The Faux-Radicalism of Kneecap

The members of Kneecap must be delighted. As a rap group with anti-establishment pretensions – albeit one whose biopic was awarded a BAFTA earlier this year – what better publicity than being ‘assessed’ by the British police for their controversial comments? Specifically, footage has been circulating of a Kneecap gig from November 2023 in which one of the trio is apparently heard saying: “The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.”

This is just the latest of a series of controversies. It began after a recent set at the Coachella music festival in California, when the group called on the mostly posh kids in the crowd to chant “Fuck Israel”. This was obviously deliberately aimed to provoke, given that hundreds of young people were massacred and raped at the Nova music festival in Israel on October 7th 2023. Since then, other footage has emerged of the band chanting “Up Hamas, up Hezbollah!” and waving the latter’s flag.

Given that the culture wars have had the effect of demagnetising many a moral compass, it is worth restating a few basic facts. Hamas and Hezbollah are proscribed terrorist groups. The Hamas charter explicitly calls for the extermination of Jews, and the Hezbollah manifesto of 1985 demands the wholesale eradication of Israel. The October 7th pogrom was the most deadly antisemitic attack since the Holocaust. There is no getting around the fact that those who support Hamas and Hezbollah are cheerleaders for fascism.

But we have to keep in mind that Kneecap, like every other pop group, deals in theatrical displays. Their faux-radicalism brings to mind those gangster rappers who have been accused of ‘poverty tourism’ for feigning a past in the ghetto. The rapper Drake, for instance, is a former child TV star, which is why one critic bewailed that “Drake’s wannabe gangsta persona is cringe”. But this is to miss the point. It’s not deception; it’s just showbusiness.

Kneecap falls into this category. The group peddles the lexicon and imagery of the Troubles, a conflict that they are far too young to have ever known. Their grandstanding is, for the most part, an attempt to be satirical and punkish. The name of the band refers to the form of punishment favoured by the Provisional IRA, and the paramilitary garb is mimicked in the tricolour balaclava worn by DJ PrĂłvaĂ­ (a name that itself alludes to the Provos).

Yet their recent spate of statements on social media have been anything but satirical, and definitely not punkish. Rather, they have been desperately earnest. The anti-Israel stance is, after all, the expected position of every middle-class student in search of meaning. And the band have even sent their “heartfelt apologies” to the families of murdered MPs David Amess and Jo Cox. It would seem that the financial ramifications of cancelled gigs have had the expected effect.

Here is an excerpt from the band’s latest statement:

Let us be unequivocal: we do not, and have never, supported Hamas or Hezbollah. We condemn all attacks on civilians, always. It is never okay. We know this more than anyone, given our nation’s history. We also reject any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual. Ever. An extract of footage, deliberately taken out of all context, is now being exploited and weaponised, as if it were a call to action.

All of which would probably be a lot more convincing had one member of the band not posted a photograph of himself online reading a copy of The Voice of Hezbollah by the antisemitic terrorist leader Hassan Nasrallah. This is a book that describes Israelis as “the descendants of apes and pigs”.

For that matter, the band appeared to have led their audience in a chant of “ooh, ahh, Hezbollah” at a gig in London, a variation on the “ooh, aah, up the ’RA” chant in support of the IRA. The only way this could be convincingly satirical is if their targets were the scores of mindless Western activists who are happy to be herded into geopolitical territory they only vaguely comprehend.

It is, of course, completely understandable that many of those who actually lived through the Troubles – where balaclavas and burning vehicles were rather more potent than mere accessories for pop groups – would not be fans of Kneecap. It was doubtless a neat gimmick for the band to invite Gerry Adams to appear in their movie for a cameo, but there are many Northern Irish citizens who hold Adams responsible for the deaths of loved ones, and they are unlikely to see the funny side.

In a sense it’s a positive thing that the Troubles are considered such a distant memory that they can be safely romanticised by young musicians who have had no experience of them. Yet there is something in this radical posturing that smacks of nostalgia, a kind of yearning after victim status that has become so fashionable. It’s reminiscent of young gay people who claim to face ‘oppression’ when they’ve only ever known complete equal rights and the ruling class’s continual celebration of their ‘identities’.

