Northern Ireland Shows Where England is Headed
The Irish Unionist historian and writer Ruth Dudley Edwards has written an incisive piece for the Telegraph in which she explains how England’s future can be seen in Northern Ireland where they appease the noisiest troublemakers:
Of the many lessons I learned from covering Northern Ireland for decades, the most depressing was that the British state almost always employed bribes and appeasement to shut up troublemakers.
British ministers – relieved that by and large these days political violence is off the agenda – have the pathetic belief that, if sufficiently humoured, everyone will see sense and work together for the good of the province.
This reached its apogee in 2007 when, after years of lying and stonewalling from the IRA over decommissioning, Jonathan Powell – Tony Blair’s Chief of Staff and now, God help us, Keir Starmer’s National Security Adviser – invited Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to his wedding.
It turns out from a Northern Ireland Select Committee report that the province has the worst public services in the United Kingdom:
NI has the highest waiting lists, the longest A&E queues and the greatest number of prescriptions for antidepressants. Par for the course, the call from most quarters is already for the provision to get more money.
But last year, the Conservative government agreed to fund Northern Ireland according to its estimated level of need of 124%. In simple language, this means that the province gets £124 for every £100 to England.
A complete lack of political responsibility reigns supreme:
Since the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement Stormont has been in a state of collapse: there is no collective responsibility at ministerial level in the devolved government; the civil service is demoralised; Sinn Féin MPs still refuse to take their Westminster seats, and since they want Northern Ireland to fail, most of the party’s republicans are focused on doing it damage while extracting the maximum from the British Treasury.
Of course, the greatest need is in the areas wrecked by terrorism and tribalism, and with the cynical representatives who shout the loudest for government assistance. But no one argues with them.
This is because whoever shouts the loudest gets the most. In Northern Ireland, quiet patriots are elbowed aside by noisy enemies of the state.
In England, we humour Islam because we are afraid of it and sneer at Christianity because we are not.
Anyone who feels frightened on this front should study what happens when – fearful of the threat of terrorism – electorates vote on sectarian lines.
England is heading that way, with the recent striking success of Muslim independents in elections to the House of Commons last year; their priority is Gaza.
Their stoutest supporters are Sinn Féin, who are uncompromising supporters of Palestinian activism and have led the way in making Ireland the most antisemitic country in Europe; sectarian voting is the key to their success.
Anyone trying to understand what’s going on with some of our Muslim politicians should nip across the Irish Sea and study how republican tacticians got their way in war and in peace.
We are in peril as a society because our enemies have skilfully learned how to turn a liberal democracy against itself. And we have a metropolitan elite that hates its own country, undermines its culture at every turn and thinks free speech should be restricted because – like our Prime Minister – they don’t know it’s an essential bastion of every democracy. J.D. Vance was right.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Absolutely right.
But I fear 2tk doesn’t really give a shit.
I’m afraid it’s gonna get a LOT worse before it gets better.
Sam Bidwell writes about the reshaping of British politics due to the ever-increasing population ( and influence ) of Muslims in the country. It seems that now Labour need them more than they need Labour; ”This rapid migration of Muslim voters towards independent candidates has not gone unnoticed. In constituencies with a large number of Muslim voters, Labour politicians are engaged in a guerilla campaign against the threat of insurgent independents. Last November, Labour MP Tahir Ali urged Keir Starmer to institute new laws which would criminalise criticism of the Qur’an or the Prophet Muhammad. Just last week, a group of twenty Labour MPs petitioned the Prime Minister of Pakistan to build a new airport in Mirpur, the ancestral homeland of a majority of Britain’s Pakistani population. These bizarre interventions can only be explained by understanding Labour’s precarious position in heavily-Muslim seats. Muslim voters no longer need the Labour Party, but many Labour MPs need Muslim voters. Like it or not, Britain is now a country in which national parties compete with explicitly sectarian candidates for the support of particular religious and ethnic groups. This should not come as a surprise. In many diverse democracies around the world, this is… Read more »
Excellent comment.
Unfortunately I don’t see 2tk as having the courage, wisdom or intellectual honesty to listen to such wisdom.
I fear the worst.
I think it’s safe to say that this nonsensical, made up term: ‘Islamophobia’, is a direct contradiction to ‘freedom of speech/expression’, therefore the two cannot co-exist. I think it’s also safe to say that these Muslims would totally introduce the same laws they live by in Pakistan if they could. The audacity of this man and his whiny perma-victimhood obsession. Good that the Deputy Speaker put him in his place;
”Labour MP Tahir Ali calls criticisms of him and a select group of MPs, who are pushing for an international airport to be built in Mirpur, Pakistan, “Islamophobic, racist attacks”.
https://x.com/vpopulimedia/status/1909331656843919572
Here he is back in November. Muslims hate the ‘freedom of speech’ laws, such as they are;
https://x.com/vpopulimedia/status/1909348261573337429
Well said.
Both Labour and Conservative, and now, it seems, Reform, are feeding the Islam crocodile hoping it eats them last.
It has been observed by others that the openly sectarian politics in Northern Ireland – probably permanent – has been replicated in Britain. This is merely a logical development given that the system of governance known as diversity is just such an arrangement of communities as has existed in Northern Ireland. In the rest of the country, a ‘community of communities’ – this Blairite creation – can really only be managed by an imperial centre, much like the British Empire was governed. Consequently, powers are devolved to community leaders by central and local government and the institutions who then have a hands-off approach to them. Just as in Northern Ireland, this system of diversity governance requires these communities to be fixed both in their identity and in their relationship to each other. Any innovation would bring into question the role of the imperial centre. Is it accurate for the Ms Edwards to write, ‘In England, we humour Islam because we are afraid of it.’ Just as it was once argued by Christian clerics and theologians that to have an animus to Christianity was evidence of being in an ‘unpardoned state’, so in Islamic theology any desire to reject, oppose or… Read more »
👍👍👍
Every time something today is bad it will have had Blair’s paws all over it. That man…..?!
Thanks to Sallust and the DS for featuring this superb article by Ruth Dudley Edwards.
It is very interesting that she refers to the Catholic IRA’s political wing Sinn Fein’s enthusiastic support for Muslim Terrorists, because there were news reports decades ago that the Catholic IRA were actually training Muslim Terrorists in secret camps in remote areas of Ireland.
This is a classic example of what Nassim Taleb describes as the Minority Rule.
Put simply, this describes how in an open, tolerant society, the most intolerant wins.
If the majority wants to maintain its culture, the only solution is to be intolerant towards the intolerant.
The discussion in the article (and in the book) shows that this is an ancient problem.
The chances of our present government understanding this, let alone doing anything about it, are nil.
Because diversity’s great, innit?
https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15
That is an interesting point about intolerance. It reminds me of that quote from the Archbishop of Philadelphia Charles Chaput some years ago, who said,
“Tolerance is not a Christian virtue.
Evil preaches tolerance until it becomes dominant, then seeks to silence the Good.”