News Round-Up
- “Trump: I’ve no desire to repair rift with Musk” – Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his rift with Elon Musk as the President warned Musk of “very serious consequences” if he switches allegiance, reports the Telegraph.
- “Zia Yusuf returns to Reform blaming departure on ‘exhaustion’” – Zia Yusuf has announced his return to Reform UK just two days after he quit as party Chairman, saying he would “redouble” his commitment to the party, the Telegraph reports.
- “Why Zia Yusuf changed his mind about quitting Reform” – “Welcome back Zia,” wrote Richard Tice on one internal Reform WhatsApp group. “Hope you enjoyed your holiday!” The Spectator‘s James Heale looks at what’s behind the dramatic U-turn.
- “Has Nigel finally shown he can be a team player?” – The return of Zia Yusuf suggests the Reform leader might have learnt how to work with others at last, says Henry Hill in the Telegraph.
- “Reform declares war on gold-plated public sector pensions” – The ‘rip-off’ public sector pension schemes must be scrapped to stop Britain hurtling towards catastrophe, Richard Tice has warned, according to the Telegraph.
- “Badenoch: Let bosses ban burkas in the workplace” – The Tory leader hits out at burqas, sharia courts and first-cousin marriage in an interview with the Telegraph.
- “We need to talk about the burqa” – In Spiked, Inaya Folarin Iman argues that, while burqas are undeniably misogynistic, a ban may backfire.
- “Without a Badenoch/Farage pact, the Left will rule Scotland for decades to come” – Reform has the passion, the Tories can come up with the policies. The two would make a perfect match, argues Daniel Hannan in the Telegraph. Presumably different policies to 2010-24…
- “Reviving Britain will require our version of the chainsaw act” – Reform in the style of Argentina’s Javier Milei is what is needed to set the UK on the right track, but Nigel Farage’s ideas would return us to the 1970s, argues Niall Ferguson in the Times.
- “Kemi Badenoch : Make migrants wait 10 years before claiming benefits” – In the Mail, Kemi argues that restricting migrants’ access to benefits is a crucial way of limiting the flow.
- “The death of the Tory Party has been exaggerated” – The Tories are languishing in the polls behind Labour and Reform, so it’s no wonder some have read it the last rites. And yet, under Kemi Badenoch there are signs the party is flickering back to life, says the Mail in a leading article.
- “The Death of Britain” – The furore raised by Professor Matt Goodwin’s latest research – that White Brits will become a minority in the UK by 2063 – is somewhat unjustified, says Frank Haviland on Substack.
- “Compulsory ID in United Kingdom” – How is compulsory ID supposed to stop illegal immigration, asks the Thinking Coalition on Substack.
- “‘Rachel Reeves can’t deliver,’ say Labour ministers” – Labour ministers drip poison to the Mail‘s Dan Hodges on why the Chancellor is doomed.
- “England football fans chant ‘Keir Starmer is a c—’” – Supporters took aim at the Prime Minister during a dull first half of a World Cup qualifying match against Andorra, reports the Telegraph.
- “Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber” – Robert Jenrick says the Attorney General is unfit for his role after spending his professional life “defending Britain’s enemies” as it emerges he represented a suspected Iraqi bomb maker who won more than £33,000 in compensation from the Government, the Telegraph reports.
- “Koran burner told of imminent terror threat to his life” – Hamit Coskun is in hiding after being convicted of a public order offence for burning the religious text, after the police warned him of a terror plot to murder him, reports the Telegraph.
- “We shall not remain a free country if we continue to submit to radical Islamists” – Some Muslims call for a blasphemy law but it is our liberties that are sacred, says Charles Moore in the Telegraph.
- “Why won’t the Met Police deal with Palestine protesters blocking parliament?” – Does the Metropolitan Police have more respect for the rights of aggressive protesters than it does for Parliament itself, asks David Spencer in the Spectator. “That’s the unavoidable question after the Met handled the latest demonstrations outside the Palace of Westminster with the usual kid gloves.”
- “Pro-Palestinian protester in two-tier police row is Islamist refugee” – A pro-Palestinian activist who evaded terror charges in a two-tier policing row is an Islamist propagandist granted asylum in Britain, the Telegraph reveals.
