Foreign Nationals Convicted of Quarter of Sex Assaults on Women
Foreign nationals are responsible for more than a quarter of sex assaults on women successfully prosecuted in Britain despite being just 11% of the population, official figures obtained via FOI have revealed. The Telegraph has more.
Data from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), obtained under freedom of information laws, showed that 26% of the 1,453 sex assault convictions women last year were accounted for by foreign nationals.
A further 8% were committed by offenders of “unknown” nationalities, a category which will include some foreign nationals, meaning the overall proportion could be higher.
The data were drawn from the Police National Computer by the MoJ.
It comes a day after Baroness Casey’s review accused governments, police and councils of covering up the fact that a disproportionate number of Asian men were responsible for child sex grooming gangs, for fear of being called racist.
The review also revealed that asylum seekers and foreign nationals were involved in a “significant proportion” of 12 active police investigations into grooming gangs.
The new data will fuel demands for the Government to publish figures on the nationality, asylum status and visa routes of all convicted offenders, or risk fresh allegations of a cover-up.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has pledged to publish data on the crimes and nationalities of foreign offenders facing deportation, and accepted Baroness Casey’s recommendation for mandatory collection of ethnicity and nationality data for all child sex abuse suspects. Foreign sex offenders will be banned from claiming asylum. …
The figures show that foreign nationals were more than twice as likely as the rest of the population to be responsible for sex assaults. While they accounted for 26% of the assaults, foreign nationals represented 10.9% of the population.
The research also showed that foreign nationals accounted for more than a fifth of all rape convictions last year. Of the 720 convictions for “rape of a female aged 16 or over”, 155 were of foreign nationals and a further 42 were of an “unknown” nationality.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Maybe this is because all the native blokes are hanging their heads in shame of their toxic masculinity; they’re engaging a lot less in behaviour which could be construed as an assault. And maybe they’re wasted on their diet of porn and less… ahem… motivated. I’m guessing a certain class of third world immigrant male remains as yet unaffected in this way.
I know that’s a cynical view, perhaps a bit extreme, but I’m sure there’s an element of truth within it…
No such thing as ‘toxic masculinity’, just Lefty made-up fake words and terms that they want to make mainstream in order to push an agenda. On a par with ‘Islamophobia/Transphobia’. There are only toxic people ( that are only available in male and female flavours ), which, incidentally, tend to be the very eejits that make up this BS woke non-language to start with. Yes, they just cannot stop barstewardizing our language.
But I know you were just being sarky. 😉
Agreed. 👍
👍
This is a seriously shoddy article. A striking example would that the trailing bar graph lists a total 547 sexual offences and the line below then claims that a mere 523 such offences would be 72.6% of them.
I could write more about this pamphlet but I’ll leave it at that.
Yes. In the Telegraph article the text following the graph is referring to 523 rape convictions where the perpetrator was a UK (etc) national. However, the graph details sexual offences.
Dropping a graph into barely related text is slapdash in the extreme.
If 523 rape convictions are 72.6% of the total, then there are about 720 such convictions.
This is old news. How many more stats do we need showing the same thing? The data are reproduced time and again ( across many European countries, also ) showing clear evidence that it’s those with a migration background that, *per capita*, commit the most sex crimes, as well as other crimes.
Meanwhile, I didn’t know this. I guess it explains why they get so triggered and go full-on psycho when non-Muslims go round burning Korans. I don’t know why the lady put it so far away that they need to stretch over the table to reach it, though;
”Here you go folks. “British values”. When Muslims swear an oath in Britain they swear on an Arabic Koran. The non-Muslim must not touch the Koran. This applies in courts and in Parliament. As you can see for yourselves, it is televised. The official must either hand the Koran in a case/cloth, wear gloves, or it is left on a table where the filthy British have not touched it.”
https://x.com/pmclauth/status/1935060333900533804
Notice the deliberate tricks in compiling these statistics: 1) Only “foreign nationals” were included, not the millions of Dual Nationals and UK-born Third World Ethnics with British Nationality. 2) People with technical Polish or Portuguese “Nationality” could easily be Third World Ethnics who entered those countries as Fake Asylum Seekers and were given citizenship. I don’t believe that Poland or Portugal have a huge number of indigenous Ethnic European rapists. “Nationality” is not the same as “Ethnicity”. 3) Only “convictions” for sexual offences against females were included, not the thousands of mostly Pakistani Muslim Gang Rapists whose crimes were either disregarded by Muslim police in the UK, or the cases were thrown out by the Crown Prosecution Service, which also includes Muslim & Leftist activist lawyers and judges, or the rapists were let off without a conviction by the judicial system for fear of being called “racist”. 4) Only female victims were included, not the untold numbers of male victims of sexual assaults by Third World Ethnics, especially little boys at public swimming pools, for example, which is prevalent in other European countries. 5) Can we just drop this misleading term “Asians”, which is used only in Britain to describe… Read more »
Well said
Doesn’t really fit into your text, but as ethnic German¹ of German nationality, this “foreign nationals” irks me.
6) There are 195 (Wikipedia) countries on this planet “foreign nationals” could have come from. How large is the list of “foreign nations” where a signal showed up compared to the total?
¹ Both of my grandfathers worked for the German state (one of them being a professional soldier) at a time when “proof of German heritage” was required for this.
Interesting about your grandfathers, because even to this day, the government of India requires “A Certificate of Indian Origin” before allowing Third World foreigners to work in India.
And yet, Indian Subcontinentals swarm into the West, bringing their racist caste system with them, and complain about “racism” and “discrimination”. The hypocrisy is off the charts.
Here’s another useful report, from which it seems that NUMBERS OF ARRESTS by nationality, not convictions, is a much more informative statistic:
UK’s First Migrant Crime Report
I bet you ethnic Germans are not over represented in any crime statistics anywhere in the world
But then I am a horrible racist
Well colour me surprised. Not.