ONS Reveals the Pitiful Number of New Green Jobs Being Created in the U.K. Economy
The problem with the green U.K. economy, and its associated destruction of the hydrocarbon environment, is that there are very few jobs being created. The few remaining ‘workers’ in the ruling Labour party are starting to rumble all the luxury boondoggles that are set to further decimate well-paid jobs in their communities. The figures compiled by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), trying to estimate the actual number of green jobs, are always a highly creative hoot, and the latest batch are no exception. Many jobs identified are simply displacement activity, with one repair or maintenance occupation taking over from another. Around 6% of the total are to be found in ‘environmental charities’, an interesting way to describe elite billionaire political funding to push the Net Zero fantasy. Such is the seeming desperation to rustle up a green job, the ONS even includes repairing home appliances, controlling forest fires and separating hydrogen by carbon dioxide-producing electrolysis.
The latest ‘estimates’ from the ONS cover 2021 and 2022, and they are said to show an increase in both years. But as the graph below reveals, the rises are pitiful over a decade, and the 2022 estimate of 639,000 is less than 2% of jobs in the economy as a whole.

As can be seen, environmental charities employ 40,000 people, almost as many as the 47,000 that work in renewable energy. But the charities figure does not include all those make-work jobs in environmental consultancy and education or what is described as in-house environmental activities. If all the displacement, invented or re-badged jobs in repair, electric vehicles, waste disposal, water treatment, energy efficiency, Net Zero promotion, teaching and the ubiquitous bureaucracy are rightly ignored, it is unlikely that more than 150,000 new jobs have been created. Fairly small pickings, it might be thought, from all the cash sprayed at subsidy-hunting chancers over at least two decades. Even worse, any new jobs are easily offset by the occupations being destroyed in steel making, refining hydrocarbons, coal mining and oil and gas exploration. Fracking for gas would transform a number of deprived areas in the U.K. at little environmental cost, as it has done in the U.S. Energy security would likely be achieved, and the tax take would be considerable. But fracking is anathema to the major political parties in the U.K., except the emerging Reform party.
Last week saw some real push back on the madness of Net Zero and the so-called green economy. The boss of GMB, the third largest trade union in the country, told the annual Labour party conference that its plans to decarbonise the energy network by 2030 will cost up to one million jobs, decimate working communities and push up bills for the poorest. According to Smith, Government’s plans for Net Zero were “bonkers” and “fundamentally dishonest”. In a week when it was revealed that British consumers, both industrial and private, had some of the highest electricity prices in the developed world, he charged that current energy policy amounted to virtue signalling by politicians. He accused them of exporting jobs and importing virtue because the jobs were being created abroad rather than in the U.K.
Meanwhile, a recent paper published in Science came to a damning conclusion that will not surprise sceptics, namely that 96% of climate policies over the last 25 years, ultimately designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, have been a waste of money. “That’s where green spin has got us,” writes George Monbiot, although these days the Guardian’s extremist-in-chief seems to have given up on all life enhancing processes that run the risk of disturbing anything on the planet. “Finally, 15 years and a trillion dollars too late, George Monbiot says what sceptics have been saying all along,” observes the sceptical journalist Jo Nova. “Nearly every single carbon reduction scheme is a useless make-work machination that creates the illusion that the government is doing something,” she says.
As we can see, the ONS survey is full of these make-work schemes providing jobs that can only exist by rigging free markets and providing eye-watering subsidies from consumers and taxpayers. As the more concerned trade unionists can see, much of the cost of these fantasy ventures falls on the poorest members of society forced to pay higher prices for many of the basic essentials of life. In addition, as we have observed, most green schemes make mugs of the wider investing public, with the RENIXX, a stock capitalisation global index of the 30 largest renewable industrial companies, showing near zero growth since it was started in 2006. None of this matters, of course, to the Mad Miliband and his weird wonks at the U.K. Department of Energy, who are ramping up ideological plans to hose cash at daft ideas like carbon capture, battery energy storage and hydrogen production.
But all is not lost on the jobs front – opportunities must be taken when they occur. Earlier this year, Gary Smith was able to point to some new employment clearing away the animal casualties of wind farm blades. “It’s usually a man in a rowing boat, sweeping up the dead birds,” he observed.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Who in their right mind covers an entire country in this clutter? Huge areas of land and sea all filled up with part time renewable clutter that cannot and never will be able to provide base load, and then makes the people pay for it all via their bills sending millions into energy poverty and thousands to their death from cold that kills 20 times more than heat form the phony global warming does. —–The answer is our Political Class of pretend to save the planet UN/WEF parasites.
They seem to think that Net Zero 2050 is a one-stop nirvana. They are blind to the fact that all their windmills and solar panels have a lifespan of just twenty odd years. They don’t stop to think how they might build and install replacements without fossil fuels!
Their aim is destruction, not replacement.
And… particularly since it was deliberate policy to bury electricity cables where possible to preserve the landscape.
Environmentalists are hypocrites. They make a great deal of fuss about protecting the environment, unless it is they who are despoiling it. They have special permission from Mother Earth.
Bats, raptors must be protected, unless being minced up in their wind totems, whales must be saved unless being sacrificed to the off-shore wind-god, the landscape must not be spoiled unless to save the planet.
And Humans are expendable.
