“Deeply Troubling” UK Muslim Matchmaking Site Advertises Virgin Brides and Polygamous Marriages
A Muslim matchmaking site for men to find virgin brides and take multiple wives is operating in Britain. The Mailhas the details.
NikkahGram describes itself as a service for Muslim men who want a “shy, untouched spouse” and those who are looking for more than one wife.
The company, which has been registered in the UK, promotes virgin women under the age of 35 as ideal first wives, the Telegraph has reported.
Videos shared on NikkahGram’s social media profiles suggest that men should beat their wives as a “wake-up call” for continued disobedience.
In a clip posted on the topic of divorce on Instagram last week, men are told: “From those wives whom you fear arrogance, first advise them.
“[After] one month of advising, then if they persist, forsake them in bed – don’t have any intimacy. Show them that you don’t desire them.
“And if they persist, finally strike them lightly, not with a baseball bat, not from the very beginning boom, no. This is gradual.” …
Chief Executive of the Muslim Women’s Network UK Baroness Gohir… described the “extreme ideology” promoted on the site as “deeply troubling”.
NikkahGram was first founded in 2023 “to facilitate marriage for Muslims who stick to core Islamic values of modesty and submission to Allah without modern excuses”.
It operates on a subscription basis but virgin women are able to access its services for free. …
NikkahGram also promotes polygamous marriages, where men can opt for a second, third or even fourth wife.
It advises men not to register Islamic marriages in the West, where polygamy is a crime.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
27 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Claphamanian
9 months ago
But Baroness, this is multiculturalism. As with the white girls abused in Rotherham and Bradford and all points coast to coast, these wives are the collateral damage of the operation of multiculturalism and diversity. You thought they would all become metropolitan liberals? Ha! Ha! Ha!
And they can’t even spell “polygamy”!🙄
The trouble is, as long as you have Sharia courts in existence, these will act as a barrier to God only knows how much abuse that wouldn’t be tolerated by native women. We would just go through the proper channels if we or our kids were subject to abuse or if we wanted a divorce, but many of these poor Muslim women are screwed because all they have is the male-dominated Sharia courts. I’ll bet there’s so much goes on that isn’t reported, for this very reason. Sharia anything should be abolished because it masks abuse and encourages the growth of parallel societies.
Do any other religions have their own court system? I’m actually not sure without searching, but it should be the law of the land or just leave.
Never heard of it, especially as I’ve also never heard of instances where a woman has been married to multiple husbands, therefore having more than one term seems a bit pointless.
How could a welfare state with uncapped child benefit ever afford such a system? Multiple wives mean extremely high birth rates. This isn’t simply ethics, it’s economics too.
Yes, and each one of the FOUR MUSLIM WIVES demands a separate council house for themselves and their children, by falsely claiming to be “single mothers” and refusing to name the fathers of their multiple offspring.
“Housing Crisis”? And people blame “Feckless White Britons”?
Not my cup of tea. But it certainly shows what can be accomplished with firm conviction.
The problem we have in the western societies is that we just don’t know how to stand up for moderate, tolerant, values that are based on mutual respect.
Instead we’ve come up with an almost equally monstrous movement of gay, trans, hyper-sexualised debauchery, posing as free liberal values. There is of course nothing free or liberal about that movement as it seeks to impose itself on everyone just like the fundamentalist islamic ideology of “submission to Allah without modern excuses”.
So what exactly are tolerant values and when does mutual respect end? Surely these things are the root cause of the dilemma you describe. Advocating the use of violence against women is not firm conviction it is assault and a crime.
Well, you’ve sort of made my point for me. There’s little chance of standing up for tolerance and mutual respect if we don’t even know what it is.
Advocating violence against women to ensure their obedience is both a firm conviction and assault.
Believe me, it’s isn’t me making excuses for this sort of behaviour. it’s the police that’s allowed it. It’s socialists who want to deconstruct our society. It’s the establishment that doesn’t give a damn who lives in Britain, it’s the judges who lock up people who complain too publicly about all this. They’re the ones who have lost sight of what tolerance and mutual respect is.
And by the looks of it, ordinary people have become so confused and angry, they’re not sure either.
Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, it is illegal for anyone in England and Wales to enter into a polygamous marriage; that is a marriage that would mean they had more than one wife (polygyny). This applies both to marriages that take place in England and Wales, and to those marrying abroad who are domiciled in England and Wales.
