News Round-Up
- “It is time for the House of Lords to come to the rescue” – The enthusiasm with which MPs have discarded centuries of consensus on the dignity of human life has been unnerving, says Tom Harris in the Telegraph.
- “Diane Abbott’s masterful Assisted Dying speech will come back to haunt us” – In the Spectator, Melanie McDonagh says Diane Abbott was brilliant when she pointed out that “if the police can’t spot coercion dealing with domestic violence, why should they spot it in assisted dying?”
- “Truly, Kim Leadbeater is the face of ‘sinister twee’” – The real, underlying principle is whether or not the state can kill, says the Telegraph‘s Tim Stanley.
- “When did our MPs form a death cult?” – Mindless libertarianism is killing compassion, says Kathleen Stock in UnHerd.
- “Britain has fallen to the technocratic death cult” – In backing ‘assisted dying’, MPs have given the state a licence to kill, says Brendan O’Neill in Spiked.
- “This Government is the most devious and dishonest in Britain’s history” – Starmer was elected on a platform of personal rectitude, but his only firm policy is selling Britain out, says Camilla Tominey in the Telegraph.
- “Britain tells Iran to stop funding proxies or face Trump strikes” – Iran has been told to stop funding its proxies, end its nuclear programme and limit manufacturing ballistic missiles in exchange for a deal to halt Donald Trump’s plans for military strikes, reports the Telegraph.
- “Has Trump ‘chickened out’ on Iran? Five reasons for his two-week delay” – To some, the President is living up to his ‘Taco’ instincts. But there are several plausible reasons to wait, says Adrian Blomfield in the Telegraph.
- “The Attorney General should not have a veto on military action” – Britain’s voice on the world stage is being stifled by a cautious legalism that views foreign policy through the rearview mirror, says former Attorney General Suella Braverman in the Telegraph.
- “Protesters attacked outside Iranian Embassy in London” – Anti-Iranian regime protesters were attacked outside the country’s embassy in London on Friday, leading to seven arrests, the Standard reports.
- “Why China won’t come to Iran’s rescue” – As America looks poised to intervene in the spiralling Israel-Iran conflict, one power which has been largely absent from discussions is China. Miquel Vila in UnHerd looks at why.
- “Why Muslim-majority countries have turned against Iran” – Saudi Arabia has described “evil” Iran as the “head of the snake” – and it isn’t the only Muslim-majority country to criticise Iran, says Kunwar Khuldune Shahid in the Spectator.
- “Palestine Action banned as terrorist organisation” – Palestine Action has been banned as a terrorist organisation after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton and sprayed red paint into aircraft engines, reports the Telegraph.
- “How deeply would you have to hate Britain to damage our means of defending it?” – The Palestine Action fanatics detest our country, our values, our traditions, our history and evidently our national security, says Jake Wallis Simons in the Telegraph.
- “Starmer defended protester who sabotaged military aircraft” – Sir Keir Starmer defended a protester – one of the Fairford Five who disrupted military operations at an air base in 2003 – when he was a human rights barrister, reports the Telegraph.
- “BBC axes new Gaza film” – The Telegraph reports that the BBC has pulled a new ‘impartial’ Gaza documentary after its Director told BBC Today that “Israel has become a rogue state that’s committing war crimes and ethnic cleansing and mass-murdering Palestinians”.
- “Has the Islamophobia ‘Working Group’ of MPs already made up its mind?” – Whatever form of words is chosen, and whatever legal status it has to start with, any Islamophobia definition will almost certainly turbocharge ‘cancel culture’, writes Sir John Jenkins in the Spectator.
- “University staff walk out over calls to return to the office three days a week” – More than 300 university workers from Liverpool University will go on strike on Friday over demands to return to the office three days a week, the Telegraph reports.
- “The Czech data reveals the truth about the Covid vaccine. Is that why no epidemiologist or infectious disease expert will touch it?” – Steve Kirsch with the latest insights from the Czech Covid vaccine data.
- “UN Calls for ‘Climate Misinformation’ to be Criminalised” – The climate censorship movement is much bigger than a bunch of disgruntled academics and big oil conspiracy theorists, and may even threaten free speech in the USA and across the world, writes Eric Worrall in WUWT.
