News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
1 year ago

‘You know she’s gonna win this, right?’

What a sad person. Elections are always about the economy, not misogyny. Political Analyst, my arse. They are brainwashed into thinking that whatever crazy shit they are told, they are 100% right and everyone else is 100% wrong. Ditto Matthew Paris in the Spectator article.

Maybe its really that the people paying the taxes have got fed up with politicians wasting the money to prop up their narrow ideologies based on division and hate, and the ‘superior person’ entitlement complex that they have all been overwhelmed with.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

“Ted Cruz is going to lose his Texas Senate seat”

https://youtu.be/zzL3SgdRxL0?si=ScxcmBM5E5rIOiIn

Ted Cruz won his Texas Senate seat.

After being so spectacularly wrong about Kamala Harris winning, she still thinks we should listen to her expert political analysis. We listen, but only for the comedy.

transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

He won it by nearly a million votes and 9 percentage points

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
1 year ago

Mathew parris really is an insufferable arse.

An absolutely stereotypical deluded lefty drone.

Zero sense of self awareness.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Totally agree. I read his articles in the Spectator and I reached the same conclusion.
And he thinks he is really-really special.

Mrs Bunty
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

My goodness was just going to comment on him too but you have put it much better than I could. Just another self-absorbed ‘Liberal’. Wasted my time getting around the paywall to read some of that dross.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Jack the dog

What complete and utter arrogance from Parris and his ilk.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

I really couldn’t say!

Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Thursday Morning Gosport Rd, A31 & Winchester Rd,
Chawton Alton
There were no negative comments in Chawton as people showed no pride and prejudice. We didn’t step on anybody’s sense and sensibility. In the end it’s just a matter of persuasion.

301
Monro
1 year ago

https://kyivindependent.com/opinion-3-ways-trumps-return-to-power-could-unfold-for-ukraine/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVW-sY66wfY (interesting watching regarding Ukrainian morale) How should democracies engage with autocracies like Russia and China in the future? Some top tips from Anne Applebaum: ‘Understanding their world view is key in protecting our democracies……they see themselves in a constant conflict with us (The U.N.) failed some time ago…..The so-called international order has always been more aspirational than real….The U.N. system is beyond saving or rebuilding. It’s a very 20th-century institution rooted in the belief that large bureaucracies based in places like New York or Geneva can solve global problems. This mindset reflects the world of the 1950s History is not predetermined. There’s nothing that guarantees democracy will fail, autocracy will succeed, or vice versa. We aren’t promised victory in the end – that’s not how it works.’ The delusional ‘peace dividend’ (in fact, by removing Europe’s conventional deterrent, a war dividend), the ‘long peace’, is well and truly over. On the upside, as most realise, competition is healthy even if it is also dangerous. The threat from Russia/Iran/North Korea to Europe, the U.S. (and China) may now crowd out the incompetent (infallibly, ultimately) low growth socialist fascist ‘Big State’ political and economic model (except in China. Japan shows… Read more »

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

In the BBC’s article Covid inquiry told top NHS doctor was terrified we find that: Prof Sir Stephen Powis told the Covid inquiry officials had drawn up a draft document advising whose care should be prioritised if the NHS found itself unable to cope with the surge in patients.The ‘Covid-19 decision tool’ assigned points based on a patient’s age, frailty and underlying conditions. A high score meant they might not be admitted to intensive care if services were overwhelmed.The tool was never issued publicly, after it became clear infections might have already reached a peak in March 2020. (my emphasis) The available mortality evidence as at 23 March showed that mortality in England and Wales was going to peak in early April (my analysis pointed to 6 April – it was actually on 8 April). This being based on mortality data known at the time. There was no need for the lockdown; the peak of infections had already passed. Later in the article the we get this. “It was not clear that the public would respond to lockdown – they did wonderfully – but that wasn’t clear [at that point],” he said. and The [decision tool] project was halted on… Read more »

JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

A generous observer might say that they have given us some good education about psychology and politics; outside their field, as well.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnK

A less generous observer might ask why the inquiry didn’t ask further questions.

A. Contrarian
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

“The public” – always other people, and definitely never the person making the rules, who is far too important to be lumped in with the great unwashed.

Much like those people who constantly bang on about how disgusting and awful the human species is, the world would be better off without them. Fine, here’s a cliff, you go first.

Jon Garvey
1 year ago

Southern town locked down after 40 monkeys escape from science lab

Don’t worry – wearing a mask will keep them off you.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

£20,000? No wonder they’re locked down.

