A Deeply Troubling Book
The Deep State Goes Viral by Debbie Lerman is a deeply troubling book. Subtitled ‘Pandemic planning and the Covid coup’, the thrust of the book is that the United States response to Covid, largely followed across the world, was meticulously coordinated. Moreover, it was not a coordinated public health response, as sold to the public, but a military response coordinated not by public health experts but by the US Department of Defence and then, beyond the shores of the United States, by NATO.
Lerman’s thesis strikes at the heart of one of the biggest schisms within the lockdown and Covid sceptic community. Was it conspiracy or was it merely cock-up that led to the gross mismanagement and an extraordinarily panicked and ‘over-the-top’ response to what was after all a mild respiratory infection?
With my cards on the table, my inclination is, and always has been, towards the conspiracy end of the spectrum. I found that Lerman’s book confirmed a great deal of what I suspected. I had always found it difficult to fathom how what appeared to be a closely coordinated international response involving the introduction of untested and previously unused measures such as lockdowns, social distancing and masking, plus the grounding of international transport and the cessation of commerce could have proceeded at such pace and with such draconian implementation without, well, some coordination.
In the scenario posited by Lerman, public health officials such as Drs Anthony Fauci and Robert Redfield were merely mouthpieces for what was being planned at a clandestine level. If my understanding is right, almost nobody in government and possibly President Trump (first time round) were fully aware of what was taking place. There is some face validity to this claim – and precisely the same applied in the UK – as people like Fauci and Redfield were advising calm and no extreme measures in response to the news from Wuhan about a ‘novel coronavirus’. But witness how quickly both Fauci and our then Prime Minister – within the space of a working week – went from advising calm and playing down the need for extreme and damaging measures, to being fully aligned with what became the Covid narrative.
That narrative was one whereby frankly inaccurate information – lies in many cases – were told, including an exaggerated lethality of COVID-19, the ‘everyone is at risk’ mantra and then the imposition of demonstrably harmful lockdowns, compulsory wearing of face masks, ridiculous social distancing rules and laughable scenarios such the famous ‘Scotch egg debate’ (does a Scotch egg constitute a meal and, therefore, could you legitimately sit in a pub and eat one?) Finally, of course, came the Covid vaccine rollout and all that entailed, with people losing jobs and being cancelled and the subsequent drug side-effects.
The question raised by the cock-up theorists is always, regarding a coordinated response, ‘who is coordinating it?’ A perfectly legitimate question and one to which I, certainly, had no answer. In my case, as a nursing academic, I worked with many people devoted to public health. However, due to the lack of robust evidence for anything they preached I always considered them to be religious style fanatics. While they, along with many of my nursing colleagues, lapped up the Covid-generated adulation I did not consider them capable of organising the proverbial booze up in the legendary brewery, let alone a coordinated response to COVID-19.
If Lerman is correct, and she makes a strong case, we have the answer to the question from the cock-up theorists: it was the US military. According to Lerman, and the book is meticulously referenced and written in considerable detail, the response to Covid was not a public health response but a bioterrorism response inflicted, initially in the United States, on the population of the world. Considerable evidence is presented that control of what was by then the pandemic response was either handed to or taken over by the US Department of Defence. Its officials were responsible for some key appointments of people to the relevant committees who, they knew, would not contradict what they were trying to do.
In some cases, people, for example Deborah Birx who was appointed as White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, were appointed without even the relevant expertise. That people like Anthony Fauci and Robert Redfield changed their tune and simply adopted the new narrative around Covid could be explained by it simply being more than their jobs were worth to speak out.
The point of the exercise enacted to manage COVID-19 was, according to Lerman, all leading to one thing: the mRNA vaccines. (To be clear, Lerman does not suggest that the virus was intentionally released for this purpose, just that the response was handled at the top level by the US military using a pre-prepared bioterrorism playbook.) The story was sold to the public that the only thing that could save us from impositions such as lockdowns was the development of an effective vaccine. mRNA technology, untried until that point for producing vaccines that were in general use, seemed to be the only tool in the cupboard and, given that this was a military and not a public health response, the usual rules about testing and safety did not apply, were by-passed, and COVID-19 vaccines based on mRNA technology were rolled out across the globe with unseemly haste.
The rest, as the cliché goes, is history. We are now reaping the harvest of problems from the widespread and repeated vaccination of millions of people with a product that demonstrably does not work and which has caused widespread and very serious side-effects, including stroke and death. Under any other circumstances, as Lerman points out, such a vaccine would have been withdrawn from use very early after its introduction due to the widespread reporting of side-effects. It is notable how other products, not based on mRNA technology, were downplayed and the UK-invented Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine – not made using mRNA technology and not without its own problems – was quietly and quickly withdrawn without explanation. The mRNA vaccines continue to be pushed by public health services across the world.
