News Round-Up
- “India strikes Kashmir” – India fired missiles across the border into Pakistani ‘terror camps’ in Kashmir, days after it blamed Islamabad for a deadly attack on the Indian side of the contested region, reports the Mail.
- “Starmer signs ‘two-tier’ tax deal for Indian migrants” – Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of implementing a two-tier tax system after signing a trade deal that exempts Indian migrants from paying National Insurance, says the Telegraph.
- “Those on the Right should be taking credit for the India trade deal, not sniping at it” – In the Telegraph, Dan Hannan argues that the Conservatives should be taking credit for the trade deal with India, not criticising it.
- “The real reason Starmer can’t sack Lucy Powell over the grooming gangs” – According to Michael Deacon in the Telegraph, Sir Keir can’t sack Lucy Powell over her grooming gangs remark because he’d made an even more inflammatory one himself.
- “Britain needs to grow a spine and ban the IRGC” – The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps has posed a significant national security threat to our nation for years, says Jake Wallis Simons in the Telegraph.
- “Nobody likes the yookay aesthetic” – The best argument against multiculturalism is staring you in the face, writes Luca Watson in the Critic.
- “Starmer’s Britain is not worthy of the sacrifice our soldiers made 80 years ago” – How did we go from a titan like Churchill to the managerial nonentity that is our current PM? asks Allison Pearson in the Telegraph.
- “Non-dom exodus threatens to cost Reeves billions” – Rachel Reeves’s crackdown on non-doms threatens to cost the Treasury billions of pounds rather than raising money, according to City A.M.
- “Ofcom’s ‘jailer’ mentality is harming Starmer’s growth plan” – Regulation by collaboration, rather than opposition, can deliver the investment Britain craves, argues Angelos Frangopoulos in the Telegraph.
- “Retired NHS workers on six-figure pensions reaches record high” – The number of retired NHS workers picking up six-figure pensions has reached a record high after increasing tenfold in the last decade, reports the Express.
- “Reform’s economic agenda is an unworkable fantasy” – If Reform UK is serious about Downing Street, then it will have to do something fairly drastic about its economic policies, warns Jeremy Warner in the Telegraph.
- “Reform councillor attacks Farage as she quits party” – The Spectator’s Steerpike reports that Donna Edmunds, a newly elected Reform UK councillor, has quit the party in a dramatic fashion after her suspension for planning to defect.
- “Teaching in the English culture war” – On his Substack, Paul Sutton exposes the absurdities and ideological battles within English education.
- “Drill oil if you want growth, City grandee urges Labour” – The boss of Britain’s biggest long-term savings firm has warned that Ed Miliband’s Net Zero drive will damage growth while making “no difference” to overall carbon emissions, reports the Telegraph.
- “Ed Miliband’s solar panel drive threatens to derail 1.5 million housing target” – Builders are warning that “unrealistic” Net Zero proposals will delay new homes, according to the Telegraph.
- “Mass immigration means the water will run out and we are not prepared” – Our leaders are ignoring the looming water crisis, says Philip Johnston in the Telegraph.
- “UK councils’ Net Zero blowout” – On her Substack, Charlotte Gill exposes the runaway spending of local councils on Net Zero schemes, revealing tens of millions blown on green gimmickry.
- “Billionaire former Tory donor to build solar farm on 18th Century manor” – A billionaire former Tory donor is aiming to build a solar farm on his 18th Century manor estate in Wiltshire to provide power for his 100-bed mansion, reports the Telegraph.
- “Covid deaths: due to or with?” – On the TTE Substack, Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson reveal how a lack of clarity in defining COVID-19 deaths has inflated the death toll.
- “President Trump issues Executive Order on gain-of-function studies” – On Substack, Dr Meryl Nass hails Trump’s new Executive Order as a long-overdue, hard-hitting crackdown on dangerous gain-of-function research.
- “‘Capturing’ Gaza could backfire spectacularly” – In the Spectator, Limor Simhony Philpott warns that Israel’s plan to retake Gaza risks escalating tensions, undermining military morale and leaving it mired in a quagmire without a clear exit strategy.
