White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority
Demographic change is becoming an increasingly talked about issue on the British Right as the prospect of white Britons becoming a minority within 40 years looms as an ever greater certainty. GB Newsâs Steven Edginton, for instance, has repeatedly asked prominent Right-wing politicians, including Richard Tice, Nigel Farage and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, whether they are concerned with the decline of the white British population. The journalist put to them the statistics that in England and Wales the white British share of the population has plummeted from 87.5% at the time of the 2001 census to just 74% of the population at the time of the most recent 2021 census â a trend that has doubtless accelerated since, following the ‘Boriswave’.
All these politicians gave unsatisfactory answers to Stevenâs question: hand-waving the issue away, vaguely pointing to ‘integration’ as a solution, or in the case of Richard Tice, simply remarking that heâd be âlong goneâ by the time it happens.
These are woefully unserious responses to what is going to become one of the most fundamental questions in the years and decades ahead. White Britons are the native population of this country â where anyone with ancestors born here prior to 1950 can almost certainly trace their ancestry back centuries. Would it be right for this group to become an ethnic minority in their own homeland, despite consistently voting against mass migration in every election and referendum theyâve been offered?
Thereâs no room for nuance here â either you view this as an acceptable outcome, or you donât. I would say unequivocally ‘No’ â we should not accept becoming an ethnic minority in our own country. Whatever the Left says, such a view is not âracistâ or âextremistâ. No sane people would or should accept it: would we expect the Chinese, Indians or the Japanese to accept becoming minorities in their respective countries?
Time is of the essence though. While projections vary on exactly when white Britons will become a minority, they coalesce around the 2050-2060 mark. David Coleman, an Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, has 2053 as the crossover point. In the view of this leading demographer: âIf this pace of cultural and ethnic change continues then the consequences are going to be very, very negative.â
Others, like a recent study by Professor Matt Goodwin in partnership with the Centre of Heterodox Social Science, forecast that the crossover point will be 2063. âThe foreign-born and their immediate descendants will become a majority by 2079,” he adds. âAnd by the end of this century, roughly one in five people will follow the Islamic faith, up from roughly one in 14 today.â
Depending on which forecast you choose, this is currently set to occur 28-38 years in the future. Plenty of time, right? Not really. In demographic terms, this is no time at all.
The problem seems even starker when you consider the ethnicity of births, which few ever seem to do. According to the most recent statistics, in 2024 just 53.65% of births in England and Wales were white British, down from 62.89% in 2014, an astonishing 9.24 percentage point drop in a decade.


If you look at provisional data for births in England for the first quarter of 2025, which cover January 1st-March 31st, the situation is even worse, with just 52.56% of births in England being white British.

These demographic trends raise the question: what exactly are future generations going to âintegrateâ or âassimilateâ into, when the native ethnic group of the country is only barely a majority of births, and on current trends, could fall below the 50% mark before 2030?
This is what needs to be kept in mind when studies and projections talk about white Britons becoming a minority some decades in the future. They are talking about the population overall, which includes a lot of older people, who, having passed child-rearing age, will not change the demographic future of the country. The median white British person was 45 years old when the 2021 census took place.
On current trends, white Britons will become a minority amongst younger cohorts much sooner than mid-century, and this is the group that matters â it is the demographic future of the country.
This is why increasing numbers of young white people are concerned about demographic change: they are the ones who will live to see themselves become a minority in their own country. Baby Boomers like Richard Tice will be dead by then.
Such rapid demographic change is of course a result of the sky-high levels of immigration we have experienced, particularly since 1997 and the arrival of New Labour. In Tony Blairâs first year as Prime Minister, net migration into the UK increased nearly threefold, from 48,000 per year to 140,000 per year.

Still, the blame does not lie entirely with Tony Blair and Labour. Labour increased immigration significantly. But the Conservatives, despite pledging to reduce net migration into the âtens of thousandsâ in their 2010, 2015 and 2017 manifestos, never did so, and indeed allowed it to increase, to a peak of 321,000 in 2016.
