News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Green Laws Destroying Jobs – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, your new MP, your local vicar, online media and friends online.  

Start a local campaign. We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.

02a-Green-Laws-Destroying-Jobs-MONOCHROME-copy
Monro
1 year ago

Lammy’s China appeasement is a national humiliation ‘Under Labour’s supine approach to China, to fight Beijing we would first need its permission to make some bullets.’ Oh! I thought Britain’s ‘Military/Industrial Complex’ was so big and powerful that it represented a threat to democracy? That kind of 1960s ‘hey man, far out’ hippy sh*t has not aged well. ‘Successive governments have failed to invest wisely in the nation’s defence capabilities. The Conservatives emphasis on competition and market forces rather than on resilience has resulted a series of defence programme horror stories and a general lack of industrial investment.’ ‘The state of Britain’s air capabilities was brutally exposed in an earlier Defence Committee report. The state of the British Army is no better. But the problem is not just one of equipment. The Services are all struggling to recruit and retain personnel across a number of areas. As a result, many of the army’s infantry battalions are short of personnel whilst the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary have been unable to crew some of their existing ships. Efforts towards improving the diversity of the armed forces have had limited results whilst the more traditional areas for recruitment have tended to dry… Read more »

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

The UK military services are apparently suffering from recruitment difficulties because they optimally want their fighting forces to be led by coloured transgender lesbians (or similar) while the UK population is trying to work out which of the dozens of possible genders they belong to. China has vastly more resources and a population of only males and females which is twenty times the size of UK’s. So why should we prepare for war with China? Firstly, what possible reason should we have for attacking China, a country which clearly has no reason nor any desire to threaten us, and is furthermore pretty far distant from our own shores? The days of the glorious British Empire are ever so sadly long gone. Whereas the days of hippies preaching “Peace, brother” may also be over, the basic message should be that peace is always vastly less destructive to all concerned than war. I agree that UK should have a strong defence force but only for defence, whereby I cannot imagine anyone dumb enough to want to take over our country in its current state. And your worries about Moldova (has everybody checked where it is on the map?) are heartening but if… Read more »

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

The tap on the shoulder….the knock on the door…..

There’s a large community of Russian dissidents in the U.K, several of whom are in contact with Scotland Yard about their safety. Some of them live everyday in fear and have to employ heavy-duty security measures. I would have thought it’s only a matter of time before there’s another suspicious death.’

RichardTechnik
RichardTechnik
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

The real risk to them is from our own agencies arranging their demisefor political capital

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  RichardTechnik

What makes you say that?

Monro
1 year ago

Moldova’s EU referendum has strengthened Russia

‘Scenes of disorder are likely to take place in Moldova in the coming days: authorities believe Moscow was behind a wave of pre-election vandalism against government buildings and have detained around 300 people suspected of being trained in Russia to break police cordons and spark public disorder. However, this is nothing compared to the energy the Kremlin will now likely expend to get rid of Sandu 

‘the first round of the presidential election, in which Sandu took 42.3% of the vote. Her main rival, former prosecutor-general Alexandr Stoianoglo, won 26.1% — far stronger than the 10% that he had previously polled.’

‘Moldovan authorities this month accused pro-Russia Moldovan-Israeli tycoon Ilan Shor and his affiliates of funnelling over $15million in Russian funds to around 130,000 Moldovan citizens — roughly 10% of the active electorate. In a Telegram video last month, Shor said he would pay voters for registering with his campaign and even more for voting…’

Coming to a town near you…….

Corky Ringspot
1 year ago

I made this comment yesterday, in response to various commenters who understandably aren’t happy about the DS’s reliance for their content in the Round-Up section on the Telegraph and Mail. Apologies for repeating it, but here seems a better place: “I tend to agree with some of the criticisms here of the Round-Up section and its over-reliance on the Telegraph and the Mail, with only a sprinkling of one or two others – but I’m thinking that perhaps this has been inevitable to some degree, according to subject matter. What I mean is that in the case of something as cut & dry as Climate Change, for instance, hoping to find anything criticizing the ‘official narrative’ is very difficult, other than in the pages of the Telegraph and one or two others. The same goes for material sceptical of the official line on transgenderism, both of these subjects being matters of objective truth. In the case of something as complex and subject to interpretation as the Israel/Palestine question or the US elections, however, surely some views from elsewhere would be welcome – useful even. Personally speaking I’m by instinct pro-Israel and pro-Trump, but reading one or two comments here, I’m… Read more »

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

God bless the Daily Sceptic.

It does not have much budget and the staff are, doubtless, extremely busy.

