News Round-Up
- “Starmer and Macron agree ‘one in, one out’ Channel migrant swap pilot” – Sir Keir Starmer is facing serious questions over whether a new migrant returns deal agreed with France will make any difference to the Channel small boats crisis, reports the Mail.
- “‘I was a Border Force officer. Starmer’s ‘deal’ with Macron is worse than useless’” – There’s still no serious long-term plan for halting the increase in Channel crossings, let alone stopping them completely, says Tony Smith in the Telegraph.
- “Starmer and Macron won’t fix the Channel migrant crisis” – The sceptic might argue that the real problem in cracking the migrant crisis isn’t so much the criminal gangs as the human rights industry, writes Gavin Mortimer in the Spectator.
- “Starmer will rue the day he made Lord Hermer de facto deputy PM” – This is a Government of human rights lawyers, by human rights lawyers, for human rights lawyers, says Stephen Pollard in the Telegraph.
- “Cut benefits for depression and ADHD, Tories demand” – Kemi Badenoch claims that the Government could save up to £9 billion by cutting PIP and UC for claimants better off in work, reports the Mail.
- “Kemi is right. The benefits bill could cripple Britain” – In the Spectator, Michael Simmons says Badenoch is right on welfare – but not tackling pensions means Britain’s real crisis still looms.
- “Britain is killing itself with compassion” – A spiralling welfare bill, ballooning debt and political idealism are setting the stage for crisis, warns Sam Ashworth-Hayes in the Telegraph.
- “Moment police officer sobs after ‘being punched at Manchester Airport’” – The moment a female police officer was left sobbing and bleeding after being punched in the face during a brawl at Manchester Airport, has been shown in court, reports the Mail.
- “The unspoken truth about 7/7” – The way we have dealt with the 7/7 bombings is effectively to deny that they happened at all, says Rod Liddle in the Spectator.
- “‘My tips to avoid arrest by the Met’” – In the Spectator, Douglas Murray slams the Met’s double standards after 11 officers arrest a man for a sandwich board at Pride, suggesting he’d have been safer shouting “Jihad” or joining a grooming gang.
- “Heard the one about Rod Liddle and the police state?” – Brighton Council’s dullard Labour leader has reported Rod Liddle to the police over an obviously satirical column, writes Mick Hume in Spiked.
- “Peerless: the purge of the hereditaries” – In the Spectator, Charles Moore mourns Labour’s quiet purge of the hereditary peers.
- “Ofcom costs hit £4.6 million after losing GB News legal battle” – Ofcom’s spending on external advisers surged to £4.6 million last year after the watchdog lost a high-profile court battle against GB News, reports the Telegraph.
- “Starmer has pushed Miliband to make a rare good decision” – Plans for so-called zonal electricity have been quietly dropped following No10 scrutiny, notes Kathryn Porter in the Telegraph.
- “The true cost of our energy delusions” – In Net Zero Watch, Maurice Cousins warns that Britain’s crumbling energy policy has sabotaged its economy.
- “‘I tried circumnavigating the UK in an electric van – here’s why it was impossible’” – It’s green, it’s eco-friendly… and, as the Times’s Chris Haslam discovered, it can take up to six hours to charge. The road trip revolution is still a long way off.
- “Scotland’s tidal bet: Net Zero, net loss” – In WUWT?, Willis Eschenbach slams Scotland’s MeyGen tidal scheme as a £66 million vanity project that churns out power at ten times the price of gas.
- “A fresh start” – On Climate Scepticism, Robin Guenier argues that Britain’s Net Zero crusade is futile virtue-signalling in a world where global emissions are rising regardless.
- “2022-2024 warming mostly linked to natural factors, not CO2” – On the NoTricksZone, P. Gosselin reports that Prof Fritz Vahrenholt attributes recent warming to natural factors like El Niño and increased solar radiation, arguing that climate models overstate the role of CO2.
