There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen
“If you reach Net Zero by 2050, if you do it worldwide, you avoid about a third of a degree of warming. If it’s just Europe and the Anglosphere, it’s closer to a tenth of a degree,” says Dr Richard Lindzen, an atmospheric physicist and professor emeritus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). “So you have avoided a tenth of a degree of warming at a cost of probably tens of trillions of dollars. Doesn’t seem like a bargain to me,” he adds. “How far will the population go in saying, we will sacrifice ourselves for a symbolic gesture?”
And who cares about a tenth of a degree of warming, Lindzen asks. “When somebody says the change of a tenth of a degree, or when (UN Secretary-General António – HS) Guterres says, if it changes a half-degree, we’re finished as a species, this is an existential threat – people have to ask, what the hell are they talking about?”
According to Lindzen, all recent predictions of climate catastrophe have proven false, and future ones will be as well. “2030 will pass. 2050 will pass. Fifty years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe,” he says.
In the interview, Lindzen thoroughly discusses what climate scientists know about climate change and its processes, as well as the half-truths and outright lies propagated by those proclaiming a climate crisis. He addresses topics such as the limited capacity of CO2 to warm the planet, its actual role on Earth, misleading claims about the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, the absurdity of climate policies and the future of energy.
Dr Richard Lindzen is an internationally recognized American atmospheric scientist and MIT emeritus professor whose contributions to climate science are significant. Over the course of his career, Lindzen has published almost 250 scientific papers, exploring the greenhouse effect and other complex aspects of climate change, like dynamic meteorology, hydrodynamic instability, planetary waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres and hydrodynamic instability. His research has involved studies about the role of the tropics in mid-latitude weather and global heat transport, the moisture budget and its role in global change, the origins of ice ages, seasonal effects in atmospheric transport, stratospheric waves and the observational determination of climate sensitivity. He has made major contributions to the development of the current theory for the Hadley Circulation, which dominates the atmospheric transport of heat and momentum from the tropics to higher latitudes and has advanced the understanding of the role of small-scale gravity waves in producing the reversal of global temperature gradients at the mesopause. He pioneered the study of how ozone photochemistry, radiative transfer and dynamics interact with each other.
Lindzen has also contributed to the scientific reports of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
He earned his doctorate from Harvard University in 1964. He served as a professor there until 1983 and as Director of the Center for Earth and Planetary Physics from 1980 to 1983. Lindzen has been affiliated with Tel Aviv University, The Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the Laboratory for Dynamic Meteorology, Paris, as a visiting professor during his academic career. In 1983 he joined MIT, where he became a professor of atmospheric sciences. Lindzen retired in 2013.
Lindzen has been recognized for his scientific contributions with several prestigious awards. The American Meteorological Society honoured him with the Clarence Leroy Meisinger Award (1968) and the Jule Charney Award (1985) for “highly significant research in atmospheric sciences”. The American Geophysical Union awarded him the James B. Macelwane Medal (1969), and the Engineers’ Council recognized him for outstanding achievements in engineering (2009), among other honours.
Lindzen is a member of both the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (elected in 1977) and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected in 1977).
First published by Freedom Research where you can watch the whole interview. Subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Oh, no, a climate denier…!
Immediately cancel him, sack him from his job, publicly humiliate him, silence him, ban him, prosecute him and threaten him with physical violence.
#BeKind
Cue for all @#BeKind – old-school American wise guy, Upton Sinclair, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
As an Emeritus Prof (born 1940), Richard Lindzen has liberty to tell it how it is, whereas career climate-cultists’ salaries, mortgages and dependents are invested to the hilt.
It’s not just climate-cultists that would take the hit if it were admitted tomorrow that the climate crisis is a fabrication. There’s a whole constellation of industries that would go under if not for the “climate crisis” cash-cow. The “renewables” industry wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. We even have an entire government department whose existence would be pointless!
Then there’s the countless authors of books on the issue of manmade climate change… all whose credibility would take a beating.
