News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
9 months ago

“Rachel Reeves is poised to unveil a cut to the tax-free cash Isa allowance in a bid to encourage British savers to invest in London-listed firms and breathe life into the UK’s ailing capital markets”

Well surely the money invested in cash ISAs is lent out by banks to to individuals and also to firms? It doesn’t just sit there. Isn’t that how fractional reserve banking works?

stewart
9 months ago

“Death to the IDF” does not mean death to Jews. Jews are one thing, The IDF are another thing. I don’t care what people people think that bloke meant or didn’t mean. To equate everything that has some Jewish link or can somehow be associated to Jewish people to the entirety of Jewish people is dangerous.

Where does it end?

Will criticising Netanyahu be anti-semitism? At this rate it seems like it’s just a question of time.

chesterbear
chesterbear
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

It clearly does means death to jews as most jews have no choice but to serve in the wonderful IDF. Pure jew hatred.

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  chesterbear

I’m not sure if your comment is serious or sarcastic.

Obviously, not all Jews have to serve in the IDF. Most Israelis of a certain age do, but Jews and Israelis are not the same thing.

There are about 16 million Jewish people in the world of which less than half are Israeli.

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  chesterbear

Agreed. And why would the Trump admin want such human trash in the country? Fair play to them for taking this approach. Check out the BS statement from ‘Bob the Nob’;

Leo Terrell, Head of the DOJ Task Force to Combat Antisemitism:

“Getting a visa is a privilege. That man incites violence — and under the Trump administration, we’re not gonna allow that.”

https://x.com/EYakoby/status/1939829785393602950

JohnK
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Correct, in principle. After all, there are many Jews who may disapprove of the activities of the Israel administration – perhaps even some of the Israeli citizens. Conflating criticism of the IDF activities with anti-semitism is a deliberate tactic, promoted via the usual suspects. Whether it will stand up in court may depend on the politics of a jury, at the end of the day.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  stewart

It is a metaphor, and it is easier to rhyme than “Jews”.

stewart
9 months ago

The problem is that the moment we start mind reading and making our own interpretations of what people mean, we’ll, where does THAT end?

Ive watched the footage and my interpretation is that the bloke is a vapid idiot who thinks he is being an edgy artist but is actually not edgy.and not an artist but a that.

But that’s my interpretation. I don’t mean to impose it on anyone.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  stewart

Entirely the point I have been making for years on here about all the Putin mindreaders, who tell us he is planning to take over Europe and nuke us all.
With regard to Pascal, I think the message behind him on the stage was perfectly clear that it was meant to cover the entire country of Israel and not just the military forces.And the fact that he is not well endowed in the brain department doesn’t excuse him one jot

stewart
9 months ago

Who is excusing him?

The issue is, do you lock people up for saying things, even horrid ones, or not.

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

He certainly wasn’t shouting for love, peace and harmony was he now? “River to the sea”
means total eradication of isreal!

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

So?

I dont like it or agree, to say the least, but do you want a society in which people who say things you don’t like are shut up or worse prosecuted and imprisoned?

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

I think the answer to your question as far as many here are concerned is yes. They don’t like the way the speech laws are currently enforced because they favour left wing views, but their solution to that is to replace that with enforcement they agree with.

This article, on which comments have been disabled, seems to agree: Might the BBC’s Tim Davie Soon Find Himself Replacing Lucy Connolly in Jail? – The Daily Sceptic

stewart
9 months ago

The revenge instinct or just too stupid to see their own hypocrisy?

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Trying to be charitable, neither. I think some just think that what they believe is right and proper, and in some future world people who agree with them will be in charge and institutions will once more be worthy of trust.

stewart
9 months ago

So stupid then, because that’s pretty much what the people who don’t object too much to the treatment of Connelly think, including astonishingly the last bit in which they think institutions are controlled by right wing, borderline fascists shilling for corporations and need to be purged of them so they can be worthy of trust again.

I know because I’ve spoken to such people. Ordinary people, not lefty, radical, studenty types.

The landscape really is pretty bleak out there.

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

If not stupid then optimistic/naive.

Yes I know lots of such people.

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Unfortunately many people like the idea of free speech, but not if they have to hear things they don’t like… as far as I’m concerned, they can say what they like (which may not be a wise move, depending on where you choose to say it, but that’s a fact of real life, or used to be). Say what you like, but you may lose your teeth in the process – natural selection, if you like…

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

So??
Calling for the total eradication of any country or population is the definition of genocide!

AbsolutelyNot
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

I think it’s just not our way in the West to chant “Death to whatever” and, while I don’t think the guy deserves to be imprisoned, it would clearly be another example of two-tier justice if he isn’t.

