome here,” the Egyptians keep their humongous wall on the border of Gaza firmly shut. Nothing is ever asked of Arab nations to help their fellow Muslims in Gaza. But Europe is always asked to offer safety to whoever turns up at the door or can hop into a boat in Calais. This has been an abject failure by the West, both on humanitarian grounds and on grounds of self-interest.

This war has indeed exposed the abject and total moral depravity in Western governments right now – but not in the way the mainstream media would lead you to believe. First, they have utterly failed to exert any pressure on Hamas or their proxies (mainly Iran) to release the hostages. They are barely mentioned now – clearly their lives don’t matter. They are Jews, so they must do what Jews always do: go off and die quietly.

Secondly, the West has utterly failed to put any pressure on Arab nations to offer safe passage, asylum or refuge to Gazans trapped in the Strip. It probably suits the agenda of many in the West to also have the Palestinians do what Palestinians do best – suffer for the eyes of the Western media.

First, that makes the Jews look bad. Secondly, a lot of people would be out of a job if those Palestinians were moved elsewhere (yes, it happens in history – it’s not ideal, but it’s not new) to live in peace instead of “dying at the hands of the Jews”. If that happened and the Strip was turned into a golf course, etc… then the entire Palestinian Suffering Industrial Complex would fall apart and a lot of people would have to find new jobs elsewhere.

So while everything goes to pieces in Britain, Starmer threatens to recognise Palestine for the Palestinian people. But you cannot have Britain for the British people, or France for the French people, or Ireland for the Irish (the oppression fetish of the Irish is a special, batshit crazy state of mind all of its own). Why is that?

I expect things will only get worse over the summer. Nothing I say or do can stop what seems to be some kind of suicide mission of the West.

Laura Perrins is a conservative commentator and former barrister. Subscribe to her Substack, where this article first appeared.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Claphamanian
Claphamanian
8 months ago

…it should be noted the obligation to feed your enemy in a time of war is a new concept.

It depends on what Solomon meant by ‘enemy’ when he codified his wisdom (Proverbs xxv.21).

The most egregious thing about Starmer’s announcement is that it was made on the anniversary day of the Southport child murders. As if to demonstrate that Britain appears to have no more leverage to help the children of Palestine any more than it evidently has to help those abused children of Britain.

Mogwai
8 months ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

Pretty much;

”Terrorists Learn Harsh Lesson That If You Rape And Murder Women, The United Nations Will Give You Your Own Country And A Billion Dollars.”

https://x.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1950944764875940278

Marque1
8 months ago

I have read that when Jordan gave refuge to the Palestinians they tried to overthrow the King and a costly war was fought before they were defeated and slung out. Similar in Egypt where they, iirc, killed the President.
I have no idea if this is true but it would not surprise at all.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  Marque1

Wikipedia says it is. The PLO tried to take over Jordan by the time the West Bank was still territory annexed by it¹.

¹ Part of the British mandate territory in this area. Annexed by Jordan after the first Arab – Israeli war, conquered by Israel during Six Days War, later formally relinquished by Jordan.

john ball
john ball
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

Yes civil war in Jordan in September 1970 also called Black September. In aftermath after failing there many Palestinians left for Lebanon taking part in civil war there destabilising that country

john ball
john ball
8 months ago

May be thought trite but I am reminded of the late great Tom Lehrer’s song for National Brotherhood Week.
the black folk hate the white folk and vice versa
catholics hate the protestants and vice versa
hindus hate the moslems and vice versa
and everybody hates the jews

RW
RW
8 months ago

The argument against supporting (forced) evacuation from Gaza is that Israel will never allow any people back in once they left. If this is true, the only option for the remnants of the population of this area prior to the post-1918 Jewish invasion to maintain their right to stay in their ancestral homeland is to remain put.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

The happiest and freeest Arabs in the ME live in Israel.

And because there no jobs in the gaza strip thanks to fucking Hamas, Palestinians travelled Ito Israel to work.

The best outcome once hamas have been destroyed, their daughters enslaved and their sons castrated (oops getting slightly carried away there) would be for the Israeli government to take over the west bank and the Gaza strip.

But I can see that idea not gaining too much traction at the UN.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

This may be because Israel conquered both areas in 1967 despite they were outside of the area allocated to it in the original partition plan and it took quite some time until it sort-of gave up claims to them again. The original attempt to acquire these territories by force didn’t solve anyone’s problems and hence, a rerun probably wouldn’t, either.

BTW, in my opinion, the best solution would be for the USA to annex the whole area and declare it a national park. The locals could then continue to cut each others throats to their heart’s content, one could sell tourist tickets to watch some “real life slaugher” and maybe, even some kind of reality TV show would be an option. Meanwhile, the rest of the world could again worry about more important issues. Such as pretty much anything else.

That’s obviously sarcasm. But A vs B in the middle east has been part of the background soundtrack of my whole life so far and I’m pretty tired of people killing each other because of quarrels about a seriously remote piece of desert nobody except themselves has any interest in.

john ball
john ball
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

A bit unfair to the Israelis who would like to conclude peace agreement with their neighbours, and return territorities in exchange for recognition of their right to exist. After 1967 Israel also conquered all Sinai but this has been returned to Egypt following peace agreement. Egypt used to administer the Gaza strip, but believe did not want it back. Peace agreement also made with Jordan who did not want West Bank back.
So in effect a separate Palestinian entity of some sort has been established on the West Bank, although formal recognition of statehood has been delayed pending the conclusion of a Peace Agreement. It is understood that following the Oslo accords full terms of such a Peace Agreement have been negotiated including what is to happen with the new Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the Old City of Jerusalem, but it has been unable to be concluded due to internal political considerations; in particular Arafat not being prepared to commit to it.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  john ball

If anything, this would be extremely prejudiced towards Israel as it has the upper hand in the present incarnation of this eternal conflict and this is unlikely to change anytime soon, if ever. But there’s really no reason why anyone should care. These people – all of them – want to be at war with each other. So, let them fight until a resolution has been established by force or they tire of it.