- “Three Years To Save The World!” – Paul Homewood chides the BBC for a story in which “scientists” proclaim we have just three years to keep temperatures below the magic 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
- “The climate scaremongers: Another £45 billion for Mad Ed to squander” – Amid Rachel Reeves’s showering of the public sector with taxpayer money as if it was confetti in last week’s Spending Review, the biggest winner in percentage terms was Ed Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, writes Paul Homewood in TCW.
- “Public Ridicule Hyped Summer Heat Headlines… Meteorologists Losing Credibility” – Sensationalist weathermen in Germany are losing credibility and getting mocked and ridiculed, says Pierre Gosselin on the No Tricks Zone.
- “G-7: Africans Deserve Real Electricity” – Those who aspire to Net Zero are condemning Africa to extreme poverty, says Brenda Shaffer in WUWT.
- “The real reason birth rates are falling” – They might not say it to a survey, but the real reason for the plummeting birth rate is because women consider babies to be hard work and to restrict their freedom to live the life of their choice, says Matthew Parris in the Spectator.
- “Primary school children taught about the 300 flags of Pride” – Schoolchildren are being taught about 300 different LGBT pride flags and the sexualities and gender identities behind each of them – yet parents say the Labour council has ignored their concerns, says the Telegraph.
- “It’s Stephen Fry, not J.K. Rowling, who’s been radicalised” – Why is it that every time Stephen Fry voices a female character in the Harry Potter audio books it’s high-pitched, whiny and annoying, no matter what she has to say, wonders Victoria Smith in UnHerd.
- “DNA screening for every baby on the NHS” – Every baby will have his or her DNA mapped under an NHS revolution to predict and prevent disease in a move that has prompted concerns about privacy and ethics, reports the Telegraph.
- “BBC Breakfast host Naga Munchetty faces claims over bullying” – The BBC’s Naga Munchetty has reportedly been accused of bullying a member of staff and using a slang term for a sex act during an off-air break, reports the Mail.
- “Masking Humanity: what was sold as public duty became quiet cruelty” – When masks were imposed in care homes and hospitals, countless vulnerable people lost human connection – and some never recovered. Watch the new short film from Smile Free about the masking mania and its brutal fallout.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well Jabby, you said I’d know what you meant in three days. That’s today; I see nothing. What did your premonition tell you?
To be fair, there’s quite a bit of today left… Lets give him up to say 6pm.?
DNA screening? Following on the back of the votes this week the 1930s comparisons are getting harder to avoid.
Friday Morning Wycombe Road
& Wiltshire Rd Marlow
Excellent! The whole world needs to be reminded of this crucial fact.
“Three Years To Save The World!”
Only three years to try and prevent Edinburgh’s average temperature from being as hot as Manchester.
Followed swiftly by the sky falling in, I presume.?
“The climate scaremongers: Another £45 billion for Mad Ed to squander
£45bn.? A mere bagatelle.! Give the fellow double, or be damned…
“Primary school children taught about the 300 flags of Pride”
As many seven year olds can’t read at their expected level, or perform simple mathematics, it may be a forlorn hope that they can recall 300 different weirdo fantasy variations of sexual proclivity.
Still no flag for heterosexuals, I notice…
Apparently there is, it its black and white horizontal stripes. The topic was covered at great length on GB News last night and the resident gay (his description) got them 100% correct.
I had to look that up, because I remember it as being shades of grey. Seems there are TWO boring flags representing heteros…what more could you want!?.
And also includes transgender?!?!
As I recall one was straight and the other was trans friendly straight
“Truly, Kim Leadbeater is the face of ‘sinister twee’”
The campaign ‘For’, has been very well funded and very professionally presented. Where is the money coming from.? Cui bono..?
But isn’t it funny how, on a straightforward moral issue, our Parliament is swayed by “well funded” and “professionally presented” rather than by their deep-seated moral convictions?
Who, or rather what, supplies the suicide cocktail the NHS will administer?
Looks like another revenue stream to me.
Yeah, it’s interesting, isn’t it?
Also, you just know that even if the pro-death movement had lost the vote, they would not have given up. One way or another, through the back door, they would have chipped away at it. Adverts on the tube, posters, BBC programs, subtle propaganda – they really want this.
The same with the other cause: unrestricted abortion. Interesting, how a single person holding up a placard is immediately removed, arrested, fined. No debate, just clamp down. On the other side, soft propaganda about how compassionate they are by removing all restrictions. They really want this.