While some of Lerman’s claims may be disputable, one set of claims is beyond doubt and unites all lockdown and Covid sceptics. I refer to the prevailing censorship that existed during Covid whereby all mainstream media outlets – to their eternal shame – sang with gusto from the same Covid hymn sheet. In this respect, the author gets it right; I speak from experience. Otherwise, in places where she is speculating, Lerman makes that clear, as is the nature of a deep state and clandestine operation, it will probably remain impossible to tie all the loose ends together.
The book is not written in a consistent style. Some chapters are transcripts of Covid related proceedings, one is a mock interview. Others are more straightforward. Beginning some sections with phrases such as “I feel scared. Very scared.” seemed odd. The book could have been more direct in places; shorter in fact, and some judicious editing and rearranging of contents may have enhanced the reading experience. Nevertheless, the book will remain an excellent reference text due to its meticulous sourcing of original material. Some may criticise the author’s use of Wikipedia as a source in places but this is usually confined to how things are described. As anybody who has dabbled with Wikipedia knows, it is a tightly controlled platform.
Lerman may well have unearthed the murky work behind the scenes which inflicted such misery on the world for over two years. The question remains as to why this all happened. There is an even more pressing question: could this happen again? Disappointingly, I think few people care and many would gladly go through it all again.
The Deep State Goes Viral, published by the Brownstone Institute, may be purchased on Amazon.
Dr Roger Watson is Professor of Nursing at Saint Francis University, Hong Kong SAR, China. He has a PhD in biochemistry. He writes in a personal capacity.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Cock up produced all those Social Distancing Stickers etc !
Over that fateful weekend of 14-15 March 2020, GUV.UK being spooked by a bioweapon narrative seems a more plausible explanation than the useful idiocy of the Ferguson paper for the policy about-face from herd immunity to lockup.
And then we were only a couple of months on from the General Election, in Dec 2019. A lot of the output looked like an election campaign for a while.
There was no ‘spooking.’ The Scamdemic was all planned and down to the smallest details. Anybody believing otherwise is highly likely to fall for the next one.
Yes, but who was actually in on it, and who played their role unwittingly?
It is possible for it to have been planned (consider the WEF and Bill Gates GAVI) and still for governments to have been spooked. The driver for a lot of the ‘spooking’ was the dramatic footage coming out of China, while none of it was verified. Consider also how the majority of politicians will go which ever way the wind is blowing – climate change being an obvious example.
Also haven’t the Aussies been told they have a new covid strain & best get Jabbed asap ! Then news just in we in the UK have a new convid strain of our own , what a coincidence after The WHO have just fudged their Treaty thingy through !! The smell of Monkey Poo is intense 😂😂😂😂
Seriously, at what point can the duped/brainwashed/threatened/scared shitless Australian citizens now sue their government? I’m guessing that if a parent wouldn’t routinely give their kid a flu jab, they’re not going to be lining up to give them a novel mRNA jab either, without some serious coercion or frighteners put on them, which we know is exactly what happened. Democide, all the way down;
”Hello, look what the Australian Government have quietly admitted today – the “benefits”of Covid vaccination are not considered to outweigh the “potential harms”.
And they State the Covid vaccines are NOT RECOMMENDED for adolescents.
https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/recommendations/healthy-infants-children-and-adolescents-aged…
It wasn’t long ago that they denied point blank that there were any “potential harms” – and anyone that suggested there were was vilified as an “anti-Vaxer” and censored.
I wonder if the ABC or Ally with broadcast this tomorrow ?
And if the vaccines are unsafe with “potential harms” (including death) for under 18 year-olds, how doesn’t that also apply to 19 year-olds or those in the 20’s ?
And will Bradley ‘Health’ Hazzard and Gladys apologise to all the school kids they tricked into lining up and submitting to be jabbed that were doing their HSC ?”
https://x.com/craigkellyAFEE/status/1929885477282226628
👍
Covid the Flu d’Etat
Clever!
The obvious problem with this theory is that COVID measures first appeared in China and were heavily marketed to the world by the WHO. It’s conceivable that the USA forces its allies to toe the line in such matters. This seemed especially obvious with the Philippines during this time which then caused me to ask publically how independent this former US colony actually is.
But why would these US organizations copy Chinese policies?
That’s a very good point.
I suppose it’s possible that the Chinese panicked or that they were in on the bio weapon exercise. My understanding is that the lockdown in Wuhan was not really emulated in the rest of the country – I’m not sure or could have been anyway as I believe it was actually a proper lockdown not a fake one like ours, and you can only do that if people come from outside and perform essential functions
I don’t think the Chinese policy is inconsistent with the idea that it was a US military/defence -led response.
If the word went out that the US military think it’s a bio-weapon grade threat I imagine that China would find this out pronto – whether that’s through ‘spying’ or even friendly advice at diplomatic level.
