News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mogwai
1 year ago

This is a response to the Green Party minister in Germany, who recently had a change of heart regarding migrants because his daughter was getting sexually harassed, from a father whose teenage daughter and her boyfriend both got stabbed to death on a train by a Palestinian failed asylum seeker with multiple convictions who the authorities didn’t deport; ”Dear Mr. Özdemir, Every person is the product of their environment. The experiences of the years teach us to question our perspectives through events. It looks as if you, Mr. Özdemir, Federal Minister of Food and Agriculture, have just had this experience. In a guest article for FAZ, you suddenly call for a vigorous change in migration policy. Apparently there is something to the saying “With age comes wisdom!” Not long ago, such demands would have been considered right-wing radical in your eyes and therefore out of the question. But as soon as it happens to you, after your daughter has been molested, your opinion turns a full 180 degrees. Welcome to the real world of normal citizens, Mr. Minister. What gives me the right to write you such lines? My name is Michael Kyrath. I am the father of 17-year-old Ann-Marie,… Read more »

Steve-Devon
1 year ago

“Net Zero: only fanatics fail to see the hopelessness of the ruinous policy” Sadly this is not correct, as far as I can see the much of the general public are meekly accepting the net-zero scam and are content to let the net-zero fanatics run things into the ground. Slowly, very slowly, some people are realising where all this is heading and the situation with Electric Cars is leading the way on this. I think the budget at the end of the month may well be another wake up call, if the Government re-imposes the 2030 ban on petrol/diesel (ICE) car sales and if it introduces taxation measures aimed at forcing us to give up ICE cars and go electric then it will be clear where all this is heading. The news item on the Fiat 500; “Electric Fiat 500 production freeze extended over ‘struggling’ EV sales”  Shows that European car makers will struggle with EVs, especially as the Chinese BYD Seagull is due to come to the UK soon, this will a cheap low range EV but if Gov policy goes the way I expect, people who need transport will be forced to buy it in order to keep… Read more »

Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

I agree with most of what you’ve said but don’t think the Chinese ev revolution on these shores will be as overwhelming as you might think
Chinese evs are poor quality and this will be apparent very quickly to anyone daft enough to buy one, little to no after sales service, hardly any parts available, poor reliability and of course higher than average fire risks (8 ev fires per day in China alone!)
I really don’t think they will swamp the market, very few private buyers actually want an ev anyway, no matter what badge is on them

Marcus Aurelius knew
Reply to  Dinger64

The Chinese EV revolution doesn’t exist in China.

Monro
1 year ago

U.K. Armed Forces ‘not up to defending Israel from missile attacks‘ Britain cannot even defend itself or its borders. That is where self serving and delusional nonsense regarding the fantasy ‘peace dividend’ has brought us. Where, now, is the British Army so laboriously and effectively constructed by the military genius of Alanbrooke and Montgomery? ‘Aucune!’ What does a rational government do when the security of the nation is directly threatened? ‘”If this decision is made, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, and European countries in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct participation. And this, of course, significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict. This will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are fighting Russia,” Putin 11 09 24 This is what a rational government does: ‘Finance Minister Andrzej Domański said that the defence spending proposal would constitute 4.7% of gross domestic product, compared to 4.2% this year…..’ https://www.euronews.com/2024/08/29/polish-prime-minister-donald-tusk-announces-record-defence-spending-in-2025-budget This is what a hopeless government does: ‘On a visit to Poland, the Prime Minister launches plan to steadily increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by the end of the decade –… Read more »

Steve-Devon
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

By the time this Government has decimated UK Industry and covered our green and pleasant land with Net-Zero junk, will there be anything left to protect? why would anybody bother to invade an immiserated, collapsed net-zero UK? Putin does not need Hypersonic missiles to decimate the UK, this Government seems hell-bent on doing the job for him with no fighting needed.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

This is not about ‘invasion’. Modern defence strategy is about preserving peace, freedom of action within the international arena in support of the British national interest, most particularly the international trade upon which what is left of our prosperity, the bulk of the population’s still excellent standard of living in relative terms, relies. ‘Trade is the sum of exports and imports of goods and services measured as a share of gross domestic product. U.K. trade to gdp ratio for 2022 was 69.52%, a 10.17% increase from 2021.’ https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/GBR/united-kingdom/trade-gdp-ratio#google_vignette We have just seen, 2020/21, what happens to Britain once international supply routes are disrupted for any length of time. ‘Modern strategy, it seems to me, deals with the use of military forces in peace as well as in war, and also in all those ambiguous conditions in between. It deals with the use of military forces to prevent conflict, to control conflict if prevention fails, and to terminate conflict if it cannot be controlled. This “what”-preventing conflict from reaching an absolute form-is of vital concern. It led to the high interest in limited war theory; it led to what many quite rationally believe to be the decline in the traditional utility of military force… Read more »

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

I am all for a strong, national defence, but diplomacy and the creation of good business relationships must take priority over military threats or the application of sanctions.

So, if we are dependent on materials only available in the ‘Third World’ then we should better promote good relationships with those countries and avoid aggressive posturing which would be guaranteed to lead to refusal to do business with us.

And we are forcing the Russians to increase the size of their army to address, for example, the new threats posed by the ever expanding NATO, in particular Finland with its direct border to Russia. We are creating the imbalance, we should restrain ourselves and stop imposing our supposed superiority on the rest of the world.

