Greenland Surface Temperatures Fall for 20 Years in Fresh Blow to Climate Alarm Narrative

Further evidence that surface temperatures across Greenland have been cooling for around 20 years has emerged with the recent publication of findings from a group of Thai scientists and mathematicians. Processing 31,464 satellite recording from 2000-2019 over the entire area, they found that the average temperature fell by 0.11°C. This is said to indicate a “non-significant change in LST [land surface temperature]”. The latest evidence of actual cooling over a significant area of the Arctic will not be news in scientific circles since it backs up previous findings of recent temperature falls. But the information is of course kept out of the mainstream since it casts doubt on the key Net Zero scare about soaring sea levels caused by the catastrophic melting of the Greenland ice sheet.

There are some crumbs of comfort for alarmists since the Thai authors found that the ice-free sub-regions of Greenland are warmer than the ice-covered sub regions. But perhaps not – the authors attributed it to “population density”. Urban heat yet again corrupting the temperature data, even in Greenland. The illustration below charts the temperature record for all areas of Greenland.

The World Economic Forum recently reported on a study that predicted a “total collapse” of the Greenland ice sheet within a few months. This suggestion is only slightly more ludicrous than the scares routinely published to induce mass psychosis in populations with the aim of promoting a collectivist command-and-control Net Zero solution. The recent farce around the COP in Baku showed the conspiracy operating in plain sight. Stop the developing word developing with hydrocarbons, then invent a number of fake scares such as island states disappearing beneath the waves. Everyone knows this and most of the other scares are false as scientists have shown on numerous occasions, but no matter. Invent some ridiculous composite figure – say $250 billion a year, or $1.3 billion by 2035 – then pretend your taxpayers can be rinsed even though the only country that could conceivably afford it is leaving the party in January.

All of this means that genuine attempts to explain the science around the climate changing are stuck in a ‘settled’ narrative hellhole. The corals can grow like topsy in record amounts on the Great Barrier Reef and the Arctic sea ice can show a small decade-long recovery. Meanwhile, mainstream media and politics prefer to take their cue from characters like  ‘Jim’ Dale, who points out of the window and attributes every puff of wind to a human cause.

Nowhere is this lack of scientific inquiry more evident than at the two Poles of the Earth. Antarctica has barely warmed during 70 years of detailed observations, while the situation in the Arctic, as we can see, is complex and open to many interpretations. The Thai mathematicians stick mainly to their statistics and find “no evidence of warming over ice-free and ice-covered areas”. But they do note earlier work by a group of Japanese scientists (Matsumura et al. 2021) that suggested the Central Pacific El Niño Southern Oscillation teleconnection played a “key role” in recent summer Arctic climate change.

The Matsumura team found a recent slowdown in Greenland ice loss and warming. The El Niño role is also thought to have helped the recent overall Arctic sea ice recovery. Changes around Greenland can be attributed to “natural variability, rather than anthropogenic forcing”, note the scientists. “Most climate models were unable to reasonably simulate the unforced natural variability over Greenland,” they added.

As we can see, Antarctica is another difficult place to get a good scare going due to a decades-long lack of any warming. Fears of a ‘tipping point’ are often heard after natural melting and ice breaks in western Antarctica. But late last year, the Daily Sceptic highlighted a paper by a group of international scientists that found significant recent cooling across the entire area. The paper was published by the American Meteorological Society and it observed a 2°C fall in the 20 years to 2018. During the spring season, the fall was a massive 1.84°C every decade, while the winter reduction came in at 1.19°C over the same time period. As is usual when temperatures drop, the carbon dioxide blame game is laid aside and answers are sought in natural climate variations. In this case it was noted that temperatures in the eastern Pacific equatorial region had dropped over the last 20 years under review.

Again don’t expect the climate models to have much idea about what is happening in the real atmosphere. There is said to be “no robust agreement” among the models on the important sea temperatures driving the western Antarctica air temperature.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cotfordtags
1 year ago

Another amazing destruction of the fake climate narrative. I am only a simple bloke and while I can understand the nihilists who want to drag mankind back to the stone age with their lies and the people who only get news from the MSM being fooled, I cannot understand why politicians who have access to all of this information pander to them. Why incur the wrath and hatred of your people with the bankruptcy of your country and the loss of all manufacturing that genuinely earns the country money. Why freeze your people and give a death sentence to those who can’t handle the cold. Why doesn’t a single leading politician from across Europe stand up like Trump and say that we all bought in to the lies of a cult but we now know that the polar regions are not melting uncontrollably, the sea is not boiling and corals are quite okay, not a single person has drowned in rising seas. A few days ago, someone on this site posed the question, what are they really targeting in 2030, because it is not climate change, so what else is it?

varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

You say you cannot understand why politicians pander to something they have full information about? There is a very simple explanation for that. —It isn’t about the climate, and it never was. To understand what is happening you need to look at the Politics involved. The Politics of Sustainable Development and Net Zero. The whole thing is about control of the world’s wealth and resources. The climate change stuff just gives bureaucrats the ideal opportunity to have policies they have long craved, but never had a plausible excuse for. But don’t take my word for it —-“One has to free oneself from the illusion that climate polices are environmental policies anymore. We redistribute the world’s wealth via climate policy”—Edenhofer of the IPCC

Cotfordtags
1 year ago
Reply to  varmint

Don’t disagree Varmint and suppose I was being a bit rhetorical but still don’t understand what their long game is as individuals. Does Millibrain have any consideration for how history will judge his lunacy. How is he benefitting from what he is doing other than a brief period of self aggrandisement. If he has the slightest knowledge of these scientific reports, he must know he will be condemned by his actions.

RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

Milliband’s long game as individual is certainly that he plans to retire comfortably in some location not negatively affected by any of the policies he implemented and be happy about all the money he got for that. It’s a mistake to assume that any of the people involved with this are anything but self-serving liars.

Keencook
Keencook
1 year ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

Minibrain? I’m not sure he’s bothered about the rest of us freezing to death in poverty.

Purpleone
1 year ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

I wonder if there is something about them wanting to be liked, the one upmanship about signing up for bigger and bigger crazy schemes in front of their peers etc – politicians surely are generally ‘people’ people, so may have more of this trait / weakness than others?

varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

Miliband has no concern because he essentially works for the global government (UN/WEF) and he is only concerned about how he is judged by them. We are simply a nuisance to people like him. Starmer is exactly the same, as we saw when he was asked whether he prefers Davos or Westminster, and he answered DAVOS.

JXB
JXB
1 year ago

Scientific data – as if this were any relevance to the Climate Change fraud.

RW
RW
1 year ago

Jim Dale has (co-)written a book titled Surviving Extreme Weather. The Complete Climate Change Preparedness Manual. This alone should be sufficient to disqualify the guy completely as climate change prepper guru sellling his expert advice how to cope with an apocalyptic future he claims must happen to a gullible audience of followers not markedly different from that of any overt leader of an apocalpytical religious cult.

Gezza England
Gezza England
1 year ago
Reply to  RW

Dim Dale runs a weather and climate change advisory company so no climate scare – no company.

Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
1 year ago

Many thanks Chris for another eloquent article deconstructing the “climate change” narrative.

RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  Bill Hickling

That’s unfortunately lost on people who are busy with surviving extreme weather which only exists in their overheated imagination.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago

The only way that Greenland is going to warm up even a little is when all of the AGW mob are piled up there and set afire.

Gezza England
Gezza England
1 year ago

Whenever I see a graphic of all the outputs from the various climate models that are completely different I wonder about the so-called settled science they are based on.

David101
1 year ago
Reply to  Gezza England

I suppose they prey on the fact that most of us are non scientists, so will readily fall for vacuous mantras like “the Science is settled”, “trust The Science” because it lands us in topics that we’re less than equipped to debate as individual lay people. Its all those pesky other scientists that call bullshit on such claims.

RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  David101

The prey on the fact that most people are pretty poor at math and that they instinctively associate math with science. Hence, whatever they publish is heavy on computer-aided math in the hope that this will intimidate people into remaining silent to avoid making a fool of themselves.

Purpleone
1 year ago
Reply to  David101

‘The science is settled’ is literally the opposite of the scientific principle – it’s never ‘done’ – that’s the point, it questions everything and looks for proof though experiments… EXCEPT when it comes to certain areas, and then we just have to accept it all as gospel…. Hmmmm

Ardandearg
Ardandearg
1 year ago

We need someone in the mould of Andrew Bridgen to stand up and address the net zero scandal in parliament. Someone who will worry away at it in public like a terrier shaking a rat.

VAX FREE IanC
1 year ago
Reply to  Ardandearg

Yes! – But look what happened to him.

Dickie Hart
Dickie Hart
1 year ago

Making no apologies for repeating the old, old saying. If you would control a populace, first make them afraid.

DontPanic
DontPanic
1 year ago

With a 5 million pound funding stream from Dale Vince Labour isn’t going to backtrack any time soon

Caroline39
Caroline39
1 year ago

Thank you Chris for another excellent, well researched article.
However I cannot totally agree with the notion that there is no “climate change.”
There is no doubt that we are currently in a Grand Solar Minimum, confirmed by NASA. The activity of the sun is diminishing- as shown by a decreasing number of sun spots- reported by NOAA – and this will be the case until the early 2050s.
There are conflicting scientific opinions – but it is possible that increasingly cold weather, episodes of heavy rainfall with flooding and increased volcanic activity might become more of a problem over the next 20 years-and if that is the case – we may face problems of both energy and food insecurity in the UK.

Douglas Brodie
Douglas Brodie
1 year ago

The treasonous Lab/Con/Lib/SNP Uniparty all push the self-flagellating Net Zero agenda at the bidding of their globalist overlords/paymasters. At least Reform, our next best thing to Trump, are publicly against Net Zero with Farage and Tice both regularly speaking out and posting against it.