Starmer Dragged Into Free Speech Union’s Koran-Burning Court Case

This morning, Hamit Coskun will appear before Westminster Magistrates Court, where he’s being prosecuted for burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish Consulate. The Free Speech Union is paying for his defence. The Telegraph has more.

Hamit Coskun is quite possibly Britain’s most endangered man. Certainly he appears to have a death wish. In February, he took a coach to London, walked up to the Turkish consulate, pulled from his bag a Koran, and set fire to it with a lighter.

A video of the incident went viral after Mr Coskun, aged 50, was violently attacked for what he insisted was a meaningful protest and what many other people would view as an anti-Islamic stunt.

In the aftermath of the Koran burning, he says two Iraqi men broke into his home in Derby and threatened him with a knife and an ashtray. Police took him from his home and moved him to a safe house elsewhere in the Midlands, a nondescript terrace that I won’t describe further for obvious reasons.

On Wednesday, he goes on trial at Westminster magistrates’ court charged with disorderly behaviour likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress” for setting the Koran alight. As he did so, according to the charges, Mr Coskun swore, and then shouted “Islam is religion of terrorism” in his broken English. He is accused under the Public Order Act of being motivated “by hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam”.

Mr Coskun remains unrepentant. He will plead not guilty and intends to go on a tour of the UK burning Korans in other cities, whether he wins or loses his case.

He himself has become a cause célèbre. The Free Speech Union has taken up his case and paid for a security team as well as half his legal fees – the National Secular Society is paying for the other half. Meanwhile, an American woman who read about his arrest online plans to fly to the UK and join Mr Coskun in future Koran-burning protests.

Mr Coskun’s lawyers will argue that he has a human right to peaceful protest, under Article 10 of the Convention on Human Rights, to burn a Koran if he wants to.

They have found an unlikely ally: Sir Keir Starmer.

Almost a quarter of a century ago, Sir Keir, in his day job as a human rights barrister, successfully argued that a peace activist had the legal right to deface the Stars and Stripes flag in a protest outside a US airbase in Norfolk. In 2001, Sir Keir told the High Court: “Flag denigration is a form of protest activity renowned the world over.”

He added that the court should protect the right of his client – a 59-year-old peacenik – to stage a “peaceful protest in a free and democratic society”.

The High Court agreed with Sir Keir and quashed his client’s conviction for disorderly behaviour “likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress” – the same part of the Public Order Act under which Mr Coskun is charged.

His client, Lindis Percy, would later suggest that Sir Keir had told her he had worn underpants emblazoned with the Stars and Stripes so he could show his unwavering support for her whenever he sat down wearing them.

Sitting in his safe house, Mr Coskun, a father-of-three, in some ways makes for an unlikely heroic figure. He is diminutive – just 5ft 5in tall – and courageous to the point of madness. He speaks no English, talking through an interpreter via Zoom. It takes him 10 minutes to answer the question: “How old are you?” because of a mix up over his papers at birth. He says he is officially 50 although he looks older.

Mr Coskun came to the UK from Turkey two and half years ago to flee persecution. He is seeking asylum and his case is under review. He is half Armenian and half Kurdish and a committed atheist, who spent close to a decade in jail for membership of a Kurdish political party that Turkish authorities said – and which Mr Coskun denies – was a terrorist front. He was a political activist who was “abused and tortured” in detention; on one occasion a gun was put to his neck.

He had become alarmed at what he sees as the Islamification of Turkey, constitutionally a modern secular state but where, he says, recent times have seen Islamism gain a hold, stoked by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, its authoritarian president, to maintain his grip on power.

It explains his decision to make the trip down to London on Feb 13. The week before, he had posted on social media his concern that the Koran was catapulting Turkey to sharia law. “I have been studying the Koran for 25 years now,” he says, convinced it encourages terrorism.

“So on February 13 I went to London, I took the bus. At 2pm in front of the Turkish consulate. That’s because Turkey has been made a base for extremism and that is why I burned the Koran,” Mr Coskun says.

He packed the Koran, two lighters (so he had a spare) and then set it alight outside the consulate.

All hell broke loose.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: Watch me interviewing Hamit Coskun in a video about why the Free Speech Union is concerned about this Government’s attempts to bring in a blasphemy law by the back door.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mogwai
10 months ago

In a majority Muslim country I can understand that somebody would end up in court for defacing/burning a Koran ( a lot worse would happen, let’s be honest. It’d be a death sentence in many instances ) but no way should somebody end up facing criminal prosecution in a so-called ‘free and democratic’ society, though I’m no fan of this type of protest, personally. I also think it’s foolish of him to state he’s going to tour the land burning Korans, especially when he knows that will paint an even bigger target on his back. Look what happened to the late, assassinated Salwan Momika, FGS. This man has children, too, so I think he’s being very reckless if he does this because he should consider his family. He must know better than anyone, having read the book and lived in a 99% Muslim country, that all manner of horrors are sanctioned within that particular religious text. I wish him well in court but he’s inviting a world of pain on himself if he thinks he can continue to do this and expect to live as a free man.

Art Simtotic
10 months ago

Brave Man. All taking place in a country in which the constitutional monarch is self-proclaimed “Defender of All Faiths” and an imported “All Faith” gets afforded special privileges over the indigenous faith defended by monarchs for five hundred years.