The fact that the BBC didn’t stop the transmission on the other hand is completely unacceptable, so I’m really hoping there will be serious repercussions.

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

I agree the double standard is appalling.
But, I don’t agree the BBC should switch the programme off. I don’t need the BBC nannying me, shielding me from things that it seems I shouldn’t hear.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  stewart

You may not have been brought up in the nanny stae but many of the mindless idiots who were chanting along with him were, and they definitely need a broader education than they are getting from today’s nanny state.

For a fist full of roubles

PS Not meaning to make any assumptions about your age or education.

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

People need to check out his 2min preamble for context, then it becomes even more obvious why the US have banned his sorry Jew-hating ( oops, anti-Zionist! ) arse from entering, consequently that’s 26 gigs over there cancelled, because spreading and encouraging hate must have consequences;

”In all the furore about #BobVylan, most people have conveniently forgotten that the ranting was preceded by a rabidly antisemitic story – live on the BBC – about his former Jewish boss, who he called “a f*cking Zionist” and “bald-headed c*nt”.
We know what you meant, Pascal.”

https://x.com/londonette/status/1939653789117809060

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

If the chant had been from a ‘far right’ audience I reckon the usual left wing suspects would have accused them of using a ‘dog whistle’. That is a softer form of words standing in for other words that might attract more criticism. Nudge nudge, wink wink, know what I mean?

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

What if he’d started a ”Death to the British Army” chant? I wonder how many of the audience would have joined in. Probably many because they’re predominantly made up of Lefty muppets that just follow the crowd like sheep. I also wonder if Tim Davie would’ve seen fit to broadcast it.
I’d just be made up if an act started chanting ”Free, free the hostages” or ”Death to Hamas”. I’d love to see the reaction that got! lol But as long as Jews/Israelis are the target, not many seem to give a shit. Hate speech is minimized and dressed up as ‘free speech’. I wonder how many Jews are ‘free speech absolutists’..

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

But as long as Jews/Israelis are the target, not many seem to give a shit

Are you serious?

I can’t think of a group of 16 million people of which a bigger fuss is made than the Jewish people. In both directions, in both a positive and a negative way.

Jewish people get a lot of stick. But they also have many people looking out for them, some very powerful.

To say not many give a shit is a gross misrepresentation of reality.

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

“I can’t think of a group of 16 million people of which a bigger fuss is made than the Jewish people.” Are you for real? So these continuous mass public protests calling for the death of Jews and the eradication of Israel as a Jewish state ( we know what “Intifada” and “From the river to the sea” is code for by now ) are just Scotch mist, are they? Tell me, where are the equivalent protests against the insidious creep of radical Islam and subsequent Islamification of the British Isles? Sure, there are ‘patriotic protests’, but is anyone brave enough to wave placards publicly stating “Islam out!”, “Death to Islamist extremists!” or “F**k off Sharia”? And I wonder why that is… 🤔 I can certainly think of a group of people for whom a bigger fuss is made, a way bigger group, who appear to have the majority of those in authority, as well as countless useful idiots, wrapped around their little finger. I’ll give you a clue: they hate Jews and will come chop your head off if you show a picture of their paedo prophet. It would appear that we both have different interpretations of what a… Read more »

stewart
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

You obviously missed the part I wrote saying a big fuss in both directions.

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Switch off their access to social media while there, and 95% of them won’t be able to receive todays instructions about what they are angry about today…

JDee
JDee
9 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Whipping a crowd up to mindlessly chant death to xxxx any group of people, crosses the line in any civilised society. I doubt disciplined armies even do this, they evoke inspirational ideas of justice and honour instead, they do not want soldiers to identify with a sub human chant .

Myra
9 months ago

For anyone interested in how your tax is being spent, I looked into the government’s procurement of 5 million doses of H5N8 bird flu vaccines for humans.
https://open.substack.com/pub/myrauk/p/avian-influenza-uk-government-procures?r=ylgqf&utm_medium=ios

CGW
CGW
9 months ago
Reply to  Myra

Good, tenacious work against Britain’s bureaucracy. I am sure you did not expect to succeed but maybe you can achieve more publicity, especially after a year has passed when one may question how many vaccines were actually administered.