Similarly, there has been a long tradition of Irish republicans claiming solidarity with Palestine, as though these conflicts were in any way connected. It’s the result of binary thinking; a blockheaded conviction that the world can be neatly divided into the two classes of Oppressor and Oppressed. I have on many occasions over the past few decades seen Palestinian flags and murals in the Bogside (a republican heartland of Derry) alongside the usual Irish tricolour and pro-IRA graffiti. They appear periodically every now and then and, whenever such insignia is raised, it isn’t long before the Israeli flag is seen flying in the Protestant areas of the city. This kind of tit-for-tat is common, but it isn’t serious political analysis.

For fans, Kneecap’s faux-radicalism is part of their appeal. But ultimately, they’re just a band. And surely by now it’s almost compulsory that popular musicians should have inane opinions about international politics. The crisis in the Middle East has long been oversimplified by numbskulls in need of a cause. Queers for Palestine, of course, represents the apotheosis of this folly, a group who would be the first to be executed in a Hamas-run state.

As for all the outrage, I will never be convinced that police should be investigating anyone for speech crimes. There is much to criticise in the comments made by the members of Kneecap, so why do the authorities need to be involved? Psychopaths who genuinely wish to cause harm to politicians are not going to wait for permission from novelty rappers. We should be worried about those who actually commit violence, not those who pose as criminals on the red carpet while they’re waiting for their BAFTA.

Andrew Doyle is a writer, comedian and broadcaster who hosts the GB News show Free Speech Nation. His latest book is The End of Woke: How the Culture War Went Too Far and What to Expect from the Counter-Revolution. This article was first published on his Substack. You can subscribe here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
11 months ago

I have no idea if they are faux or not. I don’t think you have said anything that points to their lack of sincerity. There is a certain kind of gaze and critique that inevitably follows the arrival of characters such as these and yours is prime example. It doesn’t take a genius to read every word you said and conclude that you are utterly vacuous on the salient issues. Again that is part of the signature of such attacks. Never any real meat. Not a healthy diet picking over the bones of the dead.

DickieA
DickieA
11 months ago

Former Sex Pistol Johnny Rotten defends Israel and calls Hamas ‘just Jew exterminators’. Now, that is proper “Rock ‘n’ Roll” anti-establishment thinking.
https://www.thejc.com/news/former-sex-pistol-john-lydon-defends-israel-and-calls-hamas-just-jew-exterminators-fsjg329g

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
11 months ago

The Zionist battle is lost in terms of the swaying of public opinion in the last two weeks because of a confluence of reasons. Carry on and see where it leads you. You have created a very difficult situation for yourself.

EppingBlogger
11 months ago

They must not be allowed off on a “theatrical display” excuse. Judge them by their ations and statements and let them out in about ten years.

Mogwai
11 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

But remember, ”there’s no downside to freedom of speech”, according to some on here, so you’re obviously not an absolutist.

transmissionofflame
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Who here has said there is no downside to freedom of speech? Please cite specific posts.

I’m an absolutist and I’ve never said that – at least not that I can remember.

I’d rather know that there are people like “Kneecap” out there, faux or not, and know what they think, or pretend to think, and know what those who support them think, or pretend to.

Mogwai
11 months ago

Your pal, stewart, and all the people that agreed with him. Why would you immediately assume I’m referring to you? Why so touchy?đŸ€”

”I have yet to see the downsides of free speech materialise in any significant way. The arguments are always hypothetical, theoretical.” You must have sat this one out….

EppingBlogger
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I have never heard any enthusiast for freedom say it is absolute. Calling for the death of others because they are associated with a particular political party (Tories) or a nation (Israel) on that account is not acceptable. It is or should be criminal.

By all means criticise and make fun of who you like but it is unacceptable to call for violence against those you disagree with.

Freedom of speech or anything else cannot be absolute because individual freedoms overlap. That is the reason for living under the rule of law. The law should be as loose as can be consistent with individual safety and personal freedom but no one I know has called for anarchy.