In 2019, the Conservative Party won an 80-seat majority on a pledge to âGet Brexit Doneâ and bring overall numbers down. After we left the EU, the UK regained full control over immigration policy. Yet in 2020-2021, Boris Johnson and home secretary Priti Patel decided to significantly loosen visa rules, including language and income requirements, resulting in a massive surge in immigration to levels never before seen. This betrayal is now commonly derided as the ‘Boriswave‘.
Do not be surprised if these immigration figures are later revised upwards, especially given the recent revelation that the UK Government has secretly been importing tens of thousands of Afghan nationals into the UK, which the media were barred from talking about and which were hidden from official immigration figures. In an astonishing illustration of the sheer numbers of arrivals this could portend, one Afghan national was able to bring 22 ‘relatives’ to the UK under this scheme. This influx is also deeply worrying since we know that, according to data obtained via a Freedom of Information request by the Centre for Migration Control, Afghan nationals are around 22 times more likely to commit sexual assault than native British people.
The level of immigration weâve experienced since 1997, under both Labour and Conservative governments, has meant that in 2024, just shy of 34% of births in England and Wales were to a foreign-born mother. This is an astonishing rate of demographic churn. The figure stood at 15.5% at the turn of the millennium, while just 11.7% of births were to foreign-born mothers in 1969, when data were first collected.

Births to babies with UK-born mothers and fathers hit a record low in 2024, comprising just 57% of births, down from 73% of births in 1999 and down from 62% of births in 2021. A five percentage point drop in just three years is truly incredible, demonstrating the effect of the Boriswave.

Another way of observing the change is the massive recent decline in white British births as a percentage of all births in England & Wales, depicted below from 2007 to 2024.

Barring some type of mass emigration of immigrants, or a substantial increase in the birth rate amongst white Britons, these demographics are going to become baked in. Far from being some âfar-Right conspiracyâ, on current trends, white Britons becoming a minority is a demographic certainty. Yet no politician from any mainstream party is willing to state whether this is an acceptable outcome; they just bury their heads in the sand.
They shouldnât, because in fact there is much that could be done to avert such a future. If policymakers want to avoid this outcome, in the short term we need to see a substantial reduction in levels of immigration into the UK, if not net emigration, whereby more people leave the country than enter, as was the case throughout much of the 1960s-1980s. In the medium to long term, we need to see pro-natal policies implemented to increase the birth-rate for UK-born mothers and fathers, which will overwhelmingly tilt towards white Britons. But before our political class can get to grips with this problem, first it will have to recognise that it is one in the first place.
Charlie Cole is just a regular guy who has spent way too much time trawling through ONS bulletins. Find him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Civil war is coming. This was all predicted in Christopher Priest’s 1972 dystopian novel “Fugue for a Darkening Island”. When civil war starts which side will the police and army take? It’s clear the police will side with the invaders. As for the army – who knows?
Did that book have a happy ending or not?
“…we should not accept becoming an ethnic minority in our own country.”
So, tell the white British twenty-somethings that trying (and sometimes succeeding) to make babies is usually a lot of fun! They appear to have either forgotten (porn will do that) or believe it’s bad for the planet or something and that the male-female reality is an idea invented by Hitler or someone (schools will do that).
You omit the small matter of even being able to get on the property ladder in the first place. Living with parents or in a house-share isn’t really conducive to starting a family. And if it’s anything like over here, the rental market has skyrocketed too. Mind, part of the reason for this is areas where there’s a concentration of expats, which will drive up property prices and therefore price out locals, and for that we do bear some responsibility. But affordability does have to factor into settling down and having kids somewhere along the line. Nobody wants to end up being the so-called ”working poor”; ”In-work poverty is a pressing issue that affects millions around the world, including approximately 8 million people in the UK. Often referred to as the “working poor” phenomenon, it occurs when individuals or families, with at least one working member struggle to make ends meet, often earning an income below the poverty line. It’s a sobering reminder that having a job does not always equate to economic stability and a decent standard of living. The challenges these individuals face are complex and multifaceted, ranging from low wages and job instability to limited access to… Read more »
So the white British twenty-somethings will move out. At least the ones who have any sense of adventure. Survival of the fittest. There’s a New World waiting out there, and there’s plenty of space.
