News Round-Up
- “Starmer faces down Labour rebels to drive through £6 billion benefits cuts” – Keir Starmer will press ahead with plans for £6 billion of benefit cuts despite a growing Labour backlash, reports the Telegraph.
- “Starmer braces for ‘absolute horror’ Labour benefits meltdown” – Keir Starmer is bracing for a showdown with Labour MPs on moves to cut the spiralling benefits bill, says the Mail.
- “What are Labour’s planned cuts to welfare benefits?” – In the Times, Chris Smyth breaks down Liz Kendall’s proposed welfare reforms.
- “Britain suffers growth downgrade in blow to Reeves” – Britain’s growth prospects have been downgraded for the next two years in the wake of Rachel Reeves’s tax raid and Donald Trump’s escalating trade war, reports LBC.
- “Labour minister opens door to wealth tax” – Emma Reynolds MP has hinted that Labour might bring in a wealth tax, as backbenchers push for a rethink before major welfare cuts, according to the Telegraph.
- “Should we ‘unite the Right’?” – On Substack, Pimlico Journal weighs up senior Conservatives and Reform UK proposals to ‘unite the Right’ and challenge Labour.
- “Albanian criminal allowed to stay in UK because video calls would be ‘harsh’ on stepson” – An Albanian criminal has avoided deportation after a judge ruled that long-distance Zoom calls would be “too harsh” on his stepson, according to LBC.
- “Conor McGregor launches attack on ‘illegal immigration racket’” – MMA star Conor McGregor has blasted the “illegal immigration racket ravaging” Ireland in a presser at the White House before meeting President Trump, reports the Mail.
- “Thousands of migrants claim asylum after arriving as skilled workers” – Rocketing numbers of foreign workers are lodging asylum claims in a bid to stay in Britain permanently, says the Mail.
- “More than one million foreigners claiming benefits” – More than £7.5 billion is being spent on Universal Credit as over one million foreign nationals claim benefits, reports GB News.
- “Gen Z risks benefits crisis as four in 10 consider giving up work” – Generation Z are giving up on work, a new study suggests, with almost four in 10 considering leaving their jobs and claiming benefits, according to the Mail.
- “Islamophobia laws are just censorship. Britain’s Muslims already have solid protection” – Another attempt is being made to invent special protections for just one faith group, says Douglas Murray in the Telegraph. We need to oppose it.
- “The ‘two-tier’ sentencing guidelines shatter what little faith we had left in our justice system” – To make way for the supreme god of multiculturalism, the edifice of Judeo-Christian jurisprudence has been overturned, writes Alex Story for GB News.
- “Douglas Murray is right about persecuted Christians” – Douglas Murray’s criticism of the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church for failing to speak up for persecuted Christians deserves more attention, says Julian Mann in Christian Today.
- “Councils plan to axe places at top performing academies under new Labour plans” – Education leaders are warning that Town Hall chiefs are planning to slash places at top performing academy schools with new powers handed to them by Labour, according to the Sun.
- “Labour’s education policy adds up to teaching those they don’t like a lesson they won’t forget” – It’s hard not to see the current Government’s education policies as looking after the interests of a few adults, and not many children, says Giles Dilnot in Conservative Home.
- “In defence of Ofsted’s Hamid Patel” – In the Spectator, Katharine Birbalsingh comes out in defence of Sir Hamid Patel as interim Chair of Ofsted.
- “Britain has become a pioneer in Artificial Unintelligence” – Artificial Unintelligence, or Bureaucracy-Induced Stupidity, is what we have come to expect in Britain, laments Theodore Dalrymple in the Spectator.
- “Dark days of online censorship” – In TCW, Kathy Gyngell sounds the alarm on the Online Safety Act, which she believes will force TCW to crack down on reader comments.
- “BBC wrong to allow journalist to promote own book” – The BBC has upheld a complaint against its news channel after a foreign correspondent was allowed to promote her own book during a broadcast, reports the Telegraph.
- “The cash-strapped councils eyeing up your life savings to cover Net Zero bills” – Cash-strapped councils are asking taxpayers to invest their savings in projects to help them meet their Net Zero targets, says Charlotte Gifford in the Telegraph.
- “‘Net Zero by 2050 is impossible’” – Kemi Badenoch has enraged green Conservatives by declaring the UK’s target to reach Net Zero by 2050 “impossible”, reports Sky News.
- “The risky assumptions underpinning Ed Miliband’s green job promise” – Labour’s promise of a just energy transition for North Sea workers hinges on lofty ambitions, warns Matt Oliver in the Telegraph.
