News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mogwai
1 year ago

If only it were this straightforward. What with the injustice system the way it is I can’t see any national news outlet being prepared to take the risk, despite said ”evidence”. Perhaps a U.S outlet?

”Thank you to those of you who have contacted me following my most recent transmission. Yes. 100%. I have evidence that I believe will take out a senior U.K Labour
government minister and finish off Keir Starmer’s premiership.

I will meet and hand over the evidence to any national/international mainstream news agency that is first prepared to publish the truth of what happened in Oldham and print the names of politicians, police officers, council staff and gangsters we have exposed.

For those new to me, or doubt what I have, my name is Raja Miah. I am responsible for exposing the cover up of the gang rape of my town’s children. For six years, I have led the campaign to hold to account those who were complicit in protecting Pakistani Rape Gangs. There are many reasons why the world now knows what it does. I am one of them.”

https://x.com/recusant_raja/status/1877157326173487378

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Real men do not support misogynist abusers who have amassed their fortune through simultaneously exploiting females and scamming males. Decent men do not support the degradation of women or the online bullying of a rape gang survivor;

”This is why I can’t support this dude anymore. I disagreed with him on a lot, but I used to think he had redeemable qualities. No more, this isn’t what real men do. Nobody should be looking up to this type of behavior.”

https://x.com/misfitpatriot_/status/1876843016297570304

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Mogs, I know Raja, I have worked with him. Take all this with a pinch of salt.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

The delightful head of Oldham Council. What a picture.

https://x.com/recusant_raja/status/1876956597919842580?t=24LjeqRhm3iifRs28GPQIw&s=19

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yeah I saw that. Very revealing.
It’s organized crime in plain sight, isn’t it? You’d know more than me, due to where you live and being involved in local politics. What do you think of this person’s take on it? I think it seems reasonable to me. It’s all about the votes, at the end of the day, and the Muslims increasing control and influence;

“Is it Possible that organised Criminal Pakistani Gangs! Involved in Drugs, smuggling and Prostitution! Used their position of power in the community to get involved in Politics, by Harvesting and Guaranteeing a Block vote of Support for Labour! Gaining positions of power, in order to intimidate and control local authorities! So as to enable the expansion and protection of their activities! Which they then expanded into selling white Working class children to depraved perverts for money! Because they knew they were protected!
Children sold for Votes!”

https://x.com/crom_oliver/status/1877075734923026792

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Take what with a pinch of salt? 🤔 I’ve nothing but good things to say about a bloke who’s gone out of his way to fight for justice like he has for these young women. God knows he must’ve made himself very unpopular with a lot of people ( and not all of them Pakistani rapists ) in his endeavours. It would be great to see those names in print, these b’stards named and shamed, ideally brought to justice, but I’m not holding my breath. It’s a big risk for any news outlet. But if you know him can’t you get some inside intel and find out what this dirt is he’s got on Labour MPs? 👀 🕵 ‍ ♂️

Mogwai
1 year ago

Why did they abstain from voting? Because they knew that it would be blocked anyway and to be seen to vote against would make them look like utterly callous, rape-apologist, paedo-enabling, Islam-appeasing mega-turds?

”Most senior Cabinet members abstain from voting upon the Grooming Gang Investigation amendment!

Keir Starmer
Angela Reyner
Rachael Reeves
David Lammy
Ed Miliband, and
Wes Streeting

…all ABSTAINED from voting upon the amendment which would launch an investigation into the grooming gang scandal.

All this whilst the rest of their party had been subjected to a three-line party whip.”

https://x.com/astor_charlie/status/1877116312876437821

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Another reason the girls should move city, at least after the trial, if it even gets to trial. In this woman’s case it did not. The threats and intimidation from the rape gang members and their families and the lack of support and protection they receive from the police, which is unsurprising as they aided and abetted this industrial-scale abuse in the first place. Victims and by extension their families face huge personal risk staying put in these communities, which just says to me how the rapists who’ve actually been convicted will just be the tip of the iceberg. Most are still out there and will never face justice as victims have been threatened into silence and the authorities continue to be no help whatsoever;

”My story….

This man took my virginity when I was 12 years old. He could be my son’s father. He has been to prison already for raping a child. He’s walking free because the police failed to protect me so I withdrew my statements id given about him and 5 others. Over 100 raped and groomed me underage, they all continue to walk free….”

https://x.com/Telford_Escaper/status/1877020159715480007

sskinner
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

If the girls (victims) are threatened because of testifying then it is those that threaten that should be moved, and out of the country. Why should the victims pay twice? It is their home.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  sskinner

Yes of course, but the reality on the ground is that they’re not. And they aren’t because the police and others in a position of power are enabling this, they aren’t protecting the victims and families most of the time. Listen to this clip of a dad who was threatened by a gang of Muslims who were raping his 13yr old daughter and the police’s response was ”Just let it go”! The police are blatantly part of the problem as they’re protecting the culprits, not the victims;

”This truly defies belief. Caller John’s daughter, 13, was gang raped by Pakistanis in Oldham.

