Kemi Badenoch is New Conservative Party Leader
Kemi Badenoch has been announced as the new Conservative Party leader, defeating Robert Jenrick by 56.6% to 43.4% in a ballot of party members. It was a widely expected result as she had led by a considerable margin in all polls, though the final result was closer than many surveys suggested. Badenoch now has the difficult job of reviving the Tory party and winning back the trust of millions of voters who abandoned the party over its record in Government, especially over immigration but also over taxation and public spending, fuelled in large part by its catastrophic response to Covid. Kemi won 53,806 votes to Jenrick’s 41,318. The number of legal ballots cast was 95,124 out of an electorate of 131,680 (there were 739 invalid ballots cast). The turnout was 72.8%. (Including invalid ballots the breakdown was 56.1% to 43.1% with 0.8% invalid.)
Some numbers from the Telegraph:
The total turnout of 72.8% is the lowest since the system was changed in 1998.
The turnout last time around in the contest between Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak in summer 2022 was 82.2%.
At 56.6%, this is also the lowest vote share for a Tory leadership winner (Ms. Truss received 57.4%) and therefore the tightest race on record. …
The number of eligible electors this time round was 131,680. This is 23.6% lower than the 172,437 back in the summer 2022 contest.
Badenoch paid tribute to her rival, saying she and Jenrick “don’t actually disagree on very much” and that he has a “key part to play” for years to come.
I’d also like to pay a special tribute to Robert Jenrick who has fought a great campaign. Rob, we have all been impressed by your energy and your determination. You and I know that we don’t actually disagree on very much and I have no doubt that you have a key part to play in our party for many years to come. Thank you.
Addressing the task before her now, the new leader said:
The task that stands before us is tough but simple. Our first responsibility as His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition is to hold this Labour Government to account. Our second is no less important, it is to prepare over the course of the next few years for government, to ensure that by the time of the election we have not just a clear set of Conservative pledges that appeal to the British people, but a clear plan for how to implement them.
A clear plan to change this country by changing the way that this government works. The Prime Minister is discovering all too late the perils of not having such a plan. That huge job begins today.
It will seek to involve all of our colleagues in Parliament, in the Scottish Parliament, the Sennedd, our friends in Northern Ireland, as well as councillors and party members. But this is not just about the Conservative Party. It is about the people we want to bring back to the Conservative Party. It is about the people we need to bring into the Conservative Party.
It is about what the Conservative Party needs to be in the next five, 10 and 20 years. Our party is critical to the success of our country but to be heard we have to be honest. Honest about the fact that we made mistakes, honest about the fact that we let standards slip. The time has come to tell the truth, to stand up for our principles, to plan for our future, to reset our politics and our thinking, and to give our party and our country the new start that they deserve. It is down to get down to business, it is time to renew. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.
Earlier, the Telegraph set the scene:
After the historic Tory wipeout in July, six MPs from all parts of the party threw their hats into the ring to sell their vision for the future of the party.
Among the issues that have dominated the debate include the party’s relationship with the insurgent Reform U.K. and whether the U.K. should leave the European Convention of Human Rights.
The Conservative Party Conference, designed to be a beauty parade for remaining hopefuls Tom Tugendhat, James Cleverly, Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick shook up the race.
Stop Press: The Labour MP Dawn Butler heralded Kemi’s victory by sharing a social media post accusing Kemi Badenoch of representing “white supremacy in blackface”. The Telegraph has more.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A majority turnout as well; better than most local government elections. I wonder if there were any spoilt papers?
0.8% invalid ballots.
From Churchill to Badenoch.
A study in managed decline.
Dr North did a good expose on the real Olukemi. Born here because her mother abused the NHS by coming here for the birth and then going back home to Nigeria. Olukemi was schooled in Nigeria and then went to the US for a college education so hardly a solid grounding in Britain. When elected as an MP her first words were all about being an MP for Nigeria. How she got a British citizenship seems unclear.
Given the corruption in Nigeria one wonders how her family managed to afford that life story for her.
And if there is so much available cash around why are we sending aid to Nigeria at all. My parents, my wife and me and our children could not afford to travel to deliver children in another country with better facilities. Although the NHS service will have been at the expense of the British tax payers, the flights and hotels would have added up to a lot.
Similarly with education. Who funded the US college and how.
Geography not Kemi’s strongest asset then.