Myra
9 months ago
Reply to  CGW

Good question. I expect it to be close to zero…

Jay Arrow
Jay Arrow
9 months ago

From BrexitFacts4EU.org
Public engagement on a scale rarely seenOver recent days, more than 100,000 people engaged with Facts4EU.Org and SovereignUK.Org coverage, sharing articles, emailing MPs, and making calls. In the 10th year since Facts4EU launched, no topic has prompted more activity in such a short time.
Voters cared. Westminster did not.
In one of the most extraordinary evenings in recent parliamentary history, MPs and peers agreed to let a minister control part of the country’s business according to a post-Brexit EU regulation. They did so without proper scrutiny – and with no debate in the Commons before the vote was rushed through.
Around 8pm on Monday, the Commons voted by 315 to 4 to approve the Marking of Retail Goods Regulations 2025, a measure imposing EU-derived labelling requirements across Great Britain, as well as in Northern Ireland.
Just hours later, the House of Lords debated and approved the same measure, with 9 peers – all from Northern Ireland – the only ones to say No.

Tonka Rigger
9 months ago
Reply to  Jay Arrow

Ah yes, democracy at work.

However, it may well be (and I haven’t read the Bill so I don’t know for certain), that this EU regulation refers to the mandatory labelling of foods which contain GM ingredients, in which case it is to be welcomed with open arms.

I don’t have a problem with the UK choosing to adopt some EU regulations, because amazing as it may seem, some of them are actually quite good – gems in the spoil heap, if you like.

So long as we do not have to adopt them all, or have to go along with the ECHR, then all good.

CGW
CGW
9 months ago

My apologies to all concerned for having royally screwed up the comments section of the article “Criminal Investigation Launched into Bob Vylan and Kneecap’s Glastonbury Performances …” last night. A link I provided, which worked fine on my home computer, apparently wreaked havoc.

I was unable to edit my input and I could not find any way to contact the DS editors, so I eventually found an old Toby Young e-mail address and wrote him an e-mail, but it was late at night and he presumably receives piles of e-mails each day.

Anyway, apologies all round again and I will avoid using URLs in future (assuming I am not thrown off the website!).

Have a good day.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago

Yesterday’s great news about Rupert Lowe launching, NOT a political party, but a movement welcoming members of all political parties or none: RESTORE BRITAIN, was dampened a bit by the Relentless, Nauseating Pakistani Ben Habib deliberately announcing, on the very same day, his own new “Me,Me,Me Party to Make Me,Me,Me Prime Minister”, having quickly changed the name from “Integrity”, which nobody wanted to join, to “Advance UK”, in close imitation of Rupert Lowe’s movement name.

I hope people watching Habib’s launch video will finally awaken to his true nature, after desperately trying to ride into power on Nigel Farage’s coat-tails, then on Rupert Lowe’s coat-tails, offering Rupert a place in Habib’s Me,Me,Me party (which Rupert very wisely refused), and now trying to draw people away from Rupert. Habib’s obsessive actions are a bit worrying, because Envy always turns into Hatred.

Stephen Wolfe on Dan Wooton’s Outspoken show also made some very useful comments, pointing out that Nigel has always been a member on the fringes of the Elite Club, but not accepted enough to suit him, and that he did expect to be rewarded with a knighthood for hobbling both UKIP and Brexit to hand the Tories a massive majority.

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Do you know, I think they’re trying to prepare a way to soften their stance on Letby to allow for a “Well these are the real culprits gov, new we can let her go and not lose face”!

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I hope you’re right!

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago

Pride group founder, 42, who raped boy he met on Grindr is jailed” – The founder of a Pride group, who raped an “extremely vulnerable” boy who he met on Grindr, has been jailed for 24 years”

I don’t understand the difference between these two things:

1) Depraved White Paedophile who lured ONE 12-year-old boy with drugs and raped him was jailed for 24 YEARS. That is JUSTICE.

2) Depraved Pakistani Muslim Paedophiles who lured THOUSANDS of 11-13 year-old girls with drugs and Gang-Raped them were usually jailed for 4-5 YEARS EACH. That is a TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago

While everyone is focused on Israel, spare a thought for your local postie, because this is Royal Mail’s annual DOG AWARENESS WEEK.

The UK cities where postal workers are most at risk from dog attacks | UK | News | Express.co.uk

“She told the BBC: “The dog jumped up at me and bit me three times just above the right knee. When I looked down, I could see the flesh on my leg hanging.”

She added: “I started screaming and the owner and his daughter came rushing out. I also startled the dog as it ran back into the house. I had to do my own first aid as the man and his daughter were crying.”

“Since the attack, she says she has developed a deep fear of dogs.

She said, “If I hear or see a dog now—any dog—I’ll freeze. I’ll literally stop and wait until the owner walks past me because there’s no way I’m taking a chance.”

“I feel as though I have to be ready to fight off an attack rather than it happen and I’m not aware.”