News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mogwai
1 year ago

All true; ”Until very recently, Britain was inhabited almost exclusively by white Europeans. First, the Celts, then the Germanic tribes who became the English, and then the closely related Vikings. Our DNA was more or less settled by 900 AD. A smattering of others came over the next thousand years; Norman descendants of Vikings in 1066, and then a tiny number of Jews, Huguenots, African or Asian individuals associated with Britain’s empire, and even escaped slaves from the USA. But these were few and rapidly assimilated, becoming British and part of our island story. Our ancestors fought off invaders, invaded other countries, survived plagues, built cathedrals, wrote the Magna Carta, and started the Industrial Revolution. We shared a common language, values, a strong sense of identity, and an even stronger sense of humour and national pride. Britain, a trading nation that absent-mindedly built an empire, was never a nation of immigrants, unlike the USA. What began as a trickle of immigrants in the 1950s became a torrent in the 1990s. Successive governments encouraged mass immigration by saying that there was a labour shortage, and that immigrants would “enrich” our society, take jobs that native Britons didn’t want, and would integrate into… Read more »

Mogwai
1 year ago

A toxic ideology and dangerous agenda. Anybody pushing this divisive, nonsensical crap is a sociopath; ”Critical Race Theory (CRT), Queer Theory, and Gender Ideology are deeply interwoven, forming a cohesive ideological framework called EDI/DEI which is an equity-driven utopian insanity. Each originates from postmodernist principles, rejecting objective truth, binary distinctions, and meritocratic systems in favour of subjective identities and collectivist power dynamics. CRT asserts that racism is systemic, embedded in all institutions, demanding equity to dismantle supposed oppressive structures, particularly with a queer and trans lens as in BLM. Queer Theory challenges traditional norms around sex, gender, and family, promoting fluid trans and non-binary fantasy identities to subvert what it calls heteronormative systems, and break down all boundaries, not least of all between adults and children. Gender Ideology mandates recognition of self-identified genders, erasing biological sex to pursue an idealised inclusivity. Their shared reliance on intersectionality, which prioritises overlapping identities such as race, gender, and sexuality, creates a hierarchy of victimhood that fuels division while enforcing conformity to prescribed language, policies, and beliefs. This interconnectedness, evident in “Identity Marxism”, manifests in EDI/DEI’s coercive measures, from pronoun mandates to racial quotas, all aiming for a utopian equality of outcome that sacrifices… Read more »

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I’m sure the British people feel much better knowing this and very reassured by the head of MI6. What was that about weak men creating hard times..?

”To mark Pride month, and to stand in solidarity with our LGBTQ+ colleagues, MI6 is proudly flying the Pride flag from Vauxhall Cross, alongside the Union Flag, for the whole month of June. Your sexual orientation is no bar to you working and thriving at MI6.” Richard Moore ( who has ‘he/him’ pronouns in his bio, FFS )

Top comment;

”When I read the works of John LeCarre, I always think; there really aren’t enough trans spies or bumming in these books. I’m glad this wrong has finally been righted. We can not even begin to take on the Russians and Chinese without our crack team of rainbow agents.”

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

“As Bond took a break to adjust their underwear, the SPECTRE agent slipped away…”

AbsolutelyNot
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Whenever I see such initiatives, especially corporate offices decorated with rainbows and their logo updated on LinkedIn (but only for US and European branches) I read “we admit, we used to hate gays, but we’d love to have your money now”.

Anyway, I’ve noticed a lot of corporations didn’t bother to dust off and put on their June only logo this year (so far I’ve only found Sainsbury’s who did), and the she/them/hehe bunch are losing their minds all over X, making lists and threatening with boycotts.

JohnK
1 year ago

Re the GBN story https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/cars/cargo-ship-fire-electric-vehicles-alaska , it seemed to me that they were reasonably balanced statistically – towards the end, It seems to show that, while the outcome can be more severe with BEVs, the probability of fires is less than for combustion engines overall. That said, it does indicate that the percentage of EVs being in use in Sweden is just over 12%.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  JohnK

The problem is that BEVs can spontaneously combust. The Swedish articles says, rather disingenuously in my view, that conventional vehicles “have contributed to 34,000 fires” (my emphasis).

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

Conventional vehicles are “contributors” are they?

Well I never knew that. Is a conventional vehicle a contributor if it gets torched in a riot?

