News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brett_McS
1 year ago

“Joe Biden’s final speech has divided the American public, with people on all sides declaring it a disappointing and even disturbing affair”
Doesn’t that mean his final speech has united the American public?

NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Another wilfully blind performance from the left, warning about how democracy will be destroyed by the democratically elected. These ‘oligarchs’..? Did they include Soros and Gate, Zuckerberg and Fink when they were batting strongly for the Democrats.? Anyway, move aside Joe, the Don is back on Monday and everything will begin to change.

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

The 2025 tour of Berkshire continues.
Yesterday we were in way out west in Hungerford. 

Thursday Morning Charnham St & B4192 Hungerford 

701
Monro
1 year ago

There are waiting lists to get on the waiting lists to get on the waiting lists ‘…the NHS performs poorly on almost all parameters. In the last year before Covid, the United Kingdom had the second-highest avoidable mortality rate in Western Europe after Greece (71 per 100,000). Whilst this is high among developed countries, it was still Britain’s lowest-ever recorded rate. Avoidable mortality rates were at 84 per 100,000 in 2010, and 120 per 100,000 in 2001 when the records began. For all of the common types of cancer, the UK’s survival rates are among the lowest in Western Europe, typically not far ahead of Slovenia and the Czech Republic. Even prior to the pandemic, the UK had significantly longer waiting times compared to countries like the Netherlands, with waiting times for many procedures about twice as long in the UK.’ https://iea.org.uk/media/replace-the-nhs-to-save-lives-says-new-iea-paper/ Everyone knows what to do ‘In terms of outcomes, quality and efficiency, social health insurance systems are consistently ahead of the NHS on almost every available measure. They combine the universality of a public system with the consumer sovereignty, the pluralism, the competitiveness and the innovativeness of a market system. We do not see any one particular country’s health system as a role model’ ‘The Dutch… Read more »

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

I agree save that in the UK our private pension schemes have been destroyed by taxes, regulations and political interference.

JeremyP99
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

.

NHS-Outcomes
Mogwai
1 year ago

Interesting that the first four articles all specifically mention ”rape gangs”, but we have men on this site who take exception to that as they maintain it was never rape and the victims weren’t children. Anyone speaking up about these vile crimes is an ”infatuated fantasist”, a ”paedophile” themselves and a ”pervert’, purely because we seek justice, understand what the term ”child-protection” means, plus the definition of ‘rape’ and don’t want this national scandal to be brushed under the carpet once again. Perhaps somebody should tell Tommy Robinson;

”That the non-existent child rapists you keep phantasizing about weren’t involved with this because they never existed is completely independent of that.” RW

Now, who’s going to downtick this post and demonstrate to everyone that they’re onboard with this point of view and prove to me there are more rape-apologist, ‘MAPs’ paedo-sympathizers lurking on this site? Time to out yourselves. 3,2,1 GO!

NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I don’t down vote but I will ask you to stop treating all male posters as having the same opinion. RW appears to make crass statements, but that doesn’t mean that it is some kind of homogenised ‘male view’. I suspect many of us are fathers of daughters and horrified by what has gone on, I know I am. You make some interesting posts Mogwai, but the fantasy demonising of ‘all men’ doesn’t do you any favours.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Can you point to the part where I stated or inferred “all men”? Got a veritable straw man factory going on at your end, haven’t you?
I think I’m going to need to print more ‘victim cards’ out at this rate…🙄
What is also telling, by the way, is that if you’re allegedly so “horrified” by it all you don’t seem overly keen on addressing RW directly on his views. Only me. Interesting that…

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Well it’s been 13 hours and still no evidence to support your accusation, which only goes to confirm what I already know: all you ever had in the bag was to deliberately misconstrue my post so you could paint me as the villain and blame me for something I never said. I guess there’s no limits to just how low you’ll go to claim victimhood, right?
Guess I’ll have to order a new ink cartridge for my printer so I do apologise for the delay in shipping you and your posse your new victim cards. I know how important it is for you all to retain that much-needed ‘victim status’ on here…😁
A word of advice; you ought to try looking in the mirror and repeating the phrase:”Real men aren’t offended by words on a screen”, until the feeling of being butt-hurt subsides. You’re welcome.👍

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Well said.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Mogwai

This site is all the better for a diversity of opinion, even if some of it is contrary to my views.