- “Audi to cut 7,500 jobs amid ‘challenging’ switch to EVs” – Audi plans to cut 7,500 jobs as the German car maker scrambles to find money to fund its EV transition, according to Carscoops.
- “Lucy Letby’s lawyers call for end of inquiry amid miscarriage of justice fears” – Lucy Letby’s lawyers are to meet with the Criminal Cases Review Commission to present new evidence they say undermine the nurse’s conviction, reports Sky News.
- “How the BBC continues to mislead” – On the TTE Substack, Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson dismantle yet another BBC attempt to reinforce the Covid narrative.
- “A Covid contrarian speaks out about all she has lost” – On the Unreported Truths Substack, Alex Berenson shares Jennifer Sey’s fury at the Covid lockdown fanatics who ruined her life, cost her a top job at Levi’s and still refuse to admit they were wrong.
- “Is SARS-CoV-2 of Dutch origin?” – On Substack, Jim Haslam plugs his new book COVID-19: Mystery Solved, accusing Dutch virologist Vincent Munster of turning SARS-CoV-2 into a super-spreader at a US lab.
- “The radical European country handing mothers tax breaks for life” – Mothers in Hungary will be exempt from paying income tax for life if they have two children under radical new plans to combat the country’s plummeting fertility rate, reports the Telegraph.
- “How Friedrich Merz betrayed his voters” – Friedrich Merz’s U-turn on Germany’s constitutional debt brake – which he promised to uphold during his campaign – will only accelerate the German economy’s downward spiral, says Henry Donovan in the Spectator.
- “UK accuses Israel of breaking international law in Gaza” – Foreign Secretary David Lammy says that Israel is breaking international law by stopping aid getting in to Gaza, according to Sky News.
- “Will Trump trigger a global meltdown?” – In UnHerd, Wolfgang Münchau warns that Trump’s plan to devalue the dollar while maintaining its dominance could trigger the biggest global financial upheaval since Bretton Woods.
- “Trump administration deports Venezuelans despite court order” – The Trump administration has deported alleged Venezuelan gang members, defying a court order and arguing that the judge lacked the authority to stop them, according to Reuters.
- “Trump ‘voids’ Biden’s pardons after ex-President used autopen” – President Trump has declared his predecessor’s last-minute pardons of the House committee investigating the January 6th riots “void, vacant and of no further force or effect”, reports the Mail.
- “The lost boys” – In the New Conservative, Peter Harris warns of the crisis facing young men while society looks the other way.
- “Do not discriminate against gender-critical women, Lib Dems told” – The Liberal Democrats have been told to stop discriminating against gender-critical women by their chief executive, reports the Telegraph.
- “Our self-censoring woke museums are basically criticising people for living in the past” – Great minds of history are being denounced by museums because of their supposed sins, writes Celia Walden in the Telegraph. This is cultural vandalism.
- “A banter ban? Not in my local” – The Government’s new ‘banter ban’ is yet another nail in the pub’s coffin, argues Niall McCrae in TCW.
- “Lockdown will cause more deaths than the virus” – On a Covid-era episode of Question Time, entrepreneur Luke Johnson predicts the devastating effects of lockdowns.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/03/17/starmer-labour-rebels-6bn-benefits-cuts-disabled/
£6 billion in benefits cuts, plus the £1.5 billion saved in removing pensioners Winter Fuel allowance = £7.5 billion.
Is that is what is known as robbing Peter to pay Paul? Starmer’s labour government has to find the means somehow to continue to fund the universal credit benefit claims – a minimum of £7.5 billion – of the over a million foreigners who have their fingers in the pie.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/benefits-claims-billions-universal-credit-spent-foreigners-millions-foreign-nationals-benefits
Lockdown will cause more deaths than the virus
Those ‘far right’ ‘capitalists’ know a thing or two.
Maybe the free world should have one of them running things.
Oh! It does!
Perhaps once he’s finished with the cheesemakers and the sorrowful, he can have a crack at the lockdowners…..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig23CbO1rBA
Home truths from five years ago and the Declaration of National Insanity.
Since proven true by examination of morbidity data – It was the State that Killed Granny.
‘The total number of excess deaths in 47 countries of the Western World was 3 098 456 from 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022. Excess mortality was documented in 41 countries (87%) in 2020, 42 countries (89%) in 2021 and 43 countries (91%) in 2022.’
https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282
That’s a lot of Grannies.