Once the military response is underway I can also believe that it would be difficult to stop. Who’s going to stand on the track in front of the express train to say ‘stop’?
I suppose the questions would be around – do the military think it’s an exercise or the real deal?
Surely they all knew from early on that it could only be an exercise. Not sure why the Chinese would have played along with that.
There’s ‘knowing’ it must be an exercise and being the guy who has the balls and the clout to say stop!
Look the Emperor is wearing no clothes!
Why wouldn’t the Chinese want to make the US military look silly?
What complicates things is that China presumably knew about the monkeying around with viruses going on in Wuhan, funded by the US (assuming any of that is true). Maybe they felt it best to keep quiet because of that.
You don’t think the US military look silly? They’ve just decided to rename one of their ships because it’s current name is too DEI.
Blimey!
It was China that devised all the various lockdown measures including mass testing. China then sold all the masks and mass testing kits to the West. The WHO praised China’s methods as ‘successful’ and exhorted the rest of the World to follow. The WHO is run by a Marxist. Klaus Schwab (WEF) published his book COVID-19: The Great Reset, just 3 months after the pandemic was declared. In that book he (the WEF) praised the WHO, CCP, UN (headed by a Marxist) and EU for their efforts to control this virus while criticizing Brexit Britain and a Trump US. Gates is implicated as he was given a seat on the WHO giving him the same authority as a country, but also his charitable vaccine organisation, GAVI, would get contracts. It was GAVI that came up with the Soviet style slogan: ‘no one is safe until everyone is safe’. Gates extolled the virtues of mass vaccination while he was mute about the terrible disruption to the child global vaccination programmes that actually save lives. Fauci is implicated as he funded the Gain of Function testing in Wuhan on a Coronavirus and during the lockdowns he shared a conference platform with a… Read more »
I have read it. If only the rest of the world would too.
That Birx is on the board of Palantir is deeply troubling.
Only one problem with the thesis and that is that it was China that broke the mould and started doing lockdowns. Then Italy, copying the Chinese and then other European countries.
The US did it later.
So I’d like to know how the US DoD and NATO were able to control or instigate the insane behaviour of the Chinese.
Using the WHO
According to info both from Lerman and from R.F.K. Jnr, lockdowns until vaccination were in the policy from the early 2000s, dating from the “anthrax letters” after 9/11, which were (of course) false flags.
For the future, the most worrying thing in the book for me was the quote on page 81, which showed how the National Security Council, that muscled in to control the COVID response more or less in secret, also sees its “national security” role as covering “homeland security, global public health, international economics, climate, science and technology, cybersecurity, migration, and others”.
That’s essentially a list of all the current “cock-ups”, and a few still in the pipeline.
The virus was created to be 98% survivable. The jabs were created in different batch toxicities. At the start each jab was recorded against your indiv NHS number with the date, manufacturer of jab, batch of jab and place where you were jabbed.
Yet despite recording enough information that even an amateur could produce a report, they can tell us nothing about what really happened!
And I wonder where all the data collected ended up.
Possibly in the hands of a Pharma nutter who is going to produce something effective & deadly.
And all the DNA from those phoney PCR tests…?
Yes, it was a mass medical experiment with the mRNA technology which had been under development for several decades (Fullmich Reiner found info on the patents).
When carrying out an experiment with technology which, to that date had NEVER worked, they obviously decided to try various different strengths of the concoction. Hence some batches were far more toxic than others.
That is demonstrated by the leaking of information from NZ, where the lethality of one batch was obvious.
Single batches were sent out to areas, so the batch variation showed up, by area, so they split the batches, and sent fractions of several batches to each area, so the variation was at a lower geographical resolution.
That doesn’t sound like the people’s health was the prime objective.
“…‘who is coordinating it?’…”
It’s a question one could ask on seeing a murmuration of a thousand starlings. The answer is nobody specific. It is joint entetprise by thousands of like minded people in the many intersecting and interdependent bureaucracies – international,and national – who take their cues from one another the aim being technocratic government of the World.
A useful complementary article from TCW.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-agenda-was-about-public-obedience-not-health/
“THE Biden administration designated critics of covid vaccine and mask mandates ‘Domestic Violent Extremists’ or DVEs, according to documents declassified last week.
The documents included a December 13, 2021, report by the National Counterterrorism Center, the FBI and the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) labelling views opposing mandates and restrictions as ‘prominent narratives’ that may be connected to violent extremism, including militias and groups ‘motivated by QAnon’.
Those views included ‘the belief that Covid-19 vaccines are unsafe, especially for children, are part of a government or global conspiracy to deprive individuals of their civil liberties and livelihoods, or are designed to start a new social or political order’.
Worth pointing out that in the USA people like us were demonised as…
Domestic Violent Extremists. DVE’s
😀😀😀 I’m a DVE !
