Education Secretary Faces Court Over Shelving Free Speech Laws

Bridget Phillipson is set to face legal action for her controversial pause on new free speech laws aimed at shielding academics from cancel culture. The Telegraph has more.

The Education Secretary shelved the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act just days before it was due to come into force in August and said she would consider repealing it.

The Telegraph has learned that the Free Speech Union has now been granted permission to appeal the move, with a judicial review hearing set to take place in the High Court on January 23rd.

The group has accused Ms. Phillipson of acting unlawfully by removing protections for “people of certain protected groups”, such as “gender-critical persons or those who espouse minority political views”.

It also argues the Education Secretary was not entitled to pull the plug on the Act through a written ministerial statement alone, and that “any repeal of the legislation is a matter for Parliament not the executive”.

In a legal document confirming permission to appeal the move, a High Court judge said it was in the “public interest” for the issue to be resolved promptly.

The judge added that even if Ms. Phillipson intended only to “pause” the Act while options were being considered, “it is arguable that it was insufficient for the purposes of s.149 of the Equality Act 2010 to proceed on the basis that no significant impacts were foreseen”.

It comes as the Government faces backlash from academics over Ms. Phillipson’s decision to shelve the free speech laws.

The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act would have established a new complaints scheme allowing students, staff and visiting speakers to seek compensation if they were “cancelled” on campus.

The flagship Conservative policy would have also strengthened protections against foreign interference. This would have seen the Office for Students granted new powers to terminate universities’ overseas partnerships if they were found to have contravened free speech duties. …

But Ms. Phillipson has insisted universities are being treated like a “political battlefield”, and that the legislation could “expose students to harm and appalling hate speech on campuses”.

A source close to discussions said they had been informed by DfE officials that a decision would be made on the Act’s future by “the autumn”.

It remains unclear whether the Free Speech Union’s judicial review will proceed if Ms. Phillipson has already chosen to repeal the legislation by then.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Insurrectionist
1 year ago

Shes had her orders….

Ps, its 60k not 10k…

GTb3mVwWQAAv38d
huxleypiggles
1 year ago

Phillipson can spout all sorts of twaddle in order to put a gloss on what is simply a tightening of rules around Free Speech. The suspicion if this move is not challenged and overturned is “who’s next?”

More WEF orders.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago

Don’t let the Tories off on this. If they had acted years sooner the legislation would have been well settled in by now.

Sue
Sue
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

They all have the same WEF handlers.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

That is wonderful news!
Well done to Toby and the Free Speech Union team!

RW
RW
1 year ago

the legislation could “expose students to harm and appalling hate speech on campuses”

Nobody ever got harmed by speech and it’s the very purpose of this law to stop university administration from censoring on campus discussion on the pretext that of harm prevention based on the axiom that there are only two positions on every conceivable issue

  1. The one all right thinking, woke and left-leaning people agree is the only one which should allowed to exist.
  2. Appalling hate speech of XYZ deniers.

Phillipson’s criticism is basically “I fear this law could be fit for purpose, ie, stop us from persecuting people at universities for disagreeing with out hallowed political opinions! This must not be allowed to happen!”

Of course she wants to stop that. The law was designed to stop her.

Sue
Sue
1 year ago

Good!
Why do all these Marxist Wimmin have Rosa Kleb haircuts?

Gezza England
Gezza England
1 year ago
Reply to  Sue

I think they are more like Wendolene from Wallace & Grommit.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Ha-ha! Classic. 🙂

WillP
1 year ago

These people are so disgusting.

Hester
Hester
1 year ago

Does she go to the same hairdresser as Rachel Reeves do you think? Do they ask for the Richard the 3rd look I wonder?