It’s happened since we slithered out of the sea (or whatever the latest idea of our origins is). For example, the Egyptians of today are certainly not the folks who built the pyramid complex at Giza.
A New World not composed of English people. Eventually White people will be in a minority in Western, Northern, Central and Southern Europe and in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. I don’t see the will to prevent this. Eastern Europe might save itself, possibly Argentina and Uruguay.
But then I am a horrible racist.
There is no space – everywhere habitable is already occupied by a country and most of them are as f***ed as we are. The last chance to establish new countries was in North America a few hundred years, and that place has gone to s**t too.
You’re right, you’re not only a horrible racist, but a
“Horrible Racist Neanderthal Bigot”.
Me, too! đ
Lol. Arenât white Europeans the only racial group with Neanderthal dna? These Neanderthals got a bad press.
Yes! And have you heard about the most plausible reason that Neanderthals disappeared?
Reason: They didn’t! They survived by hiding from humans, who sometimes have glimpses of Neanderthals, calling them Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Yetis, Abominable Snowmen, Yowies, and other names all around the world for the tall, strong humanoid creatures completely covered with protective hair, of which humans still retain a remnant.
The standards of living of these poor people who are so disadvantaged that they just can’t affort the luxury of getting children are much higher than those of prior generations who didn’t have the option of casual, side-effect free sex (paid for by the state) to kill the time and who thus got children unless they remained celibate.
There’s no reason to assume that they’d suddenly decide differently if their standards of living would improve even more. It’s more likely that they’d then point at their “careers” then which couldn’t survive the negative impact of children and by the time their “careers” are sufficiently established that they could think of something else, many will already have become infertile. Biologically, pregnancy is meant to happen closely after people became sexually functional and the more this is artificially pushed into the future, the less likely it becomes.
Contraception culture equals voluntary ethnic suicide because children are, after all, an expensive inconvenience for individuals affected by them.
True, there’s no reason to think an improvement in such circumstances would be enough to change everybody’s minds, but without somebody doing some actual research and asking people about their plans to have kids and if not why not, we’re just pissing in the wind because we don’t know. But given that we live in a time and a place in the world where people no longer are having kids due to necessity or because they’re duty-bound ( religion, social norms/expectations etc ), I think it’s time you accept the fact that not everybody feels compelled to breed based purely on the simple reason that they don’t like kids and/or don’t want them, so you can move on.
I don’t care what people’s reasons are because, as long as they’re exercising their own free will, I respect their decisions to do what they want with their lives, money, bodies etc. I don’t sit in judgment of anybody. ”You do you”, as the Americans say.
I think it’s time that you accept the fact that cultures where it’s considered normal and desirable that women get childen — exercise for the reader, name one which starts with isl- and ends with -am — will necessarily outbreed others and that population replacement is thus inevitably going to happen if anything else remains as it is.
Except I have accepted that fact, a long time ago. How can Western couples ever compete with a religion that behaves ( inc treating the females ) like it’s still in the Stone Age? Where women are not treated as equals, they’re dominated by men and looked upon as property in many countries and where bodily autonomy ( and freedom to choose ) is an alien concept. These women are duty-bound to breed, Western women are not. There’s the kicker.
So perhaps you need to rein in the sanctimonious attitude and obsession you have around this topic because, as I understand it, you don’t even have children, thus you’re a fine one to talk and dare to sit in judgment of others and what they see fit to do with their lives. I’d much rather couples have kids of their own free will because it’s never in a child’s best interest to be born into a family knowing they’re unwanted and feeling unloved.
What you (wrongly) believe about my attitude is of exactly no relevance here. The simple choice is “reproduce or die out” and hence, for people who – by-and-large – reject the former, it’s going to be the latter.
I don’t think men can get children on their own, hence, you accusing me of not doing that is more than a bit bizarre.
Um… aren’t you forgetting an awkward fact?
EVERY MUSLIM MAN is allowed FOUR WIVES and UNLIMITED SEX SLAVES (called “War Captives” = All European women & children), and encouraged to have as many children as possible. So that’s at least 25 children, far beyond the child-bearing capacity of one woman.
No monogamous culture in the world can compete with that.