- “Houthis agree to stop bombing, claims Trump” – Donald Trump says the US will stop bombing Yemen’s Houthi rebels after he struck a deal with the Iran-backed terror group, according to ABC News.
- “Xi Jinping can’t survive Trump’s tariff pain” – The current trade war is putting the Chinese regime under intense pressure, says Gordon Chang in the Telegraph.
- ‘The old Australia is never coming back’ – On YouTube, Sky News host Andrew Bolt discusses what “killed” the Liberal Party in key seats during the federal election.
- “Devastating new blow for Greens leader Adam Bandt as final result looms” – Green Party leader Adam Bandt’s political career is over after it’s all but confirmed that he’s lost his seat in the Australian federal elections, reports the Mail.
- “US Government warns Australia to stop censoring free speech” – The United States Government has warned Australia to halt its crackdown on free speech following the election of a Left wing Government for a second term, according to the Catholic Herald.
- “Gen-Z’s Christian revival is an act of rebellion against nihilism” – The New York Times might think the crucifix is a ‘hot accessory’, but it’s ignoring the deeper roots of why the young are embracing religion, says Caroline Downey in the Telegraph.
- “Hate not hope” – On the Restoration Substack, Helena Stone unpacks the recent landmark Supreme Court ruling that reasserts biological sex as the legal basis for women’s rights.
- “Gay railway station volunteer banned over gender-critical views” – A gay volunteer has been banned from working at a railway station by West Midlands’ Trains after asking whether the LGBTQ+ livery of the company’s trains would just be for Pride Month or last all year, reports the Telegraph.
- “The National Theatre just gets worse and worse” – Of the National Theatre we must again ask, ‘Whose nation?’ writes Gareth Roberts in the Spectator.
- “Why the Left won’t learn when the Right is right” – From trans to Net Zero, one side of the political spectrum is evidently talking sense, says Charles Moore in the Telegraph. Why won’t the other side listen?
- “BBC admits lapse after not challenging Prince Harry’s stitch up claims” – The BBC has admitted that it failed to properly challenge Prince Harry’s claim he is the victim of a “good old fashioned establishment stitch up”, calling it a lapse in “our usual high editorial standards”, according to the Mail.
- “These are not isolated towns and cities dealing with this crisis. These are interlinked organised criminal gangs” – On GB News, Charlie Peters reveals the links between grooming gang networks that show just how widespread the crisis is across the UK.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Tuesday Morning Eversley Road & Langley Common Road Arborfield, Wokingham
“Ed Miliband’s solar panel drive threatens to derail 1.5 million housing target”
Just wondering; following the electricity problems in Spain recently, how effectively can the National Grid handle all this solar power coming from such a large number of small domestic inputs?
When the mains supply collapses, all the small domestic inputs shut down as well. It’s a safety requirement – one can’t feed a supply to a distribution cable that is supposedly switched out, for whatever reason. I have one of those small domestic ones, and have had a few mains power cuts due to external cable faults, a few years ago.
In the real world, all these small domestic inputs (micro power stations) just look like a reduced load from the other end, but the latest meters can measure export as well as input.
The answer is to combine solar panels with a decent sized storage battery with an switch over device so that your part or all of your home can be powered automatically if the incoming supply fails. I am awaiting the installation of such a system as our country location with overhead supply cables is particularly iffy.
I don’t know where you draw your optimism from.😀
Be careful where you put the battery and make sure you budget to replace the whole installation sooner than you’ve been told.
Meanwhile you should feel guilty about all the child labour and pollution the components caused and the subsidy you are taking from neighbours.
Just what I thought.
I started installing solar panels in 2011 and added a battery in 2020. I detect little or no reduction in output from the solar panels and the battery has lost about 5% capacity in 5 years. Pretty much self sufficient in electricity for much of the year and fill the battery with cheap off peak rate overnight in the 4 dark months.
Good to hear, about what I expected. The LiFePO4 batteries are very robust and reliable over the long term and have a good track record. Mine will be fitted externally along with the inverter and the switchover device.
Not just that, there’s the extra expense of fitting solar panels and heatpumps to newbuilds! which no doubt will be passed on to the buyer, that should help the housing crisis huh?