- “Dawn French apologises ‘unreservedly’ and takes down her Gaza video” – The Vicar of Dibley star has taken down a video she published on social media in which she criticised Israel’s continued war in Gaza, after she was accused by the relatives of the victims of Hamas of a “smug dismissal” of their suffering, reports the Mail.
- “Dawn, there is nothing funny about October 7th” – Recording a video about Gaza without even mentioning Hamas is not remotely proportionate, says Camilla Tominey in the Telegraph.
- “Why Britain must not recognise Palestine” – The leaders of both Hamas and Fatah have proved again and again that they will not cohabit with a Jewish state, says Jake Wallis Simons in the Telegraph.
- “BBC fact-checker service under scrutiny after White House attack” – With the BBC’s Gaza coverage under fire, some staff are said to be nervous about BBC Verify as it broadens its global reach through a live webpage, reports the Times.
- “The benefits cheats making a £6.5 billion mockery of the welfare system” – Amid calls for higher defence spending and an angry electorate, the Prime Minister faces pressure to cut the nation’s soaring welfare bill, says the Telegraph.
- “Can the Tyranny Be Soft-Landed?” – Every regime that inherits a disaster of five years is necessarily going to be squeezed between the legacy regime and populist movements, says Brownstone‘s Jeffrey Tucker as he looks at how the Trump administration is faring against the swamp.
- “Save QoVAX: Biobank could prove key to treating long Covid and vaccine injuries, but first campaigners must prevent its destruction” – The Queensland Government is facing strong pushback over its plans to destroy a globally significant biobank which could prove invaluable to research into diagnosing and treating Long Covid and Covid vaccine injuries, says Rebekah Barnett on Dystopian Down Under.
- “Undercover at Youth Demand’s awards for arrested activists” – A Times reporter attends three events that launched Youth Demand, the group taking up the mantle of public disruption from Just Stop Oil, and tells all.
- “Global wheat yields would be ‘10%’ higher without climate change” – On Not a Lot of People Know That, Paul Homewood says today’s climate lie comes from Climate Brief: “Global yields of wheat are around 10% lower now than they would have been without the influence of climate change”. Yeah, right.
- “Can Anyone Save New York From its Coming Self-Inflicted Climate and Energy Disaster?” – New York State has officially ordained the destruction of its electricity system and its economy with a mad dash to energy utopia, says Francis Menton on WUWT.
- “Michelin restaurant guide ‘racist and Eurocentric’” – The Michelin restaurant guide is racist, Eurocentric and elitist, academics are claiming as it is accused of failing to support the movement to “decolonise food”, according to the Telegraph.
- “Two private schools close in wake of Labour’s VAT raid” – Two prep schools have become the latest victims of Labour’s VAT raid by announcing their closures as a result of the levy, reports the Telegraph.
- “Keir Starmer’s pick to lead EHRC defended gender critical feminists” – Mary-Ann Stephenson’s appointment to the equalities watchdog is being celebrated by women’s rights campaigners, says the Times.
- “Cruelty is central to the Garrick’s appeal” – If women are uncomfortable with the idea of being vetted, they haven’t grasped what a members’ club is for, suggests Giles Coren in the Times.
- “Is it real or is it German intelligence? On online ‘authenticity’” – Recent revelations that German intelligence is running hundreds of fake account on social media raises an obvious question: how is this not against EU law, asks John Rosenthal in Brussels Signal.
- “George Osborne negotiating a ‘reciprocal’ loan of the Elgin Marbles” – The Chairman of the British Museum is pursuing a deal in which the sculptures would return to Greece as part of a long-term loan, reports the Times. Won’t be seeing them again, then.
- “Prevent deems concerns over migration ‘terrorist ideology’” – The Government’s anti-radicalisation programme lists “cultural nationalism” as a belief that could lead to an investigation, reports the Times as it picks up the FSU’s story broken in the Telegraph.
- “Concern about mass migration is ‘terrorist ideology’, Government says” – Among the ‘dangerous’ beliefs flagged by Prevent’s online training course are “cultural nationalism” and the idea “Western culture is under threat”, reports the Mail.
- “Concern about mass migration is a ‘terrorist ideology’ that requires Government intervention, claims Prevent” – Keir Starmer himself might be included after his recent “island of strangers” speech, says GB News, quoting Toby.