Mogwai
1 year ago

I don’t think anybody is arguing against a diversity of opinion. But if this is supposed to be a site with free speech as its ethos and people should be able to therefore post whatever they like based on this ethos, shouldn’t posters then be able to exercise their own right to freedom of speech and challenge any posts they disagree with? Because what is awfully evident to me in this place is the level of hypocrisy demonstrated by certain people. The people who superficially appear to be all ‘pro-free speech’ are the very same people who want to censor other people’s free speech, such as with myself. Telling me to ‘cease and desist’ because they have a problem with what I post, where I put my post or the length of my posts. This is blatant double standards. If anyone is allowed to post whatever they like then by the same token that goes for the people who wish to respond/challenge a particular poster. Free speech works both ways. Certain people acting affronted just because they don’t like what’s being said and attempting to censor other posters is wrong, it’s hypocrisy. I will continue to challenge people on their… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Mogwai

I always appreciate your comments, Mogs, but you do seem to be going over the top with this one.
Speaking for myself, I rarely down-tick people, and when I do it is because they keep labouring the same point, and I have tried to make a cogent response to them previously. I try not to waste my time repeating myself. I think the only thing I repeatedly rail against is when people claim to know what some politician’s real motives are, when they are clearly stating a conclusion they have drawn based on prejudice.

For a fist full of roubles

For the avoidance of doubt, the last paragraph does not apply to Mogwai.

Mogwai
1 year ago

Can you elaborate on ”going over the top”? Maybe you think being outraged about the abuse of young girls, such as in the extract below, and the fact that there are *some men on here* who are of the point of view that no children were raped because they were all teenage prostitutes, the rape gangs are mere figment of people’s imagination if they want to speak up about this scandal, and they will be labelled as ”paedophiles” and ”infatuated perverts” if they do, and that we also have men in our midst who wish to legitimize sexual attraction and interaction with minors. But apparently pointing out these men on here actually exist sticks in the craw of other men on here. Go figure. But neither you nor anyone else is obliged to read my posts so it does make me wonder what the point in having a whinge in the first place is, really, given that I will carry on posting and exercising my right to free speech, while you lot carry on protecting and never ever challenging the *men on here* that I’m referring to. This makes for uncomfortable reading, but some *men on here* wish to deny… Read more »

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Mogwai

I am also outraged by the treatment of these girls but my outrage is directed at the perpetrators, facilitators and those who turned a blind eye.
I think you are going over the top over the commentators whose attitude you don’t like (the deniers), who as far as I know have not been directly involved at any level.
I am equally, if not more,outraged at the women who are reported to have assisted in the procurement of these girls and who turn condoned the behaviour of the rapists. It is as much a culture thing as a man thing, but of course driven by men in their patriarchal communities..
And yes, it has to stop.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  Mogwai

“Telling me to ‘cease and desist’…”

Mogwai, they can tell you what they like. Words, innit.

Mogwai
1 year ago

Yes, precisely. But where are the resident ‘free speech absolutists’? You know, the ones who like to wheel out the old ”Offence is taken not given” quote? Well, they’re nowhere to be found, are they? That’s what I mean: double standards all the way down….
Mind, I’ve been around long enough to know how it works by now in the ‘DS Boys’ Club’. 😉

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Should we not be referring to the gangs as Pakistani Rape Gangs in order to avoid charges of islamophobia?

What matters now is that the enablers are put on trial – politicians, social workers, councillors, senior police and the rest.

Prosecute, prosecute, prosecute.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Well of course I agree. It just seems peculiar that me making the observation that the Emperor is butt-naked: that we have rape-apologists and pro-MAPs posters in our midst, who inconveniently just so happen to be men, would somehow irritate people on here. I’m pointing out something which is indisputably true ( with many posts under previous articles supporting my claim ) but somehow it is *me* that’s at fault.
Make it make sense, as they say. 🤷‍♀️

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  Mogwai

What does “MAP” stand for?