- “Al Jazeera wrongly hypes a climate connection to recent European heatwaves” – On Climate Realism, Linnea Lueken argues that Al Jazeera’s claims about worsening heatwaves and rising deaths ignore historic temperature data and overstate climate change’s role.
- “Natural gas is green and hugely beneficial economically” – In RealClearEnergy, Benjamin Zycher exposes the myths around green energy, showing natural gas is cleaner, cheaper and more reliable than renewables.
- “Dems’ climate pivot probably just smoke and mirrors” – Dems are dialling back some of their climate policies due to their mounting costs, but some policy analysts say the changes are merely symbolic, writes Melissa O’Rourke in the Daily Caller.
- “‘I’m a young meteorologist who questioned the idea of man-made climate change. The climate zealots wanted me punished, silenced and expelled’” – Science doesn’t support the theory that climate change caused the Texas floods, but any attempts to have science-based discussion about the issue are being repressed, says Chris Martz in the Free Beacon.
- “Texas soaked, Bloomberg smoked? Lefty billionaire blames ‘climate denialism’ for floods” – Lefty billionaire Michael Bloomberg is back in the spotlight exploiting the Texas floods to blow a gasket over his most obsessive political issue – you guessed it – climate change, writes Joseph Vazquez in NewsBusters.
- “Trump cancels wind and solar subsidies – Canada’s Net Zero policies are economic suicide” – While Trump focusses on energy security and dismantling the climate empire in the US, Canada still plods a Net Zero path to economic suicide, say the Friends of Science Society on Clintel.
- “The Green lobby’s dishonest crusade for solar and wind” – In RealClearMarkets, Vijay Jayaraj argues that the Green lobby’s push for wind and solar is a “dishonest crusade” built on flawed statistics and fantasy economics.
- “Energy policy vs climate dogma: why the voters aren’t marching to the Green Revolution’s tune” – Americans just aren’t buying the climate apocalypse, says Charles Rotter in WUWT?
- “Pope Leo appeals for more climate action” – The first US pope is just as green as his predecessor, writes Eric Worrall in WUWT?
- “The poisonous face of UN Israel-hatred has finally got her comeuppance” – The Trump administration has sanctioned Francesca Albanese, writes Jake Walllis Simons in the Telegraph; it’s a sign of the West’s sickness she was indulged for so long.
- “Women who claimed Brigitte Macron was born male cleared of defamation” – Two women convicted of defaming French First Lady Brigitte Macron by claiming she was “born a man” have been sensationally cleared on appeal, reports the Mail.
- “A response to the World Health Organization and their SAGO report” – On Substack, Jim Haslam takes aim at the WHO’s dodgy SAGO report, accusing it of whitewashing evidence of a US lab origin for Covid.
- “Why should the hunt for the next Archbishop of Canterbury be ‘inclusive’?” – Just when a change in culture is needed, the same culture has shaped the process for selecting the next Archbishop of Canterbury, writes Fergus Butler-Gallie in the Spectator.
- “I’m just ugly not trans, train driver told colleagues” – Aslef is pushing back against the Supreme Court’s ruling that “woman” means biological female, reports the Telegraph.
- “‘Toilet wars are over. It’s time to flush this nonsense for good” – The SNP Government and public servants, indoctrinated by the taxpayer-funded trans lobby, are still refusing to implement the ruling of the Supreme Court on gender, says Iain Mcwhirter in the Times.
- “BBC bans Gregg Wallace over ‘unsafe’ behaviour” – Gregg Wallace has been banned from working at the BBC after the corporation ruled that he was not safe to have in the workplace, reports the Standard.
- “Terrified of criticising Islam” – Toby appeared on Mike Graham’s TalkTV show yesterday to talk about the Government’s attempt to come up with an official definition of Islamophobia.
- “‘They’re trying to correct a problem that doesn’t exist!’” – On TalkTV, Mike Graham grills lawyer Luke Gittos over the Law Society’s decision to run free training courses for aspiring judges exclusively for BAME solicitors – with white applicants excluded.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thursday Morning Sopwith Rd & Harvest Ride Warfield Bracknell
“Why should the hunt for the next Archbishop of Canterbury be ‘inclusive’?”