- “Starmer’s immigration speech ‘fundamentally racist’, says Diane Abbott” – Labour MP Diane Abbott has said Keir Starmer’s speech about Britain becoming an “island of strangers” was “fundamentally racist”.
- “Most of the country are terrorists under this definition!” – Watch GB News’s Headliners react to reports that fears over migrants are a “form of terrorism”.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Banning burkas might appear to take away women’s freedom of choice, but as many Muslim women are forced to wear a burka, banning burkas would give these women the freedom not to wear it, which is more important than the freedom to wear it.
Freedom of expression depends on identity and also responsibility for that expression. Given that a burka hides identity it is not an expression of freedom it is instead a subversion of it. Reciprocity suggests that you should not deny another their freedom of expression, and is a two edged sword, that context means you cannot freely deny the basis of your own freedom either.
I disagree strongly – but that doesn’t matter. It’s an interesting topic in a way. I really don’t like the things, don’t want to see them around me. I don’t encounter them much, so I am not overly affected, but I might feel differently if I lived somewhere where I saw them often. I think businesses and organizations should feel free to tell people (customers and workers) that they cannot wear them, and there’s a case for preventing them being worn in any public building. I don’t like the idea of telling adults what they can and cannot wear walking down the street and feel this is something of a side issue but then again not – it’s basically symbolic. Calling for a ban is saying to those people who wear them and those who expect people to wear them “Your version of your culture is not welcome here”. If that is what people mean, which is fair enough, then they should say it. I think it’s kind of awkward though when the people involved are here legally and have committed no crimes. France doesn’t allow them. I don’t know how it has worked out in France. I mean France… Read more »
I pretty much agree with you. For me the burka and some other national costumes remind me of the incompatability of certain cultures with ours. Incompatible cultures will *never* get on. That’s just human nature.
I don’t like the idea of banning any clothing (withing obvious reason). Banning clothing would make the non-woke as bad as the woke, who want to ban everything that disagrees with their world view.
My preferred method of reducing burka use would be the mass deportation of all those who shouldn’t have been allowed here in the first place, and those currently here illegally, while at the same time closing our borders until we get our immigration act together.
Thanks – I agree.
Another point about burka banning… There is no way the old bill would enforce it. They are too far gone woke-wise, despite the secret beliefs of many individual officers. Senior officers would instruct a blind eye be given to burka usage.
You are not allowed to enter many establishments wearing a full motor cycle helmet for security reasons. How is a burka any different?
I agree – I think it’s fine to ask people to remove them.
Some may argue that it’s a religious thing but I am not overly into the concept of “protected characteristics”.
The problem is there’s no ”freedom” in that particular form of ‘expression’. Not for females born into this culture. But they’re brainwashed from a young age to go along with it, even believing it’s a choice, when there is no free will involved whatsoever. ‘Cultural differences’ should not be tolerated when these are contradictory and at complete odds with our own customs, values and laws. For instance, how is it that women have equal rights under the law in Britain but that somehow doesn’t extend to Muslim women having to endure this level of subjugation? All this is doing is enabling parallel societies to exist and grow. Ban the damn Sharia courts! Laws of the land should trump all so-called ‘cultural differences’.
Seconded 👍
Well there are all sorts of parallel cultures going on in the UK and have been for a long time. A lot of them don’t cause much trouble as far as I can see. I think it’s about numbers, context, time and place, compatibility. My justification for a burka ban (which I am not on balance in favour of) would not be about helping that community to be freer but would be for entirely selfish reasons – I think being in contact with people covering their faces is just very unpleasant. Maybe if we were less eager to be so “welcoming” and expected people to integrate, we would not be in this mess – but I think it’s hard when the numbers get too big. My mum came here from Germany in 1950 and absolutely embraced our culture, language, habits and values. Easier for Germans though I guess as they are cousins.
Do they not have the choice to live somewhere that it’s legal? Same goes both ways, you cannot force a country to adapt to your version of freedom..just leave and live free somewhere else!
