Covid Vaccine Damage Consultants Paid Millions More Than Victims
Consultants assessing Covid vaccine damage claims on behalf of the NHS have been paid millions more than the victims, it has emerged. The Telegraph has more.
Freedom of Information requests made by the Telegraph show that US-based Crawford and Company has carried out nearly 13,000 medical assessments, but dismissed more than 98% of cases.
Just 203 claimants have been notified they are entitled to a one-off payment of £120,000 through the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) amounting to £24,360,000. Yet Crawford and Company has received £27,264,896 for its services.
The VDPS is run by the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) but it has been criticised for a lack of transparency regarding how claims are assessed.
Prof Richard Goldberg, Chairman in Law at Durham University, with a special interest in vaccine liability and compensation, said: “The idea that this would be farmed out to a private company to make a determination is very odd. It’s taxpayers money and money is tight at the moment.
“The lack of transparency is not helpful and there is a terrible sense of secrecy about all of this. One gets the sense that their main objective is for these cases not to succeed.
“There are no stats available so we don’t know the details about how these claims are being decided or whether previous judgements are being taken into account. They just trot out the same old line that they will examine the medical and epidemiological research and current medical consensus.”
He added: “What we want is people who are entitled to compensation to get it, and I’m not saying everyone deserves compensation. But the vast majority of cases are knocked out on causation grounds and I believe that there is a need for rigorous criteria to determine causation, as well as a system that is fair and accessible.”
Crawford and Company, which is based in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the world’s largest claims management and loss adjustment companies with offices in 70 countries.
However, it has faced public criticism. Reviews on sites such as Trustpilot and Glassdoor accuse the company of unfair claim denials, dismissal of medical evidence and a lack of transparency. The company has a 1.4 star ranking on Trustpilot.
The Hart (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) group, which was set up by medical professionals and scientists during the pandemic, has warned that Crawford and Company has a “troubling reputation with numerous reports of mismanagement and claims denials across various sectors”.
Since the VDPS was founded in 1979 it has had about 16,000 applications, but the Covid jab has made up the vast majority of claims.
Payments have been awarded for conditions related to the Covid jab including stroke, heart attack, dangerous blood clots, inflammation of the spinal cord, excessive swelling of the vaccinated limb and facial paralysis.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Brianne Dressen, the clinical trial participant and whistle-blower who wrote a book about her vaccine injury, has had her CICP claim denied by the US HHS.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Shock.
All with our money don’t forget.
We are all the victims of an ongoing assault. It is foolish to use the past tense in this regard, You might’ve gotten away with it so far but it is a mercurial fellow and it could strip the flesh from your bones at any point. No real evil disspiates as time passes it augments and builds itself. That is what you are looking at. In terms of the physical body the immune system can be seen as the most divine part of the fleshly anthropos in that it protects everything else and allows it to carry on living. This situation is not one that will improve with time.
If memory serves right, £37 billion sluiced away on Test and Trace siphoned off to Deloittes, Lighthouse Laboratories and associated cronies.
The Consultancy racket just runs and runs.
I suspect a private company would be more efficient and likely cheaper than gge public sector doing it.
with do many cases considered it ought to be possible to put some colour on the process and criteria. Odd so few succeed.
It never ends as have just had an annual review and GP pushing statins (linked to dementia) and shingles jab er linked to immediate shingles infection.
The key phrase is “they will examine the medical and epidemiological research and current medical consensus”.
Since the “consensus” says that the vaccines are safe and carry a miniscule risk of serious adverse effects this will be grounds to quickly dismiss the vast majority of claims.
Do they get a bonus for every case rejection I wonder?