‘Stop Letting Criminals Choose Their Own Gender’, UN Warns After UK Police Forces Allow 49 Rapists to Identify As Female Offenders

The UN has slammed UK police forces for allowing 49 male-born rapists to be recorded as female offenders, warning that self-ID policies endanger women and undermine accurate crime data. The Telegraph has the story.

Police forces that allow criminals to pick their own gender are the “biggest barrier to ending violence against women and girls”, a United Nations report has found.

Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur for violence against women and girls, said at least a third of British forces were still collecting data on criminals and victims’ self-identified gender rather than their sex.

It has led to a situation in which 49 convictions for rape had been officially listed as female in the decade to 2023, despite the fact they were biological men and the legal definition of rape as only being able to be carried out by men.

She said such an approach “neglects women’s and girls’ specific needs” and increases risks to their safety.

In the report, Ms Alsalem warned that feminist campaigners had been “ostracised, attacked and punished” by British political parties, universities and the media for criticising gender ideology.

She said the UK risked “undoing decades of progress made on combating homophobia” by failing to stand up for lesbians who had been “vilified” for demanding the right to same-sex spaces such as bars and dating apps.

And she demanded that Labour ensured its conversion therapy ban did not criminalise doctors and parents who question whether a child needs to change gender.

Ms Alsalem’s comments, in a report on how the UK fares on the issue of violence against women and girls, come a month after the Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act means biological sex and not self-declared gender.

In March, a review led by Prof Alice Sullivan, of University College, London, urged Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, to issue a mandatory order to all 43 English and Welsh police forces, and the British Transport Police, to collect data by sex, but she has not yet done so.

In her interim report, published on Friday, Ms Alsalem backed that call for action, writing: “The lack of legislative clarity on ‘sex’ hampers data collection on violence against women and girls.

“Police data, while disaggregated by crime and location, often conflates the sex with the gender, for data on victims and perpetrators. The special rapporteur identifies this gap as the biggest barrier to ending VAWG, obscuring trends and intersectional vulnerabilities.”

Ms Alsalem said prioritising self-identified gender erased biological sex records, “distorting the male-driven nature of violence against women and girls” and hindering analysis. …

“At least 16 of 46 police forces follow guidance favouring self-identified gender, skewing the very low rate of sexual and gender-based violence crimes committed by females,” she said.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
huxleypiggles
10 months ago

As a good little globalist I am sure Kneel will be on to this straight away.

“Yvette? Can I have a word?”

EppingBlogger
10 months ago

If the UN has got something right by accident that is no reason to follow their advice. We should do it under our own volition

Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
10 months ago

self-ID policies

There’s an interesting confusion here – foisted on us by our deranged rulers. The problem is not “self ID” as such, but the way in which it’s been confused with self-declaration. No one accepts that if I declare I’m Napoleon, then I am Napoleon. Why then, should we accept that if a man self-declares himself to be a woman, then he is a woman?

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

This comment was removed

Ralph Mellish
Ralph Mellish
10 months ago

Digging and leveling my garden into terraces on a steep hill is the most dismal form of resistance training I assure you!

I’ve a spare shovel if you want to join me Jabby – bring a handful of that stuff too would be good ..?!

jeepybee
10 months ago
Reply to  Ralph Mellish

He’s off on one!

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

This comment was removed

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

“The Expose” website has an important article showing how porn addiction leads to child porn, not because the addicts seek it out, but because once their porn supplier/website realizes that they are getting desensitized to adult porn, they OFFER (in other words, TEMPT) the addicts with child porn as something new to try, like a new kind of drug.

Then the child porn leads to rape, murder and Satanic ritual sacrifice. There’s nothing acceptable or normal about porn. It’s a Gateway to Hell.

Easily accessible online pornography is pushing users to increasingly extreme content – The Expose

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

That drive towards darker and darker sex is a form of possession. The problem is that those becoming possessed are so overcome with lust that any serious consideration is put on the back burner. There is also the issue of access.
Of course there is strong paedophile propaganda in this country with newspapers like the Daily Mail producing sexualised images of children as well. The system doesn’t mention it by name but it is everywhere.

Mogwai
10 months ago

Scratch the surface, go back to its roots, and you will always be confronted with the fact that this all started with men. Warped, perverted, paedo-sympathizing, misogynist, abusing-their-power men. And who benefits most from this dangerous and toxic ideology? Why, men. Obviously. Again, the sexual-deviant, women-hating, narcissistic degenerate kind. The compliance and support of women is of paramount importance to their ‘success’, though, and historically always has been. Even if it meant gaslighting, manipulation and psychological abuse in order for women to accept the deviant behaviour of their own husbands. In those days, women had very little choice in the matter; ”Transgender ideology is protected by mainstream media, the UN, the World Health Organization, the Open Society – and was ushered in by the American Psychiatric Association. Nothing about transgenderism is grassroots, apart from the massive lobbying campaign undertaken by transvestites who sexually abused their wives. Their campaign kicked off in the 1970’s, and was immediately taken up as a cause célèbre by powerful institutions. Transvestites organized multi-nationally in English speaking countries. They were backed by sexologists and psychiatrists, who were told, to the letter – according to a 1965 manual penned by sexologist John Oliven – to gaslight women… Read more »

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

Surely it is obvious that it cannot be quelled by rational means. Certain aberrations appear that have to play out. They might get us all agitated but if you get agitated then you are feeding it. It is not the job of any human soul to somehow grasp and comprehend the whole of reality and then set about trying to fix it. In our time, the end times it is our job to largely observe. All of this silly talk wil count for nothing when resources get really short.

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago

Surely the attorney general, will be rushing to comply with the words of one of his beloved international bodies that he grovels before.

WillP
10 months ago

But letting Hamas use UN facilities in Gaza is fine?

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
10 months ago

The UN should also call on all police forces to release figures for the ethnicity of sex (and other) offenders.

WillP
10 months ago

“Police forces that allow criminals to pick their own gender are the “biggest barrier to ending violence against women and girls”, a United Nations report has found.”

Why do nincompoop bodies like the UN always frame their pronouncements in terms of hyperbolic garbage?

The state of Afghanistan would be a better starter.

EUbrainwashing
10 months ago

What are the real objectives of this nonscience? Undermining a human fundamental, placing the state in the position of ultimate arbiter? Tell me please.

3F6791EC-9D9D-4C57-992C-095F37FEC83B