I don’t know if you’re following Kellie-Jay Keen on Twitter who has been featuring many posts from Muslim women sharing their personal experiences regarding this particular issue. Here’s just one of lots; “The oppression of women in our society doesn’t stop at clothing choices, driving, or working. Even when a woman is ‘allowed’ to live freely, society punishes her for it. Misogyny runs deep. It’s not just about controlling how we dress or covering our faces. Even if a woman has a supportive family, society will still label her a slut, question her morality, and insult her relatives especially the men for not ‘controlling’ her. We’re blamed for everything. If we face sexual harassment, it’s our fault for wearing a colorful abaya, for being outside alone, for showing a strand of hair. Society defends the abuser and shames the victim. Even women judge each other harshly. There’s this toxic mindset that if a woman is fully covered, she is “pure” and superior, while another woman who shares the same religion, the same culture, and the same beliefs is seen as dirty or immoral just because she shows her face or dresses differently. Morals don’t matter only appearance. That kind of… Read more »
The story of the poor wee girls not allowed to swim because of their fucking paki father’s religious mania is quite heartbreaking.
Well, if you’re into hoping that the lives of such women can be improved (in your view) then I suppose this could be a positive that comes out of the unfortunate position we’re in now where we have millions of people from alien cultures in our midst. I’m not personally into wanting to “fix” other cultures’ “problems”, but I suppose if we are stuck with them then perhaps this is something positive to focus on.
For the avoidance of doubt, I find the situations referred to above quite upsetting and would not wish this for anyone.
Proud to be a right wing nationalist fighting against the far left, communist scum who work for Prevent, and other establishment agencies that are enemies of rmthe safety and security of our native people. We own this land, not them. This is our country. These islands belong to Anglo Celts. No one else.
Remigrate! Repatriate! Them all.
Seconded 👍
“The death of the Tory Party has been exaggerated”
Not sure where the daily mail is looking!..maybe on the daily eternal optimist website
“Most of the country are terrorists under this definition!”
True British patriots could start a new protest with banners reading
# ‘je suis un terroriste’
and a Union flag in the other hand! 🇬🇧
Nice one Dinger.
There’s an idea for a t-shirt.
This popped up on youtube on some debate at Oxford Uni a few days ago. Some professor- quite critical of Islam i think. :-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnUNsnwQZf4
On Thursday’s Judging Freedom broadcast with Scott Ritter (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p_faUdJT3w), the latter credibly claims that the recent Ukrainian attack on Russia’s nuclear aircraft (and, incidentally, also on the helicopter carrying President Putin) were planned, organized and coordinated by MI6. In which case, “A nuclear power, Great Britain, empowered a non-nuclear state, Ukraine, to launch a pre-emptive strike using conventional weapons against Russia’s strategic nuclear deterrence. That violates at least two clauses of Russia’s nuclear doctrine … on the conditions under which Russia will use nuclear weapons. “That means that you are creating the conditions for a nuclear war. “Now, the British have taken the lead in saying that Russia is bluffing and one of the challenges that confronts Vladimir Putin today is if he doesn’t respond decisively then you sort of hardwire in the notion that Russia is bluffing … “I don’t believe that Russia will use nuclear weapons but the fact is … the Russians have to come up with a retaliation that resets their doctrine. They have to put the British on notice that the next time you do this, it’s automatic: London disappears.” Unfortunately, everything Scott Ritter said in the video sounds very sensible to me. With all… Read more »
“Undercover at Youth Demand’s awards for arrested activists” – A Times reporter attends three events that launched Youth Demand, the group taking up the mantle of public disruption from Just Stop Oil, and tells all.” Now guess what has just happened to a Columbian Patriot presidential candidate, Miguel Uribe Turbay, who DENIES CLIMATE CHANGE, after denouncing Columbia’s Leftist President Gustavo Petro for lying to the public about it? The same thing that happened to the Ethnic African leaders of five countries who refused to force covid vaccines upon their people… They were all assassinated, and replaced by willing Globalist tools who immediately launched forced vaccinations upon their people (Haiti, Tanzania, Ivory Coast, Eswatini & Burundi). Colombian Patriot Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay, whose journalist mother was murdered by a drug cartel when he was only four years old, has been shot twice in the head while addressing a rally. Only a month ago, his Leftist opponent President Gustav Petro was denied a visa to enter the USA by the Trump administration. Miguel Uribe Turbay: Colombian Presidential candidate shot in head at rally | The Standard This is what happens to Patriots in South America, and Europe: their Marxist rivals hire hitmen to assassinate… Read more »