“When elected as an MP her first words were all about being an MP for Nigeria.”
Please provide a link to that alleged quotation. Thanks
Anyway…if anyone can come up with some actual facts to confirm, or otherwise, the various wrongs attributed to Kemi above, that would be great. In the meantime, I will continue to feel positive about her appointment.
Yes. Why the Party think people will vote for a Nigerian is beyond me.
Her real name btw is Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke
When I think of the Tory (Torah) party, I always think of an Adegoke. Honestly I do.
Yes, since the media are always calling Tommy Robinson “real name Steven Yaxley-Lennon”, we can do the same to “real name Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke”.
Her “real name” is Mrs Badenoch.
OK. Olukemi Olufunto Badenoch. Happy now?
When I tried to upvote your comment, it turned into a Green Zero, instead of a Green 1.
Wonder who’s in charge of “moderating” this evening?
I quibble with “managed”.
True. More like a train wreck. Unmanaged. Hard to believe this is where the Torah party is.
The illegal holder of the Prime Minister’s post is a follower of the Torah. Nothing to do with Tories.
Conservative Party elects new leader: put crudely it’s like sheeting in your pants and changing your shirt.
Cracking🤣🤣
Brilliant!!!
The best result for Reform was to have the Nigerian Olukemi become Tory leader given that she drivelled on about ‘consensus’ and was full of platitudes but no actual solid ideas during the campaign. Now if Reform can move forward, replace its lightweight leader who demonstrated perfectly why he is unfit to take the party forward as his comments over not being allowed to raise the issue of when Two Tier and Pixie Balls knew the Southport murderer was a muslim terrorist were aimed at the wrong target. It was not the government blocking this but a Labour Speaker who was protecting his party. There could be no prejudice to the trial as all the evidence is hard evidence and not any conjecture. But as ever with Farage, he doesn’t do detail and missed an opportunity to put the pressure on Hoyle.
Why don’t you apply for the leader job?
No point. Nigel’s “Bait & Switch” is already a done deal, to hand the party leadership over to a Pakistani Muslim Millionaire, after nearly handing it to a Pakistani Jewish Millionaire, who continues to snipe from the sidelines like a sore loser.
“Among the issues that have dominated the debate include the party’s relationship with the insurgent Reform U.K. and whether the U.K. should leave the European Convention of Human Rights”
If you have to decide whether to leave the echr or not then your not a tory leader.
Just leave, make it a policy promise and you’ll get in!
That’s nonsense Dinger. Some European countries have expelled immigrants without falling foul of the ECHR. The UK’s problem is the our judiciary is a greater obstacle. Badenoch has said that she’d be willing to leave ECHR if necessary but thinks wider – and deeper – reform of the British state and the immigration system should be tried first. She’s right: with an election nearly five years in the future, it’s exactly the style of leadership the Tories need now.
Rubbish!
Far from being rubbish, it’s accurate.
She cannot legally hold the post of UK Prime Minister as a Maryolater, according to The Law of This Land, as I have explained elsewhere. And she knows it.
I think there are no similar laws about Nigerian Prime Ministers, though, because they have no monarch, so she could legally hold such a post in her ancestral homeland.
Did the Catholic Relief Act of 1829 not change that? Following that Act, as I understand it, the only thing that a non-Anglican PM cannot do is to advise the Monarch on the appointment of Anglican bishops. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Maryolaters & other non-Protestants can hold other posts in the government, but are legally forbidden from holding two posts:
The Monarch and The Monarch’s Prime Minister.
People forget that the UK Prime Minister is The Monarch’s Prime Minister.
You are, of course, incorrect.
You are, of course, a Maryolater trampling The Law of This Land underfoot, sharing the Vatican Dream of Seizing Every Protestant Church of England property to add to the Vast Treasure Hoard in the Vatican, and dragging the world back into your Blasphemous Worship of a Human Woman.
It was Michael Gove, now editor of The Spectator, who tried to point out years ago that Closet Catholic Teresa May was holding the post of Prime Minister illegally. As a Protestant himself, much as I dislike him, he is one of the few MPs legally entitled to hold the post of Monarch’s Prime Minister.
Genuine question – so she can’t become the PM because she worships the Virgin Mary? Didn’t Blair become a Catholic when prime minister? Seriously just asking. Thanks.
No. Blair officially converted when he left Office.
Well done for remembering that!
