News Round-Up
- “Jihadist wants to be deported – but Home Office still can’t get rid of him” – A convicted jihadist who has renounced his British citizenship cannot be deported to Pakistan because it would breach his human rights, reports the Telegraph.
- “Sack the judges” – In the Spectator, Rod Liddle takes aim at the UK’s judges with their daft rulings that keep criminal migrants on our streets.
- “Why were the Abedis here in the first place?” – In the Spectator, Douglas Murray demands answers regarding why the jihadist Abedi family was allowed to settle in the UK, enabling Salman Abedi to carry out the deadly Manchester Arena bombing.
- “Britain is now the heartland of Islamic extremism” – We have a lot to learn from countries like Egypt and the UAE about dealing with Islamic extremism, says Inaya Folarin Iman in the Telegraph.
- “Religious sectarianism should have no place in Britain” – We should all be worried that pro-Gaza activists are telling Muslim voters which party to back in next month’s local elections, says Tom Harris in the Telegraph.
- “Britain and France are too scared to tackle the migrant crisis” – Britain and France are both seen as soft touches by the migrants and the gangs who smuggle them in, writes Gavin Mortimer in the Spectator.
- “Germany to deport ‘single and healthy’ asylum seekers to Greece” – A top German court has ruled that single, healthy male asylum seekers who have travelled to Germany via Greece can be deported back to the Mediterranean state, reports DW.
- “Brussels chief gushes over Starmer” – Sir Keir Starmer may not be polling all that well with the British public but he’s managed to garner some overseas admiration, notes the Spectator’s Steerpike.
- “Labour’s ‘banter ban’ faces showdown in the Lords” – The European Conservative reports that Lord (Toby) Young of the Free Speech Union is spearheading opposition to Clause 20 (the ‘banter ban’) of Labour’s Employment Rights Bill
- “Free speech under threat as Labour’s ‘banter ban’ could silence football fans from shouting ‘Are you blind?’ at referee” – Football fans could face restrictions on shouting “Are you blind?” at referees under Labour’s Employment Rights Bill, reports GB News.
- “Starmer warned children will be at risk if he agrees to US demands to get trade deal” – Keir Starmer has been warned that giving in to US demands over free speech to secure a trade deal will harm children, according to the Independent. Alarmist, much?
- “How Starmer changed his tune on trans women” – The Supreme Court ruling has put an end to the Prime Minister’s inconsistent position on sex and gender – but he’s been on a journey, says George Chesterton in the Telegraph.
- “Labour’s trans school rules thrown into chaos” – The Government has been urged to clarify how this week’s Supreme Court ruling will affect single-sex schools, reports the Telegraph.
- “Equalities watchdog inundated with questions on trans women ruling” – The Equality and Human Rights Commission has been inundated with calls from organisations seeking clarity on how to enforce the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman, reveals the Times.
- “Britain’s biggest bank pledges ‘solidarity’ with trans staff” – Lloyds Bank has pledged to support its transgender staff following the Supreme Court’s ruling that trans women are not women, says the Mail.
- “Stonewall’s hour of reckoning has finally arrived” – The Supreme Court’s ruling on the meaning of the words “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act has left Stonewall on shaky ground, writes Lucy Burton in the Telegraph.
- “The famous faces who insisted ‘trans women are women’” – From politicians to pop stars, many well-known names have had their say on the trans issue. In the Telegraph, Fiona Parker has compiled a handy reminder of the worst offenders.
- “Cowards who failed women must be brought to book” – In the Telegraph, Oliver Brown slams sports bodies like the FA for betraying women by allowing men in female sports.
- “The cancelled women owed an apology for standing up to trans ideology” – The Supreme Court ruling could be the ‘last nail in the coffin’ of cancel culture for gender-critical feminists like J.K. Rowling and Maya Forstater, says Fiona Parker in the Telegraph.