No doubt 2 tier & Co and the “Attorney General” will be busy making sure are laws are not applied.
The trouble is that deception in all things is admissible in Islam, like the men who sodomize their daughters, allowed in Islam even with infants, so they can still sell/marry them off as technical “virgins”.
Islam is not unique in this, as the Talmud says that Jewish women are only “bad mothers” if they sexually assault their own children AFTER THE AGE OF NINE. Any time before that is fine. Ditto Jewish fathers with daughters— among the many horrors of the Talmud copied into the Koran by the wealthy Yemeni Jewish heiress Khadija, called a “Sorceress” in her time, first wife of her employee Mohammed, whom she asked to marry her when she was 40 and he was about 25. How could he refuse without getting sacked or worse? It was her vast wealth, inherited from her Yemeni Jewish father, that funded Mohammed’s Armies of Conquest.
Heretic
9 months ago
Well done to Richard Eldred and the DS for featuring this important article from the Daily Mail about Muslim Child Bride Merchants, because it ties in directly with the similar Sikh/Hindu practice of Navrati or Kumari Puja that was also in the news yesterday, because of complaints about the noise of the ten-day celebration in London coming up in September.
In this religious Sikh/Hindu festival, little “virgin girls” aged from 1-12 are dressed up to represent the fertility goddess Durga, and each one is publicly worshipped as the goddess. In fact, the festival is a Child Bride Market. Have a look at the photos online here:
The site has, of course, been banned? Polygamy, incitement to violence? Of course it has been banned and the perpetrators interviewed in preparation for prosecution …
Matt Dalby
9 months ago
I wonder if it also quotes the hadiths that say a woman should always be sexually available to her husband, even on the back of camel and that your wife is like your tillage, enter into her however you please. Does this mean that forced anal sex is fine in Islam?
Yes. People need to understand that only the VICTIMS of Sodomite Rape can be thrown off high buildings, because only they are considered “guilty” of “Tempting the Innocent Rapists”. The same goes for male and female human victims of Sodomite Rape, or any kind of rape, as well as animal victims. All religiously sanctioned by Islam.
Islam says you can rape a goat, for example, but you are forbidden to eat the meat from that goat, which must be sold in another town to unsuspecting buyers.
Westfieldmike
9 months ago
Ban it as a terrorist organisation.
Simon MacPhisto
9 months ago
So how come the people behind this web site aren’t in jail alongside Lucy Connelly? Oh yeah….
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
But Baroness, this is multiculturalism. As with the white girls abused in Rotherham and Bradford and all points coast to coast, these wives are the collateral damage of the operation of multiculturalism and diversity. You thought they would all become metropolitan liberals? Ha! Ha! Ha!
And they can’t even spell “polygamy”!🙄
The trouble is, as long as you have Sharia courts in existence, these will act as a barrier to God only knows how much abuse that wouldn’t be tolerated by native women. We would just go through the proper channels if we or our kids were subject to abuse or if we wanted a divorce, but many of these poor Muslim women are screwed because all they have is the male-dominated Sharia courts. I’ll bet there’s so much goes on that isn’t reported, for this very reason. Sharia anything should be abolished because it masks abuse and encourages the growth of parallel societies.
Do any other religions have their own court system? I’m actually not sure without searching, but it should be the law of the land or just leave.
In is specifically polygyny, since it is promoted to men, it means male marriage to multiple women.
Thanks for that— I thought the two terms were the same. We all learn from each other, every day.
I was going to say that they can spell polygyny which is correct. Someone who shall remain nameless beat me to it.
Never heard of it, especially as I’ve also never heard of instances where a woman has been married to multiple husbands, therefore having more than one term seems a bit pointless.
It was new to me too, although I had heard the term polyandry before (to which my response was “Why?”).
How could a welfare state with uncapped child benefit ever afford such a system? Multiple wives mean extremely high birth rates. This isn’t simply ethics, it’s economics too.
Yes, and each one of the FOUR MUSLIM WIVES demands a separate council house for themselves and their children, by falsely claiming to be “single mothers” and refusing to name the fathers of their multiple offspring.
“Housing Crisis”? And people blame “Feckless White Britons”?
In a socialist utopia everyone benefits, but only the rich non-party-members pay. The latter group are soon to be royally shafted.
