Universities Told to Drop DEI Rules for Staff Under New Government Guidance
Universities have been told to scrap rules that push the DEI agenda under new Government guidance issued by the Office for Students to ensure free speech is protected on campus. The Telegraph has the story.
The guidance instructs universities to scrap policies controversially used to enforce what critics have branded “ideological conformity”.
This is to ensure they do not breach the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, which is set to come into law in August after being proposed under the Tories.
Guidance states that to avoid falling foul of the Act, people should not be compelled to sign up to university codes of conduct that insist on promoting ‘social justice’ or other political values.
The University of Newcastle code of conduct states that it will maintain a “longstanding commitment… to social justice” and a belief that universities should “play a fundamental role in creating and fostering societies that are more equitable”.
New guidance warns that commitments such as these could stifle free speech as dissenting from what is defined as ‘social justice’ could be prohibited.
The Office for Students guide, overseen by free speech advocate Arif Ahmed, also advises scrapping other ways of compelling conformity that have proven controversial in the past.
It states that academics should not be required to prove their “commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion”.
Many job applications in academia contain an inclusion statement, which incites applicants to state how they could support diversity and inclusion on campus.
Earlier this year, the campaign group Alumni for Free Speech claimed that universities including Oxford routinely demanded that job applicants support diversity measures.
New guidance states that academics being urged to profess a commitment to certain “values, beliefs or ideas”, in order to secure a job, could stifle any expression of dissent from these ideas.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Interesting how the word inclusion has come to mean exclusion.
War is peace and all that.
941 years on.
What happened in 1084?
We live in a post-truth era but lies can still be rejected. It keeps one busy.
I have become so jaded that I am wondering how this piece of news, which on the surface seems like brilliant news, is actually going to turn out to be not what it seems.
Which isn’t to say it won’t be brilliant. I’m just chronically suspicious at this stage.
Very off-topic, but this should surprise precisely nobody. Especially off the back of the abortion amendment. Esther Rantzen will be happy;
”Parliament just voted 314 – 291 in favour of euthanasia administered by the state becoming legal in Britain.
Despite all the concerns about safeguards being removed during the drafting process.
Despite all the cases of mission-creep in Canada, Belgium, Oregon…
MPs just voted to kill their constituents, inevitably to save the NHS money.
Just three days after voting to decriminalise abortion, up until birth.
Britain is becoming an Aztec death cult in the name of “freedom of choice”.
https://x.com/Con_Tomlinson/status/1936055467752436087