How can you follow a faith that doesn’t even follow its own instruction manual?
I’m no expert in the religious texts but I’m sure somewhere in there it mentions marriage between a man and a woman and definitely no sodomy, please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong
Homosexual acts are unambiguously and explicitly sinful, both by the Old and the New Testament.
Marriage in any other combination but between one man and one woman is so absurd, it’s not even mentioned. Even 40 years ago the idea would have been considered insane.
Perhaps gay people can’t be Christians, then, and have to ditch their religion, if this is the rigid and archaic stance of the Bible. Plenty of people were persecuted for not sticking to it to the letter in centuries gone by, by pious prigs. And now I’ve got a certain R.E.M classic stuck in my head…😶
I really don’t mind one way or the other what people do in their private lives except that it should be just that, private!
Also, I’ve nothing against gay marriage except it just doesn’t sit well to be performed in a church, it seems very hypocritical to be allowed by the clergy
No, gay people can be Christians.
We are all sinners, one way or another.
That doesn’t change the fact that homosexual acts are sinful.
Isn’t this ridiculous? Skirts have been part of the school uniform in Britain since the dawn of school uniforms. Why this sudden change? Now, what do you suppose the real reason is? ( Actually, it states the supposed reason in the article. ) It’s certainly not the lame excuse that it makes buying uniforms more affordable for hard-up parents; ”A schools trust is to ban skirts in a major change to its uniform rules. Headteachers at the Northern Education Trust, which runs 17 secondary schools across the North, including four in Greater Manchester, have written to parents outlining its new uniform policy. From September 2026 the trust say skirts will ‘no longer be an option’. Instead ‘all students will be expected to wear tailored school trousers’ in a move designed to ‘promote equality and inclusivity’. The letter says: “This decision has been made following careful consideration and feedback from all stakeholders across the trust, where it highlighted the benefits of a more practical, inclusive, and consistent uniform policy. The move to trousers for all students promotes equality and inclusivity, ensuring all students feel comfortable and supported. “Trousers are also more practical for active learning and movement throughout the school day, while simplifying… Read more »
“Instead ‘all students will be expected to wear tailored school trousers’ in a move designed to ‘promote equality and inclusivity”
And if a girl wants to be girly and wear a skirt she will have to forgo her femininity then? How can this be inclusive if your forced to wear what you don’t want too?
Ho and, human rights!
In Cultural Revolutionary Maoist China everyone also wore trousers and jackets, men and women without distinction, to create uniformity and eliminate individuality.
It’s the sort of thing ultra-socialists looking to radically transform society like to impose.
“In the name of equality and inclusivity, all female students will also have to wear a hijab.”
Exactly! They don’t ban the burqa in the name of inclusivity but ban the skirts in the name of inclusivity. Clown world…
It’s their way of ensuring the boys, to whom we can’t simply say no, don’t wear dresses… similarly, a venue I go to has addressed the issue of men in the ladies lavatory by simply making the gents’ facilty unisex… a move almost poetic in its simplicity.
Absolutely disgraceful. They won’t ban the burqa but skirts? Next thing muzzie pyjamas will be compulsory innit.
It makes me wonder how much of it is to do with this ( see below ): the harassment of girls by migrants. I’ve even seen girls out protesting on the streets because they’re also getting harassed by Muslim migrant boys in their school. So I don’t know if this news with these schools stopping girls wearing skirts is them putting a band-aid over a much more widespread problem, which they refuse to tackle and get to the root cause of. Adam Brooks has been on the case with one particular migrant hotel in Epping, Essex; https://x.com/EssexPR/status/1943298223793176922 This is allegedly the culprit Adam is referring to, but there’s various crimes being reported by locals up and down the country, not just that of sexual harassment/assault. Suffice to say, men such as this have zero intention of integrating and making the most of the opportunity to live in Britain that they’ve been given; ”Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, of High Road, Epping, the Bell Hotel, has been charged with 3 counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity, & one count of harassment without violence, following reports. It’s not known if he is in custody.”… Read more »
”Cllr Jaymey McIvor
Cllr Annie May O’Neill
Cllr James Regan
Have wrote to the Home Secretary demanding the closure of The Bell Hotel & The Phoenix Hotel.