He reported it to the police, “a police constable told me to let it go, otherwise I’ll get arrested for being racist.”

“This goes higher & deeper than any of us can imagine.”

https://x.com/DaveAtherton20/status/1877264791451959423

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

No question this matter of predominantly Pakistani Rape Gangs goes all the way to the top and there are hundreds if not thousands of “officials” who are complicit one way or another.

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I didn’t realise that. What an utterly hypocritical example of “Do as we say (or else), not as we do.”

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Charlie has made a list of the top 50 towns/cities in which the rape gangs operate and how the MPs voted in those places;

”SUMMARY

• No Labour MP in these towns voted in favour of an investigation into the grooming gangs. A majority voted ‘No’ with around a fifth abstaining

• Only 3 MPs in these towns voted in favour of an investigation (“Aye”) – they were all Conservative MPs

All credit to @CDP1882
for collating this list of 50 towns in which grooming gangs operate.”

https://x.com/astor_charlie/status/1877135631358505015

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Thanks for this Mogs.

stewart
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

That is truly appalling.

I expect nothing but the worst from these people and yet they still manage to surprise me.

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Wednesday Morning The Bader Way, Miles Way Woodley Wokingham 

301
Keencook
Keencook
1 year ago

I think this would look good on a t shirt. Brilliant! Makes me laugh every morning. Thanks LS.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago

Uptake of the flu vaccine in Northern Ireland this winter has been “very disappointing” according to the Department of Health.

“only 6.4% of care home workers have taken up the flu vaccine, while 18% of health and social care staff overall have taken it.”

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/department-of-health-notes-disappointing-vaccine-uptake-as-minister-hits-out-at-mlas-who-criticise-with-no-solutions/a2142996062.html

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

Why vaccine uptake has been so low among care home staff and health workers is a complete mystery to this BBC Radio Ulster presenter, Mark Carruthers, and Alliance Party politician and former NHS nurse, Danny Donnelly – slightly after 43 minutes into the Talkback programme in the BBC Sounds link below, here is a transcript: Mark Carruthers: I asked Dr Tom Black earlier on about those stats concerning the vaccine uptake, can I just ask you what you make – you can answer this wearing either hat, as a nurse, as a health worker, or as a politician, or as both – what do you make of the uptake within nurses and health workers of 16%? 16%, those are people who are working on the front line, who are meeting lots of sick people, and 16% of them have apparently taken up the offer of a vaccine. Why is that not 90% plus? Danny Donnelly: I find that very confusing myself- MC: But you did hear that yesterday, that’s right isn’t it? DD: Yes, and for home care workers I think it was 6%. MC: Yes! DD: And now we did ask the PHA, who were there yesterday, we did… Read more »

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

No attempt at balance- default position is that vaccines are good. It’s not surprising that the BBC is like it is – it’s in keeping with the original purpose which was to “educate” as well as to entertain. The trouble started there. The Lord preserve us from people who want to “educate” us

stewart
1 year ago

What has changed for me is that I had always assumed they were fundamentally well meaning if sometimes misguided.

Now I can see clearly that the BBC has always been a deliberate state operation to keep the population in check.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

I think it was more subtle in the past, or perhaps I wasn’t paying enough attention until Trump 1, Brexit and then of course “covid”

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
1 year ago

I wonder if the nature of the BBC has swivelled from ‘educate’ to ‘indoctrinate’ as more people with recent university background are recruited? People who have been indoctrinated themselves.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

Possibly, though one man’s education may be another’s indoctrination.

I would think back in the day they would have had plenty of graduates.

The old bat
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

Yes, and until the covid debacle, I used to think the same about government.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

default position is that vaccines are good

Of course the vaccines are good! Without them we’d still be in lockdown!
(/sarc).

JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

It’s a puzzle, isn’t it? Perhaps it shows that intelligent workers are more sceptical about such products now.

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

I think it’s because the racism message is finally getting through, and staff are becoming aware that vaccination is a white supremacist thing to be shunned, like Shakespeare and statues.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Aunty Beeb has an article ‘Europe’s biggest battery farm’ built on coal mine in Scotland. Early in the article they make the ridiculous claim that: Developers say the two huge neighbouring battery farms – one at the site of a former opencast coal mine – will store enough electricity to power three million homes. National Records of Scotland tell us the number of Households and Dwellings in Scotland, 2023 is 2.5 million. So the article claims that the battery farm ‘will store enough electricity to power’ more than all the homes in Scotland. Wow. Impressive. No, really. Well, it would be but the key question is, of course, ‘for how long?’. OK. Let’s not pretend that we misunderstand. Either the article authors have deliberately mis-stated the ‘developers’ or they’re thick as mince. I don’t believe the developers would actually state that their new battery, when they’ve finally finished building it 2027, could really, together with their already built battery, power 3 million homes. Elsewhere in the article the Beeb mentions that The one gigawatt facility at Coalburn is being constructed in two phases and The giant batteries will operate for two hours at a time before being depleted. So the… Read more »

Tonka Rigger
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Well said. It’s complete and utter cr@p, but this is how the drooling masses are fooled into supporting things which will lead to their own quality of life declining.