- “Lord Triesman demands sports chiefs resign over Supreme Court trans ruling” – Former FA chairman Lord Triesman has called for the heads of sport governing bodies who haven’t protected women’s sport to resign after the Supreme Court ruling that trans women are not women, reports the Telegraph.
- “Will the Supreme Court gender case victors get the apologies they deserve?” – The Supreme Court has handed a stunning victory to those – mostly women – who have endured vilification and abuse, says Richard Dawkins in the Spectator. Will they now get an apology?
- “How J.K. Rowling got her ‘ultimate revenge’ on Harry Potter stars” – J.K. Rowling has cast fresh faces for HBO’s Harry Potter reboot, leaving Radcliffe, Watson and Grint in the dark – in what insiders are calling her ultimate payback for their trans rights bust up, writes Grant Tucker in the Mail.
- “Jenrick stokes leadership speculation with accidental WhatsApp group” – Robert Jenrick has ignited Tory leadership speculation by adding hundreds of politicians and journalists to a WhatsApp group, reports the BBC.
- “Reform UK in talks with Liz Truss as it sets sights on Senedd” – Reform UK sees the Welsh elections as a potential blueprint for Westminster, says Aubrey Allegretti in the Times.
- “Rupert Lowe sues Nigel Farage for libel amid Reform bullying row” – Ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe has instructed lawyers to begin defamation claims against Nigel Farage and other party bosses, according to the Mail.
- “Second homes tax cash not being spent on local housing, councils admit” – Councils hitting second home owners with double tax bills are spending as little as 9p in every £1 generated on affordable housing, reveals the Telegraph.
- “‘I’m a Cambridge professor – we’re sacrificing academic standards to push certain agendas’” – In the Telegraph, Charlotte Lytton talks to Cambridge professor Douglas Hedley about the university’s move to eliminate tripos rankings and limit class hours.
- “BP hit by investor revolt after slashing Net Zero plans” – BP is bracing itself for a shareholder backlash over the firm’s U-turn on Net Zero, reports CNBC.
- “E-bikes cause fires in London ‘every other day’” – After a blaze left 11 people needing hospital treatment, a fire chief has warned that E-bikes and E-scooters are causing fires in London “every other day”, according to the BBC.
- “Baby boomers urged to keep working as 70 declared ‘the new 50’” – Baby boomers are being urged to work later in life after the IMF declared that “70s are the new 50s”, reports the Express.
- “The assisted suicide Bill should not survive” – In the Spectator, Dan Hitchens slams Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill as a rushed mess that risks vulnerable lives.
- “WFH killed the office ‘buzz of ambition’ – and Gen Z is paying the price” – Remote working has eroded the competitive advantage young professionals once had, says Josh Kirby in the Telegraph.
- “Secretary Kennedy outs autism pandemic” – What is behind increasing autism rates and can VAERS help us find out? wonders Jessica Rose on her Substack.
- “The Maldives will regret this disgraceful ban on Israeli tourists” – The ban on Israelis will be damaging for the Maldives – because it will repulse so many decent people from other Western countries, says Michael Deacon in the Telegraph.
- “Trump ‘thwarted Israeli plan to attack Iran’” – President Trump quashed Israeli proposals for a series of joint strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to the Times of Israel.
- “It’s time to smash the Iranian nuke project” – Donald Trump’s apparent priority is to strike a deal with Iran, writes Jake Wallis Simons in the Telegraph. He would do better to launch a military strike against its nuclear facilities first and negotiate afterwards.
- “Why stock markets are defying gravity amid tariff chaos” – Wall Street traders are spying opportunities amid the wreckage of the President’s trade war, says Chris Price in the Telegraph.
- “Secret plans for Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ missile shield revealed” – President Trump is building a Golden Dome missile defence shield, which will cost hundreds of billions of dollars to cover the entire globe and monitor enemy threats to the US, reports the Mail.
- “How the US Government funded narrative control operations around the globe” – On Substack, Rebekah Barnett writes about a staggering $1.5 billion in US grants aimed at engineering woke narratives.
