Starmer Admits Mass Immigration Risks Making Britain an “Island of Strangers” as He Announces Latest Crackdown – But Refuses to Cap Numbers

Keir Starmer admitted mass immigration risks making Britain an “island of strangers” today as he announced the latest crackdown – but still refused to put a cap on numbers amid a Reform electoral surge hitting Labour hard. The Mail has more.

The PM deployed the “take back control” Brexit slogan at a press conference in Downing Street as he pledged to end the “betrayal” of reliance on cheap foreign labour.

Sir Keir accused the Tories of overseeing an explosion in numbers while in power, saying the system seemed “designed to permit abuse” and was “contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart”.

He said he would give Brits what they had “asked for time and time again” and “significantly” reduce legal inflows.

In a pivotal moment, he also rejected the Treasury orthodoxy that high immigration drives growth – pointing out the economy has stagnated in recent years. 

Under the blueprint, skills thresholds will be hiked and rules on fluency in English toughened. 

Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five, and face deportation for even lower-level crimes.

However, doubts have been raised about whether the White Paper proposals will have a big enough impact – as it does not include any targets or the hard annual cap being demanded by critics. 

Sir Keir underlined his determination that the changes will mean “migration numbers fall” but added: “If we do need to take further steps… then mark my words we will.”

He refused to guarantee that net migration will fall every year from now, saying: “I do want to get it down by the end of this Parliament significantly.”

The premier said: “Let me put it this way, nations depend on rules, fair rules.

“Sometimes they’re written down, often they’re not, but either way, they give shape to our values, guide us towards our rights, of course, but also our responsibilities, the obligations we owe to each other.

“Now in a diverse nation like ours, and I celebrate that, these rules become even more important.

“Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”

The announcement comes less than a fortnight after Reform UK rode a wave of rising public anger on immigration to triumph in the local elections, delivering a string of damaging defeats to Labour.

Home Office aides are said to fear that without deep-rooted reforms, annual net migration will settle even higher than the 340,000 level projected by the Office for National Statistics.

There are concerns it will end up closer to 525,000 by 2028 – when the country will be preparing for a General Election – because migrants are staying for longer than previously thought. The rate stood at 728,000 in the year to June last year.

However, the Treasury has been resisting the most dramatic steps for fear of further damaging the ailing economy.

Worth reading in full.

In the Telegraph, Kamal Ahmed – whose father came over from Sudan in the 1960s – says that “immigration should be treated with the same seriousness as economic policy, with an annual ‘Immigration Budget’ laying out levels of immigration by country, emigration data, asylum claims, case backlogs, deportations and small boat crossings”.

As the Institute for Government argues, there should also be an annual “Migration Plan, setting out [the Government’s] objectives for the immigration system and how it aims to achieve them”.

“Governments around the world already pursue similar models,” the IFG said. “The Canadian and Australian governments each carry out annual processes to broker between different immigration policy priorities and articulate a multi-year strategy for migration. New Zealand’s Residence Programme, too, offers ideas for how policies can be enacted.”

Kemi Badenoch has said Labour “doesn’t believe in secure borders” and questioned Starmer’s commitment to reducing immigration numbers. The Conservative leader said Starmer “once called all immigration laws racist” (a reference, according to the Telegraph, to a book review Starmer wrote when he was a lawyer in the late 1980s, where he said there is a “racist undercurrent which permeates all immigration law”). Badenoch tweeted:

Keir Starmer once called all immigration laws racist.

So why would anyone believe he actually wants to bring immigration down?

When I proposed ending the automatic route to British citizenship and introducing a legally binding cap, the government laughed it off.

Now—nine months into office and after voting against every serious attempt we’ve put forward to cut numbers—Starmer suddenly wants you to think he cares.

Labour doesn’t believe in secure borders. You can’t trust them to protect ours.

The Telegraph summarises the key measures in Labour’s immigration white paper:

  • Citizenship: Migrants will have to wait up to 10 years before they can apply for citizenship, ending the automatic right to apply for indefinite leave to remain and citizenship after five years. Only people who can demonstrate having made a “real and lasting contribution” to the economy and society will be able to apply for permanent residency before the 10-year period.
  • Language: Skilled foreign workers will face tougher English language tests to get visas to come to the UK.
  • Foreign care workers: Care homes will be barred from recruiting foreign staff from overseas from later this year and will instead be required to hire foreign workers who are already in the UK or British staff.
  • Crime: Any offence committed by a foreign national in the UK will be reported to the Home Office rather than only those crimes where they have been jailed, as is presently the rule. This raises the prospect that migrants could be removed from the UK for lower-level offences.
  • Skilled workers: Re-introduce a threshold for skilled foreign workers to graduate level after it was scrapped by Boris Johnson. Employers will still be allowed to recruit lower skilled workers using the points-based system but only if they are in critical sectors.
  • Students: The white paper is also expected to force foreign graduates to leave the UK unless they get a graduate-level job, based on skill levels rather than salary.
Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mrbu
mrbu
11 months ago

