Trees Get Bigger Around the World Thanks to Higher CO2 Levels
Recent scientific investigation, curiously missing from constant mainstream media reports of ecological Armageddon, confirms that trees are getting larger around the world due to higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide fertilisation. A little extra of the gas of life, nature’s bountiful plant food, has led to bigger trees and more leaf growth over the last few decades. The recent small recovery in the near-denuded level of CO2 that was a threat to plant and human life on Earth has led to an astonishing 15%-plus increase in overall global vegetation growth in the last 40 years. Plants including trees have evolved to thrive in levels of atmospheric CO2 about three times higher than the current 420 parts per million (ppm) and scientific evidence is clearly showing rising levels are leading to faster growth in flora that is both healthier and more resistant to nature’s hazards such as drought.
Fascinating results are starting to emerge from a controlled Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) experiment conducted since 2017 by the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research. This involved increasing CO2 levels to 550 ppm across patches of a 180-year old Oak forest in Staffordshire, England. When compared to controlled plots without the CO2 boost, it was found that oaks fed with the extra plant food showed growth rates that were an astonishing 10% higher in the period 2017-2023. Most of the growth is attributed to wood production. Compared to trees making do with the current 420 ppm, the boosted oaks are estimated to have produced an additional 1.7 tonnes of dry matter per hectare per year.
Early results also show that mature oak trees increased their photosynthesis rate by up to 33% due to the elevated CO2 levels, particularly in strong sunlight. Capture of CO2 by wood rather than leaves means the sequestration will be longer lasting. The carbon-nitrogen ratio in leaves remained stable and this suggests the trees adapt easily by redirecting nutrients or absorbing more nitrogen from the soil. Of course these results illustrate that sequestration of CO2 is a natural process and it has been ongoing for at least 600 million years. Much higher levels of CO2, for which there is no evidence of a causal link with runaway temperatures, have been gradually reduced with a recent low point of 280 ppm in the pre-industrial age, skirting with ecological disaster at the dead-planet level of around 150 ppm.
FACE experiments are not new and have been used to assess CO2 growth rates in trees in a number of locations. A long-term project in the Duke pine forest in Orange County, North Carolina found higher annual growth of 27% when trees were fumigated with another 200 ppm dose of CO2. In this case, photosynthetic rates by canopy foliage increased by up to 50% while the actual size of the trees, or the basal area increment, was stimulated by between 13-27%.
It seems that wherever you look, gluttonous trees around the world have been bulking up on CO2 at both existing levels and those set in experiments. A recent article published by a group of researchers working out of Ohio State University found that over the last 50 years in 10 forest groups, all types except Aspen Birch increased their per-hectare volume. Between 1970 and 2015, trees produced a 20-30% increase in biomass compared to trees from 30 years prior. The study suggested that all those porky pines and poplars were sequestering about 700-800 million tons of CO2 a year in the US, equivalent to roughly 10-13% of the country’s total CO2 emissions.
If running scared of CO2 is your political thing, this news should be most welcome. Tree planting is all the virtuous rage to justify elite ‘business-as-usual’ lifestyles, but the heavy and natural greening of the planet is not generally mentioned in polite mainstream society. Carbon dioxide is seen as a ‘devil gas’ and the need to promote the Net Zero fantasy leads to an odd and skewed understanding of its benefits. In the UK, this has led to the Mad Miliband setting up a ridiculous scheme to ‘capture’ pitiful amounts of CO2 and lock it up for ever more at a cost of £22 billion.
At least regular readers of the Daily Sceptic are not remaining uninformed about the staggering amounts of vegetation growth and de-desertification that is occurring as CO2 levels show a small recovery from the near-death experience in recent historical times. Recently, two scientists in Spain found a “striking” growth in global greening. A significant portion of Earth’s terrestrial land surface was said to show a measurable increase in vegetation cover over the last four decades. Meanwhile, crop yields have soared in the last 60 years helped by hydrocarbon-produced fertiliser and increased CO2, while deserts are reducing in places such as the southern Sahara. While kids in the Western world are sent to bed crying with their brainwashed heads full of Attenborough-style agitprop, at least many children in less developed parts of the world have slightly fuller bellies.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Climate activists will use the fact that CO2 improves plant growth as evidence that a small amount of a trace gas does indeed have the capacity to affect the planet. They will insist that our CO2 does indeed cause climate change. But when it comes to plant growth we can see the evidence. When it comes to global warming there is no evidence that CO2 is causing or will dangerous changes to the climate. Climate models may project all manner of climate changes but models are not evidence of anything. —–Climate Change is mostly POLITICS. CO2 is the one gas that can be directly tied to Industrial Capitalism and that is what this agenda is really about, with climate as the seemingly plausible excuse that most of the public are falling for.
Actually the Climatron Idiotocracy are saying that the greening of the Planet due to increased CO2 from fossil fuels is an ecological disaster.
The wrong vegetation (not approved by Climate Loonie Central) is growing in all the wrong places and disrupting the ubiquitous ”delicate” ecosystems so worshipped by the Loonies.
They insist only their trees are premissable to “mop up” the excess C02 from fossil fuels.
But if their tree planting is successful, won’t it mean their trees will stop growing, die even?
Note: the enterprises which offer the CO2 offset tree-planting, first clear large tracts of ground, destroying vegetation, using herbicides and in the process killing off fauna. Then the ground must be kept free of opportunistic vegetation which otherwise would compete with the little, tree plants – again use of herbicide. Usually non-native, but quick growing trees are planted. In any case, it take 60 to 80 years to recover the CO2 emitted by burning a tree or an equivalent amount of fossil fuel. But we must act NOW!
It’s environmentalism Jim, but not as we know it.
Cut them all down and burn them to save the planet!
This must be a a bad thing I suppose. Larger trees will make too much oxygen! No, wait, they’ll use up too much oxygen! Maybe they’ll even use up too much carbon dioxide! They’ll become unstable and fall on our heads! They’re going to take over the world!!!
Triffids! Yikes!
I read a long time ago that high CO2 levels may also have contributed to the size of dinosaurs and insects hundreds of millions of years ago.
It was higher oxygen levels up around 25%. See Nick Lane, “Oxygen”.
Something else that isn’t new is the use of increased levels in some greenhouses, when gas fired heating is in use. Done by using some of the exhaust gas, rather than just chucking it out. Natural gas burns quite clean if there is enough oxygen available.
Incidentally, I wonder if they would have used the term “natural gas” to market the new fuel now, like they did in the 1970s?
It would now be called Planet killing Gas, or Dirty Fossil Gas
In fact many commercial green houses have special apparatus with C02 tanks which realease CO2 to regulate the atmosphere inside to within 1 000ppm and 1 200ppm.
Plants grow quicker, more healthy and require less water and fertiliser.
Global greening will hit the mainstream once some crackpot comes up with a theory that links plant growth with some kind of perceived hazard.
We should call all Eco Zealots and Net Zero nutters Plant Haters.
We get called enough names, see how they like it!
This should mean that we should be seeing the changes showing up in Yield Class which is rate of which trees grow and means we can harvest them quicker then replant the next crop.
You are right. Yield Class increases of around 2 tonnes/ha/year (after the last 30-40 years) on around 12-16 for pine/fir/spruce are credited to better forest management and genetic selection of planting seedlings. The forest industry is so invested in the threat from demon CO2 and their own virtuous position in its sequestration that suggesting CO2 might be the main benefit would be heresy
The logarithmic diminution of the warming effectiveness of CO2
https://edmhdotme.wpcomstaging.com/minimal-future-warming-from-co2-ch4-n2o/
It just makes the world greener !!!