- “King praises Judaism and Islam in Easter message” – The King has praised the ethics of Judaism and the “human instinct” of Islam in his Easter message, reports GB News.
- “Every religion but our own” – In the New Conservative, Dr Roger Watson slams the PM and the King for bending over backwards for Muslim, Hindu and Jewish festivals while sidelining Christianity.
- “‘How I found Christianity’” – In the Spectator, Nigel Biggar recounts his journey to Christianity.
- “Kate and William ‘will skip Easter Sunday service’” – The Prince and Princess of Wales will skip the traditional Easter gathering at Windsor Castle this year, opting instead to stay with Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis at their home in Norfolk, according to the Mail.
- “‘Strong hint’ of alien life found on planet 124 light years from Earth” – Astronomers have announced that they’ve detected the most promising “hints” of potential life on a planet beyond our Solar System, according to ScienceAlert.
- “‘The confirmation of alien life should worry us all’” – In the Mail, Matt Ridley warns that the discovery of potential alien life on K2-18b, 124 light-years away, could signal existential risks for humanity.
- “A stunning find in my local” – On Substack, Paul Sutton shares an astonishing recent find: an unpublished poem by John Keats. (Not really.)
- “‘A lot of people on the American Right have worried about this for a long time’” – On Newsnight, Douglas Murray explains why he challenged Joe Rogan on some of the guests he has had on his podcast.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thursday Morning Bath Rd Speen Newbury
“Why stock markets are defying gravity amid tariff chaos”
Bad news for one is good news for another. Thats the rules in any economy. All you can say is ‘things will change’. It is neither good or bad. It is just change, and change is opportunity. Entrepreneurs are wired up to take advantage of opportunities. Doomsayer journalists don’t get this.
That analogy could equally be used to describe climate change too “things will change’. It is neither good or bad. It is just change”
Spot on!
“Starmer warned children will be at risk if he agrees to US demands to get trade deal”
Hasn’t he been following what has been happening to our kids for 30 years..?
“‘The confirmation of alien life should worry us all’”
Its not confirmation, it is a ‘possible hint’, (i.e just enough to get some more funding. Oh those scientists..!) , and frankly Matt Ridley, the possibility of a bit of space moss 124 light years away doesn’t come close to an existential threat. How bad are journalists nowadays.? Less about news, more like one long disaster movie.
Frankly I don’t care.
We are in the midst of destroying humanity’s greatest achievement, western civilization, some bacterium on the other side of the galaxy is the least of our problems.
Hear, hear! That’s a great quote of yours to remember.
The only way it could form an existential threat is if they interfere with the space moss or whatever it is, and bring it back to Earth where it takes over or releases deadly spores or whatever he thinks space moss might do. Otherwise, presumably it has been existing happily 124 light years away for quite some time without killing everyone on Earth.
“BP hit by investor revolt after slashing Net Zero plans”
As my point elsewhere in the comments. Bad for one is good for another. People will sell their shares because of this news, others will buy shares because of this news. If the share price falls, people will buy an undervalued share, the price will rise and they will make a profit. The market is a wonderful thing. It really doesn’t care about your ideological opinion.
For sure common sense needs to hit Ireland and become the norm again, and Enoch Burke should be the first to be vindicated; ”Calls have been made for Ireland to follow the UK after a historic Supreme Court ruling which recognises that the legal definition of a woman is to be based on biological sex. Now campaigners and political figures at home are calling on the government to review our Gender Recognition Act which allows for any biological male to apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate at government offices, which renders him legally a woman in this jurisdiction and does not require that the man have undergone any gender reassignment treatments. Independent Ireland Cllr. Linda de Courcy said she was “delighted to see the ruling of the UK Supreme Court returning truth and common sense to our nearest neighbours on Tuesday. The judges unanimously ruled that the term woman means a “biological woman” and sex means “biological sex”.” Independent Ireland Chairman and TD for Cork North-Central Ken O’Flynn described the UK Supreme Court ruling as a “victory for common sense, a victory for women everywhere and a victory for self-evident truths that have been ruthlessly smothered by the relentless onslaught of… Read more »
There are many linked articles about the supreme court ruling that the meaning of ‘Woman’ in the Equality Act is essentially adult human female. Many are expressed in triumphalist terms – but we must not get carried away.