‘The present study aimed to investigate the cancer recurrence or remission following COVID-19 vaccination as well as lymphadenopathy. It was shown that COVID-19 vaccination has led to cancer recurrence in some cases and cancer remission in limited cases. Further studies are required in this regard considering the limited available investigations.’
https://www.jnephropharmacology.com/Inpress/npj-10593.pdf
That is not particularly reassuring, either.
‘Preliminary evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences of AD and MCI.’
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38806183/
https://x.com/wartranslated/status/1901706040598532312?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Meanwhile a cheap form of defence against expensive Russian fibre optic drones has been invented…..a camouflage net….in use since about 1914……
But the Russians don’t seem to have any!:
https://x.com/wartranslated/status/1901694527984779626?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Really? Is that all you have. Why do you bother. A net will work against any FPV drone if the operator doesn’t see it. This is why Russians started stretching wires between poles across major supply routes at the front line to protect convoys.
This simple but effective measure is now being copied by the Ukrainians.
‘Ukraine has a new version of its homemade Neptune cruise missile for longer-range (600 miles) attacks, expanding the country’s deep-strike arsenal, and it says it has already used the weapon against Russia.’
”Creating a simple atomic bomb, as the United States did within the framework of the Manhattan Project, would not be a difficult task,” according to the document.
It is noted that Ukraine would most likely have to use plutonium extracted from spent fuel rods of nuclear reactors in order not to waste time on the construction and operation of large facilities needed to enrich uranium.’
Oops!
Oops, indeed. And where does this lead us? Are you looking forward to a nuclear exchange? How will that benefit anyone, especially Ukraine?
This war needs to be over and the sooner the better. Anyone who thinks Ukraine will somehow turn the tables is illusional. Better to capitulate now to save lives and end the destruction. And the idea of British or French troops trying to overturn the situation is simply suicidal and not in the interest of the British or French populations.
Did you see the size of the “simple atomic bomb” from the Manhattan project. Best of luck fitting that on a cruise missile.
Ooops!
‘The construction of a dirty bomb made from radioactive waste and delivered by a conventional weapons system like a combat aircraft is far easier and cheaper than a full-scale nuclear weapons program and is entirely plausible’
https://cepa.org/article/ukraine-can-go-nuclear-should-it/
This is what President Trump is talking about when he mentions concerns regarding WW3
‘Ukraine’s missile program has produced several notable systems, including the Hrim-2 (also known as Grim-2, Grom-2, Thunder, or OTRK Sapsan), a short-range ballistic missile system developed to rival Russia’s Iskander missile. Designed to replace the Soviet-era Tochka-U missiles, the Hrim-2 has a range of up to 700 km’
In fact WW3 already started with the deployment of North Korean troops.
Ukraine will not allow itself to be erased without doing some erasing of its own.
Avoiding that eventuality was the whole point of the Budapest Memorandum….
“The cash-strapped councils eyeing up your life savings to cover Net Zero bills” – Cash-strapped councils are asking taxpayers to invest their savings in projects to help them meet their Net Zero targets
Zero by name, Zero by nature. Stand by for a finance scandal of the future.
238 Green mugs, “collectively investing £175,750 in the Bristol Climate Action Investment,” have already fallen for it. Some mugs have even foregone interest payments to Save the Planet.
Fools and their money.
Morons.
Clearly this is donating not investing. I wonder if they have complied with all financial regulations to do with promoting financial instruments.
“Audi to cut 7,500 jobs amid ‘challenging’ switch to EVs” – Audi plans to cut 7,500 jobs as the German car maker scrambles to find money to fund its EV transition
More money and jobs down the Green Drain.
Nowadays anything and everything goes in Green Fortress Germany.
Gotterdammerung beckoning again in Das 20-Jahre Reich.
https://kyivindependent.com/weve-never-been-closer-to-a-peace-deal-white-house-says-ahead-of-trump-putin-call/ Is today the day of the ceasefire? ‘A lot of people are being killed over there and we had to get Ukraine to do the right thing. It was not an easy situation,” Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center. ‘You got to see a little glimpse at the Oval Office, but I think they are doing the right thing now, and we are trying to get the peace agreement done. We want to get ceasefire and then a peace agreement.’ If so, let us recall that similar ceasefires were agreed upon about sixty times after 2014 but Russia violated every single one. Blessed are the peacemakers (and cheesemakers) but real peace will take decades… ‘Sybiha stressed that Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty are non-negotiable, reaffirming that Kyiv will never recognize Russian-occupied territories as part of Russia. The second key condition is Ukraine’s right to choose its alliances.’ ‘It is clear who wants peace and who wants war. Russia will want to take over all of Ukraine by other means, and preferably militarily neutralize half of Europe while at it. Russia won’t succeed in that… (but that) doesn’t mean Putin won’t try…Putin could finish this war in 5 minutes by just withdrawing’….Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski… Read more »
The peace deal will come with Ukraine’s capitulation, not before, no matter what threats Trump makes. (What happened to him wanting to become the broker of peace? He only had to cease delivering weapons.)
