Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

Before Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu began bombing the absolute Shi’ite out of them, the hardline mullahs of Iran had other matters on their minds, such as whether or not to ban dogs from the Islamic Republic. In early June, it was reported the nation’s governing clerics had expanded an embargo on pet-owners walking their canines in several Iranian cities, the animals being deemed ‘un-Islamic’, a living, four-legged symbol of Western cultural imperialism.

Just like with those other scripturally inferior creatures known as women, the precise status of dogs in Islam is highly contentious: harmless loyal companions for a man throughout life, or diseased, flea-ridden vectors of corruption on Earth? Although there has never been an outright blanket ban on dogs in Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, citizens are only really supposed to own them for limited, practical reasons: as guard-animals, sheep-herders, hunting-companions, guide-dogs or meals-of-last-resort. Copying infidel kuffar by keeping them purely as pets for family entertainment is frowned upon by officials as a sign you are a bad Muslim.


To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.

There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hester
Hester
9 months ago

The British may be upset about the rape and torture of little white girls, but try and take their dogs away and there will be literally rioting in every town.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
9 months ago
Reply to  Hester

To be honest with you, I’m not even sure about that any more. There seems to be very little resistance in the British public to anything these days, as it was evident during the Covid crisis. Just some quiet grumbling and resignation from a small section of society, enthusiastic compliance from the majority.

happycake78
happycake78
9 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

i think that dogs will be the line.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
9 months ago

The problem is that the modern world is so increasingly absurd and insane, something like a campaign to ban dogs does not even seem that extreme.
The history of the last century gives us so many examples of total absurdity, it’s not like something similarly crazy would be unprecedented.
Just looking back, within my lifetime (I’m 58), if someone had told me 40 years ago that one day two blokes would be able to get married legally, I would have thought it was some bizarre joke. (My opinion has not changed, by the way.)
If someone had told me that confused teenagers will be chemically and surgically castrated in government funded institutions, I would have thought it was some dystopian nightmare.
If someone had told me that in Britain a large number of girls will be mass raped by Muslims and the authorities will cover up for them, I would have thought you were insane.
Shall I continue?
So a call for a total ban on dogs…? Not even that extreme.

A. Contrarian
9 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Exactly – you just can’t tell what’s real and what isn’t any more. No wonder people get caught up in “conspiracy theories”. After all, people being confined to their houses and fined 10k for meeting a friend in the park while a nasty flu virus was going round would certainly have seemed like madness if someone had suggested it 10 years ago…

Another example – Putin is going to block out the sun and starve us all, scientists are going to block out the sun and save us all, but only crazy far right thugs believe in chemtrails and weather manipulation.

JeremyP99
9 months ago

We’ve had a couple of West African Muslims stay with us

They loved our dogs.

Freddy Boy
9 months ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

With a nice bottle of Chianti !!..

Jay Smith
Jay Smith
9 months ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

i saw an RSPCA advert saying “A dog is for life, not just for Christmas”. Underneath was written – “Last year we had a turkey, and it lasted until the New Year”!

Mogwai
9 months ago

I call BS. Islam seems to be chock-full of contradictions. A big example is why some Muslim women seem to be fully, partially or not covered at all, and dress just like Western women, albeit keeping their arms and legs covered. You can’t exactly reference the Koran when there’s this amount of inconsistencies. Another is that they need to pray multiple times per day. No they do not. I’ve worked with enough of them over the years, and some of them rarely even go inside a mosque. Spend a few mins on the ‘net and you’ll see proof that Muslims keeping dogs as pets, not just as working animals, are actually a thing; ”Sheikh Hamdan is known as a kind leader, who is also compassionate to animals. He often shares photos with animals. In 2022, Sheikh Hamdan had rescued a stray dog, which was brutally shot with air gun pellets. The Dubai Crown Prince adopted the Saluki-mix and named her Grace, and she recovered under his care.” https://gulfnews.com/uae/sheikh-hamdan-picks-name-for-female-puppy-after-asking-residents-for-suggestion-1.1732007087730 The royals in the UAE seem to be big animal lovers and show compassion to dogs who have been mistreated; ”The owner was “heartbroken” to see his canines in such poor condition,… Read more »

Jaguar
Jaguar
9 months ago

Some years ago I read of dogs being poisoned in muslim areas.

ItsHere
ItsHere
9 months ago

Don’t forget that there are some white people who are against the keeping of pets. A violation of their human rights or something.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago
Reply to  ItsHere

True. I am “a white person who is against the keeping of pets”, and zoos.

It is one thing to raise livestock to eat, because we have to eat something, and our digestive systems were made for carnivorous and omnivorous diets.

But keeping an animal captive just for your own entertainment, as a pet or in a zoo, is unnatural, unnecessary, cruel to the animal, and often very harmful or even fatal to the human. It is also horrific depravity in millions of humans who practice bestiality, what they like to call “zoophilia”, like “paedophilia”, “love of animals” and “love of children”, but both should be renamed, because “love” has nothing to do with it.

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
9 months ago

I recently stayed in a very nice small hotel which diplayed a notice saying that owing to the appalling behaviour of some guests they would only accept bookings from people whose dogs could vouch for them.

psychedelia smith
9 months ago

In Gloucester, dog grooming vans are being spat at and their occupants harassed and abused by ‘local’ Muslims. That’s from a mobile dog groomer.

Mogwai
9 months ago

It would appear Gloucester has a different kind of grooming problem.😶

Rusty123
Rusty123
9 months ago

Tbf, they can whinge all they like, but this is a christian based country, wether church goer or not, it is also an animal loving country, including dogs, so if muslims do not like this tough, although I know muslims that do have dogs, but as with all things, some are devout, some are not.

Gezza England
Gezza England
9 months ago

A friend of mine lives in the rapidly being overrun Morden in S London and has a dog. When she walks it in her nearby park as she has done for decades – well, not always the same dog – she now gets the letterbox crowd tut tutting so I suspect that there is truth in this. I would see it in the same vein as the mass adoption of religious dress here that they would not wear back home as a means to rub our noses in it as their political religion infects our country further every day.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Years ago, there was an article by a woman who described visiting her loved ones’ graves in a cemetery, only to be harassed by Muslims who brought their dogs there to defecate on the Christian graves. When she gathered courage to remonstrate with them, they sneered that it didn’t matter because they were dead. They found it all amusing.

Imagine their reaction if she had done the same to a Muslim grave.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago

1) All dogs should be muzzled in public, especially on public transport, as in some European countries, and all dog owners whose dogs attack people or livestock should be fined and thrown into jail, and the dog put down.

2) If only pet owners realized the array of diseases like scleroderma and toxoplasmosis their pets are transmitting to them, they would just stop being so foolish.

3) If only pet owners who “love” their pets would try to see the pet’s life from the pet’s point of view, they would see their own unconscious, well-intentioned, appalling cruelty.

4) I detest dogs, attacking and killing people and livestock. And cats killing billions of wild creatures for fun every year. What is the point of keeping an animal in your house?

BedfordRL
9 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Good grief!

Borneodann
Borneodann
9 months ago

There’s a Hadith that tells the story of a woman of ill-repute finding a sick dog. In compassion for the dying animal, she filled her shoe with water to give it a drink. The Prophet pbuh declared that she would automatically enter paradise for her kindness. Go figure!