Look! A squirrel!
What is the point of toughening the rules on legal migration if illegal migration continues to increase?
If people want to move here and comply with the rules to do so, that suggests to the optimist in me that they’re more willing to comply with our laws and culture once they’re here. On the other hand, when people break the law even to enter the country, then that implies they have no respect whatsoever for our way of doing things, and we’ll be better off without them.

transmissionofflame
11 months ago
Reply to  mrbu

Agree though both need to be stopped IMO.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
11 months ago

All the progressive claptrap. The nation that ‘walks forward’. Celebrating diversity = the orthodoxy continues. “…contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart”. Whheeee…dog whistle.. the far-Right. But it’s only the ‘abuse’ and lack of ‘rules’ and absence of ‘fairness’ that risks (only risk) us not all walking forward in diverse harmony. Not that it’s the system of diversity that’s doing that pulling apart. And not by design. If it were by design, it could be redesigned. But if it’s collateral damage of a desired system it cannot. If the rules are even more ‘important’ in a diverse nation, this is an admission that there is something not quite right about the diversity itself. Something becoming unglued? ‘Significantly reduce…’ Well, reducing numbers from 900,000 to 600,000 would be ‘significant’. But so what? ‘Nations depend on rules..‘. Is this a social contract in a meritocracy? What about borders? Or are the rules to make the UK fit to accommodate migrants? ‘He rejected Treasury orthodoxy…’ Like the engineer designers of the Titanic finally having to reject the belief that the ship was unsinkable when it was nearly gunwale under. Give me a break. It was offensive enough having to… Read more »

JXB
JXB
11 months ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

Celebrating diversity…”

India and Pakistan have been doing that all last week.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
11 months ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

What an utter clown.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
11 months ago

Stop calling us ‘Brits’. Wasn’t that what the IRA used to call us?

JXB
JXB
11 months ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

The term Briton/Britons is a term for the Brythonic Celts who originally colonised the island. British is a political term for anyone who was a citizen of the British Empire, or now a citizen of the UK. It isn’t an ethnic term applicable to the inhabitants of this island, except perhaps the Welsh and Cornish.

1 500 years of intermarriage with Anglo-Saxons has muddied the genetic pool somewhat.

Paki, a contraction of Pakistani we are told is offensive and “hate speech” actionable under criminal law, so Brit, a contraction of British, must also be offensive and “hate speech” and an offence.

Robin Guenier
Robin Guenier
11 months ago

Stephen Pollard has a first-rate article in the Spectator this morning. Headed ‘Keir Starmer is wrong to think immigration is just a numbers game‘, he says for example this:

… none of this will make any difference if we do not stop providing a home for people who actively reject our values: Western values of tolerance, freedom and mutual respect.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/keir-starmer-is-wrong-to-think-immigration-is-just-a-numbers-game/

transmissionofflame
11 months ago
Reply to  Robin Guenier

Some immigrants are more desirable than others because of their own individual characters, skills, attitudes and how well their own culture fits with ours.

But the basic problem IMO is that the United Kingdom should remain a country where White English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish people are in a supermajority. That is an aspiration that would get me labelled “racist” most likely, but one that if expressed by someone from any non-White country about their own country would most likely be applauded on the basis of resisting colonialism.

wryobserver
wryobserver
11 months ago
Reply to  Robin Guenier

Spot on.

stewart
11 months ago

Nah. Just platitudes. They will do little to nothing I’m sure.

Also, no change in how they view the public – basically stupid and gullible so that you can tell them one thing and do something else and it’ll be fine.

Mogwai
11 months ago

Mere lip service and I think he’s full of sh*t. Anyone believes a word that comes out of his mouth they need their head read. Agree with Matt;

”The man who decriminalised illegal migration, removed age checks, gave tax exemptions to foreign workers, encouraged migration from India, expanded hotels for illegal migrants, removed the only deterrent we had, sent boat numbers soaring to 50% higher than where they were last year, is using taxpayer money to prioritise foreigners over Brits in the private housing market, and liberalised immigration from Afghanistan is currently claiming he is “regaining control of the immigration system”. Gaslighter-in-Chief.”

https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1921832726753169540

john1T
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

 Anyone who believes a word that comes out of his mouth would have to be off their tits on coke.