And if the Baltic States are irrationally worried about a Russian invasion then they should perhaps engage in friendly relations with Russia, rather than delivering weapons to Russia’s enemies. And the EU should exchange Kaja Kallas for a less biased diplomat.
I admire your dedication and stamina. You must spend a lot of time researching this, digging out interesting facts, interpretations, and propositions. I’m not yet persuaded by your arguments, but they do widen my field of understanding.
Sigh.
Can you not see that your laudatory comment will only get him a hefty bonus from his supervisor down at the Zelensky International Troll Service?
Hahaha! I like your contributions as well.
I hope that’s sarcasm. If there’s anybody who’s a professional troll around here it’s Mr “HYPOCRITE!!!” Heretic.😏
Hahaha! I think I’ll stop praising people! However, your posts are amongst the most comprehensive and thoughtful on this site. I always look forward to reading them. Often, I find the comments more interesting than the articles. I like the clash of opinion.
Well that does surprise me, because it’s a rare thing for anyone to like my contributions! Thank you. 🙂
You are sharp and to the point, don’t mince your words, and say it as you see it. And I like to see disagreement on this site!
“HYPOCRITE!!!”
“Two can play that game”. Bobby Brown. 😼
“How the BBC continues to mislead” – Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson dismantle yet another BBC attempt to reinforce the Covid narrative.
The two Old Geezers precision-firing the Deringers again:
“SARS-CoV-2 did not impact children. The restrictions of civil liberties did.”
“How Friedrich Merz betrayed his voters”
Mutti Merz up to more no-good.
Interesting this article doesn’t mention BRICS?
Regarding the article ( paywalled so didn’t read it ) about Viktor Orban giving tax exemptions to mothers of two or more children. This and other financial incentives have been tried in various European countries now and it doesn’t work to increase the birth rates. The reason it doesn’t work is because it’s looking at the cause of why couples aren’t having kids from purely a financial perspective, but there’s many other reasons for this. In a nut shell, the world is a different place to what it was even two generations ago, let alone three or four, and those times are never coming back. Society will never look like it did in the 1950’s and people need to accept that. These tax exemptions will at least go some way to helping women who already have kids, though; ”As Remix News already reported last month, mothers with two or more children will be exempt from paying income tax for life. Anna Nagy, head of Hungary’s Single-Parent Center, talked with Hungarian news outlet Magyar Nemzet about the new family policy measures, highlighting that the poverty rate is much higher among single parents. About 36 percent of them live in difficult financial circumstances, so… Read more »
And where are the fathers of these children?
Exactly the point I’ve made numerous times. Prejudiced and small-minded people are quick to look down on and stigmatize single mothers, but nobody ever asks that question or looks to the many reasons why she may have found herself bringing up her kids alone. I guess for some people the men get a free pass and are totally absolved of responsibility, despite creating a child being a 50:50 effort.
But I’ll bet if she had an abortion she’d be condemned, or if she gave her kid up for adoption she’d also be condemned. She keeps her kids, loves them and strives to bring them up to the best of her capabilities and some still condemn her. Women can never do right for doing wrong in some people’s eyes. But we won’t mention the absent father-shaped elephant in the room…
I know plenty of single mothers and most if not all of them have chosen not to be with the father of their children. Many set out to be single mothers.
Indeed, and one of those changes is that women don’t feel at all the need to have a male in the household to raise a family. That’s the result of years of programming and deliberate public policy of giving handouts to single mothers. Basically it’s been financially incentivised.
I don’t know a single woman who set out to be a single mother. I do, however, know several ( presently and over the years ) who ”have chosen not to be with the father of their children” for very valid reasons, such as domestic abuse and other criminal behaviour, also infidelity is a common one. Kids do not need such poor role models in their lives, or at least not in the same household.
I know plenty. It’s actually quite common now.
I also know plenty of couples that have separated. Not one of them was because of domestic abuse. All of them was because they no longer got along, for which they are both responsible. In many of those cases, the wife just wasn’t happy, satisfied, wanted more from life and precipitated the separation.
