News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
1 year ago

Friday Morning White Hill Wargrave Road Remenham 
Henley-on-Thames 

Dr Ashenden suggests peaceful protests by local
war memorials singing patriotic songs, with flags 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_LTg0NlZK4
Resist the Unjust State – Dr G Ashenden

601
Hardliner
1 year ago

Nine years for burning a wheelie bin. Clearly, the government is very worried that civil unrest is coming its way….

Mogwai
1 year ago

Clearly Labour are using this tactic to cause chaos and unrest. Disproportionately targeting and persecuting those opposing the government, whilst going soft on dangerous criminals by letting them out early or others who don’t even make it to jail in the first place; ”Anarcho-tyranny refers to a societal condition where the state fails to enforce basic law and order against serious crimes (anarchy) but simultaneously imposes excessive control, regulation, and punishment on ordinary, law-abiding citizens (tyranny). The goal of anarcho-tyranny is to maintain power and control by targeting the compliant majority while neglecting or enabling more serious, disruptive elements within society. This dynamic serves to suppress dissent and maintain the status quo, often at the expense of individual freedoms and true justice. The concept of anarcho-tyranny was coined by Samuel T. Francis. His “Leviathan and Its Enemies: Mass Organization and Managerial Power in Twentieth-Century America” offers a profound critique of the socio-political developments in the United States during the 20th century. Francis examines the rise of what he calls the “Managerial State,” a system in which power is increasingly centralized in the hands of a bureaucratic elite that manages both public institutions and large corporations. He argues that traditional structures… Read more »

Hardliner
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Interesting. But with a huge majority, and most branches of public life badly infected by the left wing, how much more power does Starmer want or need?

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  Hardliner

All of it is what Marxists always want and take.

HicManemus
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Samuel T Francis is an interesting individual. Certainly worth a read – I’ve started “Shots Fired”An original thinker, and of his time.

Monro
1 year ago

C’mon, Tucker! ‘I know you hate American support for Ukraine and want more isolationist foreign policy, Tucker Carlson, but you only hurt your case when you play footsie with Nazi apologists’ Mr Berenson describes Darryl Cooper, the nazi apologist in question, as a historian. So, apparently, does Tucker Carlson: ‘According to Tucker Carlson, Darryl Cooper is “the most important popular historian working in the United States today.” I had never heard of Cooper until this week and was none the wiser when I went to look for his books. There are none. ‘ Put downs don’t come much better. A lot of what Niall Ferguson, a real historian who has written a long list of what we call ‘books’, has to say explains a fair bit about ‘opinion’ in general and website comments sections like that of the ‘Daily Sceptic’ in particular. ‘history proceeds from an accumulation of evidence, some in the form of written records, some in other forms……….a reconstitution……..: what essentially happened. Darryl Cooper offers a series of wild assertions that are almost entirely divorced from historical evidence and can be of interest only to those so ignorant of the past that they mistake them for daring revisionism, as… Read more »

The old bat
1 year ago

Eco-madness left our roads paved with weeds, say furious residents
It amazes me that people/councils are only worried about glyphosate used to reduce weeds on our streets. Our crops are sprayed with this weedkiller as a desiccant to encourage even ‘drying up’ and enable a speedy and even harvest. God knows how much of the stuff finds it’s way into our bodies and what the effects are. There are many other ways of removing weeds without resorting to chemicals. The real reason, as we all know, for not weeding and saying you are ‘saving the bees’ is to save money on local authority labour.

EppingBlogger
1 year ago
Reply to  The old bat

I am not sure you are right about using glyphosate to kill off the crops but it is widely used to kill weeds and re growth after harvest. It breaks down rapidly in the soil.

I use it as part of a management programme for fields.

The damage which the roots of weeds and bushes can do to roads, pavements, buildings and railways will be very expensive to repair in years to come. But the damage might not be repaired, tge faster to turn our places into the conditions most new inhabitants are used to from back home.

Arum
Arum
1 year ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I think the killing off crops refers to oilseed rape doesn’t it?
The indeterminate growth of oilseed rape can make the crop a challenge to harvest. Such growth results in uneven ripening between the early- and late-formed branches. As a result, pre-harvest glyphosate applications are more common in oilseed rape crops, compared to cereals

NeilParkin
1 year ago

Starmer’s ‘nanny state’ may tax sugar and salt

Well, Sugar tax worked really well, so why not salt?. Although with dietary targets etc, salt has been reduced considerably in what we buy anyway.

Despite the good work that I expect the BHF put in, the absolute truth, is we all have to die of something. What they are doing is not ‘saving lives’, but ‘delaying the inevitable’, often with expensive and painful treatments just to say it can be done. At 63, if they offered me another 10 years of life, I’d want the ones between 20 and 30 please. I don’t want the ones I have now with arthritis and daily pain. Its not an easy message because no-one wants to die, or see loved ones pass away, but we live too long. Our DNA never intended us to get to 80 and beyond.

huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The BHF is a bad piece of work. Fully on board with all the Covid crap.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
1 year ago

Is it a coincidence that this cartoon mocking a ‘traditional’ Irish family was published at a time when there have been protests across the island of Ireland over mass immigration?

If progressives were really against racism and xenophobia in principle, this cartoon would not have seen the light of day in the first place. Thankfully, Ireland only has a patron saint and not a prophet.

Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

What’s also noteworthy, according to Ivor Cummins, is that the book was never published in the Irish language, so was never disseminated to Irish-speaking schools where English is taught as a second language. I’m not sure how many of those there are without doing a search, though.

Claphamanian
Claphamanian
1 year ago

Why does Charles Moore of the Telegraph think that the Labour Government is interested in Britain’s ‘historical DNA’?

As Peter Hitchens has repeatedly observed, the hereditary principle lies behind many things. Such as private property and the inheritance of it. Does Sir K think that all property is theft? When he talks about ‘working people’, as he constantly does, he means people without savings. (Though it was the Conservative Party that originally created death duties. Taxation that decimated the landed classes during the Great War).

Additionally, the hereditary principle lies at the heart of monarchy. Once the hereditary peers go, who’s next, Your Majesty?

Arum
Arum
1 year ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

I’m no fan of government by the hereditary principle (Kim Jong Un?), but note the Labour party doesn’t seem to want to get rid of all the other unelected peers – obviously it would be foolish to give up the power of patronage!

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Claphamanian

Has anyone noticed any significant improvement in the performance of the House of Lords as the number of hereditary peers there dwindles?

NeilParkin
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Performance.? Do they actually do anything other than claim their expenses.?

Heretic
Heretic
1 year ago

Stripping the Lords of the hereditaries would be an act of harm against our historical DNA” by Charles Moore.

For perhaps the one and only time, I agree with Charles Moore. Tony Blair’s wrecking crew got rid of almost all the hereditary peers, replacing them with party political appointments and ludicrously calling it “more democratic”. The truth is that many members of the hereditary aristocracy do have a sense of “noblesse oblige”.

I don’t remember ever being asked to vote for a member of the “more democratic” House of Lords, do you?

If it were up to me, I would re-instate all the hereditary peers and give the rest the boot, unless they were truly worthy. And abolish the copycat UK Supreme Court with its Judicial Overreach, and bring back the Law Lords.

Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Heretic

And then they should reinstate the House of Lords TV room.

I would be much happier knowing that most peers were either asleep or simply watching television (particularly the bishops) rather than meddling with things with which they have only a passing acquaintance.

The bars in the Commons perform a similar function and should be greatly subsidised.

HicManemus
1 year ago

The beatings shall continue until morale improves.

Alan M
Alan M
1 year ago

Trump “inducted”? Into what? The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? Lovely misprint.