Mogwai
1 year ago

Minor Attracted Person. They want to legalize and legitimize having sex with children/underage teens. We have them on here, but it’s apparently verboten to call them out. That seems to be the consensus of the ‘Boys Club’ anyway. It’s why they’re coming after me, because I’m not afraid to, due to having bigger balls than most on here, it appears. It does say an awful lot about a person when their loyalties lie with those who are rape-apologists, paedo-sympathizers and deniers of Pakistani rape gangs, as opposed to with the person who has no qualms in calling out these creeps.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/its-not-far-right-to-care-about-the-mass-rape-of-white-girls/

Matt Goodwin with a somewhat long-winded and convoluted view on the muslim Rape Gangs and Starmer’s denial but he get there in the end…

So let me end by saying this. It is not ‘far right’, ‘Islamophobic’ or ‘hateful’ to talk openly and honestly about the mass rape of white girls by Pakistani Muslim men. It is not ‘far right’ to ask why our elected politicians failed so visibly on this issue. And it is not ‘far right’ to demand a fresh national inquiry into what will go down as the biggest scandal in our national history, or to demand (in my view) the deportation of convicted dual national groomers who should be removed from our country and that British nationals who engage in this activity be given life sentences without parole.

None of this is ‘far right’. It is common sense. It is what the vast majority of people in this country would support. And it is what they expect to see from their so-called leaders. I know this. You know this. The only people who clearly don’t know this are Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour government, and the radical progressive elite class.”

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Matt Goodwin sounds like an “infatuated, malicious troll pervert/paedophile”, according to RW’s special version of ‘logic’. 😏

thechap
thechap
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I don’t read every article or every comment, but what on earth has happened on here?? There is a sudden explosion of people whose comments I normally appreciate reading, and often find uplifting, at each other’s throats 🤔

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  thechap

There’s a couple of men on here, one who is of the ‘MAPs’ variety, who has previously declared on various occasions that he’s attracted to minors and thinks the age of consent should be lowered. The other man denies the Pakistani child rape gangs are a thing, calling the scandal a “drama” because he denies children were raped, they were merely teenage prostitutes having consensual sex, and apparently, using his words, anybody banging on about this topic and rightly being outraged is in fact an “infatuated paedophile/pervert/fantasist”. Then me referring to these two men triggers other men on here because they decide to misinterpret my post to mean *all men* are of this persuasion when I’ve evidently never stated any such thing. I know this is just my version you’re getting but if you look at any of the articles on the rape gang scandal you can read the comments for yourself and make your own mind up. Call me abnormal but I’m just not a person who wishes to legitimise or be comfortable with men declaring they’re attracted to girls my daughter’s age, nor do I take kindly to men accusing me of being a pervert and “covert paedophile”… Read more »

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

Labour has not backed down on the call for a mass gang rape enquiry. The government has started a very limited review which will give their media friends an excuse to take the issue off the headlines (was it ever there).

no one will be satisfied.

the pathetic review will rightly confirm public suspicion of guilt among the elites.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

“Gang rape”? What Gang rape? You know if you keep harping on about this topic it makes you an “infatuated pervert/paedophile”, don’t you? And a “fantasist” to boot, because it was only ever mass teenage prostitution, according to some posters. Well there’s evidently a lot of us “infatuated malicious troll perverts” around, then. 👀

JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

https://www.gbnews.com/news/grooming-gangs-hundreds-thousands-victims-every-town-city Under the headline it says that this experienced solicitor tends to agree that another national inquiry could be a waste of time and money, rather than implementing some of the existing Inquiry recommendations.

Art Simtotic
1 year ago

The latest David McGrogan article is subject to a paywall, but the first few paragraphs are still the usual thought-provoking read:

https://newsfromuncibal.substack.com/p/endgame

“This Parliament has the feeling of an entire political framework teetering on a precipice… It is difficult to portray oneself as an efficient technocrat when one is patently ineffectual at everything one does.”

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago

It’s both heartening and sad to read all the critical comments in response to the BBC News ‘Rise of vaccine distrust – why more of us are questioning jabs’ article posted on Twitter/X:

https://x.com/BBCNews/status/1879823005959786500

Dinger64
1 year ago

Migrants not interested in integration ‘should not be here’, says Badenoch

I like what she’s saying but, it’s just that, talk!
She might be the Head but the 90% body of the snake still call the shots, use the head to get them in, cut it off when they’re in, and then grow a new liberal head again!
And she needn’t make out she was some kind of lone voice against immigration during the Tory government, because she voted along with them!
Tory trust is gone, never ever again will I trust them

And just to prove the point, where’s Kemi on this?

“Tories forced MP’s elderly mother to do diversity training after she liked immigration post”

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Indeed I wondered about this:

“Andrea Jenkyns says the Conservative Party forced her mother to undergo diversity training after she liked a social media post about illegal immigration, according to the Telegraph.