It’s perfectly possible for a single couple to have more than 15 living children (example from my town of birth). That’s arguably an extreme example but the replacement rate (rate of births sufficient to sustain a population) is only an average of 2.1 children/ women in developed countries. Western Europe is already seriously densely populated and hence, all the muslims in the world couldn’t set foot in this area if native populations weren’t shrinking. Without aliens, London would essentially be a ghost town and the same is probably true for all other larger British towns.
My medium sized British town is mainly full of White British people, as are all the surrounding villages.
North of the Thames in Reading lies the former village of Caversham. It’s about as predominantly English as the town itself isn’t. But it’s a lot smaller.
Indeed the concentration seems to increase with the size of places – some kind of quite natural ghetto effect where people like to be near other people like them, more prevalent where they have different food, religion and language requirements.
No, there’s nothing wrong with a nation having a small population!
Scandinavian countries like Finland managed to survive and thrive with a population of only about SIX MILLION PEOPLE.
The idea that people must keep increasing their population to have prosperity is a Globalist Lie.
Britain needs a massive DECREASE in population, which can be easily achieved by telling the Third World Ethnics that the Gravy Train is over, and it’s time for them to go home and work hard to build up their own ancestral homelands into great nations, instead of just Parasitizing the West.
Finland etc are mostly wilderness too cold for human habitation or much agriculture. Even without global trade, the British isles can sustain a much larger population due to their more suitable climate. And hence, a much larger population will always inhabitate them, even if white Brits insist on birth-controlling themselves out of existence. Someone else will occupy the land after them.
It’s only “inevitable” if you let other races and cultures into your country. I suppose if the birthrate stays below replacement you will eventually die out, but that’s not the same as replacement. I think that’s unlikely anyway – but that’s not overly relevant. Fact is we have imported tens of millions of aliens in a short space of time.
The fact is that they have come. That someone could have prevented that is only a supposition.
It has not happened everywhere. I think it’s pretty unlikely that it could not have been prevented, had the will been there. We agree to free movement, we invited all the “Commonwealth” people here, and issued millions of visas. There will always be some illegals, but they are only a small part of the “problem”.
Anyway, we are rearranging deck chairs here. Our ship is sinking and will be at the bottom of the ocean fairly soon (in human history terms).
Nonsense! They have not just come. They have been tempted, transported, enabled, cossetted and paid by Western Communist Traitors to come.
Both you and the people you refer to as Communist Traitors believe this is a controlled process. I don’t. I think it’s holes (so to say) left by a shrinking population being filled by other people who haven’t yet degenerated to the point that they dance around a golden
calfsex life day and night and preferably, don’t want any offspring which could interfere with this.The author forgot to mention the millions of forgotten babies aborted in the last 57 years!
Why?
Look at the numbers yourself:
From Right of Life UK
10,741,486* unborn babies have lost their lives to abortion in the UK since 1968 when the Abortion Act 1967 came into effect.
Sunday 27 April 2025 marked 57 years since the abortion law came into force.
https://righttolife.org.uk/news/57th-anniversary-of-abortion-act-coming-into-effect-10741486-lives-lost-since-1968
And this from the horse’s mouth (gov.uk):
EthnicityEthnicity was recorded on 91% of the forms received for 2022 (see table 3a(vi)), as in 2021 (91%). Where ethnicity was recorded, 77% of those having abortions reported their ethnicity as âwhiteâ, 9% as âAsianâ, 8% as âblackâ, 5% as âmixedâ and less than 1% as âotherâ.
And that was in 2022! Numbers haven’t been published for 2023 and 2024. Who knows why? For sure the numbers will be even more horrific and they don’t want us to know.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-2022/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2022
If we are going to talk about why we are becoming a minority we will have to ask why white women are killing their own babies at such disgraceful rates. And do something about it.
The killing has to stop.
One of my drinking group is a British man born in Rugby who is currently supporting his country in the Test series and will be hoping that Pant has not broken his foot or his country will lose. Yep, a British citizen with a British passport and born here is supporting India. Of course being a leftie Guardian reading BBC lover he shows hypocrisy by supporting England when it comes to football and a cynic could point to India’s great record on the international football stage as a reason for this. As an open borders fan as long as it does not affect his lifestyle he is quick to say that we all a nation of immigrants and ignores that for some of us our ancestors arrived in the 900s as opposed to the 1900s.
