Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

In The Conservative Woman, Kathy Gyngell delivers a harrowing account of a persecuted Christian woman twice denied asylum – allegedly due to interference from an Islamic network inside the Home Office – raising worrying questions about religious bias at the heart of Britain’s immigration system. Here’s an excerpt:

Yesterday [May 29th] the Daily Mail reported one of those stories that make you despair about our country. A Pakistani drug dealer – an illegal immigrant since 1998 who’s already served four years for possessing heroin and cocaine – has dodged deportation after a judge said he played a key role in teaching his son about Islam and his culture. It is but the latest in a series of bizarre decisions such as that of an Albanian criminal whose deportation was halted partly due to his son’s aversion to the type of chicken nuggets served abroad.

The insanity – or could it be a perverse form of prejudice – was underlined by a sharply contrasting case that had landed in my in tray earlier in the day. A press release from Christian Concern told the story of a Christian woman who had fled forced conversion and abduction attempts in her country of origin to friends in the UK, only to have her asylum application twice rejected by the Home Office. That was until Christian Concern stepped in to help. Seen together the reports raise worrying questions about exactly who is making asylum decisions. Who if anyone checks the Home Office investigators? Who are the judges who decide that ‘identity’ is so important that it trumps criminality? Do any have religious preferences or prejudices? We need to know.

As Christian Concern noted, this is the same Home Office that has welcomed 20,000 Syrians between 2014-20 under the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme.

Despite resistance from Islamic elements in the Home Office, they report, justice has been finally been served for ‘Maria’, who cannot be named or identified for security reasons. She finally won her legal right to remain in the country. But her case revealed evidence of ‘tampering’ with her application. It also brought to light, via documents leaked to Christian Concern, the existence of an Islamic network of more than 700 staff in the civil service.

The original decision by the Home Office not to grant her asylum has since been found to be “in breach of the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention; and unlawful under Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998”. …

Christian Concern is demanding a full inquiry. They point out that an Islamic lobby group inside the Home Office represents a serious threat to the Government’s aims of combating Islamic extremism as well as granting asylum to Christians like Maria fleeing Islamic countries.

Worth reading in full. You can read Christian Concern’s full report of the case here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
10 months ago

This case is an interesting example of the changes that are necessary if the Establishment is to succeed in The Great Replacement (which is its fundamental policy). What it boils down to is this: in our country in-group preference is illegal for whites, Christians, and the native peoples of our islands, but in-group preference is legal for non-whites, Muslims, and all foreigners.

Art Simtotic
10 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

State-sanctioned discrimination. Cue Solzenhytsin, “To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.”

Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
10 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

Yes – hence the madleft and Orwellian absurdities like “decolonisation”.

RW
RW
10 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

A great replacement is the inevitable outcome of regarding pregancy as a disease that’s to be prevented by medication, stigmatizing young mothers as spongers and classifying children as ‘luxury’ people must be able to afford before they’re morally allowed to get any. It’s going to happen regardless of any establishment policy and the society this will create – presumably very similar to the Indian society of today, namely, some mixture of Hindus and Muslims trying to be each other’s terror as good as they can – is not what this establishment would have wanted to create had it intentionally done so.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

But they ARE spongers unless they name the FATHER OF THEIR CHILDREN, they should receive NOT A PENNY FROM THE STATE unless they DO, and the father must be forced to pay his fair share for raising the child. Why should taxpayers foot the bill for him?

RW
RW
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

This statement is a vote for the caliphate which doesn’t treat its women as otherwise worthless sexual commodities but sees tham as mothers of the children which will make up its future generation.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

I think we’d have managed without all the imported people

RW
RW
10 months ago

The idea that the last living OAP in the UK will turn out the lights before his death and the country then turn into a lifeless open air mausoleum of the country that was Great Britain was never going to fly. Europe is too rich and has a too accomodating climate for it to simply remain unoccupied just because the native people went collectively crazy and considered the quest for personal riches during their finite lifes more important than the survival of their peoples.

Put into other words: All the imported people are here which proves that you didn’t manage to stay without them.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

I used the conditional

RW
RW
10 months ago

Reality disproves your standpoint: You didn’t manage. What other outcome could this have had?

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

What reality?

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

Don’t be ridiculous! Finland managed to thrive with a population of only 6 million people.

SMALLER POPULATIONS mean HIGHER LIVING STANDARDS.

RW
RW
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Finland is largely a wilderness that’s too cold for humans to live in.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

Is that all you got?
Finland and all the Scandinavian countries were once the most peaceful, clean, prosperous nations with an extremely high standard of living and a Protestant Work Ethic that made them so, before Communist Traitor politicians opened the gates to the Third World scroungers.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Indeed – and what about Japan? A big country with an ageing population, still almost all ethnic Japanese.

sskinner
10 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

And the non natives can be either an Ethnic Minority or Global Majority depending on which way the wind blows.

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago

Shows why we will need a department for remigration when Reform takes over. Perhaps starting with a recruitment stall at Millwall FC – other patriotic football clubs are available.

EppingBlogger
10 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

We also need much more effective supervision of staff. Membership of an Islamic network in the civil service clearly creates an insuperable conflict of interest.

In a sub-100 staff business that I was involved with all actions on data records could be tracked. We should demand the Home Office investigated and disciplined the Islamists involved with this case as far as dismissal if becesssry.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

May I just point out that under international law, refugees and asylum seekers must claim asylum in THE NEAREST SAFE NEIGHBOURING COUNTRY.

NOT travel thousands of miles across safe countries to the country offering the most welfare benefits.

That means that ALL THE DINGHY MOB have no right to claim asylum in the UK, as they have traversed several SAFE COUNTRIES to get here.

And since we are an island nation surrounded by SAFE DEMOCRATIC NATIONS, not one single asylum seeker or refugee claim has ANY VALIDITY. End of.

Marcus Aurelius knew
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Wales? What about Wales?

EppingBlogger
10 months ago

Does anyone really believe ”the Government’s aims [include] combating Islamic extremism as well as granting asylum to Christians like Maria fleeing Islamic countries.”

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

Does anyone seriously believe that the English care about Chrstians. This has been going on for decades in various countries and there seems to be an agreement to keep quiet about it. Contemporary English society is far more anti-Christian than Islam or Judaism in any form.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
10 months ago

This is not a surprise at all. This can’t be an accident, our politicians have been complicit in this atrocity being carried out before our very eyes. I can’t believe anyone apart from an absolute zealot ever voting for these monsters again.