No, Blair did not. Blair had to wait until leaving office before converting to his wife’s Maryolater religion.
The Law of This Land states clearly that NO CATHOLIC, JEWISH, or by extension Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Buddhist or anyone other than a PROTESTANT can legally hold the posts of Monarch and Monarch’s Prime Minister.
Jewish Starmer is occupying the post of Prime Minister illegally, as did Hindu Sunak, and Maryolater Truss.
It was Michael Gove, now editor of The Spectator, who tried to point out years ago that Closet Catholic Teresa May was holding the post of Prime Minister illegally. As a Protestant himself, much as I dislike him, he is one of the few MPs legally entitled to hold the post of Monarch’s Prime Minister.
Will Mass Immigration STOP? Will Net Zero STOP? Will Diversity nonsense and gender nonsense STOP if this woman becomes Prime Minster?—-I suggest no it won’, so what is the point? What will STOP? —NOTHING
It’s nearly five years until we’re likely to have an election. Kemi’s position on each of the issues you mention has been refreshingly clear: on mass immigration she’s seriously critical of the Government but sensibly doesn’t believe in easy answers (noting, for example, that the UK judiciary is more of an obstacle than the the ECHR); on Net Zero her position is that she’s a “net-zero sceptic but not “a climate change sceptic”, that she did not want to do something “because it looks good” and “before we figured out how to do it”- adding “is net-zero a solution or is it a slogan? .. I am not sure we have properly thought that through”; on diversity etc. she’s already wrong-footed the Government and made it look foolish. That’s precisely the leadership the Tories need now – not dreams about what they plan to do in a completely uncertain future.
Codswallop.
Not so – it’s accurate.
Doesn’t matter, since she cannot legally hold the post of UK Prime Minister.
Utter rubbish.
No, it is The Law of This Land, as I have pointed out many times, and Michael Gove, Editor of The Spectator, also pointed out years ago.
Who gives a sod about the fake Tories.
Having spend Covid years abroad, in a country with no compulsary mask wearing, no lockdown and no social distancing and few deaths, I have seen mass delusion can affect a whole nation. Jim’ll fix it. The Post Office computer system is infallible. Without net zero the planet will burn. A man is a woman. Criminals are victims. Diverse is unity. Instutional madness is now embedded in society.
On X a vidéo clip has been circulating of an audience member on BBC Question Time asking how is it that out of population of 65 million, those who get elected are all economically illiterate.
The answer is simple. Most of those 65 million are economically illiterate. They think the welfare state/NHS which has always since 1948 cost increasingly more than the wealth created in the economy won’t therefore require high taxation, high borrowing, booms and busts, bouts of high inflation, debauchery of the currency, economic regression.
Bang those pans.
Incompetent Globalist Manchurian Candidate “wins”. Here are some interesting comments from the public, especially the first one: — “A Tory leadership hopeful (Kemi Badenoch) held clandestine talks with media mogul Rupert Murdoch within days of joining the U.K. Cabinet. Murdoch questioned Badenoch for 20 minutes, and an official said a nervous Badenoch — who had not expected Murdoch himself to be in attendance — asked her aides afterward: “How did I do?” Looks like you got it, Kemi – back in in New York in September 2022 😉 ” — “Their new leader is more dog-eat-dog in her thinking than any of the other swivel-eyed loons in the Tory party. Some would say, bordering on psychopath. She has routinely lied in committee, and when called out on it, like Johnson, brass-faces and doubles-down on her claims without apology, pretending that it’s the rest of the world that’s wrong. And the Metro claiming she says the unsayable, as though that’s a good thing, well, that speaks volumes for that shyster rag of a paper.” — “It resembled a choice between amoebic dysentery or bubonic plague. Either is the end for the conservative party. All of us decent traditional conservatives have left the party or… Read more »
https://thenewconservative.co.uk/axel-rudakubana-nothing-short-of-treason/ Frank Haviland at his belligerent best. The Southport cover up… “What plays out now on the streets of Britain is a good question. The government fears unrest, and they are right to do so – given that everyone from the PM, the Home Secretary, the CPS and the Police have as good as admitted their role in the cover-up. The police are on standby, and have been instructed to ensure they have back-up provisions in place. But there is a key difference here: in the wake of Southport we only suspected the truth; now we know it. Extremists notwithstanding, no one wants unrest – but you know what else quells a rebellion? An old-fashioned adherence to honour, duty, and above all, truth. What a shame Westminster’s stores of such commodities were depleted long ago… Please watch the following clip of Keir Starmer laying flowers at the scene of the crime. You can see the fraud written all over his face: he knew, they all knew. There is a word for this level of deceit, and we used to be confident enough to use it. The fallout from the Rudakubana cover-up is nothing short of treason – which I’d define… Read more »