In other news, it was reported that a sack of rice fell over in China¹.

¹ … das in China ein Sack Reis umgefallen ist, German idiom to allude to the extreme non-importance of some event.

Ben Bellak
Ben Bellak
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

Conquered? Do you mean captured in a defensive war?

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  Ben Bellak

A defensive war is one which ends with restoring the status quo ante bellum.

Ben Bellak
Ben Bellak
8 months ago
Reply to  RW

oh dear, best go have a lie down, RW.

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  Ben Bellak

What you claim to believe about me isn’t relevant for the statement I made.

WillP
8 months ago

As a human being I would put Starmer in the same category as Ian Brady.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
8 months ago

Well, I’m not Jewish, so I try to look at it as an observer and it just seems to me that the current political elite exhibits maximum prejudice against Jews while at the same time extreme leniency towards Muslims.

Everything the Jews do or say is scrutinized from the worst possible angle and shown in the worst possible light.

Everything that the Muslims do – violence, terrorism, intolerance, oppression, corruption – is either airbrushed or treated with maximum understanding.

I can’t remember the last time the BBC mentioned that the whole Gaza shitshow started after the mass murder and rape of Jews by Hamas supporters. In contrast every time the Ukraine war is mentioned, they start with “Putin’s illegal invasion, etc”.

But then, what’s the surprise? We thought we we were different, with all that “never again” and “be kind” bullshit, but under every compassionate social justice warrior, every lefty politician, every rainbow flag waiving, save-the-planet activist there is nothing but hatred and the desire for power.

Mogwai
8 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

The psychopathic Jew-haters just released a propaganda video of one of the hostages. Here’s a ‘before’ picture alongside what he looks like now.
But we’re supposed to feel sympathy for the fictitious starving of Gazans? The hypocrisy of these sickos is truly off the charts. And don’t tell me no Gazan citizens know where these hostages are after all this time. It’s why I trust none of them, especially when you see the level of hate directed at Israelis, entrenched in them since they we’re born.
If they’re not terrorists themselves, or families of terrorists, they’re very likely to be sympathisers, and therefore complicit. Much like the Pakistani community that may never of actually harmed a white girl personally, but they looked the other way and covered for those who did. Guilt by association;

https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1950996669895430648

RTSC
RTSC
8 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

In the hierarchy of Woke, Jews are honorary whites – and therefore oppressors and colonialists – and to top it, many of them are highly educated, very successful and therefore rich.

So that makes them “fair game” for the lefties.

Mogwai
8 months ago

Killing and hatred is programmed into most Palestinians because they’re indoctrinated from a young age. For instance, how can there ever be peace as long as there are financial incentives to kill, such as with their ”pay to slay” programme over there? Doesn’t exactly scream ”tolerance” or ”civilized society”, does it? It’s just sick and twisted, but it’s how they operate, basically like a factory churning out jihadis; ”An 83-year-old Holocaust survivor, Ludmila Lipovsky, was brutally murdered last month in Israel while waiting for her daughter to take her to a doctor’s appointment. A 28-year-old Palestinian man from the West Bank is accused of stabbing her to death. This horrific act is yet another example of the violence incentivized by a multimillion dollar program known as “pay to slay” which is written into Palestinian law and governed by the Palestinian Authority. Some view it as simply a system that rewards Palestinians for committing acts of terrorism against Jewish Israelis. In reality, it is a deeply ingrained economic structure and societal program in the West Bank and Gaza that incentivizes violence, thus undermining any chance of a sustainable peace deal. The program provides monthly payments to Palestinians convicted of violent acts against Israelis and… Read more »

Gezza England
Gezza England
8 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Small wonder none of the other countries want the terrorist Palestinian scum.

johnboy12
8 months ago

One wonders why the output on the DS in relation to the Middle East issues is so dogmatically one-sided. The ‘sceptic’ element is completely missing in their approach to this region and the players involved (directly or indirectly). Perhaps, for a moment, consider another side to the story we are being fed?

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
8 months ago
Reply to  johnboy12

Just tune into the BBC – problem solved!

RW
RW
8 months ago
Reply to  johnboy12

This is a sceptic element, at least sort-of, because it stands in oppositon to the “lefty” mainstream narrative that the solution to the middle-east quagmire must be some sort of “two state solution” the UN etc have been pushing for since 1948, despite that’s the usual foul compromise none of the people actually living in the region want and nothing like this is anywhere in sight despite more than 75 years of concerted efforts to establish it.

Gezza England
Gezza England
8 months ago

Two Tier is using the standard displacement activity – focus on somewhere overseas. And in addition to that he is trying to appease the terrorist loving anti-semites in his party. Thirdly he is making a forlorn attempt to stem the flow of votes to the various islamic parties.

Coram Deo
Coram Deo
8 months ago

Would appreciate it if you kept vulgar Americanisms out of your articles. Thank you.