Germany’s Economic and Political Suicide
It’s that festive time of the year when interesting tales get told around a fireplace. So here goes (minus the fireplace).
Once upon a time there lived a country that was the envy of the world. It was among the world’s pre-eminent producers of manufactured goods. From chemicals and pharmaceuticals to precision engineering and the brewing of beer, it was second to none. Its people’s work skills, industriousness and discipline became the national hallmark of civilisational success. The country gained fame and fortune in bringing the luxuries of fine automobiles to the world’s rich and aspiring middle classes.
Alas, a blight visited that once great country not more than a score of years ago, though its destructive seed had been planted earlier. It was not some external force or act of God. Rather it was a sickness of the mind, a debilitating disease of the soul, that vexed that country’s ruling class. In restless search for virtue, the country’s rulers paid obeisance to the Goddess Gaia and promised the nation’s blood and treasure to satiate her inviolable sovereignty over her earthly domains.
This, then, is a tale of woe and misery. This Christmas shall not have been one of unalloyed merry times and good cheer. And while beer will have been drunk and dinners eaten in many a hearth and eating place, the lifeblood of that nation shall be constricted and its breathing blocked by a cursed phlegm as normal life resumes in the New Year.
Within the fateful score of years of becoming afflicted by the primordial cult of Gaia, the world’s envy has now become a sad basket case. Its economy has been tarnished as “the sick man of Europe”.
The beginning of the end of the German miracle
While the travails of Germany along with the economic stagnation of Europe as a whole have been apparent for some years now, the spate of dire headlines have gathered pace in recent weeks as the coalition government collapsed.
“Behind Germany’s Political Turmoil, a Stagnating Economy” — New York Times (December 17th)
“Germany Is Unraveling Just When Europe Needs It Most” – Bloomberg (December 15th)
“Europe’s Economic Apocalypse Is Now” – Politico (December 19th):
If Europe – and its economic powerhouse Germany – remains on its current trajectory, its future, Politico says, “will also be Italian: that of a decaying, if beautiful, debt-ridden, open-air museum for American and Chinese tourists”.
The economic rot induced by the adoption of Energiewende policies for the “energy transition” in 2010 resulted ultimately in the recession of the German economy in the last two years. Among the manifestations of this rot are the growth of corporate bankruptcies in double digits, soaring layoffs as the Federal Employment Agency said that the unemployment figure could exceed the three million mark for the first time in 10 years at the beginning of 2025, and the crown jewel of German industry, its automative sector, announcing massive job cuts.
According to a recent poll, 40% of industrial companies are currently considering reducing their production in Germany or relocating it abroad due to the energy situation; among industrial companies with more than 500 employees, more than half are now considering this. High labour costs, caused by the myriad regulations of a hyperactive administrative state, and among the world’s highest energy prices brought about by its Energiewende folly, have led to the nation’s de-industrialisation.
Germany’s governing coalition collapsed after Chancellor Olaf Scholz fired Finance Minister Christian Lindner, plunging Europe’s largest economy into political chaos. This occurred barely hours after Donald Trump’s U.S. election victory triggered existential questions about the future of the Continent’s economy and its energy security. Mr. Trump – a climate sceptic who has promised to bring the U.S. out of the UN’s Paris Agreement and its financial commitments for large scale transfers of funds to developing countries – will pull the rug out from under the EU’s famed if quixotic climate leadership.
Europe’s economic implosion is self-induced. Its ruling elites over-tax and over-regulate the private sector and obsess with promoting unreliable renewable energy to replace fossil and nuclear fuels in its crusade to ‘save the planet’ from an alleged impending climate apocalypse. Its attempt to blame Russia’s President Putin for high energy prices is hollow and self-serving.
Perhaps most revealing of Europe’s regulatory hubris is the Qatari Energy Minister’s recent statement that “I am not bluffing”. He warned that Qatar, one of the world’s largest natural gas suppliers, would cease gas exports to the EU if the bloc’s countries imposed penalties under recently adopted legislation on “sustainability due diligence”. For Europe to tell the world that it would punish foreign countries that did not buy into their “sustainability” beliefs might seem to most non-European observers as the height of arrogance. But such is the delusionary might of the Gaia cult.
The EU’s “Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive”, which entered into force in July, allows for fines of up to 5% of a company’s annual global revenue “if the management fails to address adverse human rights or environmental impacts”. Bumptious Brussels bureaucrats seem to believe that their ideas of “sustainability” command universal acceptance. This, in a world where China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam and other populous developing countries, accounting for most of the world’s population, are busy expanding their capacity to mine coal and other fossil fuels so as to afford their citizens access to affordable and reliable energy.
Back to barbarism
“Little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice: all the rest being brought about by the natural course of things.”
So said Adam Smith, the great sage of political economy, over 250 years ago. Germany has shown that the converse may also be true. To go from opulence to poverty and potential barbarism is but a short road, assured by the burden of high taxes in service of an alleged climate crisis, and an intolerable administration of “climate justice” that demands suffocating regulations on the private sector.
Dr. Tilak K. Doshi is an economist, a former contributor to Forbes and a member of the C02 Coalition. Follow him on Substack and X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Sad to see of course – sad for the Germans who notwithstanding their occasional eccentricities are a decent bunch, and sad for everybody else, having seen what can happen when said Germans get it into their heads that they’ve been stabbed in the back.
Poland or France – that is the question.
And of course 2 tier kier is doing his ineffectual utmost to reattach us to this industrial, economic and cultural hearse.
Freakin’ treacherous next Tuesday.
