Net Zero to Cost Taxpayers £800 Billion, Warns OBR

Britain’s move to a Net Zero economy will cost taxpayers more than £800 billion over the next two decades, the OBR – the UK’s fiscal watchdog – has said. But even this is based on implausibly generous assumptions, say critics. The Telegraph has the story.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said Government plans to limit climate change will cost the public purse £30 billion every year until at least 2051, as tax revenue from the sale of petrol and diesel fuel dries up.

This includes nearly £9.9 billion of spending every year on tech investments – for example updating the electricity grid – as well as £20.5 billion in revenue losses from declining fuel duty from petrol cars, as electric vehicles (EV) become more common.

Investments in green technology will initially make up most of the Net Zero cost before lost tax receipts become the bigger factor, the OBR said.

“In the next decade, expenditure accounts for the bulk of the fiscal cost, particularly public investment in residential buildings, removals and surface transport, which start to decline from 2036 to 2037,” it said.

While the sums are significant, the fiscal cost of Net Zero has been revised down from £1.1 trillion since the OBR last reviewed it in 2021. The watchdog said this was because of fuel duty freezes leading to lower lost receipts and a higher-than-expected uptake of EVs.

It also assumes the Government will spend less on the transition after the Climate Change Committee revised down the costs across the whole of the economy.

Worth reading in full.

David Turver criticises the OBR for taking the Climate Change Committee’s figures at face value, pointing out that the CCC makes numerous implausible assumptions that lower the apparent cost of Net Zero.

From the numbers they have published, we know the CCC made some highly implausible assumptions about the shifting the costs of renewables on to gas bills as well as the cost and take-up rates of heat pumps. However, the most obvious egregious errors are in the CCC’s erroneous estimates of the cost of renewables.

4. CCC Cost of Fixed and Floating Offshore Wind Compared to CCC Estimates

The CCC assumes that offshore wind in 2030 will cost less than half the value of contracts awarded for fixed bottom offshore wind in last year’s Allocation Round 6. It totally ignores the need for floating offshore wind that costs six times more than its 2030 estimate. The CCC estimates for the cost of solar for 2030 delivery were less than half the prices awarded in AR6 too. It did not even bother to estimate the cost of onshore wind, despite needing to more than double the installed capacity by 2050.

Also worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
soundofreason
soundofreason
9 months ago

The £800bn cost could be cushioned by a change in Government tax policy. The OBR said introducing a road tax for all vehicles, including EVs, could lead to a less steep fall in fuel duty tax revenue.

Whoopee! The £800bn can be raised from Road Tax instead of general taxation… It’s still our money. Money spent on this boondoggle is still money not spent on something more worthwhile. The only good thing about this idea is taxing the people who think electric cars are a good idea for the privilege of running one.

Gezza England
Gezza England
9 months ago

as electric vehicles (EV) become more common.

Not if all the empty battery charging places in the car parks I have visited are anything to go by. In town this morning they were all empty. As they were in another town last week. Just a complete waste of spaces. It could be that any battery car users were parked elsewhere as they are just used for local runarounds and charge on the drives of their homes to save money at the risk of burning their house down.

rms
rms
9 months ago

As many “error-bands” showed here as they show for historical and computed future temperatures. None.

Everything too precise.

For a fist full of roubles

So lets get this straight, that is nearly two Tory black holes each year using my Reeve Mk I calculator.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
9 months ago

Losses to “the public purse” (whatever the ff&&k that is) are the least of my concerns besides the total destruction of everything i hold dear about my country.

Stupid report.

varmint
9 months ago

This is the fox saying it will only kill 3 chickens. The chickens know the fox kills chickens but won’t be this easily fooled that it will only be 3. ——–Smart meters alone are costing 30 billion. Carbon Capture another 30. —-This is a blatant attempt to quieten down public concerns about the astronomical costs of Net Zero. But the true number will be in the trillions. Andrew Montford says the figure will be about 10 trillion.

kev
kev
9 months ago

 A higher-than-expected uptake of EVs.

Really, higher than expected? I don’t think so, not based on what they said their annual sales targets needed to be – me thinks we are being gaslit again.

EV sales have been disastrous, and falling!