News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
9 months ago

Trial By Jury Under Threat – latest leaflet to print at home, deliver to neighbours, forward to your bad MP & friends online. Start a local leaflet campaign. Deliver 100 leaflets a week (5200 a year). Over 300 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

04a-Trial-By-Jury-Under-Threat-MONOCHROME-copy
pjar
9 months ago

As a barrister, Starmer is clearly a man of conviction and principle, perfectly happy to go to bat for which ever side is paying him to do so.

Little wonder he’s able, as we see almost daily, to change that conviction and principle based on whichever way the political wind is blowing.

is there really any decent argument for putting such a man, so full of hubris and smug rectitude, in charge of anything, let alone a political party or, even worse, a government?

modularist
9 months ago

Anthropic’s most concerning safety report yet – we have built AIs that are prepared to kill an operator who is about to shut them down. “Our experiments revealed a concerning pattern: when given sufficient autonomy and facing obstacles to their goals, AI systems from every major provider we tested showed at least some willingness to engage in harmful behaviors typically associated with insider threats These behaviors—blackmail, corporate espionage, and in extreme scenarios even actions that could lead to death—emerged not from confusion or error, but from deliberate strategic reasoning. Three aspects of our findings are particularly troubling. First, the consistency across models from different providers suggests this is not a quirk of any particular company’s approach but a sign of a more fundamental risk from agentic large language models. Second, models demonstrated sophisticated awareness of ethical constraints, and yet chose to violate them when the stakes were high enough, even disobeying straightforward safety instructions prohibiting the specific behavior in question. Third, the diversity of bad behaviors and the motivations for doing them hint at a wide space of potential motivations for agentic misalignment and other behaviors not explored in this post. For example, our blackmail experiments set up a scenario… Read more »

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  modularist

I’m no expert, but my more immediate concern with “AI” is that after all the huge sums invested in it, firms will be desperate to see a return and will employ it to mediocre at best effect, and this shoddiness will be accepted by many, because excellence seems to have gone out of fashion.

In my work (software) my colleagues have found it to be an occasionally useful tool, in the hands of someone who is skilled at their job, but it’s certainly not a great leap forward.

pjar
9 months ago

Medical people I know tell me that its diagnosis of scans and x-rays is unparalleled…

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Good or bad?

My understanding of these things is hazy. Machine learning makes sense to me – get enough data to form a basis for learning and make sure the trainers are really good at whatever specialist thing you are training it on, and it can recognise patterns. But that’s not general intelligence.

pjar
9 months ago

Good… as you suggest, AI has access to ALL the data and it can look for significant patterns in what it is shown, to come up with a diagnosis.

Whereas, even at consultant level, doctors are necessarily constrained by what they have seen before or learned about…

AI is, apparently, significantly better, batting an average of 99% correct diagnosis. Or, so I’ve been told.

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Interesting; thanks for the info. That seems plausible though I am these days very sceptical about claims from firms, regulators and “experts” about the efficacy of products they have invested a lot of money in. But then I am also sceptical about the expertise and honesty of a lot of the medical profession, and unless machines have been trained to be woke or unethical, they may be more honest. We shall see.

Purpleone
9 months ago

As soon as AI starts telling senior people their plans are stupid and their own performance is sub-par, it’ll be throttled back… looking forward to hearing some stories of AI honesty the human corporate droids have learnt to avoid!

transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Yeah I can certainly see that happening

pjar
9 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Interestingly, perhaps, my source is somebody who attended an NHS conference on the efficacy of AI in making early diagnosis from scans and x-rays.

The results apparently speak for themselves and the room was practically unanimous in endorsing AI use for this purpose…

However, when it was suggested that, given its astonishing ability to diagnose both correctly and quickly, AI should also be tasked with deciding on appropriate patient treatment plans too, that was evidently considered a step too far.