With so many young men coming in we should look at âone non white parentâ rather than ânon-whiteâ mother.
It’s a biggie, so here’s just an excerpt. Jim nails it, as per, and his post provides a worthy accompaniment to Charlie’s excellent article. It’s a real concern, this ”demographic warfare”; ”The Weaponisation of Demography: How Britainâs Ruling Class is Dismantling the Nation There is no “immigration crisis.” That phrase suggests mismanagement. It suggests chaos that no one intended. But look closer and you’ll see it’s neither. What we are living through is not a blunder. It is a project. A cold, calculated campaign to transform Britain – demographically, culturally, and politically – into something unrecognisable to its own people. And they are succeeding. This isn’t migration in the traditional sense. It’s demographic warfare. The goal is not to bolster the economy or fill skills gaps. The goal is to break the contract between the people and the state. To dissolve the idea of a unified, rooted, historically-conscious population that might one day demand accountability, sovereignty, or national pride. In its place, they want flux. Disorientation. Rootlessness. That’s why every lever of power – from the judiciary to the civil service to Starmer’s backroom handlers – works to keep the borders open and the native silent. That’s why boatloads of… Read more »
Part 2:
”Starmer, like Blair before him, is a textbook example of what economist Thomas Sowell called “the anointed.” Narcissistic, unaccountable elites who push radical social experiments – open borders, identity politics, cultural erasure – with no regard for the consequences. They champion a “mascot” (small boat migrants, radical Islamists, climate protesters), and demonise a “target” (ordinary working-class Brits who dare to object).
These people aren’t just detached. They’re hostile. They cannot conceive of the idea that you might oppose mass migration for rational, non-racist reasons. That you might not want your town turned upside down. That you don’t want migrant men with no passports housed next to schools. That you’re sick of paying for foreigners in hotels while veterans sleep on pavements.
Instead, they call you fascist. They tell you your flag is offensive. They ban your daughter from wearing a Union Jack dress on “Culture Day” while celebrating hijabs, prayer rooms, and halal menus in every state school from Sussex to Sheffield.
But why? Why this relentless transformation?
Because a stable, united population is hard to control.”
https://x.com/JChimirie66677/status/1948104315681243511
The definition of Genocide. The full UN text follows.
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
Itâs already too late
In hindsight I think it was obvious we were done for when Powell was thrown under the bus by his own party for pointing out the obvious
I think the indigenous youngsters are realising that they are now disadvantaged, so we will see what happens.
I think a big issue concerning our “indigenous” youngsters is who has the greatest input into shaping their thinking on cultural issues. It appears the state education system is committed to promoting open borders, trans rights, net zero etc., denigrating British culture and historical achievements in the process. It has access to our youngsters’ minds for many hours a day.
Who knows how much meaningful communication takes place between those youngsters and their parents when they’re at home? And what other influences do they encounter in the media and on social platforms?
How many indigenous youngsters have the necessary information to assess whether or not they’re disadvantaged? And if they do feel disadvantaged, have they been trained into thinking that it is acceptable, and only fair to the “global majority”?
As I said, itâs a realisation. ie. Something they have discovered by experience for themselves.
Lefties think that young people can be moulded to their will and to an extent that is true. The problem with their ideological carp is that they fail to take into account free will and the natural desire inherent in mankind to do better.
People very rarely will themselves into extinction, although the left are good at this they always fail because their ideology is flawed and very very childish, childish but dangerous because they always end up killing millions. That inconvenient truth is now well known by most people who possess functional brains.
I do hope you are right about the young people waking up.
Aye, it looks as if Johnson achieved the impossible by being an even more destructive PM than Blair, and that is setting the bar very high.
A plague on all their houses.
