News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
9 months ago

Thursday Morning Sopwith Rd & Harvest Ride Warfield Bracknell 

201
Dinger64
9 months ago

“Why should the hunt for the next Archbishop of Canterbury be ‘inclusive’?”

How can you follow a faith that doesn’t even follow its own instruction manual?
I’m no expert in the religious texts but I’m sure somewhere in there it mentions marriage between a man and a woman and definitely no sodomy, please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Homosexual acts are unambiguously and explicitly sinful, both by the Old and the New Testament.
Marriage in any other combination but between one man and one woman is so absurd, it’s not even mentioned. Even 40 years ago the idea would have been considered insane.

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Perhaps gay people can’t be Christians, then, and have to ditch their religion, if this is the rigid and archaic stance of the Bible. Plenty of people were persecuted for not sticking to it to the letter in centuries gone by, by pious prigs. And now I’ve got a certain R.E.M classic stuck in my head…😶

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I really don’t mind one way or the other what people do in their private lives except that it should be just that, private!
Also, I’ve nothing against gay marriage except it just doesn’t sit well to be performed in a church, it seems very hypocritical to be allowed by the clergy

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

No, gay people can be Christians.
We are all sinners, one way or another.
That doesn’t change the fact that homosexual acts are sinful.

Mogwai
9 months ago

Isn’t this ridiculous? Skirts have been part of the school uniform in Britain since the dawn of school uniforms. Why this sudden change? Now, what do you suppose the real reason is? ( Actually, it states the supposed reason in the article. ) It’s certainly not the lame excuse that it makes buying uniforms more affordable for hard-up parents; ”A schools trust is to ban skirts in a major change to its uniform rules. Headteachers at the Northern Education Trust, which runs 17 secondary schools across the North, including four in Greater Manchester, have written to parents outlining its new uniform policy. From September 2026 the trust say skirts will ‘no longer be an option’. Instead ‘all students will be expected to wear tailored school trousers’ in a move designed to ‘promote equality and inclusivity’. The letter says: “This decision has been made following careful consideration and feedback from all stakeholders across the trust, where it highlighted the benefits of a more practical, inclusive, and consistent uniform policy. The move to trousers for all students promotes equality and inclusivity, ensuring all students feel comfortable and supported. “Trousers are also more practical for active learning and movement throughout the school day, while simplifying… Read more »

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

“Instead ‘all students will be expected to wear tailored school trousers’ in a move designed to ‘promote equality and inclusivity”

And if a girl wants to be girly and wear a skirt she will have to forgo her femininity then? How can this be inclusive if your forced to wear what you don’t want too?
Ho and, human rights!

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

In Cultural Revolutionary Maoist China everyone also wore trousers and jackets, men and women without distinction, to create uniformity and eliminate individuality.

It’s the sort of thing ultra-socialists looking to radically transform society like to impose.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

“In the name of equality and inclusivity, all female students will also have to wear a hijab.”

AbsolutelyNot
9 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Exactly! They don’t ban the burqa in the name of inclusivity but ban the skirts in the name of inclusivity. Clown world…

pjar
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

It’s their way of ensuring the boys, to whom we can’t simply say no, don’t wear dresses… similarly, a venue I go to has addressed the issue of men in the ladies lavatory by simply making the gents’ facilty unisex… a move almost poetic in its simplicity.

huxleypiggles
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Absolutely disgraceful. They won’t ban the burqa but skirts? Next thing muzzie pyjamas will be compulsory innit.

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It makes me wonder how much of it is to do with this ( see below ): the harassment of girls by migrants. I’ve even seen girls out protesting on the streets because they’re also getting harassed by Muslim migrant boys in their school. So I don’t know if this news with these schools stopping girls wearing skirts is them putting a band-aid over a much more widespread problem, which they refuse to tackle and get to the root cause of. Adam Brooks has been on the case with one particular migrant hotel in Epping, Essex; https://x.com/EssexPR/status/1943298223793176922 This is allegedly the culprit Adam is referring to, but there’s various crimes being reported by locals up and down the country, not just that of sexual harassment/assault. Suffice to say, men such as this have zero intention of integrating and making the most of the opportunity to live in Britain that they’ve been given; ”Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, of High Road, Epping, the Bell Hotel, has been charged with 3 counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity, & one count of harassment without violence, following reports. It’s not known if he is in custody.”… Read more »

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

”Cllr Jaymey McIvor
Cllr Annie May O’Neill
Cllr James Regan

Have wrote to the Home Secretary demanding the closure of The Bell Hotel & The Phoenix Hotel.