I am forever in their debt for the effort that they have put in over the years in order to keep ‘we happy few’ sane.

The articles they reference at the beginning of the day simply point out most of the key topical controversies.

It surely is not too much to hope that most will then do a trawl and make their own contribution to the debate, is it?

Corky Ringspot
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Well yes I see what you mean – thanks indeed to them, often expressed by me as by many others over the last few years. But I’m not sure we’re talking about the same section; you mention the “beginning of the day”; do you mean (as I do) the Round-Up section, which comes at the end of the main body of articles? Assuming you do, yes, one would hope that people do a trawl, as you say, and make up their own minds. But do they? Some, for sure – many, probably not. But the very fact that clearly intelligent people are getting so cross about the apparent bias towards the DT and the Mail suggests at least that some awareness of contrary views could be included in the listings, don’t you think?

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

Everyone is entitled to their view.

It is not one that I share.

Spoon feeding should not, I think, be required by ‘clearly intelligent people’, should it?

DS99
1 year ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

I like the way you make your point here – it is how people used to disagree before the internet offered anonymity.

Rose Madder
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Agree thanks. Suggest a wider net would be appreciated too. Jerusalem Post, @hillelneuer for the UN; National Review, @douglascarswell for US; @michaelxpettis and @hsu_steve for China, @ChrisMartzWX and @NikolovScience for climate; @TheEveryMichael for macro; @Euan_MacDonald and @PhillipsPOBrien for UKR,

or just a sidebar noting DS reads etc. ?

Myra
1 year ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

Agree with you, apart from the DT getting their mojo back. You have to wonder when you read Suzanne Moore’s hit piece on Trump. Not exactly a balanced piece to say the least.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

But a piece to offer balance to the rest of the paper?

Guardian journalist Ms Moore was no doubt taken on to do exactly that.

Corky Ringspot
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

Yes, all I meant was that in comparison to they showing during the Covid period, they seem to be back on form. But yes I’m sure they’re still capable of the unexpected.

The old bat
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

As was pointed out in comment after comment below the line. These are often what offer the balance, although the DT has a bad habit of getting rid of comments or stopping them altogether.

Purpleone
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

I believe the Telegraph still receives a good few quid from Billy gates doesn’t it, or was that a one off?

godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

In the case of something as complex and subject to interpretation as the Israel/Palestine question or the US elections, however, surely some views from elsewhere would be welcome – useful even.

Where does that end though? Why just “some views” from elsewhere, why not 50:50 balance? Why not 50% views in favour of the Covid vaccines, in favour of transgender ideology, in favour of current climate change policies, etc.

If you want a news source which claims to be balanced and objective, you should go to BBC News. 

I don’t want the Daily Sceptic to resemble BBC News.

There’s nothing to stop Daily Sceptic readers reading other views elsewhere. 

Myra
1 year ago

I gather there is more to the Moldova Eu vote?
I read yesterday that the Moldovians in Moldova voted not to join the EU.
The Moldovans living in the EU swayed this vote to a slim majority to join the EU whilst the Moldovians in Russia were
not allowed to vote?

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Myra

The difference being that one side apparently has documentary and other evidence for its claims:

‘Moldovan police also previously announced they have seized money and documents allegedly linked to Russian-backed groups looking to confuse the voting process.’

Whereas the other does not (though it is probably confecting some) and would not, in any case, be believed by most.

Some third interested and proximate parties are, meanwhile, finding the whole matter quite entertaining.

Russians complaining about unfair elections in Moldova will never stop being hilarious.’

https://x.com/wartranslated/status/1848407302031679552?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

Evidence like “ money and documents allegedly linked to Russian-backed groups”?

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

And you claim there was never any interference or any influence from pro-EU sources? Hardly credible in today’s world.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Myra

They were, but it was not made easy. There were two polling stations opened in Moscow and that was it.

Myra
1 year ago

Interesting. Thank you.

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago
NeilParkin
1 year ago

Transgender darts player hits out at ‘toxic b—–s’ after booking World Championship spot

I think Darts is one of a number of sports where the physique of the participant is not relative to their likely-hood of success. Therefore to me it makes little difference if you are Bryan, or put on a tutu and go by the name of Brianna. All that matters is your skill from 8 feet. What does concern me is that there seems to always be an edge to the participation of Trans competitors, as if ability to compete is secondary to some kind of political advantage they have gained..

ComradeSvelte
ComradeSvelte
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

In darts, yes agree, however, is it fair that a ladies title is given to a faux woman, one with the meat and veg still swinging? Bit like scholarship for ladies being given to ‘modern women, the ones with beards’, not really cricket though is it…..