Mogwai
11 months ago
Reply to  john1T

You’ve gone and stuck an Eric Clapton-shaped ear worm in my head now.😁

Mogwai
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Just read elsewhere 400 migrants have today landed at Dover with many more en route. You’re obviously having a spell of good weather over there and the people traffickers are taking advantage. The below report is several hours old so these will have landed now;

”French Military are currently escorting 100s of illegal migrants on dinghies towards England

I’m currently tracking 3 French enforcement vessels and 2 French warships, 3 dinghies full of immigrants are making their way towards the centre of the channel. Red dots on 4th pic show French vessels shadowing migrant dinghies on their way across the channel, 2 red dots our side show Border Force on way to pick them up

Border Force are on route now to pick them all up and bring them back to England where they’ll be processed then put in 4 star hotels until they have been granted asylum. There are currently 12 ships out in the channel making sure migrants get to England safely.”

https://x.com/ActivePatriotUK/status/1921789033316851784

Good job someone’s keeping an eye on this to give people a heads up;

https://x.com/ActivePatriotUK/status/1921794663381389795

ellie-em
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 I for one am sick to the back teeth in having no choice in paying towards the upkeep of these conniving, invading ne’er-do-wells. I resent every penny wasted on them and the associated management systems in place that continue to fleece the taxpayers. 😡

JXB
JXB
11 months ago

Trying to look like he’s do8ng something about it whilst not doing anything about it.

It won’t impress – people can see the reality, and alleged action from now on, does not deal with what has already happened.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
11 months ago

First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fob you off. Then they do it all over again.

BS Whitworth
BS Whitworth
11 months ago

Diverse nations need rules homogeneous nations not so much. Why is this not obvious to our politicians.

transmissionofflame
11 months ago
Reply to  BS Whitworth

I’m sure it’s abundantly obvious to them. That’s exactly why they are desperately pursuing this. Problem, Reaction, Solution.

ellie-em
11 months ago

More empty promises from the useless waste of oxygen!

JXB
JXB
11 months ago

Island of strangers? Certainly not in paradise.

ellie-em
11 months ago

BBC newsflash – Apparently the police are investigating a fire at 2TK’s house in north London.

Someone must have burnt the samosas 🤔

Freddy Boy
11 months ago

BULLS1HT !!!

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
11 months ago

The denizens of the treasury are obviously thick as mince.

Which would explain reeves’ disastrous ineptitude.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
11 months ago

You know the score it is only going to accelerate because the only way the ruling class can stay in power is by overwhelming the natives with sheer numbers and shock. It wasn’t very pleasant before but now many areas of this country have simply become unliveable. They are masters of weaponising one population against another. They also know how to make this situation irreversible which it already is. You are powerless and on a waiting list to be destroyed.

Sparrowhawk
11 months ago

Scum. Finally tears himself away from his obsessive activity with Macron Merz & the other Friends-Of-George (Soros) on the Continent, and notices that REFORM HAVE GONE FROM ZERO TO AN AVALANCHE all over the country.

So this scumbag mouths more platitudes, while each year, at a rate of influx of 900,000 per annum (last year), we are obliged to build 4 cities the size of Southampton every year.

“Fool me once (actually they never did), shame on you, fool me twice shame on me”

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
11 months ago

As long as you don’t believe in happy endings then you will be just fine.

wryobserver
wryobserver
11 months ago

My father arrived here from India in 1937, and instilled in me the philosophy of assimilation, which many of today’s immigrants are happy to do. Aggressively pushing different cultural value, as many try to do, merely fuels tension, whichever side it comes from. It’s a pity that politicians often fail to grasp that.

However, Starmer’s plan is one directional. It is aimed at reducing people coming in, and makes no reference to getting people out, perhaps because his legal friends have devised such inventive ways of circumventing deportations using feeble, banal and sometimes incredible excuses.

I suggest that all those convicted of serious crimes such as murder, manslaughter, rape, drug dealing etc should be immediately deported and, if citizens, be deprived of that privilege. Forget the EHCR. I am certain that the vast majority of peaceful immigrant citizens would be as grateful to be rid of them as everyone else. Jailing offenders is hopeless; radicalism is rife there, the cost mounts and on release it’s “Back Jack, do it again”.

RTSC
RTSC
11 months ago

A professional liar stood at a podium and lied.

End of.

Mrs.Croc
Mrs.Croc
11 months ago

Surely he can’t really believe that anyone believes him?