How Britain Sold Itself to the World as Paradise
It’s over 40 years ago now since I started work at the BBC External Services, a part of the corporation almost entirely forgotten about among the wider British public today. However, many people have heard of its flagship network, the BBC World Service. Back in those days, the External Services were based at Bush House in the Aldwych adjacent to the Strand, past which traffic surged all day. It wasn’t until 2012 that the last broadcast was made from there, the World Service having moved to Broadcasting House.
The Strand’s traffic noise belied the creepy corridors and crepuscular aged studios filled with equipment that was obsolete even then. The whole place was ramshackle, with tatty offices filled with epic quantities of box files, mountains of paper and the air thick with tobacco smoke. Everything was written on typewriters then, with photocopies and carbon copies generating the duplicate scripts. Programmes were transmitted live or recorded on huge spools of ¼” tape and edited with razor blades and sticky tape.
This was where Britain communicated to the world in a system funded at the time by the Foreign Office or, in other words, the British taxpayer. It still is actually, at least in part, the remainder coming from the licence fee and grants, though the funding is always at the mercy of cuts and reviews.
It was and remains a massive PR stunt, designed to promote British interests internationally even if the World Service’s primary remit was and is to produce an objective and accurate source of news for people denied anything equivalent in their own countries. Perpetually in need of funds, it was a shoestring operation but positively drowning in money compared to the foreign language services that occupied the smaller offices.
The newsroom created the bulletins and recorded the filed despatches from the BBC’s correspondents around the world. An army of bilingual foreigners translated both and revoiced them to transmit in their own networks which were timed to match the daily cycle of the countries targeted, such as the Hindi Dawn bulletin. Shortwave was the predominant bandwidth used because of its ability to bounce off cloud cover. The number of foreign language services has fluctuated wildly over the years, depending on the places considered to be most worth vulnerable to a shortage of unreliable information.
Bush House was run with sense of earnest pride and honourable intent, even if the building was so tatty and rundown that it felt more like a beaten-up country home run by a bankrupt aristocrat telling you how great the good old days had been. The External Services had really grown out of the Second World War and the Cold War, and were fully established at Bush House by 1958. There were plenty of people there in the 80s who had fled Russia or Hungary in the 1950s and Czechoslovakia (as it was) after 1968. They had bought in entirely to the British dream and were only too happy to extoll the virtues of British life and values.
The effect, and subliminal intention, was to tell the world what a wonderful place Britain was, an epicentre of freethinking liberal thought and enlightenment, and the exclusive source of reliable news. Sometimes this was explicit and direct. In other ways it was subtle, communicated through arts and music programmes which wafted out over everywhere from Argentina to Tibet.
For anyone in any one of the countries targeted by the language services who had the misfortune not to speak English, there was English By Radio, a sort of primeval Duolingo that enabled anyone from Burma to Chile to master a smattering of English. These programmes were endlessly recorded and repeated, transmitted at all hours throughout the British day and night to the furthest corners of the globe.
When I watch or listen to the news now and hear the handwringing over the cavalcade of flimsy dinghies laden with migrants, I know that those migrants are almost without exception too young to have any knowledge of the BBC External Services’ golden days. Some at least may have listened to present-day output. But what I do know is that the places they grew up in have a long tradition of their parents and grandparents listening feverishly to the BBC news on shortwave radios and trying to learn English and believing Britain was a place above all others.
Back in the 70s and 80s nobody seriously envisaged the prospect of unmanageable waves of illegal migrants crossing out of the Middle East and Africa to make their way across Europe to the Promised Land across the Channel in dinghies operated by international gangs. Mind you, I don’t know why not. A 1968 episode of Roger Moore’s series The Saint was called ‘The People Importers’ in which a gang of wealthy crooked British businessmen are trafficking illegal Pakistani immigrants in small boats over the Channel. The story would have had no credibility if such dealings were not already going on, and within three years it had been turned into a novel of the same name.
The reasons people try to come to the UK are multifarious and the story far too complex to simplify into foolish soundbites or facile explanations. But what I know is that the British government and the BBC have cooperated for decades in an epic advertising campaign to sell Britain to the world as the best possible place to be and to promote English as the lingua franca of opportunity. The law of course is that of unintended consequences.
You reap what you sow.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“…the World Service’s primary remit was
and isto produce an objective and accurate source of news for people denied anything equivalent in their own countries.”It’s ironic isn’t it….. an unbiased and objective source of news and current events being broadcast on, of all things, the BBC.
I imagine to an extent it has always reflected the establishment view – how could it not? – just that the establishment view has moved far to the left
The consequences are absolutely intended
The UK establishment seems hell bent on making white people a minority in their own continent and English people a minority in their own country, desperate to overcome every obstacle and objection
The words ‘white’ and ‘English’ are, if not actually racist hate-speech, certainly Islamaphobic, and their use should be made a crime.
,
I hope you are being sarcastic???
In the 1980s the World Service was half decent, although the points the author makes are fully recognised.
Since 2000 it has plummeted in quality. If you have the misfortune to listen to it now, it almost like an enemy radio station within the UK criticising every aspect of Britain, its history and culture.
Perhaps they realised they’d been attracting too many immigrants with the positive messaging and decided to put them off instead.
It says a lot that even former staff of the BBC prefer anonymity when criticising the nation’s favourite aunty.
Presumably someone who still works in the industry whose career would be wrecked by this? Or someone who doesn’t want to upset ex colleagues?
You’re 100% correct. It’s just a shame that there is an omerta in British broadcasting, which could be due to the BBC’s dominance in UK TV and radio – and the insidious influence of the commies in Ofcom.
I’d not thought in detail about this aspect. Thank you.
Thanks to DS and the author for that fascinating insider’s look at the once-revered BBC World Service. It ties in with something I read years ago, which said that the real aim of the Globalists is to transform Great Britain into a kind of Theme Park for International Tourists, like the Ethnic Orientals photographed dancing in English historical costumes at the Jane Austen Festival in Bath, or the Ethnic African woman wearing the traditional regalia of Lord Mayors, including tri-cornered hat, while seated on a kind of throne. Or the Ethnic Indian Subcontinental girl striding on top of the kneeling backs of Britons to reach the red double-decker Routemaster bus in that Olympics ceremony.
When our politicians talk of making Britain into a “Service Industry”, it means the Brits as servants and costumed role-players in a Fantasy Theme Park covering the whole nation.
An Oxford tutor type was asked if he would go to the Middle East as a private tutor to a young Arab man, he thought as a role model of an educated man but was told by the would be employer “No not that it is because you English make such good servants”. He didn’t take up the offer.
A chap called the radio some years ago, his daughter was working in a small village out in the Middle East somewhere… he said, ” I kid you not, but there were leaflets being handed out encouraging people to go to England!
Wow— it’s amazing what the comments of ordinary people contribute to our shared knowledge.
It made me remember Boris Johnson going to Bangladesh as Foreign Minister years ago under Teresa May, and telling his delighted audience that Britain needed MORE Bangladeshi Muslims to come to Britain, NOT LESS! I was flabbergasted.
The high standards of welfare and accommodation are the result of Keith’s activities when a jobbing human rights lawyers!