CGW
CGW
1 year ago

Amazing choices for the first newspaper headlines above. Firstly: “We’re on the brink of World War Three – and only one country can stop it” – Iran now presents an intolerable threat to global stability, says Allister Heath in the Telegraph. We must support the only country that stands between us and armageddon: Israel. What has Iran done? Why on earth should Iran be a threat to global security and not the one country that is regularly stirring up a hornet’s nest in that region – Israel? It is Israel that assassinates political or military leaders at will, always publicly, always at the cost of numerous innocent civilians, even if the target is in a neutral country’s embassy, even if the target is a guest at a presidential inauguration, Israel does not give a damn about anyone or anything. And the hornet’s nest are the populations of surrounding countries that are disgusted with the on-going genocidal slaughter in Gaza and the disgraceful treatment of the remaining Palestinians in the West Bank. And they are also disgusted with their own leaders (some of whom are dependent on the West) for not taking any action to stop these crimes. After months of… Read more »

stewart
1 year ago
Reply to  CGW

I agree that Iran by itself isn’t going to drag us all into WWIII.

BUT, why is Iran dropping bombs on Israel? They say in retaliation, but in retaliation for what?

Gaza isn’t Iran. Lebanon isn’t Iran. Hezbollah isn’t Iran. Does Iran have any formal security treaties with any of these countries or entities that oblige it to respond? I’m not aware of any.

So, what the hell is Iran doing dropping bombs on Israel?

Jon Garvey
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

I’m personally wondering which particular political or military leaders Iran targeted with their missiles in retaliation. It’s almost as if they were targeting population centres indiscriminately, but surely an Islamic country wouldn’t do that, unlike “blood-crazed genocidal Israel.”

I think the Hezbollah and Hamas rockets must have just been for show all these years, because they wouldn’t be targeting civilians unless they just hated Israelis for being Israelis.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Yes it was definitely all Israel’s fault. They certainly asked for this;

https://x.com/K0sher_C0ckney/status/1841205142462337093

I think they asked for this as well. One of the 8 victims was a mother shielding her baby who was strapped to her and fortunately was unharmed, by pure chance. But the 2 shooters were Palestinian ”freedom fighters” and obviously decided she posed a threat;

https://x.com/K0sher_C0ckney/status/1841155435287417339

https://x.com/K0sher_C0ckney/status/1841155939497308559

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I have no information regarding the videos you link but they are dated 1st October, so presumably not linked to the 7th October outbreak.

From dropsitenews@substack.com:

The Israeli military killed at least 710 Palestinian babies before they made it to their first birthday, the equivalent of two infants under one year old killed by Israel every day for nearly a year. That’s according to a 649-page document published by the Ministry of Health in Gaza on Sunday listing the names of tens of thousands Palestinians killed by Israel between October 7 and August 31. 

A brief breakdown of the numbers killed:

Babies (less that one year old): 710 
Toddlers, 1-3: 1,793
Children, 4-12: 5,410
Children, 13-17: 3,442 
Total number under 18 years old killed: 11,355 

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

Iran supports Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hezbollah succeeded in kicking Israel out of Lebanon in 2008. Hezbollah and Iran support the Palestinians who are being killed in large numbers on a daily basis by the Israelis because the Israelis clearly want to achieve a ‘clean’ Israel, i.e. a country without any Palestinians. The problem is that the Palestinians are the indigenous people; it is they who are being displaced (or killed) and their land taken (or stolen) by a century’s worth of Jewish immigration. The UN proposed a partition of Palestine into two countries – Israel and Palestine – but that was not accepted by the Palestinians and it was ignored by Israel who unilaterally declared the State of Israel in 1948. The UN is a toothless entity and the trouble has been brewing ever since. Netanyahu has been taunting Iran for many months now in the hope Iran would attack Israel and USA would leap in the battle to ‘defend’ Israel. Wikipedia has a list of Israeli political assassinations since the 1950s, numbering around 400! On 1st April 2024, Israel conducted an airstrike on the Iranian embassy complex in Damascus, Syria, destroying the building housing its consular section. Sixteen… Read more »

stewart
1 year ago
Reply to  CGW

You don’t get to lob bombs into a country just because you “support” their military adversaries in a war.

The US and many European countries support the Ukraine. But they’re not lobbing rockets into Russia just because they support Ukraine. If they did it would be a declaration of war against Russia and Russia would then be entitled to attack back in kind.

Sorry regardless of what you think of what Israel may or may not have done in Lebanon or Gaza, Iran has no business bombing Israel.

CGW
CGW
1 year ago
Reply to  stewart

I would argue that we are indeed very active in the Ukraine conflict, in particular in the supply of spy satellite data and long-range missile programming. Many commentators worryingly implicate MI6 being always one short step behind the CIA when it comes to knowledge and active support of Ukrainian actions – even purely terrorist actions like the Crocus City Hall massacre. I hope they are wrong.

And if Iran has no business bombing Israel (with which I primarily agree) then Israel equally has no business bombing Lebanon or Gaza. It is always innocent civilians who suffer and thousands upon thousands are being killed or wounded, and their lives and their properties destroyed, as we sit comfortably in front of our computer screens arguing over this or that.