It seemed rather resigned and a bit desperate than belligerent to me. It’s pretty obvious that the Southport problem is that that Welsh lad strangely named Rudakubana is the right kind of guy and those who have been enraged by his alleged deeds and dared to voice that are the wrong kind of guys while the dead girls are just completely irrelevant, as evidenced by the Serena Kennedy statement I quote yesterday: The public must – especially online – remain silent on this topic because Rudakuwtf must get a fair trial or rather, the government really wants to bury this story. They way they’re handling this funeral of nothing particularly important is – as I also wrote yesterday – eerily similar to the way German authorities handle the same kind of issues which obviously also keep occurring in Germany. This strongly suggests that core policy, ie, the more immigration, the better for all of us, was not devised by the people executing it and that these people have had communication training to prepare them for handling issues which will likely arise as side effect of this core policy. The people behind this expect that a certain and pretty high percentage… Read more »
Excellent post.
Core policy may be that it is easier to let uncontrolled immigration run its course than tackle the issue head on. Besides, they appear to prefer to manage the displeasure of the British people rather than have to face the career destroying consequences of disobeying the powerful globalist power elites whose agenda they appear to deliver.
You have hit the nail right on the head.
Can someone please provide a link to the ‘expose’ by ‘Dr North’ referred to by ‘Gezza England’ above? (Have googled and can’t find it.) Although I certainly don’t assume everything in Wikipedia is correct (!!), ‘Gezza’s’ comment about Kemi going to the US for a college education is at complete odds with the account at the former, and it would be good to have confirmation as to where (and why) the Wikipedia entry is incorrect.
As, it states that Kemi’s childhood was spent in Nigeria and the US, but that she returned to the UK at 16.
She achieved A Levels at Phoenix College in South London. She then studied Computer Systems Engineering at the University of Sussex, completing an MA in Engineering in 2003. It further says that whilst working in IT, she read Law part-time at Birkbeck, University of London, graduating as LLB in 2009.
Here’s an account of what someone on a social media thread (quoted above) described as ‘clandestine talks’. And elsewhere as ‘secret’. I’ve read various accounts, and, shortly after being made Secretary of State, during a trip to the US, seems she was invited for a chat, for about 20 minutes, with Rupert Murdoch, with various other people in the room present (Newscorp executives, embassy staff, government officials). As she was being touted as a future successor to Boris, it’s not surprising that RM (is he still alive?) wanted to meet her as he does like to be chummy with world leaders, and, sure, ‘use his influence’. But the meeting? Not exactly ‘secret’!
Globalist Troll Alert…
Me? 🙂 For your information, I’ve supported The Daily Sceptic since its inception, including financially, and continue to, you twit.
Then you will know that your preferred Nigerian candidate can never hold the post of UK Prime Minister legally. Nor did Catholic Truss, Hindu Sunak, Jewish Starmer or any of the other shower.
The Law of This Land states clearly that NO CATHOLIC, JEWISH, or by extension Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Buddhist, Maori Cannibal or anyone but a PROTESTANT can legally hold the posts of Monarch or Monarch’s Prime Minister.
And don’t start about Jewish Disraeli, who converted to the Protestant Church of England in order to advance in British politics and society, as did Catholic Maryolater Boris Johnson, after finding out at university that he could never become Prime Minister unless he converted.
Bigot alert.
Truth hurts, Maryolater wanting to drive a bulldozer through the Law of This Land.
The Vatican will be proud of you.
Deranged nonsense. Seek help – urgently.
Idiot! As one of the few Protestant MPs years ago, Michael Gove, now Editor of The Spectator, tried to point out this fact of British Law, when he correctly said that Closet Catholic Teresa May was holding the post of Monarch’s Prime Minister ILLEGALLY.
He was absolutely right, but everyone just ignored him and brushed the truth aside, as you are doing now.
As I have noted elsewhere, the Catholic Relief act of 1829 seems to have changed all that, perhaps just as well, this is the 21st century after all.