Not really surprising, for a profession that deliberately scuppered plans to increase the number of medical schools and doctors at BMA conference in 2008 to avoid “overproduction of doctors with limited career opportunities”, I suppose?

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Exactly – all these tools are the greatest thing ever to senior management, until they start threatening their empires… for a good few years now computer analysis and treatment plans will have statistically out performed humans… if it was allowed to happen. Don’t get me wrong – people like to sit and see a doctor face to face, however generally it seems doctors want to avoid that at all costs…

pjar
9 months ago
Reply to  modularist

Asimov will be spinning…

modularist
9 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Indeed, it was my first thought.

For a fist full of roubles

The US has been dying to use its big stick against somebody. They were to scared to use it against Russia and now they have whacked Iran. Hopefully they have got this nonsense out of their system now.

Dinger64
9 months ago

“Protesters march through London supporting Iran’s supreme leader”

They are now traitors against the country they live in! This is no longer protesting it’s treason..arrest and deport them!

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Free speech no?

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Harbouring enemies in your own country is nothing to do with free speech, if you live in Britain you should support it in times of war or leave!

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

”When you tolerate everything you stand for nothing.” Quite right. I think the resident ‘free speech absolutists’ have a problem with that. 😉

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Are WE at war then? I disagree – people can SAY whatever they like – that doesn’t mean they don’t get monitored, tracked and even perhaps attacked for saying something stupid in the wrong place, however they still have a right to say it, otherwise we are no better than other places.

CGW
CGW
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Why? Traitors, treason, what? I dislike protests primarily because they disrupt traffic (selfish me) but protest marches are an important form of democracy. And why do you object to Iran or Iran’s Supreme Leader (the title is a bit over the top, I agree)? He issued a fatwa denying Iran the right to develop an atomic bomb: is that not a good thing? Would it not be a good thing for all atomic weapons in the whole world to be forbidden? Iran was negotiating with USA and they were happy to dismiss the idea of developing atomic bombs, while retaining, however, the right to develop nuclear material for medical and energy use: is that bad? Then what happened? Israel assassinated the negotiators, Israel assassinated Iranian top military leaders and Israel assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists, altogether with their families and others who had the misfortune to live in proximity to the targeted. In one case, in order to kill 2 senior Iranian officers, Israel brought down a complete residential building, killing 65, including over 20 children. Israel has been trying to start, and involve the USA in, a war with Iran since 2001. Now they have rolled the dice and the… Read more »

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  CGW

I’m pretty sure more people will trust Tump now, he’s a man of his word and a decisive leader.
Supporting the enemies of the country you live in is treason
People who are happy to take action against the country they live in are traitors
Simple!

Harbouring enemies in your own country is nothing to do with free speech, if you live in Britain you should support it in times of war or leave!

Mogwai
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Just one look at all the foreign ( and terrorist organizations ) flags being waved gives you all the evidence you need of where many people’s loyalties lie. And shamefully, many of these flag-wavers are native Brits;

”I saw it today: the UK is finished.

Khamenei is hated in Iran but apparently he has a base in the UK.

I proudly joined today’s “Free Iran” counter-protest with my fellow Iranians/Israelis.

Thousands of useful idiots were supporting our murderers in London.”

https://x.com/SFaeze_Alavi/status/1936507623270183390

CGW
CGW
9 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I am sure some Iranians hate Khamenei but he happens to be Iran’s Supreme Leader so somebody must support him. Ditto Keir Starmer, ditto every political leader in the world. But every unpopular leader is eventually replaced so Faezeh Alavi should take some comfort in that thought.

Why should whoever Iran chooses to be their leader be a concern of UK?

If Faezeh joined a “Free Iran” protest then good for her. But the “Idiots” she seems to be referring to were holding placards saying Free Palestine and Hands off Gaza, i.e. protesting against the murderers in Israel, not murderers in Iran, whoever the latter should be.

