News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
10 months ago

“immigration is the lifeblood of this country, it always has been”

This is a miscasting of the truth. There have been influxes of people that is true, but in small numbers and for specific reasons. In 1951 the country had (according to census) about 10,000 black and 7,000 indian (99.99% white British subjects.). The key thing is numbers that allow people to integrate. What we are seeing now is that we have parallel societies functioning within our own. We cant go back to 1951, even if we wanted to. But we have to accept that immigration is not the first solution of choice to anything.

NeilParkin
10 months ago

How has the media wronged Nadiya Hussain?

Like the ingredients in her pantry, TV chefs have a ‘best before’ date on them. She’s had a very good run in the media, and she should be grateful that it appears to have given her enough money to live comfortably for all her days.

NeilParkin
10 months ago

Tories score double the donations of Reform

Having multiple times the resources of Reform, and delivering nothing but defeat and capitulation is surely not something to be proud of.

Dinger64
10 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Yes, shock horror, the rich give more to their party than others do! well well

NeilParkin
10 months ago

Rayner: Rough sleeping will no longer be a crime

Another ‘kind’ idea that will backfire horribly.. I suppose its easier to have the Chinese make 1.5m tents for us than build in bricks and timber.

Dinger64
10 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Let the immigrants know where she lives and tell them it’s now OK to set up camp outside her house 👍

Lockdown Sceptic
10 months ago

Tuesday Morning Warfield Road & Harvest Ride Warfield Bracknell 

101
Mogwai
10 months ago

He’s still at it. ”We’re an island of immigrants.” Off to a great start, pandering and sucking up to the migrants. Maybe it’s true and Reform are basically ‘Tory Lite’. This isn’t what voters that wish to be rid of the Uniparty at the next election want to hear;

”Reform Chairman David Bull has doubled down on his comments earlier today that “immigration is the lifeblood of Britain” by saying that Britain is an “island of immigrants”.

How did nobody from Reform HQ tell him not to repeat those comments?

Bull won’t last long at this rate.”

https://x.com/WorldByWolf/status/1932512111067799828

How many agree with this poster?

”I’ve been attacked for saying things like this before, but here goes.

Reform isn’t the party of Britain, for Britain, that we truly need or want right now.

They’re a protest party, and yes, that protest is valid. Draining the putrid boil that is British politics is absolutely necessary. But I urge people not to see them as the saviour of our people or the restorer of our way of life.

They’re far more likely to deliver more of the same, just a shade closer to Thatcher than to Blair.” Alexander

ituex
ituex
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I think that post is very probably right unfortunately. All this ‘immigration is wonderful, aren’t we lucky’ nonsense is not going to do them, or us, any good.

Mogwai
10 months ago

It’s paywalled so I’ve no idea what on earth the justification is for changing the law and allowing women to abort a baby right up until full-term without committing a crime. This is all kinds of messed up. Here’s Tonia whatsername, who’s supportive of this while saying she was brought up Catholic;

”“Any woman could end a pregnancy at any time, 35 weeks, 36 weeks, 37 weeks, without committing an offence. And you are comfortable with that?”

“Yes I am.”

Labour MP @ToniaAntoniazzi
says women who have abortions need “help and support”, not prosecuting.”

https://x.com/TimesRadio/status/1932364290549325939

130 MPs are backing this change of legislation, apparently;

https://x.com/Basil_TGMD/status/1932338482459869595

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

The upper limit for having an abortion should be lowered, not increased. There is no rationale whatsoever for this change. Even abortion providers are opposing this;

https://x.com/Basil_TGMD/status/1932339103967728115/photo/1

NeilParkin
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Why stop there.? Surely if you can perform infanticide on an 8 month pregnancy baby, why not give the right to terminate the baby up to 6 months. Ideal for those who produce ugly, or ‘difficult’ children, or who have decided the weed and ‘White Lightning’, tattoos and Bingo is a better lifestyle than looking after the sprog.

thechap
thechap
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I only learned about this proposed change today. ‘Horrific’ doesn’t even come close to what some people are proposing and endorsing.

They are proposing that it should be okay to kill a fully formed and self life-sustaining baby. A baby of the same size, shape and weight of a baby born in the next hospital room can be killed in another hospital room.

Society is effed.

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  thechap

Agreed. I think all of these 130 MPs supporting this proposal should be named and shamed publicly. I’ll keep my eyes open on Twitter. I feel like people have the right to know who these wicked and deranged creatures are, especially if one of them might be your own MP. Ideally they should also be made to explain their reasons for supporting this disgusting crap. Apparently this is already a thing in countries such as Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Personally, I’d like to see a collective of more than 130 MPs proposing legislation to lower the upper limit for abortion from what it already stands at.

thechap
thechap
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

12 weeks is long enough. 16 absolute max in exceptional circumstances. Even both of those suggestions make my flesh crawl.

Mrs Bunty
10 months ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/06/10/quit-disagree-israel-gaza-policy-foreign-office-staff-told/

Good grief, certainly full of themselves. I don’t agree with this government in anything but I really don’t care for what its employees think. Just do your jobs. I don’t care who you sleep with or what your opinions are on anything while you’re working. Just do your jobs. In fact just turn up everyday and do a full day of work, that’s all I want to know, then you might be more efficient at your bloated overpaid work and not have any backlog of any kind. Sorry, ex-civil servant from the time when we did have to work.

Hester
Hester
10 months ago

Todays News update should just have printed underneath.
Just subscribe to the Telegraph and Spectator.

