Dale Vince Collects Wind Farm Subsidies of £145 Million Over 20 Years – And Still Charges His Customers More Than the Ofgem Price Cap
Onshore renewable energy operator Dale Vince has collected over £145 million of state subsidies over the last 20 years, according to recent research compiled by David Turver from published accounts and government sources. But profits may be at risk, concludes Turver, with current subsidies running out and an aging wind fleet declining in performance. The subsidies of course are ultimately paid by British electricity consumers to promote the growth of wind power. Vince has donated £5.4 million to the ruling Labour party in recent years and will no doubt be hoping that even more generous future state payments will be available, and the planning brakes on onshore wind farms are lifted.
The bulk of the subsidies for his Ecotricity operation come from the Renewable Obligations Certificates (ROC) scheme. This scheme was remarkably generous and until 2017 it handed out tradable financial certificates. Vince often states that his companies are subsidy-free but ROCs are essentially moolah for megawatts. The scheme is a transfer of wealth from consumers to producers via the State and over the last 20 years the entrepreneurial Vince has collected £115 million. Alas, the scheme only subsidises windmills for their first 20 years of operation, and in the latest financial period the ROC contribution fell from £9.15 million to £7.87 million.
Other benefits clearly visible include an “enduring derogation” from the Ofgem consumer energy price cap. Turver works out that Ecotricity is allowed to charge 11.8% more on its standard variable rate than its competitors. To be fair to Vince, he can charge higher prices due to his appeal to ‘green’, presumably well-heeled, customers. Turver does, however, note that the higher prices beg the question why Vince has to charge extra for his supply when he frequently states that wind energy is the cheapest energy source.
From 2014/15, Vince’s companies have earned a further £8.55 million in renewable credits, and since 2015/16 it has collected £21.5 million for administering the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) scheme. The FiT scheme is no longer available, but it rewards home consumers for producing electricity. The FiT income would not exist without the FiT subsidies so technically, argues Turver, this is a subsidy. It brings the total of Ecotricity subsidy receipts to £145 million.
The ability to harvest subsidies and charge more than the energy price cap does not eliminate the risks of renewables. Borrowings of £80 million from banks and bondholders (Ecotricity customers get an extra 0.5 bond interest rate) are outstanding. As an entrepreneur there are the inevitable mishaps for Dale Vince. Problems with a scheme to turn grass into gas led to a recent £12.2 million write-off. In 2022, the Heckington Fen onshore wind farm was denied planning consent because of fears it would interfere with radar. Such concern appears to be growing with the Ministry of Defence recently forced to spend £1.5 billion to combat the ’Doppler’ effects of wind farms on vital military radar. Even with this amount of money spent, it’s not clear if there is a viable solution in sight. In addition, there’s political risk in the air with the Reform party leading in the UK polls and promising to save billions of pounds by scrapping what it calls Net Stupid Zero.
Interestingly, a plan for a 500MW solar farm at Heckington Fen was approved by the Labour Government earlier this year, but instead of developing it Vince has put it up for sale to achieve a quick profit. Money also came into the company last year from the sale of a 24.7% stake in the Good Energy Group. Turver observes that the CEO of Good Energy is Nigel Pocklington, who is the brother of Jeremy Pocklington, who is the Permanent Secretary of the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ). Juliet Davenport, founder of Good Energy, serves on the DESNZ Clean Power 2030 Advisory Commission. Good Energy was bought by a United Arab Emirates-based company earlier this year for £99.4 million, providing Ecotricity with £24.5 million.
Perhaps the biggest concern facing Vince and Ecotricity is the fall in wind output from the ROC-funded fleet from 159GWh in 2023/24 to 124GWh in 2024/25. Much of this was due to a farm being turned off for batteries to be installed, but the large wind farms at three sites all saw “significant drops” in output as measured by the number of RIOCs they were awarded. In considerable detail, Turver shows that older wind farms are losing efficiency and will run out of ROC payments in the near future. Most, if not all of them, seem to rely on the subsidies to remain profitable. Wind farms like Mablethorpe, Ecotech, Lowick Beacon (Swaffham), Blood Hull (Somerton) and East Kilbride will likely not be profitable says Turver, as output declines and the subsidies run out.
In Turver’s view, the performance of his companies falsifies Vince’s claim that wind power is the cheapest energy source. His companies struggle to be profitable with massive subsidies, even though he charges his customers more than the price cap. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that Vince is a skilled entrepreneur who was quick to grab the generous State cash designed to boost renewable energy over the last 20 years. Recently, he has built a large media and political presence and disseminates his views on climate catastrophe widely. His views are often controversial but his repeated calls for climate change “denial” to be criminalised is unlikely to dent his popularity with his target audience.
We have attempted to report fairly on David Turver’s work, much of which is based on published sources. However, if Dale Vince thinks we have misreported any figures or conclusions, he is welcome to reply to this article.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Isn’t he also trading in battery electric vehicle charging facilities? “Electric Highway” and so on. Probably makes claims about where the power on sale comes from, via a bureaucratic route.
He picked up on the opportunity early.
His insistence on wind being the cheapest form of energy production in every interview is begging for the reply “So we can stop the subsidies then?”… However, no interviewer seems up for that
An entrepreneur is usually someone who creates a new product or service at his own risk for sale in the marketplace and not someone who gets advance notices of future government policies and thus, stands ready to collect subsidies as soon as they become available.
Considering that Dale funds the Labour party and politicians then channel taxpayer/consumer money to him, an even less flattering description for this kind of ‘business model’ would come to my mind if my English vocabulary was large enough for this.
I understand your point, however it’s entirely legal… the fault is in the state offering such crazy options up
You made the exact point I was about to make
5 Million a cheap bit of investment for a great return, and a huge influence on the High Sparrow. Clearly Vince is not going to want to encourage anything that stops his gravy train from the tax payer.
Like reality …..!
There ois something very distasteful about hippies who become millionaires.
So there is a company which charges its customers more, relying on old assets and not investing, carrying large debts, flipping assets for quick profit and bank rolling a political party but this is a good company because it is a green company whereas the very same behaviour by water companies is evil and results in demands for nationalisation. Strange old world isn’t it.
No wonder he wants legislation to make opposition to his climate fantasies a criminal offence when he’s trousering this much from us.
Man’s just making money off a system that favours his investments. If it were oil and gas I’m sure he’d be into that instead.
As RW states above, his “contributions” to the Labour Party are doing him no harm either.
This ‘gentleman’ – wearing his Hamas scarf thing – was on GBN this morning about giving those with mental health problems free tickets to local football matches probably because he owns Forest Green Rovers. In my experience following a local team can be mental torture, but there you go.
ROCs are used to justify the lie pedalled in adverts that the electricity you get in 100% renewable when a quick look at our demand versus wind and solar generation shouts ‘bollocks’ even at the best of times. Shell Energy before they became Octopus has a document on their website that made it pretty clear that even one company could never supply 100% renewable let alone them all doing it these days. Vince must be the only one able to charge a green surcharge for this fantasy these days.
He’s placed a huge Pally flag on the Ecotricity HQ in Stroud… hopefully his support for these groups, like JSO (who he dropped like a hot potato when Hallam was sentenced), will bite him on the arse one day soon.
I gather there’s an online petition to remove it …
I’ve long believed that “net zero” refers to the IQ of its proponents
Why does everything posing as green need subsidies. Filling stations and oil companies have never had them, nor have ICE vehicles
Because it’s not viable without them…