News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
8 months ago

Trump ‘doesn’t understand’ why anyone wants Epstein files released

Well, they have become the fixation of the conspiracy theorists*, who think they contain details sufficient to bring down the elite cabal, that’s why. There was a lot of who-ha about the Kennedy assassination files being released, but they proved to be a damp squib, so its quite possible that the Epstein files are boring, and don’t clarify anything, let alone provide any proof of the type and scale that I guess we thought might be in there..

One thing I can be sure of is that The Don doesn’t feature in them. There’s no way that the Democrat DoJ would have missed that opportunity to stop Trump in his tracks.

*I say this, despite conspiracy theorists being proved right the last 28 times…

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

There are a number of reasons to release the files, foremost among them, perhaps, being that by not releasing them you provide the conspiracists with a void to be filled.

But, on the other hand, Epstein was arrested for the second time in 2019, so those files will have had six years now to be examined before they’re ‘lost’. If there’s nothing in there, perhaps it’s because there’s nothing left?

Agree on the Trump point, with the shenanigans the Dems got up to, there’s no way they’d have passed up a gift like that, unless the answer might have been: “Yes, I was there, so were Barry and Bill…”

God, conspiracy loves a vacuum!

Dinger64
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Maybe the Democrats had a player at the game too and highlighting Trump would have highlighted Bid…. sorry, their misfits!

NeilParkin
8 months ago

John Torode has been scapegoated by incompetent BBC managers

A disgusting spectacle, firing someone and besmirching their character for something they cant prove was said nearly a decade ago.

Gregg Wallace doesn’t deserve this performative pile-on
He doesn’t. They wanted a barrow-boy character. They got a barrow-boy character. ‘behaved badly’ is in the eye of the beholder. I don’t think many of the people Gregg grew up with and mixed with on a daily basis think he ‘behaved badly’. They probably think the complaints came from people used to a more polite, intellectual and rarefied atmosphere altogether. That doesn’t make him in the wrong.

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Added to which, he was apparently spoken to.in 2018, about his behaviour being out of line, after which he apparently rectified it.

The whole matter reeks of the ‘woke’ MO of judging people on things they said or did even centuries ago.

With the BBC smugly thinking they’re on the right side of history somehow by admitting that they allowed this behaviour to occur on more than 46 occasions, over any number of years, apparently without doing anything about it…

The whole thing is a smokescreen to deflect attention and to try and allow those responsible to ride out the Glastonbury, Gaza documentary debacles.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  pjar

The whole thing is a smokescreen to deflect attention and to try and allow those responsible to ride out the Glastonbury, Gaza documentary debacles.”

That is exactly what this whole pantomime is about. Davie knows he should be sacked, this episode with Torode is his method of clinging on.

There have been some truly horrible heads of BBC in recent years but the current incumbent is a national disgrace. Even by BBC standards.

Hardliner
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The BBC seems to have forgotten how ‘successful’ Top Gear became when it got rid of a non-employee….who went on to much greater things, here and abroad

Scrambled eggs, anyone?

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  NeilParkin

As I understand it Torode and many others in the BBC are given individual contracts for specific appearances, they are not employees. The fact that he was not offered a new contract does constitute firing in the conventional sense.
However it was an unnecessary move done for a very contrived reason, the main one being that the BBC wanted to look tough and decisive in the wake of much prevarication.

NeilParkin
8 months ago

“Reform has proven again it is unfit to tackle our immigration crisis” So Tom Jones in claiming that Reform is missing the point, is actually missing the point. There are many aspects of immigration that can be controlled, but grand sweeping ‘solutions’ put forward like ‘send them all back’ just ignore reality. Turning off benefits that we cant afford to pay is sensible and will encourage those here for a free ride, to repatriate. However, the rest is a God awful mess. We’ve seen what well equipped, motivated National Guardsmen and ICE agents have gone through in the USA turfing out illegals. Now apply that to Batley or Bradford. Its not long since our brave officials ran away from a confrontation in Leeds as a bus burned, and that was over one child. Who is going to do the dirty bit of gathering up these people and getting them on the bus. IMV, there is no choice other than pragmatism. The time when this could have been dealt with by the police and immigration services are long since over. There is no appetite for it either in the woke councils, police, judiciary and civil services either. They will slow march… Read more »

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Up early, Neil?

