Migrant Boat Forces Dunkirk Flotilla to Divert

A flotilla of ‘Little Ships’ crossing the English Channel to commemorate the Dunkirk evacuation was forced to divert so Border Force could escort a migrant boat to Britain. The Telegraph has the story.

The fleet of 66 boats set sail from Ramsgate, Kent, to Dunkirk at 6am on Wednesday to commemorate the 85th anniversary of Operation Dynamo.

It was intended as a “poignant tribute to the bravery and sacrifice” of the Dunkirk evacuations, where 1,000 British pleasure boats were used in the rescue of more than 300,000 Allied soldiers from the Nazi advance.

But the commemorations were disrupted when Border Force and the French navy demanded that the flotilla be diverted to provide a one-nautical mile exclusion zone for a migrant boat.

The small boat, which had been launched from northern France, was being escorted across the Channel by the French navy and UK Border Force.

It comes as two migrants died on Wednesday attempting to cross the Channel in a boat packed with 80 people.

Wednesday was also estimated to be a record day for migrant crossings so far this year with more than 800 arrivals.

Marine traffic audio heard by the Telegraph revealed that the ‘Little Ships‘ were told: “There is a [French] warship on our head with a migrant [boat] close by. And we’ve been requested to give one nautical mile distance from that vessel, over.”

A French voice, believed to be from the French navy, was then heard saying: “Thank you, sir. Thank you very much.”

One observer said: “They have asked the British ships to get out of the way. It is one of the most important days in history and they are shoving them out of the way.”

The obvious question is why the small boat wasn’t being escorted back to France…

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MajorMajor
MajorMajor
10 months ago

Britain managed to keep out the extremely powerful German army during more than five years of war.
Now we can’t even stop people in rubber dinghies.
Just about sums it up.

Marque1
10 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Not ‘can’t’, won’t.

Hester
Hester
10 months ago
Reply to  Marque1

exactly

RTSC
RTSC
10 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Not “can’t.”

Don’t WANT to.

Simon
Simon
10 months ago

Why do they need a 1 mile exclusion zone?

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  Simon

To be fair, there was a pooch. I feel for this doggy and its owner. Presumably the person isn’t a Muslim, then, or is it a bit like alcohol consumption and they’re flexible in bending the rules when it suits? Not sure, but this could be somebody’s emotional support/companion animal. I’ve always thought it excessive, the length of time the animals have to remain in quarantine, and I’m not sure of the rationale. Surely they can run all the necessary tests and get the results within a week?

”British taxpayers will be paying thousands of pounds for an asylum seeker’s dog to stay in the UK, it has been revealed.
The migrant’s German Shepherd crossed the channel in a small dinghy and reportedly needs to be kept isolated to prevent the spread of infectious diseases and for a full check-up.
A source said: “Border Force officials couldn’t believe their eyes but treated the animal with the same humanity they show any individual.”

https://www.gbnews.com/news/migrant-crisis-taxpayers-dog-channel-crossing

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Personally I would have taken it out of sight and shot it. The dog not the migrant but then…..

Mogwai
10 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Anybody that would choose to kill a healthy, non-aggressive, helpless pet is a psychopath, pure and simple. So, congrats in outing yourself there.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Yes, I think we should have a national cull of dogs instead of badgers, starting with mandatory spaying, neutering, and muzzling in all public places, especially on public transport.

Cue the outrage.

psychedelia smith
10 months ago

Nothing gets in the way of Agenda 2030.

Mogwai
10 months ago

He makes fair points. I wouldn’t want to live in the UAE, but I also wouldn’t want to live in London, Birmingham or many other highly multicultural/diverse places in the UK that have been ruined or become unrecognizable due to the changing demographics: increase in crimes, image tarnished forever due to Pakistani rape gang notoriety ( and extensive complicity and cover-up within the community ), feeling unsafe, lack of community cohesion and whites gradually becoming alienated ( surrounded by foreign signage and languages being spoken ) and eventually a minority in their own ancestral land; ”The Muslim Brotherhood, jihadists, and every Islamist in between have dragged once-civilized British cities into decay, turning them into breeding grounds for fear, rape gangs, and drug-fueled chaos. Just look at Birmingham. Muslim-majority areas are now ranked among the dirtiest in the UK. Prove me wrong. Please. And what are those mosques in Small Heath doing? Preaching peace? Absolutely not. They are manufacturing division, turning youth into isolated recruits instead of empowered citizens. These are not houses of wisdom. They are power factories, grooming young minds for Hamas, not harmony. Where is the record of good? While other communities build hospitals and serve society, like… Read more »

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I keep seeing ads from UNICEF asking for donations to help people displaced by the civil war in Sudan. The vast majority of these people will be Muslims, how much money are Muslims in Britain raising to help their fellow Muslims? They’re probably raising far more to supply weapons to Hamas, Islamic State etc.

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

None I suspect as if we think back to creating a memorial for some muslim it was taxpayers forced to fund it not the brotherhood.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
10 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Excellent comment mogs it’s a hideous situation could and should have been avoided and honestly I don’t see any way back.

SimCS
10 months ago

Why didn’t they just turn the migrant boat back?

ACW
ACW
10 months ago

Surely the flotilla could have brought a few more of the economic migrants back; in the name of realism?🤔

Freeing up the RNLI to do the job that it exists to do.

Hester
Hester
10 months ago

So things are reversed this time, we move those who seek to commemorate the protection of these isles, and rub their faces in the ideal, by forcing them to make way for the invader.
You could not make it up could you

coviture2020
coviture2020
10 months ago

I’m sure most captains would have give the dinghies a tow

RTSC
RTSC
10 months ago

Why?

Because the Establishment has a “secret deal” with the EU / France that “we’ll take our fair share” of the criminal migrants the Globalists encouraged to flood into Europe.

For the sake of appearances, Two-Tier, just like Sunak, pretends he wants to stop them coming …. and Macron pretends he is trying.

It’s all just theatre.

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago

The Little Ships should have just said,

“No, we are going straight on, full steam ahead!
GET THE HELL OUT OF OUR WAY!”

Heretic
Heretic
10 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

And they were singing, like Dad’s Army,

“Who do you think you are kidding, Mr. Muslim?
If you think we’re on the run?
We are the boys who will stop your little game.
We are the boys who will make you think again.
So, who do you think you are kidding, Mr. Muslim?
If you think Old England’s down?”

🙂