Beware. What the ruling means is that the ‘bloke-in-a-dress is a woman if he says he is‘ brigade will now campaign to amend the Equality Act to say what they think it should have said in the first place.
They wont give it up easily. That’s the lesson we are seeing as half the population has it slowly dawn on them what has been happening, and the other half wont even tolerate discussion. That’s radicalisation right there. They didn’t allow common sense to guide them to their political positions, so there’s no point trying to convince them they are wrong with common sense either. They simply can’t be reasoned with.
“Free speech under threat…”
Uh? It’s gone already, FFS
I’d like to believe this is a “turning point” with the Supreme Court ruling that I can now be classified legally as a woman (because I am) and a man in a frock isn’t. Didn’t all this turning point stuff happen with the puberty blockers and ‘gender affirming’ debacle? That’s all still carrying on so I’m not optimistic we’ve turned anywhere.
No, I do think this is the nail in the coffin. Don’t see the Supreme Court changing their decision. I, and my wife as well, look forward to a tidal wave of law suits 🤪 🤪
Oh no the Supreme Court won’t change its ruling but as soundofreason said:
“Beware. What the ruling means is that the ‘bloke-in-a-dress is a woman if he says he is‘ brigade will now campaign to amend the Equality Act to say what they think it should have said in the first place.”
Plus with our weasel word politicians I can believe they will try to get around it with weasel wording.
“‘I’m a Cambridge professor – we’re sacrificing academic standards to push certain agendas’”
Says Fenland Poly Philosophy Prof. Cut to 4-weeks those arduous 8-week terms of the odd lecture here and there, before swanning off with an arts/humanities B.A. Cantab at the end.
Science, engineering and medical degrees a different ball game all together. Survival of the fittest – ‘Twas ever thus.
Headley is an extremely smart and wise man. Suggest you watch Jordan Peterson’s series on Exodus on YouTube. Rather than spewing baseless vile.
Yup, Unis have gone down the pan (BA. Oxon. Eng. Lit. & Lang.1972), but that doesn’t mean all the Dons as well.
So, please tell us what YOU know about this man and his work. Over to you.
Mmm – looks to me like a case of offence taken by proxy. No specific criticism of Prof Headley made or intended, other than attempted satire on certain aspects of Oxbridge life that I too have some historical familiarity with from the 1970’s.
If memory serves right, sometimes called back then the rough and tumble of debate – of which I was on the receiving end of plenty and like to think I learnt to give back as good as I got.
“How the US Government funded narrative control operations around the globe” – On Substack, Rebekah Barnett writes about a staggering $1.5 billion in US grants aimed at engineering woke narratives…
…And the handouts shot up as the Democrats took power in 2021. As one of only two commenters observes:
“Your research deserves wide dissemination but as usual, 99% of the population will remain unaware of what’s really happening in the world.“
“A stunning find in my local” – On Substack, Paul Sutton shares an astonishing recent find: an unpublished poem by John Keats…
…A long-lost early 19th-century Keats limerick Hairy Mary sees the light of day, on that blissful dawn to be alive when the distinction between fake and real women dawned on the 21st century judiciary.
The Fail Online has a real scare story about aliens there. But the the next link from Science Alert above simply states that they have found (possibly) a chemical called DMS on a planet a zillion light years away. Supposed to be created by living matter. DMS has been found on comets, so may have another source apart from life. Another professor has stated that the planet is too hot to support life. Hardly scary. But the Fail online has the title:”The confirmation of alien life on a planet 124 light-years away should worry us all, says MATT RIDLEY” Behind a pay wall so not read it, but the same old problem with papers. Bullshit scare stories to sell papers.