If the LibDems support something, you know it’s wrong…
“but the real reason for the plummeting birth rate is because women consider babies to be hard work and to restrict their freedom to live the life of their choice, says Matthew Parris in the Spectator.”
Well babies (and children of all ages including grown up ones) ARE hard work and they DO restrict your freedom. I think that’s partly the point. They are also the greatest joy (for me, anyway). I rather think some “men” think the same thing as “women” – although most still choose to have kids and many have more than one.
Material well being has I think led us (me included) to tend to overthink things, including this business of “being ready to settle down” and “being ready to have children”. I kind of drifted into it, and found that I was indeed “ready” when it happened – I think that’s in the programming. I’m a bloke, for context.
I agree. Babies are hard work. No doubt about it. But the experience of becoming a father (something that I too drifted into rather than chose) is so elementary, so profound and powerful, it cannot be compared to anything else.
If a young woman leaving school were to announce that her main aspiration is to get married, have children and raise a family, she would almost certainly not be congratulated. This is not regarded as an acceptable aspiration for a woman and she would probably be made to feel a bit silly, unambitious, and even foolish.
The social pressure on women to have careers and be “independent” is enormous.
Independence has much merit, and keeps a person alive and interesting ’
This is also true, but equally making a lifelong commitment to your husband or wife and to your children seems to me to enrich your life. As I said above, people may be less reliable now.
I agree. What has happened to all the single mothers though? Where have the fathers gone? And why?
I think the family unit is important, but I’m also not into telling other people how to live their lives, and I don’t want the state to do so either.
Oh the absent fathers are the elephant in the room and we mustn’t mention them. They’re always let off the hook. That way if the kids turn out to be little tearaways or the boys end up joining gangs, the bigots can blame the present mother and not the absent father who bailed because he couldn’t hack the responsibility of fulfilling his role as a parent ( though he didn’t seem to mind his 50% involvement in creating said child, curiously ) and wanted to carry on like he’s still a single man with no ties. This also empowers the bigots and misogynists further because they get to label her a ”slapper” or a ”sponger”, and generally treat her as some low-life, to be looked down on in society. I wonder how many were using these very names to label the girls who had babies as a result of being victims of the Pakistani rape gangs. Or do they get some special exemption….? Had she gone ahead and had an abortion, however, she would also be condemned by the very same people. So you see, females are held up to a different standard ( ‘double-standard’, one could say ) by… Read more »
Imagine a girl going through her school life, performing to the best of her ability in lessons and tests, same as her brother and male counterparts, getting good marks as a result of her hard work, maybe even going on to higher education, and then wanting to actually do something with all of that knowledge and effort put in to her education at the end of it. Settling down and starting a family is something to put off until later, early 30s, perhaps, or not at all, even. I know, it’s an outrageous notion!🤯
It’s almost as unthinkable as treating somebody as an individual and respecting the right they have to make decisions about their own life, as opposed to defining them by their sex or other protected characteristics, and having expectations for them based on one’s own standards. 🙄
There is no right or wrong here. But there is “stay in your own lane and keep your nose out of other people’s lives and how they choose to live it”, basically.
Well, what you describe is pretty much what is available to young women in the western world, so no issue there.
For those, however, who don’t necessarily want a career, don’t see working for en employer from 9 to 5 every day for most of their adult life as a type of “independence” that they want, and are drawn to the idea of getting married and forming a family as their primary ambition – current day social norms are discouraging them from doing so.
All deliberate, according to the
Marxist Frankfurt School 11-Point Plan to Destroy the West:
1. Create Racism Offences for Whites Only.
2. Induce Trauma through Injustice.
3. Teach Sex and Sodomy to Children.
4. Undermine Parents’ and Teachers’ Authority.
5. Force Mass Immigration to Destroy Ethnic Identity.
6. Create Confusion by Continual Change.
7. Empty the Churches.
8. Encourage Crime to Destabilize Society.
9. Create Dependency on the State by Welfare Benefits.
10. Promote Drugs, Pornography and Alcoholism.
11. Encourage the Breakdown of the Family.
Well they just drop down to part-time hours once they have a kid. As I and countless other women have done. This is the norm. Women still have careers and work <30hrs/wk.