The article suggests that solar panels only add £3,300 to the cost of building a new house and save £1,000 per year – giving a payback after just over three years. Adding solar panels to a semi-detached or terraced house could add up to £3,300 to the cost of building a new home, and could shave £1,000 a year off a typical household energy bill, according to official calculations. I smell bullshit. I don’t believe solar panels would cut a household’s energy bills by £1,000 per year. I also doubt that they would only cost £3,300 more on the build price without some serious government subsidy. I strongly suspect that these figures are derived from government statements and are lies. According to Ofgem, the current price cap for electricity is 27.03p/kWh. At that price, to save £1,000 you would have to save 1,000 / 0.2703 = 3,700 kWh of electricity. Ofgem reckons that typical annual use for a 3-bed household is around 11,500 kWh for gas and 2,700 kWh for electricity. So, apparently solar panels on a new build house roof will save more electricity than is used in a typical household? Wait… We should assume that solar panels on… Read more »
You need to add in the not inconsiderable cost of battery storage, given daylight hours in the UK. That, or you sell surplus sparks during the day [would they offer you more than 7p/kWh?], and buy from the Grid at night at 25-30p
Octopus pay 15p for export and charge 7p for cheap rate overnight electricity.
Excellent calculations, and like you I smell BS too!
In the UK the whole thing depends on hours of sunshine and ill bet they calculate their production on estimated or models for the year which always seem to favour the high side, also will all newbuilds have south facing roofs? That will be an interesting street set out for a new housing estate!
Surely the new build will have a heat pump, and perhaps an EV, as well as solar panels (and battery) and therefore will not use gas but will use more than the past average for electricity. So 3.7MWh is not unreasonable.
I think the ownership of an EV vs an ICE car is an irrelevance in the debate on solar panels. Anyone with an EV would be nuts to charge it during the day or without a special EV tariff. Therefore the output from the solar panels is irrelevant to the EV’s daytime power consumption. However, since you mentioned an EV. Triffic, let’s have a: Tesla Model 3 extended range. £44,990 new on Autotrader. 221 Wh/mile real world Height 1,441mm Length 4,720mm Width 2,088mm Ground clearance 138mm Seats 5 Boot space (seats up) 682L Minimum kerb weight 1,747kg instead of an: Audi A3 1.5l £28,495 new on Autotrader, 47.7 mpg real world Height 1,417mm Length 4,504mm Width 1,984mm Wheelbase 2,635mm Seats 5 Fuel tank capacity 50L Boot space (seats up) 425L Minimum kerb weight 1,290kg Octopus energy offer 7p/kWh for car charging (or household use) at night. Tesco petrol ~£1.29/l (£5.86/gal) Typical mileage for a domestic car is 7,000 miles/yr Tesla energy costs: 7,000 x 0.221 * 0.07 = £108.29 / yr Audi A3 petrol costs: 7,000 / 47.7 * 5.86 = £859.96 / yr Audi costs £750.67 more than Tesla in fuel/energy cost per year Audi is £44,990 – £28,495… Read more »
Oops – Typical house uses 11,500 kWh for gas and 2,700 kWh for electricity.