A. Contrarian
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Masks don’t stop monkeypox though!

Monro
1 year ago

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/nov/07/cost-of-shed-to-protect-bat-colony-near-hs2-has-topped-100m-chair-says The state of the nation: batshit crazy bat shed! ‘To build a railway between Euston and Curzon Street in Birmingham, I need 8,276 consents from other public bodies, planning, transport, the Environment Agency or Natural England. They don’t care whether parliament did or didn’t approve building a railway.’ HS2 had to obtain a licence from Natural England, which approved the bat mitigation structure, before asking planning permission from Buckinghamshire county council. “So when we go to [the] council and say: ‘Would you like to give us planning permission for this blot on the landscape that costs £100m’, of course, the answer to that is, you’ve got to be joking, right? Why would [they] like this eyesore? what do you do? I reach for the lawyers and the environmental specialists and hydrologists……..I spend hundreds of thousands of pounds trying to……win the planning commission by going over [the county council’s] head.” ‘“No evidence, by the way, that high-speed trains interfere with bats’ At a local level, this dysfunctionality often manifests itself in random, completely uncoordinated, roadworks, key routes simultaneously dug up as if to create maximum disruption, then filled in and then immediately dug up again by someone else, inviting the… Read more »

Myra
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

When we build our house we spent £8000 on environmental surveys, bat surveys. And we had to have conservationists present for the demolition of some outbuildings. This delayed the project by 6 months, because bat surveys can only be done during certain periods of the year.
No bats were found. Conservationist told us that generally bats pushed off to their second roost if a site became too busy…
So all that money to keep this industry going. No benefit to anyone else or the bats…

DS99
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

Must be where the term “batshit crazy” comes from.

ituex
ituex
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

We’ve got a ‘bat hotel’ because of planning conditions and a bat survey person comes round periodically to check on them. So the bats have their own pitch dark shed with a hole in the door but they actually live in the top of the barn which wasn’t changed by the building work anyway. Ridiculous.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

And so it is with all planning cases.

You want to build half a dozen houses? You need at least four separate surveys costing £15k and that is assuming there is no problem. If the site is within half a mile of an ancient structure or a previously identified site with medaeval remains or earlier you can spend another £10k or much more on archaeological surveys.

That is all before you get planning consent.

If you build an access road it has to meet very high construction standards. At the junction with the existing road you will discover it has been build on minimal foundations.

You cannot put surface water down council / water company surface water drains so you have to build ponds or install crates underground to delay the absorption of water into the ground.

You have to provide Biodiversity Net Gain (since February this year – thanks Tories) which in a site I know means over half of a grass field has to be set aside for wild grass and newly introduced weeds. That reduces the number of homes and reduces the size of gardens to almost nothing.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago

“A pub’s name is to be changed after more than 500 people signed a petition calling it offensive.”

The word is still in dictionaries. Is that offensive too?

We need a campaign to eradicate all offensive words from dictionaries, as there may be some people who might be offended by seeing these words.

“You think, I dare say, that our chief job is inventing new words. But not a bit of it! We’re destroying words–scores of them, hundreds of them, every day. We’re cutting the language down to the bone.” – 1984

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  godknowsimgood

Why not tell the objector to just shove off and bar him from the pub for being a nuisance.

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago

Frontline police officers have become overwhelmed by the number of mental health incidents they are having to deal with on a daily basis, according to a senior officer.

Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson told a Stormont committee that the number of contacts had reached “unprecedented levels”.
Almost 40,000 calls about a person potentially in danger were received by the PSNI in the past year – with just 3% of those related to crime.’

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4vwvk07k5o

The more woke and medicated society becomes, the greater the increase in mental ill-health.

David Norman
David Norman
1 year ago

Dr Arlene is an object lesson in how to appear both nasty and ridiculous.

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
1 year ago
Reply to  David Norman

It was the arrogant way she was cackling at the grocery clerk because she assumed she knew how he voted, yet she cries misogyny when she doesn’t get her way. Mind you it looks like she went a bit early on the champagne……

JohnK
1 year ago

This one needs a sceptical home! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdPZ4z1OS0E&list=WL&index=4 £350,000 For This “Vital” Infrastructure and it DOESN’T WORK! By “Autoshenanigans”

Roy Everett
1 year ago

In response to the latest in the Soltanov embarrassment, we get this: “[The UN’s] code of conduct for COP officials states they are “expected to act without bias, prejudice, favouritism, caprice, self-interest, preference or deference, strictly based on sound, independent and fair judgement”. Given that the UN is solidly supportive, indeed the sponsor, of NetZero, this is a monumental lie!