No, it did not. As I pointed out elsewhere, Maryolaters are allowed to hold any other post in the British Government except two:
THE MONARCH and THE MONARCH’S PRIME MINISTER
So, basically, Badenoch wants us – insofar we’re allowed to vote – to vote for change, right? But similar to some other guy, she either doesn’t really have an idea what she’d like to change in which ways or …. also doesn’t want to tell.
Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen.
[German proverb, old vine in new bottles, same difference.]
Your German proverb is from the New Testament, which is fitting since the German people have been faithful Protestants for just over 500 years:
Mark 2:22
“And no man putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put into new bottles.”
Matthew 9:17
“Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.”
Luke 5:37
“And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles, and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish.”
Luke 5:38
“But new wine must be put into new bottles; and both are preserved.”
It’s a direct allusion to that. The word used for the container doesn’t really mean bottle. It refers to a tanned animal hide sewn together to keep liquid in it and is the German word Luther used in his translation of the Bible. The literal English translation of Schlauch is hose but I don’t think this would make any sense.
Aside: I’m also still a member of the evangelical/ reformed church of Germany, ie, the Calvinist one, although it seems to have deserted me a while ago.
Calvin deceived the world. Luther is the true one, the great one, and also gave us the marvellous gift of Congregational Singing in Church, which the Catholic Maryolaters banned for about 1400 years, from the Council of Laodicea until they changed tack and started copying the Protestants in alarm. For 1400 years, Catholic congregations were forced to be silent spectators to the monks droning monotonous chants and performing rituals in Latin, which the common people didn’t understand. Same thing in the Orthodox churches in Old Slavonic that nobody understands.
Luther said they sounded like “braying donkeys”, and started writing simple melodies and hymn lyrics in German for the congregation to sing together. It was revolutionary, and it is to him we owe our “Songs of Praise”.
I remember a few years ago being surprised to see many local Catholics arriving at the Anglican church Christmas carol service. When I asked them why they had come, they said their Catholic church didn’t do carol services, and they loved ours, and came every year to sing with the Protestants.
“which is fitting since the German people have been faithful Protestants for just over 500 years”
Ahem, what about Bavaria? The last time I was in Bavaria, there did seem to be an awful lot of Catholics.
Yes, the Vatican launched wars to crush the German Protestants and drag everyone back into crawling on their knees to statues, the Blasphemous Worship of a Human Woman, the Impostor “Goddess” calling herself the “Virgin Mary”, the Liar, the Baby Thief who stole Newborn Jesus from his mother Elizabeth and his non-identical twin brother John the Baptist the True Christ at Ein Karem where they were born. Then the Impostor “Goddess” calling herself Virgin Mary smuggled Newborn Jesus SEVEN MILES AWAY TO BETHLEHEM, so she could claim he was born in the City of David, before sneaking him away to Egypt. It was only the beginning of the Impostor’s atrocities.
In general, Germany is catholic in the west, ie, the Rhineland¹ and in the south, in Baden, Würrtemberg and Bavaria (a grand duchy and two kingdoms before our “friends and allies” chose to take the monarchy away from us and rearrange German states according to some plan they had come up with during a game of darts with a map on the wall …).
¹ One of the reasons why the traitor Adenauer, himself a Rhenian Catholic, sought to abolish the ‘foreign rule’ of the Protestant Prussians although it took until after the second world war until someone would do his bidding (the official justification for abolishing Prussia has literally been taken from some of his writings after the first world war, before the attempt to create a West Germany as French satellite state had faltered due to lack of French military support for the insurgents’ coup).
She was my choice, although I’m not a member. Jenrick talked a good game, but who in their right mind would ever trust a Remainer? He says he has changed his mind. I say, all Remainers lie all the time and can never, ever be trusted. Being a Leaver is a feeling, it’s as deep inside you as breathing. You either are or you can never be.
“Being a Leaver is a feeling, it’s as deep inside you as breathing.”
Absolutely.
You, as an Englishman, chose a Nigerian woman to represent the Indigenous People of the British Isles: the English, Welsh, Scots, Irish and their descendants around the world, whose ancestors have lived in these islands for more than a thousand years?
What on earth is the matter with you people? You’ve lost all common sense!
Racist twaddle.
I wonder if the Nigerian people would choose a white Brit to represent and lead their country? Just asking?
Precisely.