Our community is fair and compassionate but has run out of patience.”
https://x.com/EFReform/status/1943389752046096771
And we all know what the response will be.
Well one things for sure, there is more to this than we are being told.
“‘I was a Border Force officer. Starmer’s ‘deal’ with Macron is worse than useless’”
Stopping boats is prevention. Creating a revolving door that depends on the boats crossing is a machine for some people (I don’t mean gangs of foreigners) to make a lot of money.
The other side of the coin is that it appears to be based on the creation of legal immigration to cross balance the export 1:1, so there is likely to be an opportunity for those who organise the pilot scheme. Perhaps the culprits that operate the current method will, errr, ‘migrate’ in an opportunistic fashion?
If people with ADHD can fill in a 20 page form they don’t have ADHD.
https://camera-uk.org/2025/07/11/bbc-news-coverage-of-terrorism-in-israel-june-2025/
Starting off with the text on your link: The Israel Security Agency’s report on terror attacks during June 2025 shows that a total of 370 incidents took place in Judea & Samaria, Jerusalem and within the ‘green line’. Where is Judea and Samaria, and are they not biblical names? Wikipedia helps us by stating: The Judea and Samaria Area … is an administrative division used by the State of Israel to refer to the entire West Bank, which has been occupied by Israel since 1967, but excludes East Jerusalem. Its area is split into 165 Palestinian “islands” that are under total or partial civil administration by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), and a contiguous territory of Area C containing 230 Israeli settlements into which Israeli law is “pipelined”. Drop Site News reported yesterday, “After its unprovoked strike on Iran on June 12, Israel accelerated another war, as well. The West Bank, already experiencing record levels of settler violence and demolitions, was immediately put under siege by the Israeli army.” Hours before dawn on June 18, as Iran sent a wave of ballistic missiles into Israel, the Israeli army stormed Al-Walaja, a village in the occupied West Bank south of Jerusalem. Moataz Al-Hajajleh,… Read more »
Another interesting article in The Exposé:
Court case against Bill Gates in the Netherlands goes ahead despite the jailing of the lead lawyer.
Despite Bill Gates attempting to claim a Dutch court has no jurisdiction over him, the court case against him and 16 other defendants went ahead on Wednesday.
Two lawyers were representing 7 vaccine-injured claimants: Arno van Kessel and Peter Stassen. In June, the day after submitting documents for the initial proceedings, van Kessel was arrested and taken away blindfolded by a team of semi-military police. He is still being held in the Netherlands’ highest security prison. So, on Wednesday, Stassen represented the 7 claimants on his own.
Speaking after the hearing, Dutch independent media outlet Pinch of Soot said, “If van Kessel’s arrest was meant to intimidate Stassen, it did the opposite. As if he felt he had nothing left to lose, Stassen did all but mince his words, [he took the bull by] the horns and named the defendants’ crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit and assault.”
The judge will issue his ruling in six weeks’ time.
I feel strongly that if articles appear behind paywalls the Daily Skeptic should not include them in the News Round-up unless they are free- to- view here. If anyone pays for media content they can or should be assumed to be aware of such content, and this organ should not in effect provide them with free advertising.
I agree totally and I have complained frequently on here about the preponderance of articles in the NR which are behind paywalls but my complaints fall on deaf ears. As I have commented elsewhere the NR starts the day but if most of the links are to paywalled sites it puts people off. I doubt there is much growth in DS subscribers and I am convinced it is the NR which is holding the site back.
Disable JavaScript on your device/browser and many common paywall blocks will not work…