Or DIVER.
Not sure we are who they mean when they praise the benefits of DIVERsity.
Surely a designer jab that can alter human dna can alter human nature and make it subservient. All ready for digital slavery with social credit scoring conditional on being all jabbed up. While we sleep the conspirators never rest.
Fortunately, contrary to common opinion, human behaviour is a lot more than genes. You’d probably have to disable people completely to prevent their eventual rebellion.
The Professor agrees with a conspiracy theory that puts all the blame for the Covid disaster on the US Military, ignores the Pharma with the big gains (Pfeizer) and totally fails to mention that China created and spread the virus and also leaned heavily on WHO to enforce globally its draconian measures. Bearing in mind that he is a Professor of Nursing at Saint Francis University, Hong Kong SAR, CHINA, a counter-conspiracy is in order.
Wrong. The book deals fully with the involvement of Big Pharma, international NGOs and so on.
The idea of ‘lockdowns’ was conceived in 2006 as a science project by a 14 year old school girl, Laura Glass, who’s father was part of the Bush administration.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3372334/
I don’t think they were clueless. I remember a Frenchman stating in 1982 that a vaccine would be introduced as an intelligence test, the idea being that if you were stupid enough to take it would probably be a good thing for you to disappear. If you are concerned about a growing population and want to preserve the best then it is a perfectly reasonable strategy, although the element of coercion complicates matters. Politicians aren’t the best and brightest but I guarantee you that not a single one of them took the death spike.
Which Frenchman?
When this happened all of the serious people I knew understood quickly that this was just a play by the financial system which started crashing in 2019. I remember watching in in live time. The idea was to bring about this disruption and then markets could be coralled into disaster capitalism. The ultra rich increased their wealth by about fifty percent and everyone else suffered the same in loss. Not a cry or moan because of the crisis mentality. You’re feeling it now though. They ripped you to shreds and they haven’t even got properly started yet.
It’s pretty obvious it was planned and overseen. From the World Military Games in Wuhan October 2019 to supplying the agents of transmission to the Bildeberg run legacy media’s unquestioning approval of the enforced removal of all civil liberties, and the creepy members of SAGE foisted on no 10 by who?
Clearly global compliance was orchestrated from the highest level.
‘(The ideal response) would be active case-finding combined with isolating patients in fully equipped and staffed hospitals, but this is not practical in the current situation.
In some areas, the outbreak has already
overrun hospitals; many suspected Ebola cases are being turned away for lack of beds.
An unknown proportion of cases remain at home. For those who seek medical care, the current median time between becoming symptomatic (and thus infectious) and isolation in Sierra Leone is four days.
Many wait more than a week. These delays will only get longer. Current UK aid efforts — which have so far pledged more than £200 million (US$320 million)
and the largest UK troop deployment outside Afghanistan — will help to increase Sierra Leone’s bed capacity threefold by January.
But at current measures of R, the projected increase in new cases (thousands per week) will far exceed the number of possible new hospital beds.
To avoid that scenario, beginning this month, affected regions must substantially increase rates of early isolation for suspect and confirmed Ebola cases’
Sounds familiar? It should do. It was written by Whitty, Farrar and Ferguson in 2014.
Very interesting, and I suspect the book is right.
On the subject of vaccines, let’s also not forget the traditional killed-virus vaccines that were developed in China. They were downplayed and rubbished in the West, but do seem to be perfectly effective.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_mainland_China
Just look at that: “In 2021 Nature reported that “studies have questioned the length of protection” that domestic vaccines such as CoronaVac and Sinopharm offer, especially when compared to mRNA vaccines.”
So keep on taking those mRNA boosters, folks. Their length of protection is so good that you need them repeatedly.
I’d find this more convincing if the US had started or led the push for lockdowns, and if there hadn’t been such big differences between the measures adopted in different American states. This feels like a case of looking for evidence for a pre-existing view.
I haven’t read the book, but I reached the “conspiracy” conclusion a long time ago: whilst the tyranny was still in operation.
The clue: The Federal Government in America* and the others in the Five Eyes moved in lockstep when implementing the restrictions. (*Some Republican States didn’t).
And in Europe, so did the NATO countries.
Sweden – in the EU but at that time not in NATO – didn’t.
It was obvious it was a policy being implemented by the USA using its allies in the Five Eyes and NATO. I always thought it was a CIA job!
“Hydroxychloroquine, a medication primarily used to treat autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. It works by slowing down an overactive immune system”
IIRC, Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquine early on, and was heavily criticised, even though many medics now know that it can protect and alleviate C19 symptoms.
And what’s the problem with the spiked protein, attacking the host?
I find the response similar to NET Zero: the loudest promoters are those with the least basic knowledge of the subject. And many are the same people!
This is something I suspect many on here would sadly agree with. Will the truth ever be told and, more importantly, accepted?