BS journalism been getting worse since time immemorial. As Defoe wrote in 1722, looking back to events in 1665:
“We had no such thing as printed newspapers in those days to spread rumours and reports of things, and to improve them by the invention of men, as I have lived to see practised since.”
it is how they sell news papers
Good find, that quote!
The mainly WFH youngsters in my mainly WFH team are going great guns – the future of our firm is in good hands.
It is fine for some jobs. I was an ace programmer (honest! Not bragging. Wrote my first code in 1967) and worked best at home and my boss knew it.
Why? Because when the code flows (an act of creation) the last thing you need is for someone to turn up asking “Can you fix this for me?”
Sadly, in the public sector it is often a shirker’s paradise.
We do software.
You need intrinsically motivated staff, attentive management, the right incentives and work tracking – all basic stuff that should be present in any well run workplace.
Very few instances of those attitudes in the public sector, I’ve been there. Those that do have those attitudes, leave and maybe like we did start our own business.
Trouble is nowadays the govt are anti business, despite their ‘growth strategy’, hence our daughter is chary of employing UK workers in her WFH business with the upcoming regs they’re implementing .
Indeed. I know one bright, hardworking civil servant who is busy planning an exit into something of his own.
I’m sure a better job could be done than at present but it is hard to provide the right incentives in a not for profit business.
‘The confirmation of alien life should worry us all’ It wasn’t confirmation, it simply said this was evidence of plankton-like activity. It was millions of years before life as we know it on Earth developed from the primordial soup.
Even if these plankton have devloped to a level where they are superior to us, 124 light years is a long way to travel and why would they come in our direction anyway?
Matt Ridley is usually better than this, and since I can’t read the article I can only assume it was tongue in cheek.
Britain and France are too scared to tackle the migrant crisis
Pathetic!
For the money we are already spending, the solution is simple.
Give the Royal Navy rules of engagement that allow them to halt the boats by whatever means necessary, transfer the migrants to unmanned vessels programmed to return to French beaches, pay one or two competent migrants to accompany the unmanned vessel in order to turn it around when the migrants have disembarked, return the unmanned vessel to the RN and repeat.
This contravenes no international law since the migrants have not landed in Britain so are not being ‘returned’.
Or do as the Australians do and abandon the unmanned vessels.
‘The (Australian) high court ruled on-water transfer operations were legal in a judgement delivered in January 2015.
Inevitably, the UN takes a different position but, plainly, that position, as ruled by the Australian High Court, is nonsense:
‘UNHCR’s position is that they [asylum seekers intercepted at sea] must be swiftly and individually screened, in a process which they understand and in which they are able to explain their needs. Such screening is best carried out on land, given safety concerns and other limitations of doing so at sea.’
Oz put an end to drownings by their actions.
Criminal Gangs are operating in France with impunity & virtual immunity. This because France is in the EU and dutifully compiles with the EU rules which can be summed up by ‘Let the migrants in. Share the migrants out.’ It doesn’t matter who they are or where they come from. ‘Let them in. Share them out.’ This has now led to France becoming a ‘Failed State’.
What should have happened by now with this stupid UK Gummint and the previous ones, is that they should have given Macron an ultimatum – send in the French military to deal with the gangs in the Calais region or the UK will send in its military. Just because France is on course to destroy itself – doesn’t mean that UK gets destroyed too.
But with the current Liebour Gummint in the UK the invasion will be allowed to continue as it one of the best ‘progressive’ policies for the destruction of Western Civilization.
Alien life, Matt? Already here in the form of Starmer
“King praises Judaism and Islam in Easter message”
May I just point out that NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE does it tell us to celebrate Christ’s birth, death or resurrection.
None of The Apostles did, so why should we?
They only celebrated The Last Supper “IN REMEMBRANCE”, not as a crazed act of cannibalism as the Maryolaters have been taught to believe.
E-zus (there was no “J” in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic) did not roll up his sleeve and tell the Apostles to take a bite out of his arm.