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

You know, what I’d really like to see is a Muslim burn a Bible, just as a comparison and a test to see if it really is a case of ‘two-tier justice’ when it comes to this sort of thing. For some strange reason we never hear of this happening, though. They seem keener on going after you with a knife than setting fire to the Christian holy book.

7941MHKB
7941MHKB
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Don’t forget American “Artist” – Andre’s Serrano, who won fame amongst the “intelligencia” for his 1987 “Artwork” called “Piss Christ”, comprising of a plastic crucifix in a glass container of his own urine.

I guess anyone could do what they like with a Bible. Although perhaps a few Muslims might possibly remember that the Old Testament is supposedly amongst their Holy Books”.

A Bible burner would very likely be rewarded by 2TK Stūrmer.

Smotters
Smotters
10 months ago
Reply to  7941MHKB

Don’t forget American “Artist” – Andre’s Serrano, who won fame amongst the “intelligencia” for his 1987 “Artwork” called “Piss Christ”, comprising of a plastic crucifix in a glass container of his own urine.



I thought I was the only person left in the world who knew about that – I remember reading the TimeOut review on the bog in my flat in Hoxton

soundofreason
soundofreason
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I’m sure most Christians would tut a bit and buy another copy of the Bible. Destroying a copy of a book shows contempt for its contents but does not actually destroy the content (with the rare exception of it being the only remaining copy of something).

It’s interesting that he’s studied the Koran for 25 years. That’s surely more than most followers of Islam.

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Well Muslims are not renowned for their tolerance, nor their support for freedom of speech/expression, compared with other people, are they? As society’s largest and most influential perma-victim group ( in my opinion), they consider themselves above criticism, therefore having to manufacture the nonsensical ‘Islamophobia’ term as a shield and defence mechanism against those who wish to legitimately critique their faith, just like all other religions are able to be questioned and challenged, targeted for satire, etc. The fact they consider themselves exempt from this by default shows that they also consider themselves special and a cut above everybody else.
These people definitely need to look in the mirror and repeat the mantra “offence is taken, never given”.

Tonka Fairy
10 months ago

Oooooh! Brown-skinned asylum seeker vs Islam, a tough one for the authorities!

(Although I think Islam will win, it seems to be top of the hierarchy)

huxleypiggles
10 months ago

“behaviour likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress”

Ordinarily common sense would require definitions of “harassment, alarm or distress” but that no longer exists.

Who has sufferred the above and anyway so what? I find myself under assault from behaviour likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress” on a daily basis. I go in to Manchester or the shithole that is my hometown and find myself genuinely distressed at how foreign, dirty and un-English these places have become. Am I entitled to take the Council to court?

The Koran is a seriously offensive document to me but I cannot challenge this.

The Public Order Act needs erasing from the statute books and that would be a start.

I wonder how one of the bent judges will wriggle round Kneel’s bit of jiggery-pokery?

Big thumbs up to the FSU for taking this on and it is a win-win whatever the result.

All the best.

stewart
10 months ago

If Muslims are allowed public expressions of their belief in Islam, then people should be allowed public expressions of their beliefs against it.

That would also hold for any religion.

Or indeed any belief.

And before you know it, you are a free speech absolutist.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
10 months ago

Let’s see how the religion of peace will react to this. After all they say “Allah the merciful”.
As a Christian, I would find someone burning a Bible a reflection of a sad mentality but at the same time I know that truly sacred things cannot be hurt by human actions. The communists blew up churches in the Soviet Union and still, in the end, the regime only lasted 70 years.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

So this father-of-three Hamit Coskun came to the UK from Turkey two and half years ago to flee persecution. He is seeking asylum and his case is under review. He is half Armenian and half Kurdish. He speaks no English.” “It takes him 10 minutes to answer the question: “How old are you?” because of a MIX-UP OVER HIS PAPERS AT BIRTH. [Really?] He says he is officially 50 although he looks older.” [So he’s obviously lying about his age, and probably hoping to go onto a UK state pension, along with his wife] So instead of just fleeing to his ancestral ARMENIA just across the border from Turkey, he somehow chose to bring his whole family 2000 MILES across Europe to claim “asylum” in the UK with much higher welfare benefits, even though he speaks NO ENGLISH, and whose taxpayers will be forced to support him, his wife and three children indefinitely. “He says two Iraqi men broke into his home in Derby and threatened him with a knife and an ashtray. Police took him from his home and moved him to a safe house elsewhere in the Midlands [paid for by British Taxpayers].” [Really? Does anyone with the… Read more »

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
10 months ago

As far as I’m concerned he’s welcome to stay.

RTSC
RTSC
10 months ago

Looks to me suspiciously like a stunt to ensure that he and his family are given asylum here.

Cusanus
10 months ago

Several years ago the Bavarian state government, which held the expiring copyright to Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and had refused republication, relented and permitted a heavily annotated edition to be published. The annotations provide historical context, correction of matters falsely asserted as facts, linguistic analysis and much else, as one would expect from an academic forum.

In view of widespread aspersions on The Koran, which aspersions are often incorrectly subject to blanket condemnation as islamophobic, would it not be appropriate to launch a similar project for The Koran?