Steve-Devon
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

”while the outcome can be more severe with BEV”
Yes indeed, when these EV fires occur on ships they tend to have to evacuate the crew and abandon the ship as the ships fire control systems cannot control an EV fire the way they can control a petrol or diesel car fire. Thus an EV fire on a ship tends to result in astronomical losses, I think the Volkswagen/Audi car group are being sued by a shipping company over huge losses due to EV fires. You can see more in this video;
https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/05/zodiac_maritime_electric_car_fire/

Hardliner
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Not to mention if an EV should catch fire on the crowded car deck of a ferry, or under the English Channel on Le Shuttle. The real problems are that the smoke produced by EV batteries when they explode is very toxic. On top of that, the batteries burn very hot and they can’t really be extinguished. Just imagine that on the car deck of the Isle of Wight ferry, cars parked just inches away from each other, and 400 people sitting on the deck above. Terror, bedlam…

‘NSIT’, which used to be a charming and useful social acronym, now means ‘not safe in tunnels’…

Marcus Aurelius knew

.

Mogwai
1 year ago

Did you have second thoughts?🤭 What happened to: “It’s just words, innit”?

Hardliner
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Let’s see how many likes we can get for MAk…. 😉

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  Hardliner

🤣

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Hardliner

Actually I much appreciate M A k’s thoughtful, reflective and measured responses which tend to have a slightly subdued yet sometimes arrogated flavour.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  Mogwai

I choose my words. Sometimes I think to myself,

“Do you know what, MAk, it isn’t worth it today. Delete that one. I know I am right, but today, I want to enjoy myself. I don’t want to have to field replies from people who desperately need a leader, who look for white knights. I’ll continue tomorrow.”

Not speaking about you, Mogwai 🙂👍

transmissionofflame
1 year ago

I don’t “desperately need a leader” nor do I believe in white knights. I wish everyone agreed with me. But in today’s political system, leaders do make a difference and while they are not the “solution”, people do matter.

Purpleone
11 months ago

Good point, well made… 😉

Brett_McS
1 year ago

One of my uncles was a policeman in Leicester during the ’60s. He was a great character and told us many stories of his time in the force when he came to visit Australia in the ’80s. Pointy shoes had just come into fashion and one of his colleagues on the beat bailed up this young lad with “Do your feet go to the end of those shoes?” The lad looked up and replied “Does your head go to the top of that helmet?”. That story was greeted with hilarity when it was repeated back at the station. A different world.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

That would be worth three years now from TTK’s mob.

Brett_McS
1 year ago

“the US considers banning foreign censors from entering the country”. Immigration – certainly in the US – can stop anyone from entering the country for any reason. It’s not necessary to be anyone objectionable to get banned, but being a censor helps.

JDee
JDee
1 year ago

I didn’t read Toby’s article as it’s behind a wall, but it sounds like he is on the hook of free speech absolutism. Free speech absolutism is not some moral high ground because it allows a contradiction in terms, as it allows the free denial of itself which is plain nonsense. Some of the current histerical critique is based on this straw man, it a bit like critiquing bible belief by assuming a straw man literality. Of course you have to stop the cancellers, but you have to do this not on the basis of a fire with fire reactionary revenge, but because you clearly point out that what they have been doing is incompatible with free speech, which is about reciprocity especially in what is the common public space. The problem is of course that these differentiated ideas of common public space, and private free space needed and how they are needed to make proper sense of freedom, is not yet well appreciated.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
Reply to  JDee

You’ve made incorrect assumptions about the article you haven’t read.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

I didn’t realise.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  JDee

“hysterical”

JohnK
1 year ago

A new medical problem? Curiosity Deficit Disorder (CDD) – according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1JpkNyIgok&list=WL&index=7 by John Campbell. No risk of it here, of course!

transmissionofflame
1 year ago

I don’t know exactly what that woman said about the “burka ban”. Not sure exactly what she means by “burka” either but for the avoidance of doubt I am talking about those things where there is just a slit for the eyes. I’m torn. I don’t like the things – by which I mean I don’t especially want to be around lots of people wearing them. I certainly think their use is incompatible with certain jobs and employers can and should insist that people’s faces are visible. But not sure it’s worth chasing after people walking down the street wearing them – think there are more important things to worry about. Interested to know what others think.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