NeilParkin
8 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I usually start work at 5am. I was a bit earlier out of bed today. The overnight round up is pretty much my first stop of the day (to see what the b’stards have been up to yesterday) so I had time today to cast a few pearls of wisdom before breakfast.!

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

I have similar circumstances, the dog having decided that four o’clock is apparently the ideal time for breakfast!

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Leaving aside the untold damage done to the host culture when you try to mix those that fundamentally oppose each other, the issues we face are, I think, exacerbated by a complete lack of foresight by those responsible who, at no stage appear to have thought about the practical effects of adding huge numbers to a small island, regardless of whether they intend to ‘assimilate’, or not.

To oversimplify, you wouldn’t invite twenty relatives to stay at your house over Christmas, if you only have three bedrooms and one bathroom… you’d work out how you’d accommodate them before you issued the invitations. Or, you would if you weren’t a government, it seems.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Do not default to cock-up theory. Kneel is acting under orders and he has been ordered to finish the job of destroying this country and that includes getting rid of the native British.

transmissionofflame
8 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

It is a mess and there are no easy solutions. This is an interesting piece sort of on the subject, from the US: Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Even Dumber Than You Look, by Andrew Anglin – The Unz Review

One thing that does seem achievable however is saying we’re aiming for close to zero new immigration. NOT “net immigration” but immigration full stop. We’re in a hole so step 1 is to stop digging. I don’t know if this is a current Reform promise.

Monro
8 months ago

Trump has launched as many air strikes in five months as Biden did in four years The U.S., Britain and no doubt many others are a bit confused about the utility of air power. Some of this confusion derives from ignorance, some of it from obsolete military doctrines and some of it from vested interests. Consequently, as the United States has chosen to rely more and more on air power to buttress its position in the world, the conduct of American foreign policy has grown more difficult. That is because air power is not inherently strategically significant.  Britain and the U.S. would have been far better served if the Royal Flying Corps and the United States Army Air Forces had remained in being. It is no good wearing a big hat if you cannot fight. Similarly, as the recent Franco British air war in Libya, the air war on Serbia have demonstrated, air power, on its own, cannot win a war for you. Indeed, air power, in a contested air space, can have very little utility, as Russia demonstrates to us every day. President Trump’s air campaigns are statements of intent. They would carry a great deal more weight if… Read more »

Monro
8 months ago
Reply to  Monro

And deployment of ground forces to deter aggression need not be expensive.

Apparently, just deploying one General on his own will do the trick

‘Kellogg arrived in Kyiv, and for two nights in a row, there have been no massive attacks on the city.’

The great benefits of conventional deterrence made manifest.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Just imagine the deterrent effect if Nestle and Weetabix joined in.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Yup, those RFC Sopwith Camels and Brisfits would have made a big difference.

Monro
8 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Low-slow aircraft, particularly those with loitering munitions capabilities, are increasingly being used to counter the threat of drones. These systems offer a flexible and adaptable approach to drone defense, combining advanced detection and tracking with various neutralization methods. 

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Except when you read the article it says “Donald Trump has unleashed almost as many airstrikes in five months as Joe Biden managed in four years,”. The key word “almost” was left out of the headline.

For a fist full of roubles

Trump 529, Biden 555.

THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST

NEW EPISODE! Ep 59. Built By Immigrants? (Plus we talk about the Afghan issue)
https://therealnormalpodcast.buzzsprout.com/1268768/episodes/17514059-ep-59-built-by-immigrants
This week we discuss Kier Starmer’s 1-in-1-out policy with Macron. The Big Glorious Bill in the USA. Was this country built by immigrants? Pepsi ring pull disasters. Syfret’s soabox from the pub PLUS LOADS MORE!

Logo-beer-faces
Dinger64
8 months ago

“According to UN predictions, Britain could be home to 75 million people by the end of the century”

Go swivel… it’s already way above that!

A. Contrarian
8 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

At least 80 million I would guess, but probably more.

huxleypiggles
8 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I think Tesco declared a population of 80 million twenty years ago.

Purpleone
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

And you can bet their data is more thorough than the governments…

Dinger64
8 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Guaranteed it is, if you only count heads in a census how do you know how many are keeping their heads down?

pjar
8 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Yes. It’s always been a mystery to me that they apparently think illegal migrants will fill out the census too…

Dinger64
8 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yes remember seeing that and sewage utilities reported a matching set of data with the amount of sh..waste they had to deal with!

Keencook
Keencook
8 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

What goes in has to come out – so food, water & sewage. Real time indicators.