GroundhogDayAgain
10 months ago
Reply to  Hester

Block JavaScript and the Telegraph is free to read

CGW
CGW
10 months ago

At a conference in Moscow yesterday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov publicly stated he was 100% certain that UK was behind Ukraine’s attack on Russia’s nuclear triad one week ago. According to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, that means Russia is legally able to react with a nuclear strike against UK. As Scott Ritter reported yesterday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljtC3D3hWsw), the purpose of MI6 planning and organizing this attack was to provoke a strong – hopefully nuclear – reaction from Russia against Ukraine, so as to argue that now USA and NATO must now openly join forces against Russia. Why is there no reaction from the UK public? Why is MI6 playing ludicrous games, playing with all our lives, for what reason? To support the UK government’s ridiculous notion that it is still a major player in international relations, that it is entitled to challenge Russia, a nuclear power to war, on our behalf? I have no hatred whatsoever against Russia, or the Russian people or Putin. I regard the Ukraine issue as a ‘local’ problem which would have been solved – indeed, never started – years ago without interference from the West purely wishing to promote the MIC and satisfy the atavistic hatred against… Read more »

BillT
BillT
10 months ago
Reply to  CGW

You really believe anything Lavrov says??

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  BillT

You really believe anything that anyone says on this topic?

CGW
CGW
10 months ago
Reply to  BillT

You can read all Lavrov’s statements here and Putin’s statements here. Let me know if you find any untruths anywhere.

Do I believe anything Keir Starmer or David Lammy says? No, not a word.

Does that make me a Russian agent? Probably, in many people’s eyes, but I am not.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  CGW

Well it was either UK or USA, or most likely the USA feeding the UK with info but not doing the planning to give them and Trump deniability.
However, what neither of them seems to have thought through is that this action is likely to cause a breakdown of the agreements to verify nuclear weapons by leaving delivery vehicles in the open to enable satellite verification. The real US military are apparently extremely unhappy about bombers being attacked which were left exposed due to treaty obligations, which now gives Russia a perfectly valid excuse for concealing them now, and feasably for taking other action.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  CGW

There have been so many examples of the West, primatily UK and USA, taunting Russia to try to induce some sort of intemperate response from Russia.
Even ignoring the destabilising efforts by US neocons prior to the confilict, there was a period of extreme provocation against Russia when they were massing the troops on their side of border which culminated in them making a feint towards Kiev in the hope of inducing talks and diverting Ukraine military attention away from attacking their own citizens in the Donbass.
This resulted in the Istanbul talks, which the combined efforts of USA and UK through their mouthpiece Johnson finally wrecked with the outcome we now see.
All this time I don’t recall any genuine statement from Russia about any intention to threaten wider Ukraine or the western world. They wanted to secure their borders from the malign intentions of a proven duplicitous West.

CGW
CGW
10 months ago

As Scott Ritter clarified, if a country’s nuclear triad is attacked, that country has to immediately decide whether to launch a responsive retaliatory strike. So, while the Ukrainian drones were attacking the Russian sites, the Russian military and political leaders had to decide on the spot whether this was a preliminary strike building up to a massive attack, or something not so serious.

The UK government and MI6 know this very well: of course, the procedure is exactly the same in USA if there had been a drone strike against their B-2 or B-52 bombers.

Fortunately, Putin is a very moral and highly responsible leader, and so there was no such nuclear reaction. And, by all accounts, he was furious during his subsequent phone call to Trump, as signified by Trump’s muted response on Truth Social.

Certainly, the CIA knew what was happening and may have simply notified Trump something was about to happen but it was better he was not aware of the details for reason of plausible deniability.

With all the UK and France’s recent nuclear posturing one can only wonder what game our shamefully immature leaders think they are playing.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

“How has the media wronged Nadiya Hussain?” (on playing the Muslim “race” card) Here are two more indications that Islam is quietly taking over the United Kingdom: 1) Kent news: Christian patient forced out of hospital chapel by ‘Muslim doctors’ 2) START UK and Qatar sign Typhoon extension agreement | The Peninsula Qatar Qatar donates GBP 25m to support establishing Sandhurst Centre for Leadership and Technology | The Peninsula Qatar “The new centre will be named the HH Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani Centre…” …AT THE UK MILITARY ACADEMY OF SANDHURST. This £25 million pound “donation” evidently convinced the Royal Air Force top brass to extend, yet again, the unbelievable 12 Squadron Joint RAF-Qatar Typhoon “training” programme that was set up in 2018 and supposed to end in 2023, then extended to 2025, now suddenly extended again to 2027, so the Qataris don’t have to return to Qatar as planned. See how “Temporary” turns into “Permanent”, especially when the benefits of such hazardous western military cooperation with the Global Caliphate all go ONE WAY: to THEM. What happens when your “allies” become your enemies, after you have trained them in all your military secrets? Like all the Afghans trained by the… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

There have also been comments on the internet that the reason Nigel is not bothered about Mohammed Zia Yusuf’s “measly” £200,000 donation is that Qatar and Dubai may also be quietly funding Reform. Which country did Reform’s Isabel Oakeshott suddenly drag her children out of British schools, uprooting them from their ancestral homeland, culture and school friends, to move them to?

So with Muslim Alli backing Labour’s Starmer, and Muslim Mohammed Yusuf backing Reform, are there any political parties that are not being controlled by the Caliphate?

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

It was actually Robin Cook who warned against Sandhurst training foreign cadets, especially from countries whose ideology is fundamentally hostile to the West.

Tony Blair appeared to support him in this, but nothing came of it.