Yes, I read years ago that the vast majority of divorces and partnership break-ups are initiated by the women, not the men.
Sadly Mogs when I was at DWP single motherhood was a lifestyle choice. For plenty of young girls aged 15 /16 (and younger) the prospect of their own flat, rent and council tax paid plus free prescriptions, eye tests, dentistry, gym memberships and some freebies I have forgotten, was too good to turn down. Sad I know but fact.
Well done to you for telling the unpalatable truth to the public!
I’m not disputing the fact that such girls do exist because they’ve always existed. However, I’d be interested in how you came to the conclusion it was a ”lifestyle choice”, because, once again, where was the boy/father? I don’t blame a family for not being able to handle a pregnant teenager and new baby in the home so if this is her right, to have a flat etc, then so be it. I’d rather that then her be chucked out of the home and into foster care or for that same flat plus benefits to go to newly arrived migrants. But my point is, these girls hardly represent the majority of women who find themselves single mothers for a myriad of reasons, either before the baby is born or due to relationship breakdown. To tar all single mothers with the same ‘benefit-scrounger’ brush is both inaccurate and demeaning.
Absolutely spot on! Feminists have made women look upon men as Sperm Banks and Cashpoint Machines, knowing that the Taxpayers will pay for all their children if the men refuse. No single mother should get benefits unless she reveals the father of the children, and proves it by a paternity test.
It’s a shame, the best and most wholesome way to bring up children is always a loving mother and father, (not nessasarily married) it wasn’t so unusual in my day it was normality
Agreed, Dings. But it’s also a shame that many men are willing to ‘do the deed’, basically acting as a sperm-donor, but go AWOL when they don’t want to take responsibility and face up to the consequences of their actions. I’m pretty sure even a chimp could be taught how to put on a condom with enough training.
Agreed. Also though in this era of self, self, self, some women it seems need to be taught self respect. Our daughter helped out at a church retreat some time ago and the number of girls that were subservient to the needs of men and thought they needed to go along with sex in order to ‘keep’ their boyfriends horrified her.
Yes, indeed. I’ve a 13yr old daughter so I’ve all these ‘life lessons’ to look forward to.😬
Oh and look, the inevitable response from the resident women-haters who can’t cope with reality and for whom females are always in the wrong.🤡
Chocks away, cowards!!👎👎👎👎👎👎👎🤦♀️
Yes, responsibility does seem to be a lesser consideration these days
Where are all the real men at?? Well, they’re seemingly down the nail bar getting a manicure. 😮 Has anyone seen this? I’m fairly sure men can have man to man ”meaningful conversations” that don’t involve getting their nails painted. Mind, I’m all for gender equality so what do I know…? Any thoughts, chaps?
”Bizarre men’s campaign ‘Hard As Nails’ aiming to ‘break stereotypes’ around masculinity by encouraging more men to get manicures.”
https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/1900495050846646761
Seems to be a thing in the Australian Navy;
https://x.com/Just_Rad/status/1900528819175645551
The day is fast approaching when those paragons of manliness, the SAS, refuse to go into combat in case they chip their nail varnish.
Shelling out good money for what you can do for free in two minutes with the tried and tested nail-scissors and file. More than happy with the usual chums for a man to man rant.
Well didn’t men used to go have a man-to-man chat down the pub over a pint? Surely there’s still enough pubs that haven’t closed down in order to keep up this time-honoured tradition? It would seem the de-masculinization/de-feminization of the sexes continues at pace. But I don’t think this nail bar thing will ever catch on. Couldn’t they just play cards or Dominoes instead? LOL
Was the men’s area called the tap room and women’s area the snug? Seems to ring a bell.
The Tap Room was typically the men’s room. Ladies preferred the generally tidier Snug.
The only snugs I ever saw in pubs were a very tiny little room where only 2-4 people could sit together at the single table. It was was used by both men and women for private conversations away from the noise of the public & private bar areas. Here is a picture of one:
That looks very cosy. I quite like that. I haven’t been in a proper pub for years.
☝️
😁 The main reason I know you qualify as a ‘real man’, Dings, is that you don’t come on here and blame women exclusively for all the things wrong with the world, or indeed, for men’s shortcomings. A realist beats a fantasist any day of the week.😇
Nobody does that. Stop your endless whingeing.
Says Mr Mysoginist himself. 🤡
“HYPOCRITE!!!” Heretic.
