News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
10 months ago

How many ways in how many days can Starmer Humiliate Britain?

Dinger64
10 months ago

THE GREAT BRITISH NATIONAL STRIKE!
TOMORROW, 24TH OF MAY 2025, EVERY CITY IN BRITAIN, YOU MUST BE A GENUINE BRITISH CITIZEN TO ATTEND!

Lockdown Sceptic
10 months ago

Net Zero Uses Slave Labour latest leaflets to print at home

deliver to neighbours, forward to your bad MP & friends online. Start a local campaign. Deliver 100 leaflets a week (5200 a year). Over 300 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

05b-Net-Zero-Uses-Slave-Labour-MONOCHROME-copy
Lockdown Sceptic
10 months ago

Block the Sun Kill the Planet

latest leaflets to print at home, deliver to neighbours, forward to your bad MP & friends online. Start a local campaign. Deliver 100 leaflets a week (5200 a year). Over 300 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

05a-Block-the-Sun-Kill-the-Planet-MONOCHROME-copy
Mogwai
10 months ago

You don’t need to watch this video in its entirety or even put the sound on to see how deeply unhinged and propagandized this person is. Now let’s say there’s 1000 just like him all congregating in a public space, holding the placards, shouting the vitriol. You don’t need to be Jewish or Israeli to see how being forced to accept this level of hate en masse is not conducive to living in a civilized society where basic standards of decent behaviour are maintained. What people get up to online is one thing, what they decide to do ( usually in large numbers, therefore harder to ignore ) in the street is quite another. This is one severely radicalized and warped individual, much like the Washington shooter, who will *always* be able to justify the atrocities they commit. This is also why there should be rules/boundaries, and precisely why I will never be a ‘free speech absolutist’, because it gives people like this a free pass. Once again: ”If you tolerate everything, you stand for nothing”, and society goes to sh*t as a result, as we are witnessing; ”Guy Christensen releases a 9 minute rant about how every single Israeli… Read more »

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Caitlin Johnstone ( the terrorist-supporters’ fave heroine ) displaying what a full-on wack-job she is;

”People like this are the reason two people were executed in cold blood tonight.

These are the modern-day Nazis. Blood is on their hands.”

https://x.com/EYakoby/status/1925424733249470514

They’re pursuing the death penalty for the evil psycho, which seems perfectly reasonable to me because he should already be dead. The only reason he wasn’t killed by police at the scene is because his gun jammed and he ditched it before they arrived;

“Once the decedents fell to the ground, Rodriguez advanced closer, leaning over them and firing several more times. As Decedent-1 attempted to crawl away, Rodriguez followed behind her and fired again. After a brief moment, Rodriguez reloaded and fired several times.”

https://x.com/EYakoby/status/1925710170866237801

transmissionofflame
10 months ago

“On Substack, Dr David McGrogan argues that Sir Keir Starmer’s weak and insecure leadership exemplifies how individual character remains crucial to national success.”

If we have to have “leaders”, I suppose we want ones with good character. I don’t really want to be “led”. Other people seem to want or expect this. I just want someone to run stuff sensibly, within narrow parameters. Anyway we don’t have a President. Giving away territory should be a decision at least for Parliament (though they would probably approve it) if not for a referendum. I also think that the top quality in a “leader” is SOMEONE WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

Good post, but I disagree with your final sentence. Many Third World Invaders claim to “love this country”, but only as a termite loves the wooden house they are busily eating up.

“Someone who loves this country, and its people, because it is their ANCESTRAL HOMELAND.”

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Well as of now we have a native Brit who clearly hates it. I reckon Badenoch loves this country more than Starmer.

I agree that it’s somewhat odd for a country to keep choosing leaders other than from the pool of indigenous people, and not something that happens in many places (though note that the President of the Dominican Republic, which is one of the most prosperous countries in the region, is of Lebanese extraction.

Having a decent leader of any kind would be a start. Some bloody hope!

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

No. No one needs a leader “of any kind”.

When did the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots or Irish, or their descendants around the world, demand that Third World Ethnics be chosen to represent them as their “leaders”. The whole idea shows the depth of brainwashing now imbedded into Ethnic Europeans, to lay down like doormats before an alien onslaught.

Don’t be deceived by the World Economic Forum “Manchurian Candidate”.

You just try going to Nigeria and telling them they should vote for you as their leader, because you “love Nigeria” so much!
They would laugh you to scorn.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Perhaps in time of war or an imminent existential threat you may want your “leaders” to say some appropriate words to rally the country to the cause, but in general I just want my government to do the basics of keeping order and protecting our borders, efficiently. They can’t even do that as they are too busy prancing and poncing about.

huxleypiggles
10 months ago

“Tell me Kneel, Davos or Westminster?”

Oh Davos definitely.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

How anyone could have voted for him after he said that beggars belief.