I find the sneers about “She’s Nigerian” and “her real name ..” as distasteful and pathetic as all those who have never listened to Tommy Robinson but comment endlessly. They always start with “Real name Yaxley-Lennon” like it is some crime. How many David’s are on here who call themselves Dave? For heavens sakes, you know who you are, stop being so pathetic, grow up and ween yourself off your dummies and school shorts.
Grow up and support your own Ethnic Europeans, The World’s Smallest Ethnic Group, instead of cravenly kneeling before George Floyd’s Ethnic Africans.
True , all this Ethnic Minority schtick & its whitey who is the worlds smallest demographic & the easiest to pick out in any crowd ! We could be on the way out 😳
Yes, that’s what the Globalists want.
For what it’s worth, I’ve read a lot of interviews and her own essays, and she impressed me. The issue is whether, a la Truss, she will be allowed to be a Conservative. I rather doubt it.
“…allowed to be a Conservative?”
She either is or she isn’t and if she is she must ram it down the necks of the fake tories or boots them out. She must take charge and lead.
T I N A.
No, an actual ENGLISHMAN must take charge and lead.
What a complete wally you have turned out to be.
I wonder which one is correct, DT and the Spectator, or Scottish TV.
Here is STV:
Barely 95,000 people voted in this year’s contest as turnout plunged to its lowest level on record amid declining party membership.
In 2022, when Liz Truss defeated Rishi Sunak, 141,725 members out of a total of around 172,000 voted in that leadership contest.
However, by Saturday there were only 131,680 Tory members eligible to vote for their next leader, a drop of 23%, while turnout fell from 82.6% to 72.8%.
It was also the tightest on record: while previous Tory leaders secured more than 60% of the vote, Kemi Badenoch was backed by 56.5% of those who took part.
Meh. Let me know when she’s changed the party’s policies on Net Zero. Then I might begin to care.
Her position on Net Zero is:
That she was a “net-zero sceptic” but not “a climate change sceptic”. That she did not want to do something “because it looks good” and “before we figured out how to do it”. And “Is net-zero a solution or is it a slogan? .. I am not sure we have properly thought that through.”
Makes sense to me.
All just soundbites. Who cares? The people of Nigeria are not so feeble as to choose a blonde Swedish woman to represent the people of Nigeria, so why are the People of Great Britain supposed to choose a Nigerian woman to represent them?
It’s bizarre.
Well you should care – at last we’ve got someone in a position of power in this country who’s talking sense about the socially and economically disastrous – and pointless – Net Zero policy.
I can remember that back in 1975 when Thatcher was appointed to the leadership of the Conservative Party there were bigoted people like you saying ‘Oh No how can you expect a woman (a woman!) to lead a major political party – a job that can only be done by a MAN’. “It’s bizarre” they said.
And look what happened.
Oh my, a full-blown woketard here on the Daily Sceptic. That certainly makes a change.
Are you sure you’re not on her campaign team?
But she’s not in a position of power. She’s nominal leader of a divided party with inadequate clout in parliament to get anything done.
I find it mildly amusing that Labour still can’t manage to get a non-white, non-male leader but that’s about all. I hope I’ll be pleasantly surprised with Badenoch – but I doubt it.
So are you. Racist drivel.
Imbecile!
I am not ‘net zero sceptic.’ It’s a firkin con.
I am not a ‘climate change sceptic.’ It’s a firkin con.
So Ms Baddenoch needs to do some proper research and then put out the bloody truth and stop peeing about fudging matters. Simple honesty will suffice.
Wait and see hp – you’re going to be surprised.
No, there’s no surprise about the Globalist Manchurian Candidate being shoehorned into any leadership post the Globalists choose.
They are determined to put an Ethnic African female in charge of Britain, an Ethnic African female on the throne as “Queen Regent”, and an Ethnic African female in charge of the US. It’s all part of The Great Replacement.
As Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke said herself, she is “proud to be part of The Project That Is Great Britain”. What “project” is that? Nobody told the indigenous Brits about any project.
Oh, she means “THE GREAT REPLACEMENT”.
Her Indigenous Husband could do a much better job.
More racist drivel.
Tell it to the Indigenous Ethnic African people of Kenya, whose great former President Jomo Kenyatta said,
“THERE ARE TOO MANY TICKS ON THE LION’S BELLY!”,
before he kicked all the Indian Subcontinentals out of Kenya, for banding together against the Indigenous Ethnic Africans and taking over everything, trampling the Indigenous underfoot.