Or were you under the impression it was ‘all or nothing’? That way you have the best of both worlds. Plus, I’ve never worked a 9-5 Mon-Fri job in my life.
Lucky you! But how many men have the luxury of telling their boss they only want to work part-time to raise their kids while their wives work full-time to support the family?
This privilege of part-time hours is normally only extended to women.
It’s women who usually change to a part-time contract because we are the main care-givers. I’d just done 6 month maternity leave, which is pretty bog standard in the UK, and my work then was more flexible, as opposed to my husband’s office-based job. An employer cannot discriminate based on sex so I’d imagine men have the exact same ability to work p/t, depending on their workplace.
It’s hardly a “privilege” as most employers have part-time contracts, with many now working from home too. But due to the ever-present grievance mentality of you misogynists, youre bound to twist this as somehow being favouritism. You must deny reality to confirm your own “woe is me, I’m so hard done by” victimhood, ergo reinforcing your contempt of the opposite sex. Same old same old..
Yes. I guess the social pressure used to be very much the other way. It’s possible men have become less reliable too. I don’t know what to think. I can’t imagine what life would have been like without children.
It’s not much an incentive to men to be “reliable” if the predominant message they receive from women and society at large is that women don’t need them. Why would they need to be “reliable” if they are told they’re expendable?
Actually, it’s almost as if their expendability is celebrated. Single women raising families by themselves are held up as virtual heroines. It’s almost as if women are being incentivised to dispose of their men because it will confer them even more social status.
Well yes though in the world I inhabit, mercifully small, men and women are more or less doing what they have done since forever – getting along, doing their best, and not thinking too much about a lot of this stuff. At least that’s how it seems to me. That’s not to say societal trends such as the ones you refer to don’t exist or don’t have an influence, but as with so much, the people shouting loudest with the most extreme message get all the attention and many others just get on with life.
Spot on! Looking at that photo of a father holding his newborn child I posted previously, I wondered what the future would hold for him, despite his genuine affection for his children and best efforts to work hard to give them and his wife a comfortable, happy home. For so many modern men, the mother of their children often tries to turn them against their father, by ridiculing him in front of them, by which they learn not to respect him, because she doesn’t, even when he tries his best to provide for them all and to be a good father and husband. Then she sometimes commits adultery with a new man, or just decides to dump the father of her children, takes the house, the kids, and everything he provided, exiling him to a bedsit, while lawyers & judges take every spare penny away from him. In the end, he is left with nothing. Even if he is lucky enough to find a new love, and have more children with her, he is still shackled with the financial burden of his unfaithful, or ungrateful, previous wife and hostile children who hate him for no reason. Many men have decided… Read more »
And get back to work asap if they do have a baby. Fortunately I was able to care for my children full time – and it can be tough but also the best thing I have done.
And it’s natural to do that! I don’t understand why women want to have kids and then hand them over to strangers to raise, even in infancy. What is the point?
As I was saying: flying monkeys…
Isn’t there still a requirement for a medical diagnosis of 6 months or less life expectancy before euthanasia will be an option?
Vernon Coleman’s ‘Old Man in a Chair’ videos are always worth watching : https://expose-news.com/2025/06/19/the-depopulation-plan/.
“There is, in case you hadn’t noticed, a plan to reduce the world’s population,” Dr. Vernon Coleman begins his new ‘Old Man in a Chair’ video.
They aim to reduce the world’s population by 90% through various means, including the global warming myth, massive immigration, the end of medicine, the destruction of farming and economies, and wars.
Easily obtained from corrupt doctors, especially from the Third World, keen to encourage The White Man to top himself. People should remember that, when a doctor gives you a “diagnosis” of some terminal illness like cancer, or some pseudo-scientific “syndrome”, or that you need an organ transplant or hip replacement, always get a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th opinion before letting the doctor cut out bits of you, blast you with radiation & chemo, stick a dead person’s organs into you, or encourage you to top yourself. Or try some self-treatment with alternative medicine, as they do in China. Remember the Evil Lebanese Catholic Dr. Farid Fata, who gave false cancer diagnoses to hundreds of white patients in Michigan, did the above to them, and made himself pots of money from medical insurance claims. Office of Public Affairs | Detroit Area Doctor Sentenced to 45 Years in Prison for Providing Medically Unnecessary Chemotherapy to Patients | United States Department of Justice “Rather than use his medical degree to save lives, Dr. Fata instead destroyed them in pursuit of profit,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell. “Time and again, Dr. Fata callously violated his patients’ trust as he used false cancer diagnoses and unwarranted… Read more »
From the DT, just as I was posting that Starmer should announce a ‘shoot on sight’ policy for all military incursions (like Brize). This is the problem when advocacy meets policy, lawyers have no right and wrong, just what works best on the day
“Starmer defended protester who sabotaged military aircraftPM represented one of the Fairford Five who disrupted military operations at air base in 2003”
Top marks for “lawyers have no right and wrong, just what works best on the day”.