Monro
10 months ago

Trump ‘told Zelensky that he and Putin need to reach peace themselves How does that work, in practice? Oh! Someone already has a plan! ‘The rules written for peaceful coexistence no longer work. The institutions meant to control these rules can no longer do so, because they themselves are part of those who rejects them. The strength of the treaty means nothing anymore. What is the Budapest Memorandum worth? About as much as Article 5 of the NATO treaty. The concept of security guarantees – legal, diplomatic, or military – has lost its certainty…… The nature of modern warfare has changed and continues to change. When I talk about the nature of war, I don’t just mean drones taking over the battlefield. Never imagine that you need just a transformation of the defence industry or some rearmament. You need…….new tactics, new organisation, new doctrines, new training and defence planning (budgeting). All this requires not only additional resources, but also, most importantly, additional time. The nature of modern warfare is far from what NATO is now operating. So the current capabilities can be used up within a very short period of time. If a future war involves more than one region,… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Given that the West is said to have set the ground warfare strategy for Ukraine (how has that gone?) and supplied training and weapons, I think both Britain and the rest of the Western powers need a radical change in understanding of modern warfare in Europe.
The combination of drone technology and AI, plus the speed with which both can be refined and developed, almost in real time, means the looking back to 1918 is pretty foolish.
Also foolish is thinking that a failed military man has anything new to say about warfare.

For a fist full of roubles

No-one can deny that blitzkieg was successful in WW2 and that it has no parallel in the static battlefields of WW1.

Monro
10 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘The medium tanks were to be assisted in this endeavour by aircraft operating in a ground-attack role. Once the enemy’s command structure had been paralysed and his forces fragmented, the heavy tanks, supported by motorized infantry and artillery would push several attacks in depth into the central 50 miles of the battlefield area. This would serve to eliminate the main enemy formations. Thereafter, the medium tanks, followed by the motorized infantry and towed artillery, would exploit into the enemy rear areas and roll up the forces on the flanks.’

J.F.C. Fuller, Diary, 24 May 1918, TC Archives 1362, Bovington

Monro
10 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Ukraine often made political and military decisions independently, sometimes without full alignment with U.S. strategy. Despite claims that Kyiv followed Washington’s lead, The New York Times article and subsequent statements suggest otherwise—Ukraine frequently pursued its own course, even when it diverged from American advice.’

Ukraine’s Lost Offensive: How Infighting Among Generals Shaped a Strategic Defeat

Monro
10 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘We conducted the first quantitative test of air superiority and battlefield outcomes and found that air superiority is strongly associated with victory. We contend that this is because air superiority enhances the manoeuverability and firepower of one’s forces.

We also found that air superiority has a larger substantive effect than other factors associated with victory in war. Air superiority may also explain why democracies generally prevail in war. Democracies typically achieve air superiority over their adversaries.

Among the implications of our research is that more attention needs to be given to the effects of advanced technology on military effectiveness.’

Air superiority on today’s battlefield, of course, now layers down to very low level micro drone operations. The key will be AI dominance.

The forthcoming British SDR will set out the importance of AI on the modern battlefield:

‘Decisional Supremacy at Every Level of Command Establish AI-empowered command systems that reduce time-to-decision from minutes to milliseconds.’

Monro
10 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘On the morning of Feb. 24, the general had two strategic goals for Ukraine’s defense. “We could not allow Kyiv to fall,” he said. “And, on all the other vectors, we had to spill their blood, even if in some places it would require losing territory.” The aim, in other words, was to allow the Russians to advance and then destroy their columns in the front and supply lines in the rear. By the sixth day of the invasion, he concluded it was working. The Russians had failed to take airports around Kyiv and had advanced deep enough to begin straining supply lines, leaving them exposed. Milley, Zaluzhny’s U.S. counterpart, was in some ways astounded when he saw the Ukrainians holding out. He asked Zaluzhny whether he planned to evacuate to safer ground. “I told him, ‘I don’t understand you,’” Zaluzhny says. “For me the war started in 2014 … I didn’t run away then, and I’m not going to run now.” He too was surprised by Russia’s blunders. When the enemy faced heavy resistance or lost the ability to resupply, they did not retreat or shift to a different approach. “They just herded their soldiers into the slaughter,” Zaluzhny… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

They were actually strategic withdrawals caused by a large reduction in manpower at the end of the first tranche of volunteers after 6 months or so of enlistment when their contracts expired.,

Mogwai
10 months ago

Logic and reason do not feature in the minds of the radicalized, who are fueled by hate and truly believe their actions are justified; ”That Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim happened to be at an event about delivering humanitarian relief across the region, including to Palestinians in Gaza, was of no concern to the alleged murderer. He was there to “free Palestine”—the slogan he shouted after he executed them. According to several witnesses, after the shooting, he reached into a bag, pulled out a keffiyeh and said: “I did this for Gaza.” That may sound nonsensical to ordinary people. How would killing two Israeli embassy staffers improve the situation in Gaza? Of course one could ask the same question about the slaughter of some 1,200 men, women, and children by Hamas militants who invaded Israel on a Jewish holiday on October 7, 2023, and brought so much ruin on Gaza. But the shooter’s evil worldview has a demented logic, and, as he proved, it’s a risk to us all. It’s a worldview that says that Jews and those who support the Jewish state—wherever they live—are now acceptable targets. It’s a worldview that insists that a beautiful young woman and man in love… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

This is vitally important, because so many other mainstream media in the West are also downplaying, and even totally denying, the horrific White Genocide against South African farmers, dismissing it all as “conspiracy theory” and “misinformation”.

Their attitude shows that Henry Makow was right when he said,
“The World has been taken over by a Satanic Cult”.

Here is Robert Hersov’s open video letter to Trump:

Dear President Trump: The ANC Is Destroying South Africa – YouTube

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Indeed. It was worse in what was once called Rhodesia – look how that has gone for them.

transmissionofflame
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

It’s a much poorer country than it was. Probably a few Africans are now much richer, but my guess is that the average standard of living has plummeted since “majority rule”. My guess is that the same is true of South Africa.