The leaders of Tanzania and Uganda followed Kenya’s excellent example, and also kicked out all the Indian Subcontinentals for the same reason.
And did they return to their own ancestral homelands to build those lands into great nations of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan & Sri Lanka?
No, they did not. They all swarmed into the West, to take over everything here.
NOBODY EVER CALLED THE KENYANS, TANZANIANS & UGANDANS “RACIST”.
So pack it in, hypocrite!
Yes, I read that about her opinions. If she manages to change her party’s policies on net zero I’ll be prepared to check them out once more.
I strongly suspect the party is too set in its ways on that subject for her to achieve that. As I said, let me know if it happens.
So she’s bought into the climate change nonsense, which is all the fault of western industrialised nations ….. and definitely not the fault of China, India, Brazil, Indonesia (deforestation) so they get a “free pass.”
Meanwhile, the UN has admitted that it is all about redistribution of wealth.
https://www.climatedepot.com/2017/05/24/global-warming-is-not-about-the-science-un-admits-climate-change-policy-is-about-how-we-redistribute-the-worlds-wealth/
Reason alone to never vote for her.
Reform keeps my vote.
It’s not that I don’t trust the Conservatives.
I do,
With a few noble exceptions, I trust them to oversell, undermine, break their word, misrepresent.
Time for change.
But with that said, it’s obvious they will win certain seats, Reform will win others. In our first past the post system Farage and Badenoch must collaborate against Labour to beat them.
I hope and pray they both place country before party.
Time will tell.
Which country?
https://image.vuukle.com/afdabdfb-de55-452b-b000-43e4d45f1094-0ad5a908-2c3c-4bd7-a759-7919584cf290
And here is Kemi with her WEF buddies.
“A picture paints a thousand words…”
I voted for her. I am delighted that she won. She gives me hope…. not much else does. The miserable, twisted comments of some people posting here make me sick. Pathetic negativity. What happened to giving a person a fair chance and making decisions on the outcomes.
I think we have given the whole rotting edifice, of democratic representation, endless, too many, chances. We keep madly doing the same thing and we keep, surprise surprise, getting the same result. We don’t need to vote differently or pray for a saviour, we need to end the indoctrinated cult belief in the legitimacy and the utility of ‘the state’ now and for ever. It’s a busted flush.
Why do I get the DS roughly 24 hrs after everyone else?, as for Kemi, well time will tell, personally wouldn’t trust any of them either Liebour or Tory to walk the dog ,that I dont have!
So do I. Get it in my inbox around 4 AM. Often comments made 10-17 hours previously.
Look directly at the website, don’t wait for the newsletter. Articles appear there when they are ready I suppose, often not in newsletter until following day.
I have no idea but via my computer I have the same issues. To follow DS in real time I have to use my mobile.
I’m sure the WEF and British Establishment are delighted to get their Puppet into position.
I won’t be voting for them.
Those sexist, racist Tories eh?
I let ChatGPT have a ponder on our illustrious new leader in opposition, the was the final result: Let’s refine the mystical interpretation of Kemi Badenoch’s name by incorporating the connections to the ancient name of Egypt and the duality of the term “Bad Enoch.” Refined Mystical Interpretation of Kemi Badenoch’s Name 1. Kemi – Connection to Ancient Egypt: • The name Kemi not only signifies “one who is cared for by God” in Yoruba but also resonates with Kemet, the ancient name for Egypt, meaning “the Black Land.” This connection evokes a rich history of civilization, wisdom, and mystical knowledge. In an occult context, this could suggest that Kemi embodies the legacy of ancient wisdom and leadership, positioning her as a figure who carries the weight of historical significance and profound cultural heritage. This alignment may imply that her leadership draws upon deep-rooted traditions of governance, spirituality, and enlightenment. 2. Badenoch – Symbol of Resilience and Authority: • The surname Badenoch, linked to a Scottish region, implies strength and resilience. This association can represent her role as a guardian of values and traditions. The symbolism of a bad or strong wall further supports the interpretation of her as a… Read more »
Real Name Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke, so your whole “analysis” is meaningless.
Far from it; that her name was consciously selected adds grist to the mill. And it’s not ‘my’ analysis, (though it obviously was guided by my prompts).