https://global.espreso.tv/russia-ukraine-war-since-1991-russians-have-undergone-deep-transformation-that-intensified-their-worst-instincts-ukrainian-writer “In one of your interviews, you said that at the start of the full-scale invasion, you thought — and now admit you were wrong — that after the first thousand Russian soldiers were killed, people would wake up and say, ‘Listen, enough.’ But they didn’t wake up. Why? Why is this happening to them?” “My mistake in those expectations was that I believed this community of people we call Russians had changed — that the process of social transformation and simple technological progress had turned them into people who also valued comfort, people who didn’t want to die. But it turns out, no. Moscow and St. Petersburg are still islands of that comfort, and probably a few other major cities too,” Andrukhovych said. He noted that people from those places don’t really sign up for deadly military contracts. “I didn’t factor in that there’s still this vast space full of poverty, backwardness — including mental backwardness — degraded human qualities, and generational alcoholism going back 10 generations. Basically, it’s a kind of zombie community. I was also basing my assumptions on what I remember from my own lifetime, like the so-called special military operation in Afghanistan. Back then, the… Read more »
It seems crazy. Putin has been given an ‘easy out’: keep Crimea, no NATO for Ukraine and yet he carries on, thousands dying every day. Why? Beneath Putin’s bonkers idea of demographic imperialist expansionism lies a bigger problem for peacemakers. He has started, as with most wars, a series of actions and reactions that he does not know how to stop, will not be able to stop…… ‘“Let’s not forget, let’s imagine the moment when the war de facto, though not de jure, stops. Well, okay, there may be a period of time where the military-industrial complex is still getting orders, and they’ll try to recover a lot of the lost equipment, etc. Yes, this will create another economic imbalance in Russia. Inflation will soar again. Well, basically, Putin will get the full range of economic hardships. This is already almost officially stated by officials from the Central Bank. But that’s not even the issue. If Putin stops the war, he risks facing internal problems that he can’t even imagine yet,” he said. Ohryzko believes that Russia will face serious problems with the return of so-called “military men,” who will demand the same provisions they had while on the war… Read more »
Just what is the point of your daily tirades against Russia? Or why do you feel compelled, with very few exceptions, to publish your pieces every single day calling out for war, for increased defence (war) spending, for more Ukrainians (and Russians) to die, for more of Ukraine (and Russia) to be destroyed? Who are you serving? Russia is fighting an existential fight because the West, particularly USA, has always been determined to break Russia up into small pieces, to then boss those pieces around (as USA does to many countries today), and to exploit all those pieces’ resources. Ukraine is fighting for what? The ability to join NATO, when NATO has repeated told Ukraine that will not be possible? The ability to join the EU, that totally undemocratic and corrupt institution that UK had the sense to leave a few years ago? When asked if Donald Trump understands what is at stake in the Special Military Operation in Ukraine, Scott Ritter went off on a complete rant (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3Q0Y96mO3k): “I don’t think Donald Trump can spell Russia, let alone understand the complexities of Russia. He certainly doesn’t understand Ukraine because he is all over, he’s a schizophrenic when it comes… Read more »
Scott contradicted Trump saying this is Biden’s war: “This is Donald Trump’s war. Donald Trump made this war, Donald Trump designed this war. “It’s not just that he sent more military aid. Understand the underlying policy. The underlying policy of the United States during the first Trump term is the same policy that is in place today: to destroy Russia from within. Donald Trump has not reversed course on that policy. “20 CIA bases were built in Ukraine during Donald Trump’s time. 20 CIA bases! And these aren’t bases there to hold hands and sing “Kumbaya”, these are people that are carrying out covert operations inside Russia, facilitating deep, direct action strikes by the Ukrainians, to train people for unconventional warfare, guerrilla warfare. This is what the CIA was doing under Donald Trump for one reason and one reason only: because we’re building a Ukrainian army in the West. And then there’s a slide that was put out by the Department of Defense under Donald Trump that had an arrow that said “So we can take them over here and kill Russians in the east.” “That’s Donald Trump’s policy. He’s a liar when he says this war would [not] have… Read more »
‘General Sergei Shoigu, secretary of the Russian Federation’s Security Council, has warned that the presence of UK or allied forces in Ukraine ‘could lead to a direct clash between Nato and Russia and subsequently to world war three’,
….the armed forces are already stretched beyond endurance, with minimal provision for protecting the UK itself; that Russian naval vessels have patrolled extensively around the coast of Britain and Ireland, and are believed to have surveilled undersea cables
Whitehall recently wargamed the scenario of a hostile state undertaking missile and cyber attacks on the UK’s critical national infrastructure, and the published risk assessment was not promising.
Britain’s missile defences would not be able to intercept every incoming weapon, and the attack would be ‘likely to result in civilian fatalities as well as members of the emergency services.’
For the scale and horror of those ‘civilian fatalities’, we need only look at the news from Ukraine over the last three years.’
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-britain-must-prepare-for-war-with-russia/
The scale and horror of the war – caused by the West attempting to destroy Russia. Stop feeding Ukraine with weapons and money and the war stops. Stay out of the war and Russia will have no reason to attack UK. Considering UK (among others, of course) has been feeding and promoting this war, as well as directly participating itself, you can understand the enormous restraint Russia has shown in not directly attacking the West up to now. So, stop providing Russia with ample reasons to attack UK!