Our community is fair and compassionate but has run out of patience.”

https://x.com/EFReform/status/1943389752046096771

huxleypiggles
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

And we all know what the response will be.

huxleypiggles
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Well one things for sure, there is more to this than we are being told.

Jon Garvey
9 months ago

‘I was a Border Force officer. Starmer’s ‘deal’ with Macron is worse than useless’

Stopping boats is prevention. Creating a revolving door that depends on the boats crossing is a machine for some people (I don’t mean gangs of foreigners) to make a lot of money.

JohnK
9 months ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

The other side of the coin is that it appears to be based on the creation of legal immigration to cross balance the export 1:1, so there is likely to be an opportunity for those who organise the pilot scheme. Perhaps the culprits that operate the current method will, errr, ‘migrate’ in an opportunistic fashion?

For a fist full of roubles

If people with ADHD can fill in a 20 page form they don’t have ADHD.

CGW
CGW
9 months ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

Starting off with the text on your link: The Israel Security Agency’s report on terror attacks during June 2025 shows that a total of 370 incidents took place in Judea & Samaria, Jerusalem and within the ‘green line’. Where is Judea and Samaria, and are they not biblical names? Wikipedia helps us by stating: The Judea and Samaria Area … is an administrative division used by the State of Israel to refer to the entire West Bank, which has been occupied by Israel since 1967, but excludes East Jerusalem. Its area is split into 165 Palestinian “islands” that are under total or partial civil administration by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), and a contiguous territory of Area C containing 230 Israeli settlements into which Israeli law is “pipelined”. Drop Site News reported yesterday, “After its unprovoked strike on Iran on June 12, Israel accelerated another war, as well. The West Bank, already experiencing record levels of settler violence and demolitions, was immediately put under siege by the Israeli army.” Hours before dawn on June 18, as Iran sent a wave of ballistic missiles into Israel, the Israeli army stormed Al-Walaja, a village in the occupied West Bank south of Jerusalem. Moataz Al-Hajajleh,… Read more »

CGW
CGW
9 months ago

Another interesting article in The Exposé: 

Court case against Bill Gates in the Netherlands goes ahead despite the jailing of the lead lawyer.

Despite Bill Gates attempting to claim a Dutch court has no jurisdiction over him, the court case against him and 16 other defendants went ahead on Wednesday.

Two lawyers were representing 7 vaccine-injured claimants: Arno van Kessel and Peter Stassen. In June, the day after submitting documents for the initial proceedings, van Kessel was arrested and taken away blindfolded by a team of semi-military police. He is still being held in the Netherlands’ highest security prison. So, on Wednesday, Stassen represented the 7 claimants on his own. 

Speaking after the hearing, Dutch independent media outlet Pinch of Soot said, “If van Kessel’s arrest was meant to intimidate Stassen, it did the opposite. As if he felt he had nothing left to lose, Stassen did all but mince his words, [he took the bull by] the horns and named the defendants’ crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit and assault.”

The judge will issue his ruling in six weeks’ time.

Joss Wynne Evans
Joss Wynne Evans
9 months ago

I feel strongly that if articles appear behind paywalls the Daily Skeptic should not include them in the News Round-up unless they are free- to- view here. If anyone pays for media content they can or should be assumed to be aware of such content, and this organ should not in effect provide them with free advertising.

huxleypiggles
9 months ago

I agree totally and I have complained frequently on here about the preponderance of articles in the NR which are behind paywalls but my complaints fall on deaf ears. As I have commented elsewhere the NR starts the day but if most of the links are to paywalled sites it puts people off. I doubt there is much growth in DS subscribers and I am convinced it is the NR which is holding the site back.

Purpleone
9 months ago

Disable JavaScript on your device/browser and many common paywall blocks will not work…