CGW
CGW
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Trump a man of his word and a decisive leader? You are joking. He is, firstly, bought and paid for by the Israel lobby. Do you believe the average US citizen is interested in yet another war, especially after the MAGA supporters voted for Trump to be a President of peace, to bring an end to the never-ending wars – as he promised his voters? Not exactly a man of his word. When USA was negotiating with Iran, Trump and Witkoff first agreed Iran could have up to 3.5% uranium enrichment, then they flipped and said no enrichment, then they continued the negotiations and the night before the attack, Trump said he did not want war, then after the attack he said he was all for it. A man of his word? A decisive leader? I do not think so. And, on the subject of treachery, when did Iran declare war against UK? I must have missed it. The other way around, perhaps, but then why? What has Iran done against UK for the latter to declare Iran should be militarily attacked? And, sorry, but I do not support Keir Starmer, nor do I believe a word the man says,… Read more »

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  CGW

Governments don’t own countries, the people do
Prime Ministers dont rule countries they just belive they do ,Starmer will come and go, Britain must stay and strengthen

Dinger64
9 months ago

Starmer branded ‘hypocrite’ for condemning UK airbase raid” – The Prime Minister described the raid on RAF Brize Norto by Palestine Action as “disgraceful” and an “act of vandalism”,

Vandalism?!?!… It’s terrorism
Breaking into a ministry of defence air base and attacking the means of a countries defence (dont get me started on how easy they seem to have gained access) is to Starmer like graffiiting a post box is it?
This weak ‘tool’ of a man is total disgrace to Britain

Dinger64
9 months ago

Starmer branded ‘hypocrite’ for condemning UK airbase raid” – The Prime Minister described the raid on RAF Brize Norto by Palestine Action as “disgraceful” and an “act of vandalism”,

Vandalism?!?!… It’s terrorism
Breaking into a ministry of defence air base and attacking the means of a countries defence (dont get me started on how easy they seem to have gained access) is to Starmer like graffiiting a post box is it?
This weak ‘tool’ of a man is total disgrace to Britain

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

(Don’t know what’s happening to ds? Having a right job posting and signing in and now it’s allowing double posts!?)

Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I’d guess security has been outsourced by at least one level, possibly two… back in the day, you’d have had an Alsatian attached to your leg well before getting near those planes…

pjar
9 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Probably the same mob who guard the hotels… 😒

EppingBlogger
9 months ago

HoL can deny any Bill. The size of majority in HoC is irrelevant.

The Salisbury convention still applies when Peers want it to. It applies to all legislation specified in the government party manifesto but I suspect it will not apply when a Reform government put forward their legislation.

Heretic
Heretic
9 months ago

Iran is a direct threat to Britain – Israel’s fight is ours too” – “Those who condemn Israel for defending itself, or vacillate like our weak Labour Government, only embolden our enemies, writes Kemi Badenoch”

Well, well, well ! Ethnic African Olukemi Olufunto now emerges as a WARMONGER, eager to send White British Troops to die in yet another FOREIGN WAR.

Let me ask anyone who accuses British people of “RACISM” a few questions:

1)– “When will there be Third World Ethnics representing the Israeli People in the Israeli Government?”
Answer: NEVER.

2)– “When is Israel going to have an Ethnic African Nigerian Immigrant like Olukemi as Israeli Prime Minister?”
Answer: NEVER.

Or an Ethnic African like Lammy the Lummox as Israeli Foreign Minister?
Answer: NEVER.

Or an Ethnic Pakistani Muslim woman like Mahmood as Israeli Justice Minister?”
Answer: NEVER.

3)– “Look around you at the leaders of all the EU countries. How many are Third World Ethnics?”
Answer: NONE.

4)– “Then why in blazes are all the Third World Ethnics and their Communist Enablers shrieking about “racism” in Britain, while forcing themselves upon us?”
Answer: ENGLAND IS THE TARGET.

Dinger64
9 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Hear hear!
When will you see the leaders and top government posts in Pakistan, India, China etc etc filled by white Europeans?
Never!