Britain Is Sleepwalking Into Total State Control of Our Daily Lives

In a gloomy piece for the Telegraph, Sam Ashworth-Hayes warns that Britain is blindly sleepwalking into total state control, sacrificing individual freedom to an ever-expanding, intrusive government that now dominates every aspect of daily life. Here’s an excerpt:

Thank God we won the Cold War. For a while there, it was touch and go, the future of the world on a knife-edge.

On one side, we had a system permeated top to bottom by an official state ideology. Employment and freedom was made contingent on adherence, an extensive network of censors and informers was established to maintain the illusion that dissenters were a minority, harsh punishments were meted out to political prisoners and the state took control of vast swathes of the economy.

On the other, the promise of freedom: freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and association, freedom to do as you would with your private property.

It was, as I said, close. But in the end, despite Thatcher’s brief, doomed fightback, the Socialists won.

It’s a tongue-in-cheek reading of British history, but it doesn’t take a great deal of exaggeration to see how it could be true.

As AJP Taylor once wrote, “until August 1914 a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state beyond the post office and the policeman”.

That is emphatically not the case today. Having won the wars, the advocates of freedom comprehensively lost the peace. They lost to such a degree that those of us born and raised afterwards find it hard to comprehend the scale of the change.

It’s easiest to start with the size of the state. To be sure, socialism in Britain has receded from its high point. The nationalisation of coal, iron, steel, electricity, gas, roads, aviation, telecommunications and railways has been mostly undone, although steel and rail are on the way back in.

But by comparison to our pre-war starting point, we live in a nearly unrecognisable country. In 1913, taxes and spending took up around 8% of GDP. Today, they account for 35% and 45% respectively. To put it another way, almost half of all economic activity in Britain involves funds allocated at the behest of the government, and over half of British adults rely on the state for major parts of their income.

And if anything, this understates the degree of government control. Outcomes which are nominally left to the market are rigged by a state which sees prices as less as a way for markets to clear, and more as a tool for social engineering.

Universities charge tuition fees capped by the state to students funded by the state, with the looming threat of lost university status if they veer from approved principles. Energy prices are capped, and in crisis subsidised. Mandates are put in place for the installation of heat pumps and sale of zero-emission vehicles as a share of business.

Wherever you look, there is meddling. The judiciary has revived the labour theory of value, awarding tens of millions of pounds in equal pay claims to shop workers who explicitly acknowledge they would never have taken warehouse jobs unless they paid far more than retail.

The benefits system has recast the old mantra as “from each according to their pre-tax labour income, to each according to their needs-based assessment”. The support of the proletariat is purchased, the middle classes are punished.

And the Government appears to view its primary task to be finding caches of private wealth or institutions that have slipped state control – private schools, pensions, and the like – and reeling them in.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
10 months ago

Receded from its high point? Perhaps in one limited regard (direct state ownership of industries) but not in any other. Arguably the high point so far has been “Covid” – brought to you by the Fake Conservatives. “Net zero” is another contender, brought to you by the Uniparty.

FerdIII
10 months ago

Spot on. Funny (not really) how the Rona Fascism is never mentioned. 100% Medical Nazism and yet apparently, it did not occur and no one will discuss it. All for a fake, non-existent ‘bat virus’ (maybe a US-Wuhan biolab release, also never mentioned).

varmint
10 months ago

Net Zero is first and covid controls a distant second.—–Covid was temporary but Net Zero is ongoing and costing us all 1.4 TRILLION and leading us to IMPOVERISHMENT. Which is ofcourse the whole ide of the eco socialist fraud that pretends to be about the climate.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  varmint

Yes, “covid” was a short, sharp, shock, “net zero” is a cancer.

huxleypiggles
10 months ago

Ultimately this destruction will fail as all communist enterprises do but how long will it last and how many will die before freedom reasserts itself?

Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
10 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

At the moment our rulers are hoping that draconian prison sentences for non-crimes (cf Lucy Connolly) will work for them. My view is that such sentences won’t deter us for ever. Therefore, the Establishment will have to resort to mass murder – bearing in mind that according to the authors of “The Black Book of Communism” the 20th century Marxists murdered at least a hundred million.

huxleypiggles
10 months ago

https://thenewconservative.co.uk/diversity-in-islamabad/

Anyway, in an attempt to provide some merriment here is Roger Watson with his thoughts on lslamabad’s Yorkshire Mayor…

“Let us be the first to announce the appointment of former Rotherham resident Percival Thistlewick as the new Mayor of Islamabad.

The appointment has sparked controversy, as Thistlewick does not speak Urdu or any of the other languages used in Pakistan. And, with his thick Yorkshire accent, even locals who are fluent in English are struggling to understand him. Naturally, the appointment has proved controversial. But, as explained by an Islamabad Town Council spokesperson, the elected councillors have a right to appoint their own leader. The public has no right to vote on the matter.”

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

You can’t help but laugh.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
10 months ago

Without a shadow of a doubt, the ultimate aim of the state is total control over the population.
What else?
Is anybody so naive as to think that at some point the state would say “I think we already regulate people’s lives enough, let’s back off a bit”?
What is the point of the entire army of legislative, administrative and executive bodies if not to exert control over citizens?
And, to dispel an illusion: most of the population actually want this. Contrary to popular belief, most people can’t cope with too much freedom and have the mentality of a slave. A textbook example was the covid lockdown: there was very little resistance and enthusiastic support.
And the modern, 21st century state can exert control to a level that would have been the envy of Stalin. All internet communication can be monitored. Bank accounts can be shut down. Central banks digital currency can control who spends money on what.
A totalitarian regime is in the making.

stewart
10 months ago

Whenever I argue against the need for a state I am confronted with the argument that we would just have anarchy. But we already all live in a state of anarchy. We are all faced with the same reality. You are as free as the power you personally have allows you to be. In every other respect we do what we are told to do in order to obtain the protection of a stronger power, which in the modern world is the state with all its bits and pieces. Every part of our society exerts power on others as far as another greater power allows it to. Banks debank and they get away with it. NHS trusts carry on with trans nonsense even though they arent supposed to. The police interpret “hate speech” as they see fit. Judges give draconian sentences for social media posts. Hell, the Prime Minister has a nickname which describes his arbitrary use of power – two tier Kier. We live with the illusion that we live in a world of rules and laws. But at best these are constantly being redefined and renegotiated and the deciding factor is always power. At worst the rules and… Read more »

Purpleone
10 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Great post – absolutely spot on

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

I don’t think it is sleepwalking into anything the enclosure was well underway before I was born. At this point there isn’t enough recognition of freedom and beauty left to bring about any sort of revival. Travels With My Aunt by Graham Greene made it clear through the character of the aunt that the things that made life beautiful were already jettisoned by the 1960s. Bit by bit they chipped away at it because it was not resisted with zeal.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

The British have a propaganda model that has been finely honed since before the first world war. One could say that it is a wonder that there is any dissent left at all. There is more informed dissent now than there has ever been. This is no small achievement.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

Another example of total control over our lives is the demand that parents must allow their babies to be jabbed with 72 needles full of toxins before the age of five years old. Here’s an excellent article showing the result: Childhood vaccines cause autism, a review of 850 studies concludes – The Expose “He refers to a significant study conducted in 2018 that found up to 88% of autism cases are characterised by autistic regression. This phenomenon occurs when a child, who initially develops normally, suddenly loses abilities such as eye contact, speech and social interaction OVER A MATTER OF HOURS, DAYS OR WEEKS.” “ ‘This suggests an ACUTE TOXIC EXPOSURE and we now have eyewitness testimony from hundreds of thousands of parents that the acute toxic exposure that preceded the autistic regression was a ‘well baby’ vaccine appointment with a paediatrician,’ Rogers said. ” [Note: I have personal experience of this, after a neighbour years ago told me this happened to her grandson, who was transformed from a happy, healthy little boy into a kind of depressed robot within hours of the Measles/Mumps/Rubella vaccine. She said the family had tried to protest to the doctors, the hospital, the social workers,… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

Oh just pack it in, will you?