Greens and all their worshippers are rotten and evil.
If you realise that most of the CND commies moved to Greenpiss et al when the Soviet Union ended you can see why environment means nothing to them as opposed to destroying capitalism. It explains why they are opposed to nuclear power as it means economies can carry on as normal which is not what they want.
Yep exactly
In theory, it ought to create jobs because intermittent power has to have a backup and also needs building and deploying, whereas the existing sources it pretends to replace are already built. But I think most or all of the building is done somewhere else, and the existing sources may well have needed replacing anyway as they may have been coming to end of life. Most of the rest of the stuff seems like made up bullshit or rebadged activities that were already happening.
Anyway, as someone pointed out the other day, jobs are a cost as well as a benefit. Just because something “creates jobs” doesn’t mean it’s good. You can “create jobs” by being less efficient – which is exactly what the “green” industry is doing. Low cost energy creates sustainable jobs by making it possible for more goods and services to be provided at lower prices.
Yes, from what I’ve read it seems they include things like making copper pipes for a heat pump as a new green job? When, in reality, it has simply taken over from making copper pipes for a gas boiler.
The fella at the sharp end is still just making copper pipes… 🤷
Including building jobs is complete bollocks as they are transient jobs. The Tory scum around me were pushing a ‘garden village’ – yes, as big as the town hosting the council offices – and including the claim of lots of jobs. But when it was finished where were the jobs for all the residents? Yes – somewhere else. Hence the transport study pointed out all the problems with the traffic generated by the commuting residents and how the council had no powers to alleviate them. As a district council they are not a highway authority. Neither are they Network Rail/Southern trains. Nor are they Highways England. So no road, rail or motorway alleviation.
In the meantime, the good old beeb trumpeted that the last blast furnace at Port Talbot closes down today, with at least 2800 redundancies, and that Ratcliffe on Soar power station (the last ‘proper’ coal fired one) officially shuts down today.
Is some clown, Miliband perhaps, going to blow this one up, for a spot on prime time TV, like they did last time?
Just press the button when you’re ready Ed. Debris? No, no. You’ll be fine just there.
The explosion would cover the sound of the gunshot……
Presumably in ten years time Michael Shanks will eventually turn up in a jungle on some reality television show as an ex-MP. This whole scam will have unravelled and all energy-dependent manufacturing will have moved to China and India, and we will all be living in old, dark, pods in fuel poverty while eating ze bugz, having been told that the rest of the world owes us a debt of gratitude for Saving The Planet. All previous PMs since 2000 will sell their memoirs about how they “followed the science”, except Boris Boris Johnson who will say he is “no longer sure” coal-power shutdowns played a decisive role in defeating “Climate Change”.
You might be but I won’t.
I’m well out of the UK, and never coming back.
Where did you go ?
The purpose of energy production is primarily to produce ENERGY, not JOBS.
Consumption being the sole end and purpose of all production… etc.
Unfortunately, Comrade, in order to have a compliant collective, the proles all need something to do where they can be closely watched and controlled.
So full employment trumps efficiency and labour productivity. This is why Liebour and other Socialist filth like nationalised economies. Jobs, jobs, jibs – work, work, work. And of course since it’s all so inefficient, the plebs don’t need a big wage because there’s not much to buy anyway and most of their money will have to be spent on bread and keeping the ruling elite in comfort.
Well we could always have a war to use up excess production. Perpetual war.
How many MP’s [or their families], especially the Net Zero zealots, are receiving ‘consultancy payments’ and other income from the sector?
Easier to count those who are not?
I listened to the podcast where Smith gave voice to his thoughts on the Net Zero madness. When the boss of the GMB union says the policy/zealotry is bonkers & does not reflect real life, it gave me hope at least that Mad Ed will be reined in! More please!
And it’s taken him 30 years to get to that conclusion? Yes, well…
I thought it was interesting he was comfortable enough to be that blunt – I never thought our saviour would come from a large union, however I’ll take anything at the moment vs the madness
Look whats happening in Norfolk, these people are going to be forced to have this monstrosity on their door step and others to planned soon in Norfolk on farming land which we need for food production which will only make our bills go up https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/24603605.bradenham-norfolk-surrounded-huge-solar-farm/
Little prediction: local weather stations will report increased temperatures, thus proving Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Earlier this year, Gary Smith was able to point to some new employment clearing away the animal casualties of wind farm blades. “It’s usually a man in a rowing boat, sweeping up the dead birds,” he observed.”
What a sad and poignant tale, one which symbolises the callous heart of the Net Zero agenda.
Sadly, Mr Smith of GMB was also reported to say “Climate change is a huge problem, we accept that”. If he really wants to serve his members’ best interests, he needs to waken up from has climate change brainwashing.
What you mean “we” paleface?
Jobs are a cost. Unless they create and add wealth to the economy which otherwise would not take place without them, they should not be done. In short: if the cost is greater then the value of output, they make us poorer. And that describes ‘green jobs’ – cost without benefit.
But worse, they replace jobs that do produce benefit.
Exactly – sadly much of the ‘state’ can fall into this category
Perhaps, when all of this insanity is over and the devastation is complete, the UK will experience an economic miracle like Germany and Japan did after the devastation of WW2?
Clutching at straws, I know, but I need something to console me.