Manufacturers of heat pumps, electric vehicles and smart meters would go into liquidation.
Climate activists would feel rather ridiculous, and move onto other latest fashions, like pro-Palestinian campaigns.
Climate Change (TM) is vested-interest central.
Just think of the number of school books that will need to be pulped.
And then there’s the teacher retraining …
You would think that when someone of his academic background says “relax, nothing to see here”, Governments around the world would cheer massively. Overnight they can save £/$100 billions. They can then spend the money on their own populations – schools, hospitals, defence, roads, tax cuts etc.
But they don’t. I wonder why?
Because as usual, following the money, it ends up in the pockets of people who are in power and associated with those in power.
Death’s too good for them.
I don’t care what the “job / project” is if it involves government, central or local, extracting cash from taxpayers then it is in reality a money-laundering scheme. It really is as simple as that.
Exactly, it’s almost as if they want a good old Climate crisis…. are pathetic.
Lining their pockets with gold, perchance?
Calculating global average temperatures is still nonsense and hence, talking about “a third of a degree of warming” doesn’t make any sense, either. Plus, the daily temperature differences in any particular location between sunrise, noon, sunset and midnight are much larger than ⅓ of a degree.
Considering both, the statement essentially means “Achieving Net Zero world-wide by 2050 won’t have any effect”.
Nut zero is impossible.
End of, job done.
It certainly is. But it’s also useless: If it could be accomplished, the outcome would be an extremely costly nothingburger. And I think extremely costly is the real motivation for this. It wouldn’t affect the planet or the climate much. It would certainly affect the bottom lines of the people getting these tens of trillions of dollars in a way they like very much.
Take Dale Vince as example: The guy used to be a New Age Traveller, that is, someone living in a camper van and travelling from festival to festival to make money with odd jobs and small-scale sale of legal and illegal goods. It’s probably not too far off to call him a travelling petty drug dealer. Nowdays, he’s a green energy industrialist (Wikipedia) and gadzillionaire and for as long as subsidies for green energy roll, he can expect to get ever richer.
There will be a climate catastrophe it just won’t be attributable to human activity. Catastrophe is perhaps the most important and salient element of human existence. This uniformitarian gradualist view which massages you into thinking that things are just stable and will keep getting better and better forever. This is not the case. As Plato said, mankind would have to start again like children with no recollection of what went before. It has to be that that way from a cosmological perspective. Can you imagine if the corruption we have now were not to be stopped by catastrophe.
Tbh I’ve no idea what you’re on about, still we all ha e our moments.
😀😀😀
You mean evolution through crises alternating with periods of crisis resolution? True enough. But even Greta “How-Dare-You” Thunberg gave up tweaking the end dates her doom-calendar and just jumped ship to the pro-Palestinian fraternity.
We all know that, but lots of even quite smart people still believe, we are making ground but until we have systematic blackouts and bills 3 times what they are now these people will not wake up.
It’s a f#cking nightmare to be honest.
I do not see how we can escape.
There is literally such a degree of zealotry about the “climate crisis” that there are influencers out there who would be happy to see the bedlam unfold with regular power outages because of a grid with pitiful output, just so long as the “planet is being saved”!
It’s either zealotry or weariness, worn down by the unreasonable expectation that people will consider proposals in an intelligent fashion.
I can imagine Ed Millipede is getting quite weary for that very reason! “Can’t they just believe me when I sing a song about climate and play the banjo?”
If you have any sense then you would look at what has been happening with insect populations. I am sure you have noticed the decline. This is a serious matter. Have you heard a single person ever even mention it?
In the end times you can either get all irate or you can chill with it. Don’t look for shelter. If you are destined to be saved you will be sheltered. You can still have a bit of fun in the end times you don’t have to be all serious about it.
The main thing about the end times is that you enjoy them. Just savour every moment.
Of course, and REPENT NOW! REPENT NOW! Remember 2012, that year when the world abruptly ended?
It did for my Mum.