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago

These people are coming in because you want cheap restaurants and cheap nannies and delivery drivers seven days a week. This is a really crap way to run an economy. Why can’t you see that the economic model of your country leads to tawdry outcomes? I can see it easily it isn’t difficult to discern.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

Why don’t you go help Conor McGregor free the Irish from Mass Third World Invasion, instead of focusing your ire on “the Brits and the Yanks”?

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

I don’t see any difference. I don’t feel ire I just don’t understand it. The only plausible argument I can see is that populations are getting older and the younguns aren’t breeding enough. I hope you understand why they aren’t breeding enough. Just read about Japan in the late 1980s.

Smudger
10 months ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

That is what the politicians tell the people as an excuse to open the flood gates not what the people have expressly requested.

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago

It started under Tony the Liar and then when he went off to make shedloads of money from any idiot dumb enough to pay him, along came Call Me Dave and his Liberal government followed by more years of socialism under the Tories, who did nothing to roll anything back and made it all worse.

Mogwai
10 months ago

Well there’s always the possibility of a revolution; ”In even plainer sight are the ‘four stages of undermining free societies’, outlined by self-professed KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov in a 1984 TV interview. These are Demoralisation, Destabilisation, Crisis, and Normalisation. Britain is nothing if not demoralised; it is nothing if not unstable; and it now appears to be in crisis. Meanwhile, the process of normalisation also seems to be well under way: some type of domestically-focused standing army; the release of violent criminals to make room for protestors (remember Solzhenitsyn); and ‘Operation Scatter’ to embed migrants more deeply in society. Whether or not Bezmenov was genuine, like Balaam’s Ass he seems unnervingly accurate. Under the cover of the resulting terror and social paralysis, the institutional march will be resumed in the form of Blairism 2.0. As always, the ‘state of exception’ introduced by social destabilisation provides essential cover for institutional changes that could not be achieved under the historical operation of a country’s Social Contract. Faced with such a complete and integrated process, the average law-abiding British citizen is faced with three options. The first is to give up and keep their head down. As safety — let alone comfort — becomes a precious resource, mere apathy becomes a luxury. Those… Read more »

varmint
10 months ago

My uncle Willie was torpedoed twice in the Atlantic by U boats and rescued both times. He could ever have imagined that his fight for freedom would eventually mean people in the UK being jailed for something they said. But that is where we are today. —-Afraid to speak

marebobowl
marebobowl
10 months ago

The sooner the parliament votes to do away with benefits and make them available for ONLY those with REAL disabilities, the Uk,is doomed. The current situation of spending millions on housing, feeding, medical care, of illlegal immigrants is bankrupting the country, and yet not a word from your gov’t or taxpayers. The little guy is continuously ignored while those in authority continually run roughshod over them. It is a system I do not understand. People here say they live in a democracy and yet, they appear to have fewer and fewer rights.

WillP
10 months ago

Who funds these bien pendant turds?

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
10 months ago

Wonderful cartoon!

Sums up the article to a tee 🙂

Purpleone
10 months ago

It is… all you end up doing is going around and around in circles, until you are exhausted and sink – sounds about right

JXB
JXB
10 months ago

“… To be sure, socialism in Britain has receded from its high point. The nationalisation of coal, iron, steel, electricity, gas, roads, aviation, telecommunications and railways has been mostly undone,”

No it hasn’t – just transferred. Instead of workers being on taxpayer funded payroll in productive jobs albeit in loss-making industries, they are now on the taxpayer funded payroll in non-productive jobs working for the bloated State at national and local level.

In fact that was the consequence of denationalisation, a huge number of workers from bloated industries with no work, the natural organic evolution of industry (creative destruction) stopped by State-ownership meant little chance of new jobs for old. The solution was to shunt Government departments out of London to the old industrial areas with high unemployment to provide “jobs”, create new departments to increase the size of the civil service, and create new regulation to be administered providing more “jobs”.

In fact those on welfare in reused exponentially, but appeared to be “working”.

varmint
10 months ago

The omnipotent busy bodies. Or as someone once pointed out it would be better to be ruled by Robber Barons because they sometimes sleep.