The old bat
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

It must be my age, but when I read the first sentence about Europe’s biggest battery farm, my mind conjured up an image of millions of chickens…if only!

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  The old bat

Me too.

But that’s far too many as we’ll only be allowed 40g of meat each per day. Don’t forget your ration book when you go shopping.

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  The old bat

What a great idea – millions of battery chickens operating treadmills to power 3 million homes. Renewable and the technology is already in existence!

stewart
1 year ago

Here is how all this “grooming gang” furore is going to play out.

The establishment is going to hunker down, admit nothing, do nothing, until the public tires and it blows over.

That has been the playbook for the establishment since Iraq and the weapons of mass destruction. They learned they could pretty much do anything and get away with anything as long as the establishment (political class, bureaucracy and media) are aligned.

What will remain after this has blown over is a population that is that little bit more demoralised and that little bit more angry.

Tonka Rigger
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

Nailed it.

AbsolutelyNot
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

In my opinion, they really miscalculated this one and I also have a strong feeling that there’s way more to it than we know at the moment. Could it be that it’s not Muslim votes that they care about (after all, working class whites are still the majority in the areas affected by the grooming gang scandals and those are votes that they’ll never see back) but protecting those in the local councils, social services, the police, etc. that were involved in the cover up? If a national inquiry is a waste of time then just do it to at least pretend you are on the side of the people you still claim to represent – they could definitely use a boost of image after the disproportionate response to last year’s riots… And, most importantly, can we imagine finding out in a few year’s time about similar gangs still operating in other areas while the government missed the chance of at least pretending to do something? That would definitely be the end of Labour, if not serious civil war material.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
1 year ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

Arguably Labour have stopped caring about ‘the working man’ some time ago. Despite flirting briefly with the Gays, Feminism, the Trans, and Muslims these have been just window dressing – Labour now ‘care’ for the public sector workers, and it is the public sector workers who would be the scapegoats of any inquiry.

The old bat
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

This time, I don’t think so – there’s only so much room under that poor old carpet for stuff to be swept under.

Tonka Rigger
1 year ago
Reply to  The old bat

I pray you are correct. This has been going on for a long time though – the Cons did absolutely Jack 5h1t about it during their tenure as well, so I’m not fooled by their sudden moral high ground stance.

The rot was allowed to progress completely unchecked during the tenures of three “conservative” PMs.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

More than three Shirley?

Cameron, May, Johnson, (Truss), Sunak. Who are you letting off the hook?

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Truss is out of the equation.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

According to Johnson six or was it sixty million was “staffed up the wall” on a child grooming enquiry. Such a nice chap.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

I suspect you are right using the old playbook of political life.

But I begin to hope that Labour (and previously the Conservatives) are finding that the old playbook is now out of date. A supine Main Stream Media led to a supine electorate… but other options are now available. Social media is now finding its courage to allow greater free speech and provide access to news that would previously have been ‘omitted from view’. In the UK (and elsewhere) new political parties are finding their feet and have no historical background of the cosy consensus of the political club.

I suspect too many skeletons have been exposed for them all to be hidden away again. It way take years but the erosion of trust in ‘the government’ is well underway.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

‘Erosion of trust is well under way.’

Hear, hear.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

What I don’t understand is:

Why the sudden, out-of-the-blue explosion of interest in the Pakistani Muslim Rape Gangs, which have been operating in the UK for at least 40 years?

Some people have warned that we should always look around for other things that a sudden “distraction” might be hiding. What’s the agenda here?

And why is Drumpf’s new Counter-Terrorism chief, Triple National Hungarian/British/American Gorka, practically commanding the UK to take back Shamima Begum and all the other Muslim Terrorists who want to come back after committing treason against Britain? Is he a Closet Communist or what?

One honest public comment in the news:

“People are crazy if they think we should take in those crazy terrorists, let’s never forget what ISIS done, they have beheaded people, locked people in cages and set them on fire, radicalised young people turning them against the very country they were brought up in, and let’s not forget those young girls who fled to join ISIS were also seen waving guns around, people like Shamima Begum are part of that terrorist group, and the only reason she should be let back into the UK would be to HANG her!”

David101
1 year ago

The reason given that underpins the entire Labour party voting down a new inquiry into the grooming gangs is that it would likely compromise the progress of the proposed Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
Looking into this bill, I would personally read it as a trojan horse for introducing greater state regulation of all education. It includes measures intended to regulate home schooling, tougher school inspections and regulation of private education.

If the green-lighting of a sorely needed investigation into mass-scale rape gangs who should have been banged up decades ago, spells the demise of yet another Orwellian piece of legislation, then bring it on.

I guess they’re so keen to protect their ability to reach their dirty little socialist tentacles into all aspects of citizen’s lives and indoctrinate children that they consider that allowing the rape and torture of innocent young women in 50 locations across the UK to continue unabated is a small price to pay.

JohnK
1 year ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5_yHgX4Ewg&list=WL&index=5Confrontation is up to the driver“. Shot in west London.