They should deal with their own, of course. So much of the Green Baloney comes from Berlin.
It’s going back a bit, but at least the Jews dealt with their own, and didn’t blame their problems on foreigners.
In both Germany and England the problem isn’t the people, it never was; both countries are saddled with a political class and a civil service that despise the population they are supposed to govern.
At least in Germany they have the constitutional court in karlsruhr. We don’t even have that.
So perhaps we should go easy on the schadenfreude…
The Guardian thinks everything is fine and dandy in Germany, or at least they did back in 2020.
How Angela Merkel’s great migrant gamble paid off | Germany | The Guardian
Many white people seem to either hate themselves or their country or hate other white people.
The abysmal grauniad which is only kept in business by the government advertising civil service jobs…!
That’s how fucked we are.
Of course we could transpose Great Britain for Germany and the article would remain equally valid.
Common link? The EEC/EU aka Forth Reich to which the UK surrendered in 1973 – no shots fired.
A good article but part of Germany’s economic plight is also due to Angela Merkel opening Europe’s gates in 2015 to all and sundry at great cost to tradition and the social security budget.
Indeed
See my post above
I have strong connections to continental Europe and I always hoped the European project would prove positive- that move by Merkel made me realise I needed to vote Leave
I agree, but since I was writing on a climate focused article, I avoided the mass migration issue. But you are absolutely correct. Mass migration, the Ukraine war and the climate cult are part of a [in]coherent package deal that Germany, EU and the UK all subscribe to.
Of course.
The same is also true of other countries e.g. Britain that allow all and sundry to settle in the country. Admitting hundreds of thousands of migrants every year will create a few jobs, funded from our taxes, for asylum lawyers and various do-gooders working for migrant support charities, but very few if any “proper” jobs in the “real economy”. An increasing population and the creation of very few jobs can only lead to two things, lower wages meaning that more people have to claim in work benefits and more people claiming out of work benefits both of which strain public finances.
Germany tried about all of the progressive woke ideas.
They thought that the 3.5 million or so migrants will turn into hard working, law abiding citizens.
They thought that it could forever sustain its energy need from Russian gas and oil and in the meanwhile develop green energy.
Well, they do have a habit of sticking with bad ideas until the bitter end. Adolph in the bunker.
“Its attempt to blame Russia’s President Putin for high energy prices is hollow and self-serving“.
Didn’t a certain Mr D Trump warn the Germans that is was foolhardy to rely on Russian gas?
He was laughed at, who’s laughing now?
“When I said I wanted to be a comedian when I grew up, they laughed at me. Well, they’re not laughing now” – Bob Monkhouse
So the Holy Roman Empire (Das Erste Reich) was spawned by the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire and without wanting to suggest that there is a Fourth Reich, that is an empire founded on right wing politics, there is no doubt that for many years, people saw the creation of the European Union as a German led supranational empire founded on middle of the road politics and commerce that seemed to cover a lot of the territory that Charlemagne ruled either outright or by treaty. It seems, therefore, we are seeing the Decline and Fall of the latest iteration.
I think the Holy Roman Empire/Reich was the Second Reich, no? The first being the Roman Empire/Reich. And Hitler wanted to usher in the Third Empire/Reich.
I think you flatter your empirical position, my Caesar, by believing yours was the first empire, when, of course, many preceded you, Persians, Greeks and others. I think the little corporal was only interested in Germanic empires, starting with Carolus, who modelled himself on you and your fellows, as the first, the empire ruled by Bismarck, 1871-1918, as the second and his as the third. Legacy Nazis then hoped for a Fourth Reich to come from the diaspora of those who escaped the allies.
Yes Himmler was planning that and had the arrogance to meet a jew in Sweden when the war was not going his way. Let’s forget all this Jew stuff he said. Interesting how his brain was removed to try and find out why he was so evil.
There never should be any celebrating, when Germany is brought to it’s knees….we all know what could follow.
The crassest decision was to close down the nuclear power stations following the tsunami in Japan. We all know how frequent such tidal waves are in Germany!
The EU (run by Germany) is delivering UN Agenda 2030 and the WEF’s Great Reset.
That requires the destruction of Europe’s industrial and manufacturing base, which will affect Germany the most since Germany is the industrial/manufacturing powerhouse in Europe.
We’ve been witnessing the same deliberate destruction in the UK, but we already had a much smaller manufacturing base thanks to the switch to a largely Services-based economy from the 1980s onwards.
Impoverish and destabilize Germany at Europe’s and the world’s risk, history has proven.
Germany has operated an economic policy advocated by Signor B Mussolini, a ruling triumvirate of State + Big Business + Unions for mutual benefits operating as directed by the State in the interests of the State. Big business and unions profit from protectionist regulation which eliminates the innovation internally that produces ”creative destruction” with jobs, businesses destroyed and new ones created. It eliminates external competition reducing consumer choice and keeps prices up. Workers have full employment and job security, businesses keep high profits and pay good wages, those running the State are guaranteed re-election because the unions and businesses support them financially and politically and they can exercise their ideological hobby-horses funded by taxation, borrowing and money printing. This is the model also chosen by France since WWII – they call it Dirigisme – and thanks to Germany and France, the economic model for EEC/EU. Such command and control economies inevitably collapse as they stagnate through lack of innovation and the distorted price system leads to misallocation of resources. Countries operating a trades surplus – Germany – are particularly vulnerable to changing external conditions. As the 85% of the global economy outside the EU has developed, Germany (and the EU… Read more »
? No mention of Covid???