Ah yes, white male leaders showing us how it’s done. Personally, I thought the way the Scamdemic was handled in the UK by all those upstanding and capable men in positions of authority, full to the brim with integrity, collectively demonstrated peak competence and unrivaled leadership qualities. I mean, imagine how much worse it could’ve been!đ°
“Demographic change is becoming an increasingly talked about issue on the British Right ….GB Newsâs Steven Edginton, for instance, has repeatedly asked prominent Right-wing politicians, including Richard Tice, Nigel Farage and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, whether they are concerned with the decline of the white British population…All these politicians gave unsatisfactory answers to Stevenâs question: hand-waving the issue away, vaguely pointing to âintegrationâ as a solution, or in the case of Richard Tice, simply remarking that heâd be âlong goneâ by the time it happens.”
I put it to you that these politicians are therefore not on the “British Right”. They are all centrists. We are f***ed.
Thanks to the DS for this powerful article by Charlie Cole.
The graphs show the frightening reality even more clearly than words.
All the nations of the West must declare a Total Five-Year Moratorium on All Immigration from the Third World: Zero Legal, Zero Illegal, Zero Refugees, Zero Asylum Seekers, and Mandatory Repatriations to the Third World country of their choice.
We must remember the great African President Jomo Kenyatta, “Father of the Kenyan Nation”, who famously said,
“THERE ARE TOO MANY TICKS ON THE LION’S BELLY!”
…just before he KICKED all the Indian Subcontinentals out of Kenya, because they had taken over everything, trampling the Indigenous Africans underfoot. He said (paraphrase)
“We didn’t get rid of the British only to be taken over by Indians & Pakistanis”.
Tanzania and Uganda followed his splendid example, and NO ONE CALLED THEM RACIST for taking drastic action to protect their own Ethnic African people.
Charlie, the answer may be natal but that ship sailed long ago. If a country passes a law permitting the termination of the natal process so that there are 10m less persons, and then imports 10m people into the country instead who respect natal rights, what do you expect? In the rush to sexualise, they forgot to consider the consequences.
But to suggest that other countries wonât allow themselves to become a minority when South Koreans, for instance, are predicted to disappear within 100 years is to ignore the consequences of putting self-interest before the good of the society that unwisely made that self-interest possible. It is scuttling the natal ship.
It’s too late to stop it now. The appalling and deliberate destruction of the native population was started under Blair and carried on enthusiastically under the Treacherous Tories.
Blair even got a reward for it: The Charlemagne Prize … for implementing the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.
Not too late.
The official figure for the size of the ‘muslim community’ in the UK today is 4 million, but who really believes it? The official figure is based on census returns, but the ‘muslim approach’ to census returns is the same as it is to postal votes; the ‘community leaders’ gather up the forms and fill in the data they want. The true figure, which is nearer to 14 million, therefore grows by stealth.
Our Blarite Uniparty cultural planners are not remotely worried about whites becoming a minority because thy are planning gradually to abolish the distinction between races, Andrew Marr in the Observer February 1999 told us this, a perfect corollary to multi culturalism. All our TV adverts and dramas teach this doctrine covertly and overtly. And as Marr says, the state needs to act coercively to enforce this miscegenation (race mixing) for the greater good and stamp out the notion of ‘natural beliefs’. Teachers he says are the best indoctrinators for this purpose – how right he was.
ps Here is Marr’s full article from 1999
https://www.theguardian.com/Columnists/Column/0,,311213,00.html
.
As alluded to in the final paragraph, immigration is only half the picture behind these statistics. The other half of the reason is that people in the UK, especially White British people, are having far fewer babies than are needed to sustain their numbers. THE FERTILITY RATE âOur Births in England and Wales: 2023 release shows that the total fertility rate in England and Wales has fallen to its lowest level on record, at 1.44 children per woman.â (ONS – How is the Fertility Rate Changing in England Wales) 2.1 children per woman is generally understood to be the rate required to keep the population stable. So overall (covering all ethnic groups), too few babies are being born to sustain the population. This is a big driver for the governmentâs aim to get immigration up. (Yes, we all know that is actually their aim.) It is generally believed that the fertility rate for non-White ethnic groups is higher than for Whites (although the ONS does not publish these figures). The birth rate is certainly much higher, although this is partly because the immigrant population is younger on average than the indigenous population. THE ABORTION RATE The very low fertility rate… Read more »
“…despite consistently voting against mass migration in every election and referendum theyâve been offered”. We don’t get to vote on issues in elections, and I don’t remember any referendum on mass immigration.