Maybe “what pays best on the day”?
Exactly why there should be NO LAWYERS as Members of Parliament.
“DNA screening for every baby on the NHS”
Not just “DNA screening”, but sticking needles into the Umbilical Cord of Newborn Babies to take blood samples for this:
Every baby in UK to have DNA mapped under NHS ‘genomics revolution’
“Under plans due to be unveiled in a major 10-year strategy next month, all newborns will undergo WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING to assess their risk of developing hundreds of conditions.”
“The move, part of a broader push to shift the NHS away from diagnosing illness and towards preventing it…”
“The initiative will be backed by a £650 million investment in GENOMICS as part of the Government’s wider Life Sciences sector plan. It follows pilot programmes to SEQUENCE THE GENOMES OF 100.000 NEWBORNS and draws inspiration from similar schemes in Japan.”
“The NHS currently offers a heel-prick blood test blood test for nine rare conditions in newborns. Under the new model, blood samples — typically taken from the umbilical cord — would be used for FULL GENOME SEQUENCING.”
Wasn’t that what the movie “The Minority Report” was about?
Diagnosing “PRE-CRIME”?
Dear parents, don’t let these Evil B*stards anywhere near your child!
An article from ten years ago pointed out that:
“These initiatives essentially require patients and donors to forego their privacy expectations but, in fact, genomic anonymisation – removing identifiers to conceal the identity of the genome owner – is hardly effective, BECAUSE THE GENOME IS BY NATURE A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER.”
Sequencing your genome is becoming an affordable reality – but at what personal cost?
“Mrs Brown, I’m afraid the DNA testing shows your son has a 51% chance of developing rhabdosarcoma of the epitympanic recess by the age of forty. Do you really want to to put him through all that, or isn’t it more responsible to let him slip quietly away now in peace, while he’s essentially just like an animal, before he has a brain to worry about it…”
Of course, like free abortion up to term, it could never happen in Britain… but here (right hand column) is what I wrote in 1982. We held it back a little longer than my prophecy.
Excellent post.
“Three Years To Save The World!” – Paul Homewood chides the BBC for a story in which “scientists” proclaim we have just three years to keep temperatures below the magic 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels”
Which scientists? Name them! publish their peer reviewed papers!
And while we’re pulling dates and times from the air let’s go back to pre dinosaur levels or pre life levels why is pre industrial levels so fu£#ng important?
Because the industrial revolution happen in the throes of the Little Ice Age, and we wouldn’t want to date our records from that, would we?
“DNA screening for every baby on the NHS”
Nothing to do with preventing future illnesses but everything to do with future surveillance, control and manipulation!
Another bio identifier on your digital passport! “Papers please”
Exactly! As some public commenters said, — “Surely this violates the Human Rights Act—the collection of DNA samples at birth and adding this genetic information to a database without consent implies the beginning of what the Second World War and all those who sacrificed their lives fought against: the creation of a perfect engineered human being. This news article appears to promote the revival of such an ideal, fostering the notion of a perfectly bred human. It raises concerns about the ultra-wealthy engineering designer babies and having free rein to clone themselves for future body parts. From assisted dying to mandatory DNA scans at birth with stored data, this scenario feels like a science fiction story alarmingly close to becoming reality.” — “What about the Rights of the Child ?” — “This is the alarming thing! They will “treat” children who don’t have to be treated and parents wont have any say!” — “No this is too dangerous!! Who knows what it will be used for. Don’t go there!!!!!” — “Can they check that the fathers are indeed the fathers at the same time before registering the birth? I am sure that this won’t happen.” — “Big Brother wants to… Read more »