God talking: ‘A carnival of murderers, rapists, and so on. There will be destabilization in regions where a lot of these people will return to. And then how will Putin act when, on the one hand, the economy is almost on the brink of collapse, and on the other hand, there’s this internal turmoil? These internal processes will force him to cling to his chair with both hands, to avoid being overthrown. That’s why, for him, continuing the war is the only way to feel somewhat secure. So, will he give this up? No, for any price, unless Ukraine and the collective West force him to’ ‘Putin simply is not persuadable; he is all in. For him, preventing Ukraine from becoming a bastion that the West can use to threaten Russia is a strategic necessity. He has taken personal responsibility for achieving that outcome and likely judges it as worth nearly any cost.’ ‘it’s important to consider how Putin’s dictatorship could be fatally undermined if Russia were to give up on the war in Ukraine. After all, Putin’s grip on power rests upon the fact that others close to him are too afraid to challenge him. If he were… Read more »
God talking?!
I return to my original question: why are we DS readers subjected to your daily anti-Russian propaganda? Your verbiage is simply very tiring. Is that your intention?
‘People like him turn to Russia and to the cold yet very confining embrace of the Russian government because they’re opportunists,”
“They see a financial and career opportunity by working for and with the Russians. By that I mean bad Russians, the very same bureaucrats who are enabling Russian fascists today and are enabling this attempt at a genocide in Ukraine.”
‘Ritter is an example of a typical disgraced American – often a man – who discredited himself in the US and now wants to be perceived as a source of “honest analysis” in Russia as a means to achieve renewed or increased glory.’
‘Desperate men like him have frequently come to Russia to get a fresh start. It’s true that Russians will overlook anything as long as you’re useful to them. They don’t care’
Says who? Are they as popular as Scott Ritter on talk shows discussing the conflict in Ukraine? There are reasons for his popularity: very simply his exhaustive knowledge on military matters and Russia.
“Covid deaths: due to or with?” – On the TTE Substack, Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson reveal how a lack of clarity in defining COVID-19 deaths has inflated the death toll.
As posted by an old-school commenter:
“Evidence is inconvenient in a regime where narratives are all-important… We inhabit a Dark Age, where the scientific approach based on observation and experiment is undesirable and irrelevant… The Dark Age approach corrupts everything from climate science, to the origins of Covid, even to death certificates.”
“India strikes Kashmir”
I’m really interested to see how the western msm is going to spin this! Which is the virtuous country? Who’s in the right? the press always have to have a good guy country, an under dog who deserves the world’s backing
Unlike the Gaza conflict or Russia/Ukraine the UK has large populations of both sides involved and the UK government has just struck a massive deal with India
Pakistan is an Islamic country and it’s diaspora generally vote Labour!
India is Hindu and make massive financial deals with the UK
Starmer will be in a bit of a pickle if this escalates
I wonder if the related fellow countrymen will head home to help fight for their respective homelands? (We can live in hopes!)
What’s your thoughts?
I think we know how it’ll be…”solidarity with Pakistan!” the ‘Muslim underdog’.
Prepare to welcome yet more Pakistani men to your town.
And Indians after the national insurance payment gift they’ve just been handed!
War between Pakistan and India will be fought on the streets of Britain!
British residents will not return home in any significant numbers to fight. They will fight on our streets here.
👍👍
War in Leicester?
I think that already started over a cricket match…
That sounds like it should be ridiculous!
I think it’s a strong possibility
I think this is the gayest stand-off I’ve ever seen. They must practice yoga to get their legs right up there. John Cleese eat your heart out;
https://x.com/siegfriedmuell/status/1919900750332760241
Good grief! They look like they’re having physiological ischaemic attacks!
They should just battle it out and settle their scores on the cricket pitch, lol. I can see their next scheduled match turning rather, er…lively. 😮
Atomically lively!
They are both nuclear powers!
Tories agree with Labour to subsidies Indian immigrants.
That won’t play well in either the blue wall or red wall constituencies.
With foreign domestic and international disputes being contested on British streets the deal with India won’t go down well with Labour’s Pakistani voters.