I think the idea that a woman should be forced to wear such a garment is wrong. I don’t know where the lines are between tradition, expectation, coercion and force on this. I was in a supermarket a few years back and an apparently Muslim family came in. She (presumably) in full black robe and face covering with a gap to see out. He in long white shirt/robe and ‘Arabic-looking’ (forgive my ignorance) head gear. Two kids in normal (in my opinion) Western gear. Kids were behaving normally: in other words running around being a noisy nuisance – just being kids. At one point the man and the woman were in separate aisles and the man said to the kids ‘Where’s your mother?’. I wondered: ‘If there was more than one similarly dressed woman, how the Hell would they know?’ When I see a Muslim woman dressed like that I recall many years ago when I attended a Roman Catholic primary school which had a number of nuns/sisters on the staff. Most of the nuns began to wear very conservative conventional clothing with a token head-dress when their order began to relax the rules. Sister Michael, who was a dragon… Read more »

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I think the idea that a woman should be forced to wear such a garment is wrong.”

Depends what you mean by “wrong” and “forced”. I don’t like it, and I don’t like people telling me what to wear, and I think “forcing” people to do things with threats of violence is wrong (and illegal) but saying to someone “I won’t marry you unless you wear one of those things” or “I will throw you, my adult daughter out f the house if you don’t wear one” while it strikes me as kind of horrible probably should not be illegal – I don’t like the state intervening in what seem to me to be private matters between consenting adults, or in the bringing up of children beyond obvious physical abuse/neglect.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Wrong – as in ‘does not belong in our society’.

Forced – as in ‘under threat of violence’.

compared with

Coerced – as in “I will throw you, my adult daughter out f the house if you don’t wear one”. In such an example coerced into not belonging to our society.

The obvious retort being that ‘they’ have their own society and are not interested in joining anything different.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

It doesn’t belong but they are here and it’s their culture. I think it would cause more problems than it solved. Happy to consider a “ban” for certain places e.g. any “official” building and happy for businesses and employers to say “we must be able to see your face”.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

In a way it’s a moot point because it will never ever be banned under a Labour/Uniparty government. We know how they pander to and appease the Muslims. Can you imagine the uproar and backlash? Look how you’ve basically got blasphemy laws now, for instance, so there’s no way without a radically different government ( and even then, would Farage and Reform have the balls to implement something so drastic? ) any of this is going away. Similarly with regards to Sharia courts or even non-stun slaughter. Islam is now so seriously entrenched within British ( and Western ) society that it’s not going anywhere because nobody now has the power ( or the will, when we look at the traitor class ) to make it so. It doesn’t matter how much we oppose it or moan about it. It’s like me banging on about sex work/prostitution and how it should be banned, another moot point because that’s also here to stay, legally or otherwise, whether we like it or not. This is why wishing Geert Wilders to be PM here in the Netherlands is as realistic as expecting Rupert Lowe to be PM of the UK. It sounds great… Read more »

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

I don’t just want the burkha banned I want the whole of islam banned. It does NOT belong in our country and while it does it undermines us.

England and St George.🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

I did not understand why it was politically useful to raise the issue again at this point. What did it achieve? Nothing useful, I suggest. It is a narrow (sic) second order issue.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I agree

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

I don’t.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://youtu.be/Wdy0FvnnHB8?si=tzEeiQgDHsSG7WG1

We owe it to the ladies of the world to ban the bloody things.

On this tof you are wrong.

So 7th century.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I find it deeply unpleasant and I don’t want any more of the damn things here but other peoples and cultures must find their own path.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Thanks for the link – she refers to among other countries France where full face head coverings of any kind are banned except in specified circumstances – this includes the burka – in public spaces excluding places of worship.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

“Cargo ship carrying 3,000 cars catches fire with ‘smoke seen rising from deck loaded with EVs’” – A cargo ship carrying around 3,000 vehicles, including more than 750 electric and hybrid cars, has been abandoned by its crew after a fire broke out, according to GB News. Research from the Civil Contingencies Agency in Sweden reported that the number of fires involving electric cars was 23, representing just 0.004 per cent of the nation’s 611,000 EVs.In comparison, the country’s 4.4 million petrol and diesel cars have contributed to 34,000 fires, or 0.08 per cent of its fleet. The Swedish CCA report is misleading. The rate of fires in diesel and petrol cars may indeed be 20 times higher than in EVs – but what about the relative age of the fleets and the amount of damage done? The only vehicle fire I have any real knowledge of was a renovated VW Beetle (the proper ‘Herbie’ type). My neighbour spent a lot of time on the bodywork and paid too little attention to the guts of the machine. I personally had a near miss (lots of smoke, no flame) when a non-standard repair I did on my Mini (not BMW) squirted… Read more »