Well, I’d hate to forget to cite my source. 😉
Trump believes that it is the act of signing that validates a document and becuase it was done by a machine then it is not legal.
Much as I would like to see these people take responsibility for their viindictive actions, unfortunately in the US, a legal signature generally signifies an individual’s intent to be bound by a document, and can be a handwritten signature, a digital signature, or even a mark, as long as it’s clear the signer intended to sign.
I think he’s arguing that Biden didn’t know about it and therefore had no intent.
If he didn’t sign it himself, which would be the proof of intent, then they’d have to come up with evidence that it was his intention to do that.
I don’t like Starmer. He strikes me as an arrogant technocrat who loves nothing more than micro managing people’s lives. That said, cutting benefits, painful as it is, is absolutely the right thing to do. Cut down to zero is what I personally believe it should be.
The state has no business taking money from the more productive members of society and giving it to those who can’t be bothered to work or can’t be bothered to save properly for a rainy day.
Put an end to the nanny state.
I’ve heard “cutting benefits” many times when i worked in DWP. It never happened. So my view is let’s wait and see.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/benefits-claims-billions-universal-credit-spent-foreigners-millions-foreign-nationals-benefits
Double or even triple this because as we all know there are millions of “British” citizens who have only a fleeting connection to this country and who really belong in Pakistan, Afghanistan or the like.
Luke Johnson, brilliant. I wish he would run for office, he would be the Elon Musk of Whitehall
Sky News tells us that:
First things first: In what insane world might ‘bankrupting us’ not result in ‘a serious drop in our living standards’? It’s not or it’s and.
On a less important note why the hell are we told what someone is going to say. Sky News? Sky Predictions more like. Write your damn’ article and wait ’til she’s said what you think she’s going to say before publishing it
Th general gist of what’s coming will have been leaked to see if there there is a terrible twitter reaction to it, then they have time to water it down etc… sad
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/jd-vance-doubles-down-globalist-europe-on-brink-of-suicide/
Thank God fir J D Vance.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/whats-the-covid-19-exit-strategy-there-isnt-one-2/
And here’s Will Jones doing a touch of freelancing. 😀😀😀
“Conor McGregor launches attack on ‘illegal immigration racket’”
Well done to him !!!
“Should we ‘unite the Right’?”
Yes, but the Tories are no longer “Right-wing” = “Conservative”.
They have been forcing Left-wing Policies upon the nation for decades, so they cannot be included now, just for suddenly Jumping on the Patriot Bandwagon.
Rupert Lowe is the one who can truly unite the Patriots.
Well, well, well— the Closet Communist Sikh woman finally showing her true colours at last.
Remember the “Red-Green Alliance”, also called “The Unholy Muslim-Marxist Alliance”. Here you have a good example. Westerners have no idea how widespread Marxism is on the Indian Subcontinent.
Hear, hear! Once again the Patriot Douglas Murray says the things that desperately need to be said.
In TCW, Kathy Gyngell sounds the alarm on the Online Safety Act, which she believes will force TCW to crack down on reader comments.
I wonder when our comments here will be suppressed. We will have to word them more carefully.
Nope, don’t care.
There is only male and female. Men cannot become women and women cannot become men. DEI is racist. Woke is stupid. Immigration is too high. Illegal entry for any reason means deportation. Climate change is fake.
Not going to pander to stupidity or mental illness. Long live the revolution ✊
So I see on the news now Liz Kendall is confirming Labour want to save £5bn off the welfare budget, by 2030. Hmmm that doesn’t exactly seem much of a stretch target to me – ~£1.25bn a year, if we don’t include 2030 itself AND we don’t adjust for inflation (which will stay high)… remember, Millibrain wants to spaff £22Bn up the wall on a plant to remove CO2 from the atmosphere (capital cost only, not the vast amounts of electricity needed to make it operate)…. Just shows they really don’t have a bloody clue – clearly the only possible excuse for such a pathetic target is they don’t want to worry so many of their core voters. Why not set 50% as a target, or better still, work out how much we can afford from general taxation (vs borrowing or printing new money) declare that figure is max starting point, and work down. I’m guessing if they did that the answer would be £zero, so they don’t want to go there. Again (I know I know) where the hell are Reform? Why haven’t they published clear data on the spending areas and set some rough ambitious targets for people… Read more »
Someone on Talk Radio was suggesting that it was actually that it would be a £5bn smaller rise, not a reduction from today’s figure.
So more smoke and mirrors you reckon – you probably aren’t far off. None of them have the stomach to lay off civil servants, just move them around…