“…it should be the law of the land or just leave.”
No ifs, no buts.
NO SHARIA !
Social cohesion is so much more important than the battered and broken bodies and minds of these poor women.
Not my cup of tea. But it certainly shows what can be accomplished with firm conviction.
The problem we have in the western societies is that we just don’t know how to stand up for moderate, tolerant, values that are based on mutual respect.
Instead we’ve come up with an almost equally monstrous movement of gay, trans, hyper-sexualised debauchery, posing as free liberal values. There is of course nothing free or liberal about that movement as it seeks to impose itself on everyone just like the fundamentalist islamic ideology of “submission to Allah without modern excuses”.
So what exactly are tolerant values and when does mutual respect end? Surely these things are the root cause of the dilemma you describe. Advocating the use of violence against women is not firm conviction it is assault and a crime.
As is advocating polygamy in western countries where it is a crime.
…but an ‘open’ relationship is OK.
Yes, otherwise known as debauched promiscuity.
Well, you’ve sort of made my point for me. There’s little chance of standing up for tolerance and mutual respect if we don’t even know what it is.
Advocating violence against women to ensure their obedience is both a firm conviction and assault.
Believe me, it’s isn’t me making excuses for this sort of behaviour. it’s the police that’s allowed it. It’s socialists who want to deconstruct our society. It’s the establishment that doesn’t give a damn who lives in Britain, it’s the judges who lock up people who complain too publicly about all this. They’re the ones who have lost sight of what tolerance and mutual respect is.
And by the looks of it, ordinary people have become so confused and angry, they’re not sure either.
Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, it is illegal for anyone in England and Wales to enter into a polygamous marriage; that is a marriage that would mean they had more than one wife (polygyny). This applies both to marriages that take place in England and Wales, and to those marrying abroad who are domiciled in England and Wales.
No doubt 2 tier & Co and the “Attorney General” will be busy making sure are laws are not applied.
I thought you captured well the glaring contradictions in British society. The thoughtful points you make are valid and utterly depressing.
The trouble is that deception in all things is admissible in Islam, like the men who sodomize their daughters, allowed in Islam even with infants, so they can still sell/marry them off as technical “virgins”.
Islam is not unique in this, as the Talmud says that Jewish women are only “bad mothers” if they sexually assault their own children AFTER THE AGE OF NINE. Any time before that is fine. Ditto Jewish fathers with daughters— among the many horrors of the Talmud copied into the Koran by the wealthy Yemeni Jewish heiress Khadija, called a “Sorceress” in her time, first wife of her employee Mohammed, whom she asked to marry her when she was 40 and he was about 25. How could he refuse without getting sacked or worse? It was her vast wealth, inherited from her Yemeni Jewish father, that funded Mohammed’s Armies of Conquest.
Well done to Richard Eldred and the DS for featuring this important article from the Daily Mail about Muslim Child Bride Merchants, because it ties in directly with the similar Sikh/Hindu practice of Navrati or Kumari Puja that was also in the news yesterday, because of complaints about the noise of the ten-day celebration in London coming up in September.
Plans for 10-day Hindu festival in north London face backlash over noise and disruption fears
In this religious Sikh/Hindu festival, little “virgin girls” aged from 1-12 are dressed up to represent the fertility goddess Durga, and each one is publicly worshipped as the goddess. In fact, the festival is a Child Bride Market. Have a look at the photos online here:
kumari puja ages of girls – Search Images
The site has, of course, been banned? Polygamy, incitement to violence? Of course it has been banned and the perpetrators interviewed in preparation for prosecution …
I wonder if it also quotes the hadiths that say a woman should always be sexually available to her husband, even on the back of camel and that your wife is like your tillage, enter into her however you please. Does this mean that forced anal sex is fine in Islam?
Yes. People need to understand that only the VICTIMS of Sodomite Rape can be thrown off high buildings, because only they are considered “guilty” of “Tempting the Innocent Rapists”. The same goes for male and female human victims of Sodomite Rape, or any kind of rape, as well as animal victims. All religiously sanctioned by Islam.
Islam says you can rape a goat, for example, but you are forbidden to eat the meat from that goat, which must be sold in another town to unsuspecting buyers.
Ban it as a terrorist organisation.
So how come the people behind this web site aren’t in jail alongside Lucy Connelly? Oh yeah….