How can they “force” her? I suppose we’re meant to understand she’s a party member and the “training” was a condition of her continuing membership? Why would anyone want to be in a party that “forces” you to undergo “training” for liking a post on illegal immigration? If she wants to stay in the party then she’s bloody welcome to it. You’ve made your bed, now lie in it.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

This certainly reflects badly on Andrea Jenkyns, not even guts enough to stand up for her mother.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I campaigned alongside Andrea to help her win Morley and Outwood from Ed Balls. I had a good impression of her. Especially her mum. But then Andrea stopped communicating with me when I demanded to know why the hell she was voting for all the “pandemic” crap. Since then I have had ABSOLUTELY ZERO RESPECT FOR HER.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago

Cheers M A k.

klf
klf
1 year ago

I’d have told them to fuck off.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Spot on Dinger.👍

A. Contrarian
1 year ago

Had a long conversation about the NHS with a friend whose daughter has been in hospital for months on end (unusual, unknown disorder) with no progress. She was complaining about the lack of care and attention, and the lack of willingness/resources to refer her daughter on to other departments and fully investigate the problem, She completely agreed with me that you can’t rely on the NHS to do its job, and said that she and her family were having to do lots of work and research themselves and pester the staff endlessly. But when I then said something very general and nonspecific about the NHS not coping very well and needing some sort of change – melt down. “Well what would YOU change?” (accusingly); and “Well we’ve only ever had good experiences” (but you’ve just spent the last 10 minutes telling me the opposite, haven’t you?). It was certainly a very puzzling exchange!

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

May I add this shocking bit of news, summarised by a public commenter:

Wake up people, these people are being recruited from the hotels. Look at the security in your local supermarket and hospital. They are not going back. At some stage in the future they will be used against us.”

“Has someone lost his mind? What’s next, army officers? Police? Border force? Mi5-6…. This government lost its mind!”

UK prisons recruit officers from Nigeria in move which sees some sleeping rough

CGW
CGW
1 year ago

Another worrying step in the UK government’s attempt to stifle and control its citizens to ‘save’ the environment is the Climate and Nature (CAN) Bill. The following is a selection of text taken from The Exposé (https://expose-news.com/2025/01/16/uks-can-bill-a-draconian-vague-law/): This bill could devastate the UK’s economy, destroy rural communities and jeopardise energy security – all while eroding our rights and freedoms. Clause 2[d) of the bill proposes banning fossil fuels, including exploration, extraction, export and import, which could lead to bans or heavy taxes on petrol, diesel and heating fuel, making them unaffordable for millions. The bill’s premise to control economic and social activities within the UK is a “global carbon budget.” Among other controlling measures that the Bill empowers a selected, appointed few to use, the bill aims to limit the United Kingdom’s “total emissions of carbon dioxide to no more than its proportionate share of the remaining global carbon budget … To achieve this target, personal carbon allowances may be introduced, which would track people’s energy use, travel and food choices through digital IDs and smart meters, and penalise those who exceed their quota. The bill also aims to restore ecosystems and prioritise conservation, which could lead to compulsory land purchasing… Read more »

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
1 year ago
Reply to  CGW

Sounds like they’ve been reading M. Zermansky’s “Declined” and have adopted it as policy. Sinister and deeply depressing.

JeremyP99
1 year ago

Whilst JUSTICE is needed more than an inquiry, this is a very slippery move by Cooper. Local inquiries will not consider what part those at the top played in enabling these.

Both Brown AND Starmer did.

Starmer_DPP_DNA
GordonBrown
Marcus Aurelius knew

“Kamala Harris is reportedly planning to write a tell-all book about her presidential run and defeat to Trump…”

Hm? Sorry, I’m already bored.

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
1 year ago

More like a short story/fantasy fiction.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Drill rapper promoted by BBC who boasts about murder is killer of Jimmy Mizen

I see this evil person has now been recalled to prison. Maybe he’ll get parole again soon. After all, the prisons are a bit crowded.

Killer recalled to prison after murder ‘boast’

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  soundofreason

Just listened to an interview by Tom Harwood and Emily Carver on GBN. He started of by blaming the rise of drill musict on 14 years of Tory government. The remainder =of the interview was barely literate, but no responsibility was ackowledged for the viciou lyrics of music the I consider should be treated as hate speech and prosecuted..