Mogwai
11 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Well, I would agree with you. But we would be in the minority round here, if the response to my post where I shared this article 6 days ago is anything to go by. I agree with the author, he’s talking about what’s discussed in this very article, but then certain people misinterpret that as me suddenly being pro-censorship; ”Using freedom of speech to shield open aggression and acts of terror is a blatant violation of the very value of that freedom. Freedom of speech is not synonymous with permissiveness. Yet many interpret it exactly that way. This is a dangerous misconception—and it must be challenged. Let’s return to the idea that many influential individuals believe even minimal restrictions on free speech mean it ceases to be “free.” But in practice, without a reasonable set of principles, this leads to the abuse of that freedom. Soon, we see the rise of populists, propagandists, and demagogues who distort fundamental values and gradually erode the very essence of free speech with their toxic influence. When we say that certain rhetoric is dangerous, it doesn’t mean we’re calling for censorship. It’s a judgement we are entitled to make. When criticism is based on… Read more »

transmissionofflame
11 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I think the approach used in the US is a good one and seems to work – the sky has not fallen in there. This US Supreme Court judgement is regarded as the landmark interpretation of the first amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Note the lack of caveats and compare that with other bills of rights including the proposed UK one. Brandenburg v. Ohio – Wikipedia A member of the KKK was charged with an offence for a speech he made which was interpreted as advocating violence. The case went to the supreme court and eventually his local court conviction was reversed. The approach used is now this: “The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action”” That is also the position that the FSU holds on the matter – at least that’s what Ian Rons said in a… Read more »

Tonka Fairy
11 months ago

After Hamas have killed the Queers for Palestine, I think the Catholics would be pretty high on their list.

Such people are idiots, supporting groups that would literally kill them given the chance.

Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
11 months ago

There is no ‘Hamas’. Hamas is Israeli intelligence even Netenyahu said in 2019 that Israel needs to keep the idea of Hamas alive in order to stifle genuine resistance. Look at the funnelling of money via Qatar. It is a joke and everyone knows it. If you don’t know it then just stay chilled and avoid talking to people.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
11 months ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

If there’s no Hamas who carried out the 7 October massacre. Was it Mossad in order to give the government an excuse to attack an enemy that doesn’t exist?
Who fired thousands of rockets at Israel, was that also Mossad?
Your statement makes as much sense as claiming 9/11 was an “inside job” carried out in order to justify US Imperialism in the Middle East.

psychedelia smith
11 months ago

If the world wasn’t so full of preening morons, Kneecap would be dividing their time between their Department of Education funded touring drama group and Pinochio at the Belfast Opera House.

soundofreason
soundofreason
11 months ago

The members of Kneecap must be delighted. As a rap group with anti-establishment pretensions – albeit one whose biopic was awarded a BAFTA earlier this year – what better publicity than being ‘assessed’ by the British police for their controversial comments?

OK. I admit: I have no idea who nominates or votes to award BAFTAs. Maybe I should bother to find out? It seems they don’t have the same values as I do – perhaps they’ll be pleased about that.

As for the insanity of the UK Arts Council awarding funding to the group… Who are these morons?

soundofreason
soundofreason
11 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

The British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA, /ˈbéftə/[2]) is an independent trade association and charity that supports, develops, and promotes the arts of film, television and video games in the United Kingdom.

Charity? Right.

Grim Ace
Grim Ace
11 months ago

No. Harass. Attack. Cancel these cretinous communist pigs. Fight the left with the same tactics they use against us. That is why conservatives always loose. Because we are weak. You don’t fight wars by using weak tactics.
I suspect Andrew Doyle of being a closet lefty. He always seems to pull his punches on them.

Cotfordtags
11 months ago

It’s a funny old world. As a teenager, I was a fan of the Tom Robinson Band (ironic considering the new Tommy Robinson) and with my mates we would belt out the songs, despite being neither gay, nor left wing. We idolised Pink Floyd but didn’t agree with most of the anti capitalism sentiment of the tracks on Animals. The Jam were amazing, but in my experience, Doc Martens, skinheads and violence were of the left not the right. I still enjoy hearing the music when the shuffle feature chooses them on my phone and still disagree vehemently with the political messages. However, maybe I am getting old, because I can’t imagine getting into a band such as this.